Optimal Admission Cervical Dilation in Spontaneously Laboring Women

Abstract

Objective To estimate the impact of admission cervical dilation on the risk of cesarean in spontaneously laboring women at term.

Study Design Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of women admitted in term labor with a singleton gestation. Women with rupture of membranes before admission, induction of labor, or prelabor cesarean were excluded. The association between cesarean and cervical dilation at admission was estimated, and results were stratified by parity. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, using cervical dilation ≥ 6 cm as the reference group. Cesarean for arrest was secondarily explored.

Results A total of 2,033 spontaneously laboring women met inclusion criteria. Women admitted at <6 cm dilation had an increased risk of cesarean compared with those admitted at ≥6 cm (13.2 vs. 3.5%; RR 3.73; 95% CI 1.94–7.17). The increased risk was noted in nulliparous (16.8 vs. 7.1%; RR 2.35; 95% CI 0.90–6.13) and multiparous (11.0 vs. 2.5%; RR 4.36; 95% CI 1.80–10.52) women, but was statistically significant only in multiparous women.

Conclusions Decreasing cervical dilation at admission, particularly <6 cm, is a modifiable risk factor for cesarean, especially in multiparous women. This should be considered in the decision-making process about timing of admission in term labor.

Keywords

admission criteria - cervical dilation - cesarean delivery - labor

Condensation

Decreasing cervical dilation at admission is an important modifiable risk factor for cesarean delivery, especially in multiparous women.

• References

• 1 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2013; 62 (1) 1-69 , 72
• 2 Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS ; Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ 2007; 176 (4) 455-460
• 3 Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107 (6) 1226-1232
• 4 De Luca R, Boulvain M, Irion O, Berner M, Pfister RE. Incidence of early neonatal mortality and morbidity after late-preterm and term cesarean delivery. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (6) e1064-e1071
• 5 Healthy People 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion;
• 6 Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (5) 1181-1193
• 7 McNiven PS, Williams JI, Hodnett E, Kaufman K, Hannah ME. An early labor assessment program: a randomized, controlled trial. Birth 1998; 25 (1) 5-10
• 8 Holmes P, Oppenheimer LW, Wen SW. The relationship between cervical dilatation at initial presentation in labour and subsequent intervention. BJOG 2001; 108 (11) 1120-1124
• 9 Bailit JL, Dierker L, Blanchard MH, Mercer BM. Outcomes of women presenting in active versus latent phase of spontaneous labor. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (1) 77-79
• 10 Rahnama P, Ziaei S, Faghihzadeh S. Impact of early admission in labor on method of delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006; 92 (3) 217-220
• 11 Cheyne H, Hundley V, Dowding D , et al. Effects of algorithm for diagnosis of active labour: cluster randomised trial. BMJ 2008; 337: a2396
• 12 Friedman E. The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1954; 68 (6) 1568-1575
• 13 Zhang J, Troendle J, Mikolajczyk R, Sundaram R, Beaver J, Fraser W. The natural history of the normal first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115 (4) 705-710
• 14 Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW , et al; Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (6) 1281-1287
• 15 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 101: Ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (2, Pt 1) 451-461
• 16 Holcomb Jr WL, Smeltzer JS. Cervical effacement: variation in belief among clinicians. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78 (1) 43-45
• 17 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (3) 693-711