Int J Sports Med 2024; 45(02): 110-115
DOI: 10.1055/a-2184-9078
Training & Testing

Load-velocity Relationship of the Bench Press Exercise is not Affected by Breast Cancer Surgery and Adjuvant Therapy

1   Human Performance and Sports Science Laboratory, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
,
Carlos Pérez-Caballero
2   Sports Medicine Centre, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
,
1   Human Performance and Sports Science Laboratory, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
,
1   Human Performance and Sports Science Laboratory, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
,
1   Human Performance and Sports Science Laboratory, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
,
1   Human Performance and Sports Science Laboratory, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
,
1   Human Performance and Sports Science Laboratory, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

We examined the effect of breast cancer surgery and adjuvant therapy on the relationship between bar velocity and relative intensity (load-velocity [L-V] relationship) of the bench press (BP) exercise. Twenty-two breast cancer survivors (age: 48.0±8.2 yr., relative strength: 0.40±0.08) completed a loading test up to the one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the BP using a lightweight carbon bar. General and individual relationships between relative intensity (%1RM) and mean propulsive velocity (MPV) were studied. Furthermore, the mean test velocity (MPVTest) and velocity attained to the 1RM (MPV1RM) were analyzed. These procedures and analyses were also conducted in 22 healthy women (age: 47.8±7.1 yr., relative strength: 0.41±0.09) to examine the differences in velocity parameters derived from these L-V relationships. Polynomial regressions showed very close relationships (R2≥0.965) and reduced estimation errors (≤4.9% 1RM) for both groups. Between-group differences in MPV attained to each %1RM were small (≤0.01 m·s−1) and not significant (p≥0.685). Similarly, the MPVTest (0.59±0.06 m·s−1) and MPV1RM (0.17±0.03 m·s−1) were identical for breast cancer survivors and healthy women. These results suggest that practitioners could use the same velocity parameters derived from the BP L-V relationship to prescribe this exercise in middle-aged women, regardless of whether they have suffered from breast cancer.



Publication History

Received: 02 August 2023

Accepted: 06 September 2023

Article published online:
13 November 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 209-249
  • 2 Soerjomataram I, Bray F. Planning for tomorrow: global cancer incidence and the role of prevention 2020–2070. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021; 18: 663-672
  • 3 Llavero F, Alejo LB, Fiuza-Luces C. et al. Exercise training effects on natural killer cells: A preliminary proteomics and systems biology approach. Exerc Immunol Rev 2021; 27: 125-141
  • 4 García-Chico C, López-Ortiz S, Peñín-Grandes S. et al. Physical exercise and the hallmarks of breast cancer: A narrative review. Cancers 2023; 15: 324
  • 5 Schmitz KH, Troxel AB, Cheville A. et al. Physical activity and lymphedema (the PAL trial): assessing the safety of progressive strength training in breast cancer survivors. Contemp Clin Trials 2009; 30: 233-245
  • 6 Dos Santos WDN, Vieira A, de Lira CAB. et al. Once a week resistance training improves muscular strength in breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Integr Cancer Ther 2019; 18: 1534735419879748
  • 7 Cešeiko R, Thomsen SN, Tomsone S. et al. Heavy resistance training in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant therapy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2020; 52: 1239-1247
  • 8 Rodríguez-Rosell D, Martínez-Cava A, Yáñez-García JM. et al. Linear programming produces greater, earlier and uninterrupted neuromuscular and functional adaptations than daily-undulating programming after velocity-based resistance training. Physiol Behav 2021; 233: 113337
  • 9 González-Badillo JJ, Sánchez-Medina L. Movement velocity as a measure of loading intensity in resistance training. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 347-352
  • 10 Hernández-Belmonte A, Alegre LM, Courel-Ibáñez J. Velocity-based resistance training in soccer: Practical applications and technical considerations. Strength Cond J 2023; 45: 140-148
  • 11 Hernández-Belmonte A, Martínez-Cava A, Morán-Navarro R. et al. A comprehensive analysis of the velocity-based method in the shoulder press exercise: Stability of the load-velocity relationship and sticking region parameters. Biol Sport 2021; 38: 235-243
  • 12 Martínez-Cava A, Morán-Navarro R, Hernández-Belmonte A. et al. Range of motion and sticking region effects on the bench press load-velocity relationship. J Sports Sci Med 2019; 18: 645-652
  • 13 Sánchez-Medina L, González-Badillo JJ, Pérez CE. et al. Velocity- and power-load relationships of the bench pull vs. bench press exercises. Int J Sports Med 2014; 35: 209-216
  • 14 Marcos-Pardo PJ, González-Hernández JM, García-Ramos A. et al. Movement velocity can be used to estimate the relative load during the bench press and leg press exercises in older women. PeerJ 2019; 7: e7533
  • 15 Marques DL, Neiva HP, Marinho DA. et al. Load-velocity relationship in the horizontal leg-press exercise in older women and men. Exp Gerontol 2021; 151: 111391
  • 16 Marques DL, Neiva HP, Marinho DA. et al. Estimating the relative load from movement velocity in the seated chest press exercise in older adults. PLoS One 2023; 18: e0285386
  • 17 Diez-Fernandez DM, Baena-Raya A, Alcaraz-Garcia C. et al. Improving resistance training prescription through the load-velocity relationship in breast cancer survivors: The case of the leg-press exercise. Eur J Sport Sci 2022; 22: 1765-1774
  • 18 Campbell KL, Winters-Stone K, Wiskemann J. et al. Exercise guidelines for cancer survivors: Consensus statement from international multidisciplinary roundtable. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2019; 51: 2375-2390
  • 19 Pareja-Blanco F, Walker S, Häkkinen K. Validity of using velocity to estimate intensity in resistance exercises in men and women. Int J Sports Med 2020; 41: 1047-1055
  • 20 Hernández-Belmonte A, Buendía-Romero A, Pallarés JG, Martínez-Cava A. Velocity-based method in free-weight and machine-based training modalities: The degree of freedom matters. J Strength Cond Res 2023; 37: e500-e509
  • 21 Martínez-Cava A, Hernández-Belmonte A, Courel-Ibáñez J. et al. Reliability of technologies to measure the barbell velocity: Implications for monitoring resistance training. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0232465
  • 22 Sanchez-Medina L, Perez CE, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ. Importance of the propulsive phase in strength assessment. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 123-129
  • 23 Pallarés JG, López-Samanes Á, Fernández-Elías VE. et al. Pseudoephedrine and circadian rhythm interaction on neuromuscular performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2015; 25: e603-612
  • 24 Pallarés JG, Sánchez-Medina L, Pérez CE. et al. Imposing a pause between the eccentric and concentric phases increases the reliability of isoinertial strength assessments. J Sports Sci 2014; 32: 1165-1175
  • 25 Torrejón A, Balsalobre-Fernández C, Gregory Haff G. et al. The load-velocity profile differs more between men and women than between individuals with different strength levels. Sports Biomech 2019; 18: 245-255
  • 26 Lipps DB, Leonardis JM, Dess RT. et al. Mechanical properties of the shoulder and pectoralis major in breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery with axillary surgery and radiotherapy. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 17737
  • 27 Loturco I, Grazioli R, Veeck F. et al Effects of a short-term detraining period on the strength deficit and functional performance of highly trained soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2023; 37: 2058-2063 Online ahead of print
  • 28 Garcia-Ramos A, Jaric S. Two-point method: A quick and fatigue-free procedure for assessment of muscle mechanical capacities and the 1 repetition maximum. Strength Cond J 2018; 40: 54-66