Myocutaneous Gracilis Free Flaps in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Variations of the Upper Gracilis Flap

Abstract

Background The transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flap has gained increasing acceptance as a reliable option for breast reconstruction, specifically in patients without adequate abdominal tissue. Three major flap designs of the upper gracilis flap have been proposed to balance volume needs with flap vascularity. A systematic review was performed to identify outcomes of the major gracilis flaps: TUG, vertical-transverse upper gracilis (V-TUG), and longitudinal gracilis myocutaneous (LGM) flaps. This study is the first and only systematic review to date reviewing the variations of the upper gracilis flap in microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed database from 1966 through 2015. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Outcomes assessed included total flap volumes, additional breast procedures to achieve intended breast volume, and complication rates.

Results A total of 485 gracilis-type flaps were performed in 335 patients. V-TUG flaps provided the largest mean flap weights and did not require additional lipofilling or implant placement, whereas the majority of TUG flaps (50.6%) required additional fat grafting or implant placements. All flap types demonstrated a low incidence of donor-site morbidity. Overall flap loss rate was low; TUG flaps reported 2.3% total and 2.0% partial flap losses, while V-TUG and LGM flaps reported no flap losses.

Conclusion This review found V-TUG yielded highest mean flap weights and did not require additional breast augmentation procedures as compared with the TUG. Also, the V-TUG was a safer donor-site option with fewer flap and donor-site morbidities.

Keywords

transverse upper gracilis flap - vertical-transverse upper gracilis flap - longitudinal gracilis myocutaneous flap

• References

• 1 Vega SJ, Sandeen SN, Bossert RP, Perrone A, Ortiz L, Herrera H. Gracilis myocutaneous free flap in autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (05) 1400-1409
• 2 Kind GM, Foster RD. The longitudinal gracilis myocutaneous flap: broadening options in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61 (05) 513-520
• 3 Yousif NJ, Matloub HS, Kolachalam R, Grunert BK, Sanger JR. The transverse gracilis musculocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 1992; 29 (06) 482-490
• 4 Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Oni G. , et al. Modifications to extend the transverse upper gracilis flap in breast reconstruction: clinical series and results. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (01) 24e-36e
• 5 McKane BW, Korn PT. The fleur-de-lis upper gracilis flap for breast reconstruction: flap design and outcome. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (04) 383-386
• 6 Fattah A, Figus A, Mathur B, Ramakrishnan VV. The transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap: technical refinements. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (02) 305-313
• 7 Schoeller T, Huemer GM, Wechselberger G. The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap for breast reconstruction: guidelines for flap and patient selection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (01) 29-38
• 8 Mohan AT, Saint-Cyr M. Anatomic and physiological fundamentals for autologous breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2015; 4 (02) 116-133
• 9 Craggs B, Vanmierlo B, Zeltzer A, Buyl R, Haentjens P, Hamdi M. Donor-site morbidity following harvest of the transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (05) 682e-691e
• 10 Abbas S, Seitz M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the used surgical techniques to reduce leg lymphedema following radical inguinal nodes dissection. Surg Oncol 2011; 20 (02) 88-96
• 11 Arnez ZM, Pogorelec D, Planinsek F, Ahcan U. Breast reconstruction by the free transverse gracilis (TUG) flap. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57 (01) 20-26
• 12 Bodin F, Schohn T, Dissaux C, Baratte A, Fiquet C, Bruant-Rodier C. Bilateral simultaneous breast reconstruction with transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (01) e1-e6
• 13 Buntic RF, Horton KM, Brooks D, Althubaiti GA. Transverse upper gracilis flap as an alternative to abdominal tissue breast reconstruction: technique and modifications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (06) 607e-613e
• 14 Fansa H, Schirmer S, Warnecke IC, Cervelli A, Frerichs O. The transverse myocutaneous gracilis muscle flap: a fast and reliable method for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (05) 1326-1333
• 15 Hunter JE, Mackey SP, Boca R, Harris PA. Microvascular modifications to optimize the transverse upper gracilis flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (06) 1315-1325
• 16 Locke MB, Zhong T, Mureau MAM, Hofer SOP. Tug ‘O’ war: challenges of transverse upper gracilis (TUG) myocutaneous free flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (08) 1041-1050
• 17 McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD, Rasheed T. Transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flap for volume replacement in breast conserving surgery for medial breast tumours in small to medium sized breasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (08) 1056-1060