Endoscopic size measurement of colorectal polyps: a systematic review of techniques

Abstract

Background

Accurate size measurement of colorectal polyps is critical for clinical decision making and patient management. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current techniques used for colonic polyp measurement to improve the reliability of size estimations in routine practice.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE to identify studies relevant to size measurement techniques published between 1980 and March 2024. The primary outcome was the accuracy of polyp sizing techniques used during colonoscopy.

Results

61 studies were included with 34 focusing on unassisted and assisted endoscopic visual estimation and 27 on computer-based tools. There was significant variability in visual size estimation among endoscopists. The most accurate techniques identified were computer-based systems, such as virtual scale endoscopes (VSE) and artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems. The least accurate techniques were visual or snare-based polyp size estimation. VSE assists endoscopists by providing an adaptive scale for real-time, direct, in vivo polyp measurements, while AI systems offer size measurements independent of the endoscopist’s subjective judgment.

Conclusion

This review highlights the need for standardized, accurate, and accessible techniques to optimize sizing accuracy during endoscopic procedures. There is no consensus on a gold standard for measuring polyps during colonoscopy. While biopsy forceps, snare, and graduated devices can improve the accuracy of visual size estimation, their clinical implementation is limited by practical, time, and cost challenges. Computer-based techniques will likely offer improved accuracy of polyp sizing in the near future.

Publication History

Received: 29 April 2024

Accepted after revision: 25 November 2024

Article published online:
10 January 2025

• References

• 1 Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC. et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 1131-1153e1135
• 2 Hassan C, Antonelli G, Dumonceau J-M. et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 687-700
• 3 Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ. et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut 2014; 63: 949-956
• 4 Djinbachian R, Iratni R, Durand M. et al. Rates of incomplete resection of 1- to 20-mm colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2020; 159: 904-914 e912
• 5 Taghiakbari M, Kim D, Djinbachian R. et al. Endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: current standards of treatment. eGastroenterology 2024; 2: e100025
• 6 Eichenseer PJ, Dhanekula R, Jakate S. et al. Endoscopic mis-sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 315-321
• 7 Pham T, Bajaj A, Berberi L. et al. Mis-sizing of adenomatous polyps is common among endoscopists and impacts colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Clin Endosc 2018; 51: 485-490
• 8 Djinbachian R, Dube AJ, Durand M. et al. Adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 673-683
• 9 Anderson BW, Smyrk TC, Anderson KS. et al. Endoscopic overestimation of colorectal polyp size. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 201-208
• 10 Kwong JCC, Khondker A, Lajkosz K. et al. APPRAISE-AI tool for quantitative evaluation of AI studies for clinical decision support. JAMA Network Open 2023; 6: e2335377-e2335377
• 11 Abdelrahim M, Saiga H, Maeda N. et al. Automated sizing of colorectal polyps using computer vision. Gut 2022; 71: 7-9
• 12 Hotta K, Itoh H, Mori Y. et al. Computer-aided size estimation of colorectal polyps. Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 25: 186-188
• 13 Requa J, Dao T, Ninh A. et al. Can a convolutional neural network solve the polyp size dilemma? Category Award (Colorectal Cancer Prevention) Presidential Poster Award: 282. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: S158
• 14 Kwak MS, Cha JM, Jeon JW. et al. Artificial intelligence-based measurement outperforms current methods for colorectal polyp size measurement. Dig Endosc 2022; 34: 1188-1195
• 15 Martínez F, Ruano J, Gómez M. et al. Estimating the size of polyps during actual endoscopy procedures using a spatio-temporal characterization. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2015; 43: 130-136
• 16 Allimant C, Rouquette O, Le Roux S. et al. Computer-aided polyp measurement of 78 polyps during live colonoscopy (CAPME): a prospective study. United European Gastroenterol J 2017; 5: A677
• 17 Itoh H MY, Oda M, Kudo S. et al. CARS 2019 – Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress and Exhibition, Rennes, France, June 18–21, 2019. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2019; 14: 1-194
• 18 Abdelrahim M, Saiga H, Maeda N. et al. OP091 Size Matters: Is Ai Using Computer Vision Better Than Humans in Sizing Colonic Polyps? UEG Week 2020 Oral Presentations. United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 8: 8-142
• 19 Suykens J, Eelbode T, Daenen J. et al. Sa2012 Automated polyp size estimation with deep learning reduces interobserver variability. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: AB241-AB242
• 20 Bechtold ML, Dahip MS, Matteson-Kome A. et al. S312 Using artificial intelligence for polyp size in colonoscopy: a phantom study. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116: S136
• 21 Itoh H, Oda M, Jiang K. et al. Uncertainty meets 3D-spatial feature in colonoscopic polyp-size determination. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis 2022; 10: 289-298
• 22 Su R, Liu J, Wu B. et al. Accurate measurement of colorectal polyps using computer-aided analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33: 701-708
• 23 Akanbi O, Chela HK, Bechtold ML. Artificial intelligence for polyp size in colonoscopy: fellows versus faculty. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: AB158
• 24 Zuo W, Dai Y, Huang X. et al. Evaluation of the competence of an artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy system in clinical practice: a post hoc analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10: 1158574
• 25 Sudarevic B, Sodmann P, Kafetzis I. et al. Artificial intelligence-based polyp size measurement in gastrointestinal endoscopy using the auxiliary water jet as a reference. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 871-876
• 26 Safavian N, Toh SKC, Pani M. et al. Endoscopic measurement of the size of gastrointestinal polyps using an electromagnetic tracking system and computer vision-based algorithm. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2024; 19: 321-329
• 27 Safavian N, Toh SKC, Pani M. et al. Enhancing endoscopic measurement: validating a quantitative method for polyp size and location estimation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Surg Endosc 2024; 38: 2505-2514
• 28 Yoshioka M, Sakaguchi Y, Utsunomiya D. et al. Virtual scale function of gastrointestinal endoscopy for accurate polyp size estimation in real-time: a preliminary study. J Biomed Opt 2021; 26: 096002
• 29 Shimoda R, Akutagawa T, Tomonaga M. et al. Estimating colorectal polyp size with a virtual scale endoscope and visual estimation during colonoscopy: prospective, preliminary comparison of accuracy. Dig Endosc 2022; 34: 1471-1477
• 30 Haumesser C, Zarandi-Nowroozi M, Taghiakbari M. et al. Comparing size measurements of simulated colorectal polyps size and morphology groups when using a virtual scale endoscope or visual size estimation: a blinded randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc 2023; 35: 638-644
• 31 Djinbachian R, Taghiakbari M, Haumesser C. et al. Comparing size measurement of colorectal polyps using a novel virtual scale endoscope, endoscopic ruler or forceps: a preclinical randomized trial. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11: E128-e135
• 32 von Renteln D, Djinbachian R, Zarandi-Nowroozi M. et al. Measuring size of smaller colorectal polyps using a virtual scale function during endoscopies. Gut 2023; 72: 417-420
• 33 Taghiakbari M, Djinbachian R, Haumesser C. et al. Measuring size of colorectal polyps using a virtual scale endoscope or visual assessment: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119: 1309-1317
• 34 Djinbachian R, Khellaf A, Noyon B. et al. Accuracy of measuring colorectal polyp size in pathology: a prospective study. Gut 2023; 72: 2015-2018
• 35 Htet H, Siggens K, Suthan H. et al. O14 Time to implement resect & discard service into practice: two novel ways of polyp sizing and optical diagnosis with CADx. Gut 2023; 72: A7-A7
• 36 Kaufman D, Djinbachian R, Taghiakbari M. et al. A preclinical blinded randomized-controlled trial evaluating the clinical relevance of polyp size measurement using a virtual scale endoscope. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2023; 7: 149-153
• 37 Popescu Crainic I, Djinbachian R, Rex DK. et al. Expert endoscopist assessment of colorectal polyp size using virtual scale endoscopy, visual or snare-based estimation: a prospective video-based study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2024; 59: 608-614
• 38 Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Goulston KJ. Clinical accuracy in the diagnosis of small polyps using the flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscope. Dis Colon Rectum 1982; 25: 669-672
• 39 Hofstad B, Vatn M, Larsen S. et al. Reliability of in situ measurements of colorectal polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992; 27: 59-64
• 40 Margulies C, Krevsky B, Catalano MF. How accurate are endoscopic estimates of size?. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 174-177
• 41 Morales TG, Sampliner RE, Garewal HS. et al. The difference in colon polyp size before and after removal. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43: 25-28
• 42 Gopalswamy N, Shenoy VN, Choudhry U. et al. Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate?. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46: 497-502
• 43 Schoen RE, Gerber LD, Margulies C. The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46: 492-496
• 44 Rubio CA, Höög CM, Broström O. et al. Assessing the size of polyp phantoms in tandem colonoscopies. Anticancer Res 2009; 29: 1539-1545
• 45 Moug SJ, Vernall N, Saldanha J. et al. Endoscopists’estimation of size should not determine surveillance of colonic polyps. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 646-650
• 46 Chang CY, Chiu HM, Wang HP. et al. An endoscopic training model to improve accuracy of colonic polyp size measurement. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25: 655-660
• 47 Hyun YS, Han DS, Bae JH. et al. Graduated injection needles and snares for polypectomy are useful for measuring colorectal polyp size. Dig Liver Disease 2011; 43: 391-394
• 48 Chaptini L, Chaaya A, Depalma F. et al. Variation in polyp size estimation among endoscopists and impact on surveillance intervals. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 652-659
• 49 Turner JK, Wright M, Morgan M. et al. A prospective study of the accuracy and concordance between in-situ and postfixation measurements of colorectal polyp size and their potential impact upon surveillance. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 25: 562-567
• 50 Oka K, Seki T, Akatsu T. et al. Clinical study using novel endoscopic system for measuring size of gastrointestinal lesion. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 4050-4058
• 51 Rex DK, Rabinovitz R. Variable interpretation of polyp size by using open forceps by experienced colonoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 402-407
• 52 Kume K, Watanabe T, Yoshikawa I. et al. Endoscopic measurement of polyp size using a novel calibrated hood. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014; 2014: 714294
• 53 Izzy M, Virk MA, Saund A. et al. Accuracy of endoscopists' estimate of polyp size: a continuous dilemma. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7: 824-829
• 54 Jin HY, Leng Q. Use of disposable graduated biopsy forceps improves accuracy of polyp size measurements during endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 623-628
• 55 Leng Q, Jin HY. Measurement system that improves the accuracy of polyp size determined at colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 2178-2182
• 56 Levene Y, Hutchinson JM, Tinkler-Hundal E. et al. The correlation between endoscopic and histopathological measurements in colorectal polyps. Histopathology 2015; 66: 485-490
• 57 Watanabe T, Kume K, Yoshikawa I. et al. Usefulness of a novel calibrated hood to determine indications for colon polypectomy: visual estimation of polyp size is not accurate. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30: 933-938
• 58 Kaz AM, Anwar A, O’Neill DR. et al. Use of a novel polyp “ruler snare” improves estimation of colon polyp size. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 812-816
• 59 Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee JH. et al. Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of colon polyp size?. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 3220
• 60 Visentini-Scarzanella M, Kawasaki H, Furukawa R. et al. A structured light laser probe for gastrointestinal polyp size measurement: a preliminary comparative study. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E602-e609
• 61 Atalaia-Martins C, Marcos P, Leal C. et al. Variation between pathological measurement and endoscopically estimated size of colonic polyps. GE Port J Gastroenterol 2019; 26: 163-168
• 62 Buijs MM, Steele RJC, Buch N. et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of visual estimation of polyp size in large colorectal polyps. Acta Oncol 2019; 58: S37-S41
• 63 Tang L, Di Re A, El-Khoury T. Accuracy of estimation of polyp size at colonoscopy. ANZ J Surg 2020; 90: 1125-1129
• 64 Han S-K, Kim H, Kim J-W. et al. Usefulness of a colonoscopy cap with an external grid for the measurement of small-sized colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 2365
• 65 Ortiz DAB, Solís MER, de la Mora Levy JG. et al. Difference between endoscopic and pathology measures in colon polyps. Am J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 2: 1011
• 66 Beukema KR, Simmering JA, Brusse-Keizer M. et al. Factors influencing endoscopic estimation of colon polyp size in a colon model. Clin Endosc 2022; 55: 540-548
• 67 Liang J, Church JM. Estimating the size of colorectal polyps endoscopically: random guess or systematic error?. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93: 612-616
• 68 Mun EJ, Yen T, Hochheimer CJ. et al. Effect of an online educational module incorporating real-time feedback on accuracy of polyp sizing in trainees: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2024; 56: 421-430
• 69 Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ. et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 901-906
• 70 Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 658-662
• 71 Fennerty MB, Davidson J, Emerson SS. et al. Are endoscopic measurements of colonic polyps reliable?. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 496-500
• 72 Liu P, Zhang X, Lin HP. et al. Study on accuracy of endoscopic polyp size measurement by disposable graduated biopsy forceps. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2013; 16: 1142-1145
• 73 Elwir S, Shaukat A, Shaw M. et al. Variability in, and factors associated with, sizing of polyps by endoscopists at a large community practice. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E742-e745
• 74 Shamsi N, Shaukat A, Halperin-Goldstein S. et al. Sizing of polyp illustrations differs by endoscopists’ gender and improves with a measurement reference. Eval Health Prof 2020; 43: 270-273
• 75 Utsumi T, Horimatsu T, Nishikawa Y. et al. Factors associated with inaccurate size estimation of colorectal polyps: a multicenter cross-sectional study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36: 2224-2229
• 76 Schwartz E, Catalano MF, Krevsky B. Endoscopic estimation of size: improved accuracy by directed teaching. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 292-295
• 77 Vleugels JLA, Dekker E. Does polyp size matter?. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E746-E748
• 78 Mazumder M, Olaywi M, Tejada J. et al. Comparison of endoscopic and pathologic colon polyp measurements: does the method of polypectomy or site of polyp make a difference?: 1864. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: S758-S759
• 79 Tran T, Sundaram CP, Bahler CD. et al. Correcting the shrinkage effects of formalin fixation and tissue processing for renal tumors: toward standardization of pathological reporting of tumor size. J Cancer 2015; 6: 759-766
• 80 Taghiakbari M, Anderson J, von Renteln Dl. et al. Extent of normal polyp resection margin: a possible quality measure for polyp resection. Gut 2024; 73: 216
• 81 Loughrey MB. Microscopic pathology assessment of colorectal polyp size is less accurate than intracolonoscopic assessment. Gut 2024; 73: e37
• 82 Plumb AA, Nickerson C, Wooldrage K. et al. Terminal digit preference biases polyp size measurements at endoscopy, computed tomographic colonography, and histopathology. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 899-908
• 83 Sakata S, Klein K, Stevenson ARL. et al. Measurement bias of polyp size at colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60: 987-991
• 84 Sakata S, McIvor F, Klein K. et al. Measurement of polyp size at colonoscopy: a proof-of-concept simulation study to address technology bias. Gut 2018; 67: 206-208
• 85 Hassan C, Repici A, Rex DK. Addressing bias in polyp size measurement. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 881-883
• 86 Sakata S, Grove PM, Stevenson AR. et al. The impact of three-dimensional imaging on polyp detection during colonoscopy: a proof of concept study. Gut 2016; 65: 730-731
• 87 Vakil N, Smith W, Bourgeois K. et al. Endoscopic measurement of lesion size: Improved accuracy with image processing. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 178-183
• 88 Sonnenberg A, Giger M, Kern L. et al. How reliable is determination of ulcer size by endoscopy?. Br Med J 1979; 2: 1322-1324
• 89 Catalano MF, Van Dam J, Bedford R. et al. Preliminary evaluation of the prototype stereoscopic endoscope: precise three-dimensional measurement system. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 23-28
• 90 Pochapin MB, Khan A, Rosenberg J. et al. S0520 The Napoleon: a pilot feasibility study of a small endoscopic ruler for accurate polyp measurement. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: S259