Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2015; 19(01): 18-22
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1545384
Schwerpunkt Zentralisation
Vertiefung
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Mit der Zentralisation besser diagnostizieren und prognostizieren

Helen Clare
1   Suite 24, 272 Pacific Highway, Crows Nest, NSW 2065
,
Stephen May
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 February 2015 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Effektivität: Immer mehr Klassifikationssysteme für Patienten mit spinalen Schmerzen integrieren die Zentralisation. Sie ist ein nachweislich zuverlässiges Instrument. Unsere Schwerpunktautoren Helen Clare und Stephen May meinen, dass sie fest zur Untersuchung gehören sollte.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Aina A, May S, Clare H. The centralization phenomenon of spinal symptoms: A systematic review. Man Ther 2004; 9 (3) 134-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Albert HB, Hauge E, Manniche C. Centralization in patients with sciatica: Are pain responses to repeated movements and positioning associated with outcomes or types of disc lesions?. Eur Spine J 2011; DOI: 10.1007/s00586–011: 2018–9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Al-Obaidi S, Al-Sayegh N, Nakhi H et al. Effectiveness of McKenzie intervention in chronic low back pain: A comparison based on the centralization phenomenon utilizing selected bio-behavioral and physical measures. Int J of Phys Med and Rehabil 2013; 1: 128 DOI: 10 4172/jpmr.1000128.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Broetz D, Hahn U, Maschke E et al. Lumbar disc prolapse: Response to mechanical physiotherapy in the absence of changes in magnetic resonance imaging. Report of 11 cases NeuroRehab 2008; 23: 289-294
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Broetz D, Kueker W, Maschke E et al. A prospective trial of mechanical physiotherapy for lumbar disk prolapse. Journal of Neurology 2003; 250: 746-749
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Browder DA, Chlids JD, Cleland JA. Effectiveness of an extension-oriented treatment approach in a subgroup of subjects with low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. Physical Therapy 2007; 87: 1608-1618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bybee F, Olsen D, Cantu-Boncser G et al. Centralization of symptoms and lumbar range of motion in patients with low back pain. Physio Theory Pract 2009; 25: 257-267
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Christiansen D, Larsen K, Jensen OK et al. Pain response classification does not predict long-term outcome in sick listed low back pain patients. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40: 606-615
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Delitto A, Cibulka MT, Erhard RE et al. Evidence for use of an extension-mobilization category in acute low back syndrome: A prescriptive validation pilot study. Physical Therapy 1993; 73: 216-222
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dionne CP, Bybee RF, Tomaka J. Interreliability of McKenzie assessment in patients with neck pain. Physiotherapy 2006; 92: 75-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Donelson R, Aprill C, Medcalf R et al. A prospective study of centralization of lumbar and referred pain. A predictor of symptomatic discs and annular competence Spine 1997; 22 (10) 1115-1122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Donelson R, Murphy K, Silva G. Centralisation phenomenon: Its usefulness in evaluating and treating referred pain. Spine 1990; 15 (3) 211-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Donelson R, Silva G, Murphy K. Centralization phenomenon. Its usefulness in evaluating and treating referred pain. Spine 1990; 15 (3) 211-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Edmond SL, Cutrone G, Werneke MW et al. Association between centralization and directional preference and functional and pain outcomes in patients with neck pain. JOSPT 2014; 44: 68-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Edmond SL, Werneke MW, Hart DL. Association between centralization, depression, somatization and disability among patients with nonspecific low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40: 801-810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Erhard RE, Delitto A, Cibulka MT. Relative effectiveness of an extension program and a combined program of manipulation and flexion and extension exercises in patients with acute low back pain. Physical Therapy 1994; 74 (12) 1093-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Fritz JM, Brennan GP, Clifford SN et al. An examination of the reliability of a classification algorithm for subgrouping patients with low back pain. Spine 2006; 31 (1) 77-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Fritz JM, Delitto A, Erhard RE. Comparison of classification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain. A RCT. Spine 2003; 28: 1363-1372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 George SZ, Bialosky JE, Donald DA. The centralization phenomenon and fear-avoidance beliefs as prognostic factors for acute low back pain: A preliminary investigation involving patients classified for specific exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005; 35: 580-588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hefford C. McKenzie classification of mechanical spinal pain: profile of syndromes and directions of preference. Manual Therapy 2008; 13: 75-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Karas R, McIntosh G, Hall H et al. The relationship between nonorganic signs and centralization of symptoms in the prediction of return to work for patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 1997; 77: 354-360
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kilby J, Stigant M, Roberts A. The reliability of back pain assessment by physiotherapists using a „McKenzie algorithm”. Physiotherapy 1990; 9: 579-583
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kilpikoski S, Airaksinen O, Kankaanpaa M et al. Interexaminer reliability of low back pain assessment using the McKenzie method. Spine 2002; 27 (8) E207-E214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kilpikoski S, Alen M, Simonen R et al. Does centralizing pain on the initial visit predict outcomes among adults with low back pain?. Manuelle thera 2010; 14: 136-141
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Laslett M, April CN, McDonald B et al. Centralization as a predictor of provocation discography results in chronic low back pain, and the influence of disability and distress on diagnostic power. Spine J 2005; 5: 370-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Laslett M, McDonald B, April CN et al. Clinical predictors of screening lumbar zygapophyseal joint blocks: Development of clinical prediction rules. Spine Journal 2006; b 6: 370-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Long A. The centralization phenomenon: Its usefulness as a predictor of outcome in conservative treatment of chronic low back pain (a pilot study). Spine 1995; 20 (23) 2513-2521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Long A, Donelson R, Fung T. Does it matter which exercise? A randomized control trial of exercise for low back pain. Spine 2004; 29: 2593-2260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Long A, May S, Fung T. The comparative prognostic value of directional preference and centralization: A useful tool for front-line clinicians?. J Manual Manip Thera 2008; 16: 248-254
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 May S, Aina A. Centralization and directional preference: A systematic review. Manual Therapy 2012; 17: 497-506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 McKenzie RA. The Lumbar Spine: Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy. Waikanae, New Zealand: Spinal Publications; 1981
    Google Scholar
  • 32 McKenzie RA, May S. The Lumbar Spine: Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy. 2nd edition. New Zealand: Spinal Publications; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Mitchell UH, Wooden MJ, McKeough DM. The short-term effect of lumbar positional distraction. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 2001; 9 (4) 213-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Murphy DR, Hurwitz EL. A theoretical model for the development of a diagnosis-based clinical decision rule for the management of patients with spinal pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2007; 8: 75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Niemisto l, Saran S, Lahtinen-Suopanki T et al. Predictive factors for 1-year outcome for chronic low back pain following manipulation, stabilizing exercises and physician consultation or physician consultation alone. J of Rehab Medi 2004; 36: 104-109
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Petersen T, Olsen S, Laslett M et al. Inter-tester reliability of a new diagnostic classification system for patients with non-specific low back pain. Aust J Physiother 2004; 50: 85-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Rapala A, Rapala K, Lukawski S. Correlation between centralization or peripheralization of symptoms in low back pain and the results of magnetic reasoning imaging. Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja 2006; 8: 531-536
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schmidt I, Rechter L, Hansen VK et al. Prognosis of subacute low back pain patients according to pain response. European Spine Journal 2008; 17: 57-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Skikic EM, Suad T. The effects of McKenzie exercises for patients with low back pain, our experience. Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences 2003; 3 (4) 70-75
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Skytte L, May S, Petersen P. Centralization: Its prognostic value in patients with referred symptoms and sciatica. Spine 2005; 30: E293-E299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Sufka A, Hauger B, Trenary M et al. Centralization of low back pain and perceived functional outcome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 27 (3) 205-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Tuttle N. Is it reasonable to use an individual patient’s progress after treatment as a guide to ongoing clinical reasoning. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2009; 32: 396-403
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Werneke MW, Deutscher D, Hart D et al. McKenzie Lumbar Classification. Spine 2014; 39: E182-E190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Werneke MW, Hart DL. Centralization: Association between repeated end-range pain responses and behavioral signs in patients with acute non-specific low back pain. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37 (5) 286-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Werneke M, Hart DL. Centralization phenomenon as a prognostic factor for chronic low back pain and disability. Spine 2001; 26 (7) 758-765
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Werneke M, Hart DL, Cook D. A descriptive study of the centralization phenomenon: A prospective analysis. Spine 1999; 24 (7) 676-683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Werneke MW, Hart D, Cutrone G et al. Association between directional preference and centralization in patients with low back pain. JOSPT 2011; 41: 22-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Werneke MW, Hart DL, George SZ et al. Clinical outcomes for patients classified by fear-avoidance beliefs and centralization phenomenon. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2009; 90: 768-777
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Werneke MW, Hart D, Oliver D et al. Prevalence of classification methods for patients with lumbar impairments using the McKenzie syndromes, pain pattern, manipulation and stabilization clinical prediction rules. J Man Manip Ther 2010; 18: 197-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Werneke M, Hart DL, Resnik L et al. Centralization: Prevalence and effect on treatment outcomes using a standardized operational definition and measurement method. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008; 38: 116-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Williams MM, Hawley JA, McKenzie RA et al. A comparison of the effects of two sitting postures on back and referred pain. Spine 1991; 16 (10) 1185-1191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Young S, April C, Laslett M. Correlation of clinical examination characteristics with three sources of low back pain. Spine Journal 2003; 3: 460-465
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar