Download PDF
Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel 2012; 7(4): 302-307
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313153
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Inzidenz kardiovaskulärer Ereignisse bei Typ-2-Diabetespatienten unter Insulinglulisin und anderen Insulinanaloga im realen Versorgungsalltag: eine retrospektive Datenbankanalyse

Incidence of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Treated With Insulinglutisine or Other Rapid Acting Insulin Analogs Under Real-life Conditions: a Retrospective Database Analysis
B.-M. Scholz
1   Diabetologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Hamburg
,
F.-W. Dippel
2   Sanofi Deutschland GmbH, Berlin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 August 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Insulinglulisin hat einen rascheren Wirkungseintritt als andere schnellwirksame Insulinanaloga, was einen günstigen Einfluss auf die postprandiale Glukoseregulation hat. Zielsetzung war es, die Inzidenz von makro- und mikrovaskulären Ereignissen unter realen Versorgungsbedingungen bei Typ-2-Diabetespatienten zu vergleichen, die entweder mit Insulinglulisin oder anderen kurzwirkenden Analoga behandelt wurden.

Patienten und Methoden: Daten von 732 Glulisinpatienten und 2196 Anwendern anderer Analoga aus allgemeinmedizinischen Praxen (Disease Analyzer Datenbank; 11/2004 – 01/2011) wurden nach Matching für Alter (61 ± 10 Jahre) und Geschlecht (Männer: 51 %) retrospektiv analysiert. Hazard Ratios (HR; Cox Regression) für makro- und mikrovaskuläre Endpunkte (Follow-up: 3,5 Jahre) wurden für Arzttyp (Diabetologe), Praxisregion, antidiabetische Co-Medikation (Basalinsulin, orale Antidiabetika), arterielle Hypertonie, Hyperlipidämie, frühere Behandlung mit kurzwirksamen Insulinen, Lipidsenker, Antihypertensiva, ASS, sowie dem Charlson Komorbiditätsindex adjustiert.

Ergebnisse: Das Risiko für makrovaskuläre Ereignisse war bei den mit Insulinglulisin behandelten Patienten insgesamt um 22 % geringer als bei anderen Analoga (p = 0,01). Es fand sich ein vermindertes Risiko für koronare Herzkrankheit (HR, 95 %; KI: 0,72; 0,57 – 0,91) und inzidenten Apoplex/TIA (0,66; 0,44 – 0,98). Es zeigte sich ebenfalls ein Trend für ein erniedrigtes Risiko (0,76; 0,56 – 1,03) für das Auftreten einer Retinopathie, während sich für Nephropathie und Neuropathie keine Unterschiede fanden.

Folgerungen: Die Behandlung mit Insulinglulisin ist im Vergleich zu anderen Insulinanaloga mit einer reduzierten Inzidenz von makrovaskulären Ereignissen bei Typ-2-Diabetespatienten assoziiert. Dieses Ergebnis aus einer retrospektiven Beobachtungsstudie muss durch eine prospektive randomisierte kontrollierte Studie überprüft werden.

Abstract

Background: Insulin glulisine has a more rapid onset of action than other fast-acting insulin analogues, which has a beneficial effect on postprandial glucose regulation. The objective was to compare the incidence of macro-and microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients treated with either insulin glulisine or other short-acting analogues under real-life conditions.

Patients and Methods: Data from 732 type 2 diabetes patients with glulisine and 2196 users of other analogues in general practices (Disease Analyzer database; 11/2004 to 01/2011) were retrospectively analyzed after matching for age (61 ± 10 years) and gender (men: 51 %). Hazard ratios (HR, Cox regression) for macro- and microvascular outcomes (follow-up: 3.5 years) were adjusted for type of physician (diabetologist) and region, antidiabetic co-medication (basal insulin, oral hypoglycemic agents), hypertension, hyperlipidemia, previous treatment with short-acting insulins, lipid-lowering drugs, antihypertensives, aspirin use, and the Charlson comorbidity index.

Results: A reduced risk (22 %) of macrovascular events was found in patients with insulin glulisine compared to other rapid-acting analogues (p = 0.01). In particular, a decreased risk of coronary heart disease (HR, 95 %; CI: 0.72, 0.57 to 0.98) and incident stroke or TIA (0.66, 0.44 to 0.98) was observed. There was also a trend for a decreased risk (0.76, 0.56 to 1.03) for incident retinopathy, whereas for nephropathy and neuropathy no differences were observed.

Conclusions: Treatment with insulin glulisine in type 2 diabetic patients is associated with a reduced incidence of macrovascular events compared to other rapid-acting insulin analogues. These results from a retrospective observational study must be verified by a randomized prospective controlled trial.

Schlüsselwörter

Insulintherapie - mikro- und makrovaskuläre Komplikationen - Insulinglulisin

Key words

insulin treatment - micro- and macrovascular outcomes - insulinglulisine
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil AW et al. Association of glycemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000; 321: 405-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837-853
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Akbar DH. Sub-optimal postprandial blood glucose level in diabetics attending the outpatient clinic of a University Hospital. Saudi Med J 2003; 24: 1109-1112
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Cavalot F, Petrelli A, Traversa M et al. Postprandial blood glucose is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular events than fasting blood glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus, particularly in women: lessons from the San Luigi Gonzaga Diabetes Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91: 813-819
    Google Scholar
  • 5 DeWitt DE, Hirsch IB. Outpatient insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: scientific review. JAMA 2003; 289: 2254-2264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Becker RHA, Frick A, Burger F et al. Insulin Glulisine, a new rapid acting insulin analogue, displays a rapid time-action profile in obese non-diabetic subjects. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2005; 113: 435-443
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Becker RHA, Frick AD, Burger F et al. A comparison of the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel rapid-acting insulin analog, insulin glulisine and regular human insulin in healthy volunteers using the euglycemic clamp technique. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2005; 113: 292-297
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Becker RHA, Frick AD, Teichert L et al. Dose-response relationship of insulin glulisine in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Diab Obes Metab 2009; 11: 60-68
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Rayman G, Profozic V, Middle M. Insulin glulisine imparts effective glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007; 76: 304-312
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dailey G, Rosenstock J, Moses RG et al. Insulin glulisine provides improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2363-2368
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria. The DECODE study group. Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative analysis Of Diagnostic criteria in Europe. Lancet 1999; 354: 617-621
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 DECODE Study Group. Glucose tolerance and cardiovascular mortality. Comparison of fasting and 2-hour diagnostic criteria. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 397-405
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nakagami T, Qiao Q, Tuomilehto J et al. Screen-detected diabetes, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia as predictors of cardiovascular mortality in five populations of Asian origin: the DECODA study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2006; 13: 555-561
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Meigs JB, Nathan DM, D’Agostino SRB et al. Fasting and postchallenge glycemia and cardiovascular disease risk: the Framingham Offspring Study. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1845-1850
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Levitan EB, Song Y, Ford ES et al. Is nondiabetic hyperglycemia a risk factor for cardiovascular disease? A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 2147-2155
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Coutinho M, Gerstein HC, Wang Y et al. The relationship between glucose and incident cardiovascular events. A metaregression analysis of published data from 20 studies of 95,783 individuals followed for 12.4 years. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 233-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Heise T, Nosek L, Spitzer H et al. Insulin glulisine: a faster onset of action compared with insulin lispro. Diabetes Obes Metab 2007; 9: 746-753
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Arnolds S, Rave K, Hövelmann U et al. Insulin glulisine has a faster onset of action compared with insulin aspart in healthy volunteers. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2010; 118: 662-664
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Luzio S, Peter R, Dunseath GJ et al. A comparison of preprandial insulin glulisine versus insulin lispro in people with Type 2 diabetes over a 12-h period. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2008; 79: 269-275
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bolli GB, Luzio S, Marzotti S et al. Comparative pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics of subcutaneous insulin glulisine and insulin aspart prior to a standard meal in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011; 13: 251-257
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hanefeld M, Fischer S, Julius U et al. Risk factors for myocardial infarction and death in newly detected NIDDM: the Diabetes Intervention Study, 11-year follow-up. Diabetologia 1996; 39: 1577-1583
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Esposito K, Giugliano D, Nappo F et al. Regression of carotid atherosclerosis by control of postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2004; 110: 214-219
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hohberg C, Forst T, Larbig M et al. Effect of insulin glulisine on microvascular blood flow and endothelial function in the postprandial state. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 1021-1025
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Becher H, Kostev K, Schröder-Bernhardi D. Validity and representativeness of the Disease Analyzer patient database for use in pharmacoepidemiological and pharmacoeconomic studies. Int J Clin Pharm Therap 2009; 47: 617-626
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Motheral B, Brooks J, Clark MA et al. A checklist for retrospective database studies – report of the ISPOR task force on retrospective databases. Value Health 2003; 6: 90-97
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ceriello A. Postprandial hyperglycemia and diabetes complications: is it time to treat?. Diabetes 2005; 54: 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Raz I, Wilson PW, Strojek K et al. Effects of Prandial versus fasting glycemia on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 Diabetes: the HEART2D trial. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 381-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Raz I, Ceriello A, Wilson PW et al. Post hoc subgroup analysis of the HEART2D trial demonstrates lower cardiovascular risk in older patients targeting postprandial versus fasting/premeal glycemia. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1511-1513
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 NAVIGATOR Study Group. Effect of nateglinide on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1463-1476
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Snell-Bergeon JK, Wadwa RP. Hypoglycemia, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012; 14 (Suppl 1): S51-58
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Icks A. Diabetische Spätschäden. Stand der Umsetzung der St-Vincent-Ziele. Diabetologe 2010; 6: 190-195
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar