Considerations for the Representation of Meta-Data for the Support of Structured Data Entry

Summary

Objectives: Research and decision support require patient data to be structured. Flexible data representation, to cope with expansion and new recording demands, can be achieved through abstraction of the data model. Such a model, however, does not include explicit information for the support of structured data entry (SDE), i.e. the definition of what is relevant to say in a specific context. The objective of this paper is to provide considerations for an intuitive conceptual representation of such meta-data for domain experts.

Methods: The content of meta-data for SDE is compared with that of controlled medical terminologies in the context of its purpose.

Results: Upon analysis of medical descriptions, a network and a tree both emerge as an intuitive structure to represent meta-data for the support of SDE. The pros and cons of a tree versus a network are dominated by the challenges of representing multiple contexts for description. Meta-data for SDE only partially overlap with the content of controlled medical terminologies.

Conclusions: Integration of meta-data for SDE and controlled terminologies would benefit standardization and retrieval, but the requirements for flexible data entry are at odds with the rigidity and limited granularity of a standard. The preferred strategy seems to be a mapping between the concepts from a terminology standard and meta-data for SDE.

Keywords

Computerized Patient Records - Structured Data Entry - Data modeling

• References

• 1 Dick RS, Steen EB. The computer-based patient record: an essential technology for health care. Revised edition. Committee on Improving the Patient record Division of Health Care Services. Institute of medicine.; 1997
• 2 Amatayakul M. The state of the computer-based patient record. J Ahima 1998; 69 (Suppl. 09) 34-6 38, 40; quiz 43-4.
• 3 Shortliffe EH. The evolution of electronic medical records. Acad Med 1999; 74 (Suppl. 04) 414-9.
• 4 McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Tierney WM. et al. The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience. Int J Med Inf 1999; 54 (Suppl. 03) 225-53.
• 5 Schoenbaum SC, Barnett GO. Automated ambulatory medical records systems. An orphan technology. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1992; 8 (Suppl. 04) 598-609.
• 6 Date C. Introduction to Database Systems. 6th ed. New York: Addison-Wesley; 1995
• 7 Nadkarni PM, Marenco L, Chen R, Skoufos E, Shepherd G, Miller P. Organization of heterogeneous scientific data using the EAV/ CR representation. JAMIA 1999; 6: 478-93.
• 8 van Ginneken AM. The significance of abstraction and metadata for the computer-based patient record: applied in structured data entry. In: Cooper E. (ed). World Markets Series -Business briefing; Next Generation Health Care. London: World Markets Research Center; 2001: 32 34,36-37.
• 9 Johnson SB. Generic Data Modeling for Clinical Repositories. JAMIA 1996; 3 (Suppl. 05) 328-339.
• 10 Cimino JJ, Clayton PD, Hripsack G, Johnson SB. Knowledge-based approaches to the maintenance of a large controlled medical terminology. JAMIA 1994; 1 (Suppl. 01) 35-50.
• 11 van Ginneken AM, de Wilde M. A new approach to structured data collection. In: Waegemann CP. (ed). Proc. of TEPR 2000. San Francisco: Medical Records Institute; 2000: 627-35.
• 12 Chen RS. Exploring Performance Issues for a Clinical Database Organized Using an Entity-Attribute_Value Representation. JAMIA 2000; 7 (Suppl. 05) 475-87.
• 13 Nadkarni PM. Data Extraction and Ad Hoc Query of an Entity-Attribute-Value Database. JAMIA 1998; 5 (Suppl. 06) 511-27.
• 14 OpenEHR Foundation.GEHR.http://www.gehr.org.2003-01-27.
• 15 HL7.http://www.hl7.org.
• 16 LOINC.http://www.loinc.org.2003-27-10.
• 17 Krämer M, Norgall T, Penzel T. Short Strategic Study: Strategies for harmonisation and integration of device-level and enterprise-wide methodologies for communication as applied to HL7, LOINC, and ENV13734. www.centc251.org.2001.
• 18 National Library of Medicine. UMLS. www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/.2003-01-27.
• 19 Medical Informatics Group Manchester UK, Open GALEN www.opengalen.org . 2003-01-27.
• 20 ICD/SNOMED/READ.http://www.eihms.surrey.ac.uk/abbott/IT-EDUCTRA/html/p405_h.htm.2003-01-27.
• 21 Lussier YA, Rothwell DJ, Cote RA. The SNOMED Model: A knowledge source for the controlled terminology of the computerized patient record. Meth Inform Med 1998; 37: 161-4.
• 22 Rothwell DJ. SNOMED-based knowledge representation. Meth Inform Med 1995; 34: 157-209.