Methods Inf Med 1999; 38(02): 119-124
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634176
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

The Number of Independent Signals in Body Surface Maps

R. Hoekema
1   Cardiology Department and The Netherlands
,
G. Uijen
1   Cardiology Department and The Netherlands
,
A. van Oosterom
2   Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 February 2018 (online)

Abstract

This paper reports on the number of independent signals in body surface maps measured using a variety of lead systems incorporating 32 up to 219 leads. The number of independent signals is estimated using the minimum description length. It is found that the number of independent signals in body surface maps is of the order of 10. For lead systems incorporating many leads the number of independent signals is only marginally larger than in lead systems incorporating fewer leads. A lead system incorporating 64 leads will suffice for most applications.

 
  • References

  • 1 SippensGroenewegen A, Spekhorst H, van Hemel NM, Kingma JH. Body Surface Mapping of Ectopic Left and Right Ventricular Activation; QRS Spectrum in Patients without Structural Heart Disease. Circulation 1990; 82: 879-96.
  • 2 Gulrajani RM, Savard P, Roberge FA. The Inverse problem in Electrocardiography: Solution in Terms of Equivalent Sources. CRC Crit Rev in Biomed Eng 1988; 16: 171-214.
  • 3 Gulrajani R. The Forward and Inverse Problems of Electrocardiography. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 1998; 17: 84-101.
  • 4 Lux RL, Smith R, Abildskov J. Limited Lead Selection for Estimating Body Surface Potentials in Electrocardiography. IEEEBME 1978; 25: 270-6.
  • 5 Musso E, Stilli D, Macchi E, Aimi B. et al. Diagnostic Features of Body Surface Potential Maps in Patients With Myocardial Ischemia and Normal Resting 12-lead Electrocardiograms. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65 (Suppl. 15) 973-9.
  • 6 Hoekema R, Uijen GJH, van Oosterom A. Lead System Transformation of Body Surface Map Data. J Electrocardiol 1998; 31: 71-82.
  • 7 The NEMY Concerted Action. Deliverable D1-1, Interim Development Standards. Ref.: EC/SE/-NEMY/D1-1, NEMY Co-ordinating Centre, School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering. United Kingdom: University of Bath; 1994
  • 8 Kornreich F, Montague TJ, Rautaharju PM, Kavadias M. et al. Diagnostic Body Surface Potential Map Patterns in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy During PQRST. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63 (Suppl. 09) 610-7.
  • 9 Kornreich F, Montague TJ, Kavadias M, Segers J. et al. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Characteristic Body Surface Potential Map Features in Anterior and Inferior Myocardial Infarction. Am J Cardiol 1987; 60 (Suppl. 16) 1230-8.
  • 10 Uijen GJH. The Information Content of the Electrocardiogram . Nijmegen/The Netherlands: Ph. D. thesis, University of Nijmegen; 1991
  • 11 Uijen GJH, van Oosterom A. On the Detection of the Number of Signals in Multi-lead ECGs. Meth Inform Med 1992; 31 (Suppl. 04) 247-55.
  • 12 Uijen GJH, van Oosterom A. The Performance of Information-theoretic Criteria in Detecting the Number of Independent Signals in Multi-lead ECGs. Meth Inform Med 1992; 31 (Suppl. 04) 256-62.
  • 13 Jenkins GM, Watts DG. Spectral Analysis and its Applications . San Francisco: Holden Day; 1969
  • 14 Stilli D, Musso E, Barone P, Ciarlini P. et al. Newer Data on the Configuration and Variability Ranges of Body Surface Maps in a Sample of Normal Subjects. N Electro-cardiol 1988; 21: 1-14.
  • 15 Musso E, Stilli D, Macchi E, Regoliosi G. et al. Body Surface Maps in Left Bundle Branch Block Uncomplicated or Complicated by Myocardial Infarction, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy or Myocardial Ischemia. J Electrocardiol 1987; 20: 1-20.
  • 16 Stilli D, Musso E, Macchi E, Dei Cas L, Vasini P, Taccardi B. Body Surface Potential Mapping in Ischemic Patients With Normal Resting ECG. Can J Cardiol 1986; Suppl A: 107A-12A.
  • 17 Uijen GJH, Heringa A, van Oosterom A, van Dam RT. Body Surface Maps and The Conventional 12-lead ECG Compared by Studying Their Performances in Classification of Old Myocardial Infarction. J Electro-cardiol 1987; 20: 193-202.
  • 18 De Ambroggi L, Santambrogi C. Clinical Use of Body Surface Potential Mapping in Cardiac Arrhythmias. Physiol-Res 1993; 42 (Suppl. 02) 137-40.
  • 19 Lux RL, Burgess J, Wyatt RF, Evans A. et al. Clinically Practical Lead Systems For Improved Electrocardiography: Comparison With Precordial Grids and Conventional Lead Systems. Circulation 1979; 59: 356-63.
  • 20 Lux RL, Evans AK, Burgess MJ, Wyatt RF, Abildskov JA. Redundancy Reduction for Improved Display and Analysis of Body Surface Potential Maps I: Spatial compression. Circ Res 1981; 49: 186-96.
  • 21 Lux RL, Smith CR, Wyatt RF, Abildskov JA. Limited Lead Selection for Estimation of Body Surface Potential Maps in Electro-cardiography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1978; 25: 270-6.
  • 22 The Math Works. Matlab User’s Guide . The Math Works, Inc.; Cochitua Place: 24 Prime Park Way, Natwick, Mass 01780, USA, 1992
  • 23 The Math Works. Matlab Reference Guide . The Math Works, Inc.; Cochitua Place: 24 Prime Park Way. Natwick, Mass 01780, USA, 1992
  • 24 Hoekema R, Uijen G, van Oosterom A. On Selecting a Body Surface Mapping Procedure. J Electrocard 1999; 32: 93-102.
  • 25 The NEMY Concerted Action. Deliverable D1-3, European Standards For Remote Sensing. Ref: EC/SE/NEMY/D1-3, NEMY Co-ordinating Centre, School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering. University of Bath; United Kingdom: 1997