Synlett 2018; 29(11): 1405-1414
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1591959
synpacts
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Expanding the Chemical Diversity of DNA

Chun Guo
a   Department of Chemistry, University of Georgia, 140 Cedar Street, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA
,
Dehui Kong
a   Department of Chemistry, University of Georgia, 140 Cedar Street, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA
,
Yi Lei
a   Department of Chemistry, University of Georgia, 140 Cedar Street, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA
,
Ryan Hili  *
a   Department of Chemistry, University of Georgia, 140 Cedar Street, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA
b   Department of Chemistry and Centre for Research on Biomolecular Interactions, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada   Email: rhili@yorku.ca
› Author Affiliations
Financial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation (1506667), the National Institutes of Health (­R21CA207711), the University of Georgia, and York University.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 04 January 2018

Accepted after revision: 21 February 2018

Publication Date:
20 March 2018 (online)


Abstract

Nucleic acid polymers can be evolved to exhibit desired properties, including molecular recognition of a molecular target and catalysis of a specific reaction. These properties can be readily evolved despite the dearth of chemical diversity available to nucleic acid polymers, especially when compared to the rich chemical complexity of proteins. Expansion of nucleic acid chemical diversity has therefore been an important thrust for improving their properties for analytical and biomedical applications. Herein, we briefly describe the current state-of-the-art for the sequence-defined incorporation of modifications throughout an evolvable nucleic acid polymer. This includes contributions from our own lab, which have expanded the chemical diversity of nucleic acid polymers closer to the level observed in proteinogenic polymers.

1 Introduction

2 Polymerase-Catalyzed Synthesis of Modified Nucleic Acid ­Polymers

3 Ligase-Catalyzed Oligonucleotide Polymerization (LOOPER)

4 LOOPER with Small Modifications

5 LOOPER with Large Modifications

6 Evolution of Aptamers Derived from LOOPER Libraries

7 Outlook

 
  • References

  • 1 Chen K. Zhao BS. He C. Cell Chem. Biol. 2016; 23: 74
  • 2 Batey RT. Rambo RP. Doudna JA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999; 38: 2326
  • 3 Serganov A. Patel DJ. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007; 8: 776
  • 4 Nissen P. Hansen J. Ban N. Moore PB. Steitz TA. Science 2000; 289: 920
  • 5 Tuerk C. Gold L. Science 1990; 249: 505
  • 6 Ellington AD. Szostak JW. Nature 1990; 346: 818
  • 7 Liu J. Cao Z. Lu Y. Chem. Rev. 2009; 109: 1948
  • 8 Silverman SK. Cell 2016; 41: 595
  • 9 Dunn MR. Jimenez RM. Chaput JC. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017; doi: DOI: 10.1038/s41570-017-0076.
  • 10 Kong D. Yeung W. Hili R. ACS Comb. Sci. 2016; 18: 355
  • 11 Lipi F. Chen S. Chakravarthy M. Rakesh S. Veedu RN. RNA Biol. 2016; 13: 1232
  • 12 Tolle F. Brändle GM. Matzner D. Mayer G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 10971
  • 13 Welter M. Verga D. Marx A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 10131
  • 14 Meek KN. Rangel AE. Heemstra JM. Methods 2016; 106: 29
  • 15 Rohloff JC. Gelinas AD. Jarvis TC. Ochsner UA. Schneider DJ. Gold L. Janjic N. Mol. Ther.-Nucleic Acids 2014; 3: No. e201
    • 16a Perrin DM. Garestier T. Helene C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 1556
    • 16b Hollenstein M. Hipolito CJ. Lam CH. Perrin DM. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37: 1638
    • 16c Hollenstein M. Hipolito CJ. Lam CH. Perrin DM. ACS Comb. Sci. 2013; 15: 174
    • 16d Thomas JM. Yoon JK. Perrin DM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 5648
  • 17 Zhou C. Avins JL. Klauser PC. Brandsen BM. Lee Y. Silverman SK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 2106
  • 18 Jager S. Rasched G. Kornreich-Leshem H. Engeser M. Thum O. Famulok M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 15071
  • 19 Malyshev DA. Romesberg FE. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 11930
  • 20 Hili R. Niu J. Liu DR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 98
  • 21 Guo C. Watkins CP. Hili R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 11191
  • 22 Lei Y. Kong D. Hili R. ACS Comb. Sci. 2015; 17: 716
  • 23 Kong D. Lei Y. Yeung W. Hili R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 13164
  • 24 Guo C. Hili R. Bioconjugate Chem. 2017; 28: 314
  • 25 Lei Y. Hili R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017; 15: 2349
  • 26 Schmitt MW. Kennedy SR. Salk JJ. Fox EJ. Hiatt JB. Loeb L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012; 109: 14508
  • 27 Eckert KA. Kunkel TA. PCR Methods Appl. 1991; 1: 17
  • 28 Kong D. Yeung W. Hili R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 13977
  • 29 Bock LC. Griffin LC. Latham JA. Vermaas EH. Toole JJ. Nature 1992; 355: 564
  • 30 Tasset DM. Kubik MF. Steiner WJ. J. Mol. Biol. 1997; 272: 688
  • 31 Woodson SA. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005; 9: 104
  • 32 Hottin A. Marx A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016; 49: 418
  • 33 Thirunavukarasu D. Chen T. Liu Z. Hongdilokkul N. Romesberg FE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 2892
  • 34 Rydel TJ. Ravichandran KG. Tulinsky A. Bode W. Huber R. Roitsch C. Fenton II J. W. Science 1990; 249: 277