J Hand Microsurg 2020; 12(03): 163-167
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683458
Original Article

The Efficiency of WhatsApp in Teleconsultation of Finger Vascularity in Hand Surgery

Sreekanth Raveendran
1   Dr. Paul Brand Centre for Hand Surgery, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Binu Prathap Thomas
1   Dr. Paul Brand Centre for Hand Surgery, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Visalakshi Jayaseelan
2   Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Background Teleconsultation over the smartphone is now widely used in modern medicine in the management of burns, flap cover, upper extremity trauma, and in the assessment of the feasibility of reimplantation in amputated fingers. The development of the WhatsApp application has enhanced the smartphone's efficiency remarkably to transmit images in clinical and academic settings with its failsafe and encrypted technology. In hand surgery, a teleconsultation technology must communicate details of finger vascularity effectively. However, there is a paucity of evidence on the functionality of these modern teleconsultation technologies in Hand Surgery. Here, the authors have estimated the efficiency of the WhatsApp teleconsultation in the assessment of finger vascularity.

Materials and Methods In two phases, the authors transmitted clinical photographs of vascular and avascular fingers to experienced hand surgeons over the WhatsApp and asked them to assess the finger vascularity. The efficiency of the WhatsApp teleconsultation in assessing the details of finger vascularity was estimated from their responses.

Results Despite 81.06% of the hand surgeons rating the vascular fingers on the transmitted photographs correctly, only 44.95% detected the avascular digits accurately; that is, 55.05% of the surgeons failed to diagnose the avascularity of fingers. This suggests serious implications in a clinical setting. The intra- and the inter-rater reliability values were 0.232 and 0.6086 (with 95% confidence interval), respectively, which indicated poor reliability of the WhatsApp teleconsultation regarding the assessment of finger vascularity.

Conclusion The authors, therefore, conclude that WhatsApp is inadequate in teleconsultation given the value of vascularity details of the fingers in making a diagnosis in hand surgery.



Publication History

Article published online:
24 March 2019

© 2020. Society of Indian Hand & Microsurgeons. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Barr C, Yao J. The use of smartphones in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (01) 168-170
  • 2 Natarajan S, Nair AG. Outsmarted by the smartphone!. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015; 63 (10) 757-758
  • 3 Patel RK, Sayers AE, Patrick NL, Hughes K, Armitage J, Hunter IA. A UK perspective on smartphone use amongst doctors within the surgical profession. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2015; 4 (02) 107-112
  • 4 Franko OI. 66th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand: the use of smartphone “Apps” among orthopaedic surgeons. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (08) 46
  • 5 Elkaim M, Rogier A, Langlois J, Thevenin-Lemoine C, Abelin-Genevois K, Vialle R. Teleconsultation using multimedia messaging service for management plan in pediatric orthopaedics: a pilot study. J Pediatr Orthop 2010; 30 (03) 296-300
  • 6 Tsai HH, Pong YP, Liang CC, Lin PY, Hsieh CH. Teleconsultation by using the mobile camera phone for remote management of the extremity wound: a pilot study. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53 (06) 584-587
  • 7 Archbold HA, Guha AR, Shyamsundar S, McBride SJ, Charlwood P, Wray R. The use of multi-media messaging in the referral of musculoskeletal limb injuries to a tertiary trauma unit using: a 1-month evaluation. Injury 2005; 36 (04) 560-566
  • 8 Hsieh CH, Jeng SF, Chen CY. et al. Teleconsultation with the mobile camera-phone in remote evaluation of replantation potential. J Trauma 2005; 58 (06) 1208-1212
  • 9 Jamal A, Temsah MH, Khan SA, Al-Eyadhy A, Koppel C, Chiang MF. Mobile phone use among medical residents: a cross-sectional multicenter survey in Saudi Arabia. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016; 4 (02) e61
  • 10 Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and potential use among physicians and students. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14 (05) e128
  • 11 Hadjipanayis A, Klonis A, Abdel-Mannan OA, Sutcliffe AG. Smartphone use in paediatric practice: a national survey. J Mob Technol Med 2016; 5 (01) 3-8
  • 12 Laksanasopin T, Guo TW, Nayak S. et al. A smartphone dongle for diagnosis of infectious diseases at the point of care. Sci Transl Med 2015; 7: 273-273re1
  • 13 WhatsApp. Home. Available at: https://www.whatsapp.com/. Accessed June 18, 2016
  • 14 Wang K, Kowalski EJ, Chung KC. The art and science of photography in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (03) 580-588
  • 15 Samsung Galaxy Note 4. In: Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia; 2016. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? title=Samsung_Galaxy_Note_4&oldid=722659382. Accessed June 19, 2016
  • 16 Salem MZ. Simple finger tourniquet. BMJ 1973; 2 5869 779
  • 17 Zarem HA. Standards of photography. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 74 (01) 137-146
  • 18 Andriole KP, Ruckdeschel TG, Flynn MJ. et al. ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for digital radiography. J Digit Imaging 2013; 26 (01) 26-37
  • 19 de Meijer PPG, Karlsson J, LaPrade RF, Verhaar JA, Wijdicks CA. A guideline to medical photography: a perspective on digital photography in an orthopaedic setting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (12) 2606-2611
  • 20 Uzun M, Bülbül M, Toker S, Beksaç B, Kara A. Medical photography: principles for orthopedics. J Orthop Surg Res 2014; 9: 23
  • 21 Ashique KT, Kaliyadan F, Aurangabadkar SJ. Clinical photography in dermatology using smartphones: an overview. Indian Dermatol Online J 2015; 6 (03) 158-163
  • 22 Nayler JR. Clinical photography: a guide for the clinician. J Postgrad Med 2003; 49 (03) 256-262
  • 23 Display resolution. In: Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia; 2016. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Display_resolution&oldid=725427637. Accessed June 19, 2016
  • 24 Comparison of high-definition smartphone displays. In: Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia; 2016. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_high-definition_smartphone_displays&oldid=714216721. Accessed June 19, 2016
  • 25 Willemse J. Undergraduate nurses reflections on WhatsApp use in improving primary health care education. Curationis 2015; 38 (02) 1512
  • 26 Khanna V, Sambandam SN, Gul A, Mounasamy V. “WhatsApp”ening in orthopedic care: a concise report from a 300-bedded tertiary care teaching center. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2015; 25 (05) 821-826
  • 27 Gulacti U, Lok U, Çelik M. Use of WhatsApp application for orthopedic consultations in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2016; 34 (07) 1305-1307
  • 28 Gulacti U, Lok U, Hatipoglu S, Polat H. An analysis of WhatsApp usage for communication between consulting and emergency physicians. J Med Syst 2016; 40 (06) 130
  • 29 Wani SA, Rabah SM, Alfadil S, Dewanjee N, Najmi Y. Efficacy of communication amongst staff members at plastic and reconstructive surgery section using smartphone and mobile WhatsApp. Indian J Plast Surg 2013; 46 (03) 502-505
  • 30 Molnar JA, Lew WK, Rapp DA, et al. Use of standardized, quantitative digital photography in a multicenter Web-based study. Eplasty 2009;9:e4 Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627310/. Accessed June18, 2016