Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33(09): 612-618
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604082
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Institutional Outcomes of Leech Therapy for Venous Congestion in 87 Patients

Agustin Cornejo
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
,
Ronnie L. Shammas
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
,
Luke P. Poveromo
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
,
Hui-Jie Lee
2   Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
,
Scott T. Hollenbeck
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

03 April 2017

24 May 2017

Publication Date:
04 July 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background We aimed to report the outcomes associated with leech therapy and to identify risk factors associated with reconstructive failure.

Methods We retrospectively reviewed cases of flap reconstruction or replanted appendages that required leech therapy over an 8-year period at the Duke University Medical Center. Using logistic regression, we assessed the association of risk factors with reconstructive failure.

Results The study cohort included 87 patients which correspond to 2.1% of 4,115 cases done during the study period. The most common flap recipient site was the lower extremity (n = 33, 37.9%) followed by the upper extremity (n = 30, 34.5%), head and neck (n = 13, 14.9%), and trunk (n = 11, 12.6%). Flap types were pedicled in 44 (50.5%) cases and free in 24 (27.5%) cases. Fifteen (17.2%) were digital replantation, and four (4.5%) were replanted appendages. The average duration of therapy was 4.6 days (range: 1–11). The overall leech therapy success rate was 60.9% (53/87) and accounted for cases without flap loss (n = 45, 51.7%) and with partial flap loss in which the original reconstructive goal was achieved without further reconstructive procedures (n = 8, 9.2%). Postoperative blood transfusion was administered in 32 (36.7%) cases, and infectious complications occurred in 7 cases in spite of the administration of prophylactic antibiotics (8%).

Conclusions This study represents the largest single-institution series evaluating the outcomes after leech therapy. Our data support the use of leeches as an adjunct for the management of venous congestion after reconstructive surgery. However, the morbidity associated with it should be considered, particularly the need for a blood transfusion.

Keywords

leech therapy - venous congestion - Hirudo medicinalis - medicinal leech

Note

The authors have no financial disclosures.


 

  • References

  • 1 Irish JC, Gullane PJ, Mulholland S, Neligan PC. Medicinal leech in head and neck reconstruction. J Otolaryngol 2000; 29 (05) 327-332
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cornejo-Esquerra A, Talleri-de-Andrea G, de Jesús Blanco-Favela J, Ramos-Mora A, Villarán-Muñoz B. Leech hirudo medicinalis: a therapeutic alternative available in Mexico [in Spanish]. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2009; 47 (03) 335-340
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Whitaker IS, Cheung CK, Chahal CA, Karoo RO, Gulati A, Foo IT. By what mechanism do leeches help to salvage ischaemic tissues? A review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 43 (02) 155-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Derganc M, Zdravic F. Venous congestion of flaps treated by application of leeches. Br J Plast Surg 1960; 13: 187-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rados C. Beyond bloodletting: FDA gives leeches a medical makeover. FDA Consum 2004; 38 (05) 9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Zhao X, Higgins KM, Enepekides D, Farwell G. Medicinal leech therapy for venous congested flaps: case series and review of the literature. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 38 (02) E61-E64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Soucacos PN, Beris AE, Malizos KN, Xenakis TA, Georgoulis A. Successful treatment of venous congestion in free skin flaps using medical leeches. Microsurgery 1994; 15 (07) 496-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ribuffo D, Chiummariello S, Cigna E, Scuderi N. Salvage of a free flap after late total thrombosis of the flap and revascularisation. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2004; 38 (01) 50-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gideroglu K, Yildirim S, Akan M, Akoz T. Immediate use of medicinal leeches to salvage venous congested reverse pedicled neurocutaneous flaps. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2003; 37 (05) 277-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Iglesias M, Butrón P. Local subcutaneous heparin as treatment for venous insufficiency in replanted digits. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (06) 1719-1724
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Henderson HP, Matti B, Laing AG, Morelli S, Sully L. Avulsion of the scalp treated by microvascular repair: the use of leeches for post-operative decongestion. Br J Plast Surg 1983; 36 (02) 235-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Frodel Jr JL, Barth P, Wagner J. Salvage of partial facial soft tissue avulsions with medicinal leeches. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 131 (06) 934-939
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tanaka Y, Tajima S. Completely successful replantation of an amputated ear by microvascular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 84 (04) 665-668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Talbi M, Stussi JD, Meley M. Microsurgical replantation of a totally amputated ear without venous repair. J Reconstr Microsurg 2001; 17 (06) 417-420
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Rapaport DP, Breitbart AS, Karp NS, Siebert JW. Successful microvascular replantation of a completely amputated ear. Microsurgery 1993; 14 (05) 312-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hussey AJ, Kelly JI. Microsurgical replantation of an ear with no venous repair. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2010; 44 (01) 64-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Funk GF, Bauman NM, Rinehart RJ, Mankarious LA. Microvascular replantation of a traumatically amputated ear. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (02) 184-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Concannon MJ, Puckett CL. Microsurgical replantation of an ear in a child without venous repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (06) 2088-2093 , discussion 2094–2096
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Akyürek M, Safak T, Keçik A. Microsurgical ear replantation without venous repair: failure of development of venous channels despite patency of arterial anastomosis for 14 days. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 46 (04) 439-442 , discussion 442–443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Tuncali D, Terzioglu A, Cigsar B, Aslan G. The value of medical leeches in the treatment of class IIC ring avulsion injuries: report of 2 cases. J Hand Surg Am 2004; 29 (05) 943-946
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Steer A, Daley AJ, Curtis N. Suppurative sequelae of symbiosis. Lancet 2005; 365 (9454): 188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Snower DP, Ruef C, Kuritza AP, Edberg SC. Aeromonas hydrophila infection associated with the use of medicinal leeches. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27 (06) 1421-1422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hermansdorfer J, Lineaweaver W, Follansbee S, Valauri FA, Buncke HJ. Antibiotic sensitivities of Aeromonas hydrophila cultured from medicinal leeches. Br J Plast Surg 1988; 41 (06) 649-651
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Abbott SL, Cheung WK, Janda JM. The genus Aeromonas: biochemical characteristics, atypical reactions, and phenotypic identification schemes. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41 (06) 2348-2357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Whitaker IS, Izadi D, Oliver DW, Monteath G, Butler PE. Hirudo Medicinalis and the plastic surgeon. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57 (04) 348-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Chepeha DB, Nussenbaum B, Bradford CR, Teknos TN. Leech therapy for patients with surgically unsalvageable venous obstruction after revascularized free tissue transfer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128 (08) 960-965
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Whitaker IS, Oboumarzouk O, Rozen WM. , et al. The efficacy of medicinal leeches in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review of 277 reported clinical cases. Microsurgery 2012; 32 (03) 240-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Nguyen MQ, Crosby MA, Skoracki RJ, Hanasono MM. Outcomes of flap salvage with medicinal leech therapy. Microsurgery 2012; 32 (05) 351-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Weinfeld AB, Yuksel E, Boutros S, Gura DH, Akyurek M, Friedman JD. Clinical and scientific considerations in leech therapy for the management of acute venous congestion: an updated review. Ann Plast Surg 2000; 45 (02) 207-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Sugg KB, Schaub TA, Concannon MJ, Cederna PS, Brown DL. The reverse superficial sural artery flap revisited for complex lower extremity and foot reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015; 3 (09) e519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Cornejo A, Ivatury S, Crane CN, Myers JG, Wang HT. Analysis of free flap complications and utilization of intensive care unit monitoring. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (07) 473-479
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Pannucci CJ, Nelson JA, Chung CU. , et al. Medicinal leeches for surgically uncorrectable venous congestion after free flap breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (07) 522-526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Foucher G, Norris RW. Distal and very distal digital replantations. Br J Plast Surg 1992; 45 (03) 199-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Conforti ML, Connor NP, Heisey DM, Hartig GK. Evaluation of performance characteristics of the medicinal leech (Hirudo medicinalis) for the treatment of venous congestion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (01) 228-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Whitaker IS, Kamya C, Azzopardi EA, Graf J, Kon M, Lineaweaver WC. Preventing infective complications following leech therapy: is practice keeping pace with current research?. Microsurgery 2009; 29 (08) 619-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Verriere B, Sabatier B, Carbonnelle E. , et al. Medicinal leech therapy and Aeromonas spp. infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2016; 35 (06) 1001-1006
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kruer RM, Barton CA, Roberti G, Gilbert B, McMillian WD. Antimicrobial prophylaxis during Hirudo medicinalis therapy: a multicenter study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (03) 205-209
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar