J Knee Surg 2017; 30(09): 925-929
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1599246
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

All-Arthroscopic Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis-Aided Repair of a Patellar Cartilage Defect Using Dry Arthroscopy and a Retraction System

Boguslaw Sadlik
1   Biological Joint Reconstruction Department, St Luke's Hospital, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
,
Mariusz Puszkarz
1   Biological Joint Reconstruction Department, St Luke's Hospital, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
,
Lidia Kosmalska
1   Biological Joint Reconstruction Department, St Luke's Hospital, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
,
Martin Wiewiorski
2   Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

22 November 2015

14 January 2017

Publication Date:
10 March 2017 (online)

Abstract

The technique of all-arthroscopic autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC)-aided repair of patellar cartilage lesions using a retraction system and dry arthroscopy has been recently described. We report the first clinical and radiological data at a short-term follow-up. Twelve patients underwent AMIC-aided cartilage repair for a patellar lesion. All steps of the procedure were performed arthroscopically, which include the use of an intra-articularly placed retraction plate for distraction of the patellofemoral joint and evacuation of saline solution for collagen matrix insertion and fixation. Clinical assessment performed before surgery and at a mean follow-up time of 38 months (range: 24–70) included the following scores: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and visual analog scale (VAS). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at the follow-up examination, including the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score. The mean KOOS and IKDC scores increased significantly (p < 0.01) from 50.3 and 37.4 points preoperatively to 90.1 and 79.4 postoperatively. The VAS score decreased from 7.8 to 2.3 points. Mean MOCART score at follow-up was 58.3 points. Cartilage repair of patellar lesions aided by a retraction system in a dry arthroscopy setup is a promising approach. Further studies are needed to evaluate this procedure and compare it to existing matrix implantation techniques. The level of evidence for the study is 4 (case series).

 
  • References

  • 1 Gille J, Schuseil E, Wimmer J, Gellissen J, Schulz AP, Behrens P. Mid-term results of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for treatment of focal cartilage defects in the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (11) 1456-1464
  • 2 Kusano T, Jakob RP, Gautier E, Magnussen RA, Hoogewoud H, Jacobi M. Treatment of isolated chondral and osteochondral defects in the knee by autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (10) 2109-2115
  • 3 Behrens P. Matrixgekoppelte Mikrofrakturierung. Arthroskopie 2005; 18 (03) 193-197
  • 4 Piontek T, Ciemniewska-Gorzela K, Szulc A, Naczk J, Słomczykowski M. All-arthroscopic AMIC procedure for repair of cartilage defects of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (05) 922-925
  • 5 Sadlik B, Wiewiorski M. Implantation of a collagen matrix for an AMIC repair during dry arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (08) 2349-2352
  • 6 Sadlik B, Wiewiorski M. Dry arthroscopy with a retraction system for matrix-aided cartilage repair of patellar lesions. Arthrosc Tech 2014; 3 (01) e141-e144
  • 7 Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28 (02) 88-96
  • 8 Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL. , et al. Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29 (05) 600-613
  • 9 Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 1983; 16 (01) 87-101
  • 10 Caton J, Deschamps G, Chambat P. , et al. Les rotules basses. A propos de 128 observations. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 1982; 68: 1998
  • 11 Marlovits S, Singer P, Zeller P, Mandl I, Haller J, Trattnig S. Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57 (01) 16-23
  • 12 Goutallier D, Bernageau J, Lecudonnec B. Mesure de l'écart tubérosité tibiale antérieure-gorge de la trochlée (TA-GT). Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 1978; 64: 423-428
  • 13 Brittberg M, Winalski CS. Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (Suppl. 02) 58-69
  • 14 Trillat A, Dejour H, Couette A. Diagnostic et traitement des subluxations récidivantes de la rotule. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 1964; 50: 813-824
  • 15 de Girolamo L, Quaglia A, Bait C, Cervellin M, Prospero E, Volpi P. Modified autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for the treatment of a large osteochondral defect in a varus knee: a case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (11) 2287-2290
  • 16 Maeno S, Hashimoto D, Otani T. , et al. Hanger-lifting procedure in knee arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (12) 1426-1429
  • 17 Siebold R, Sartory N, Yang Y, Feil S, Paessler HH. Prone position for minimal invasive or all-arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation at the patella. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (12) 2036-2039
  • 18 Schiavone Panni A, Cerciello S, Vasso M. The management of knee cartilage defects with modified amic technique: preliminary results. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2011; 24 (01) (Suppl. 02) 149-152
  • 19 Gille J, Behrens P, Volpi P. , et al. Outcome of autologous matrix induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) in cartilage knee surgery: data of the AMIC Registry. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133 (01) 87-93