Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2019; 51(01): 23-29
DOI: 10.1055/a-0809-2974
Übersichtsartikel
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Interdisziplinäre Behandlung von Patienten mit angeborenen Fehlbildungen – Zusammenhang zwischen Dysfunktion und Dysgnathie

Interdisciplinary Treatment of Patients with Congenital Malformations – Interaction of Dysfunction and Dysgnathia
Teresa Kruse
1   Poliklinik für Kieferorthopädie, Zentrum für seltene Erkrankungen, Uniklinik Köln
,
Bert Braumann
1   Poliklinik für Kieferorthopädie, Zentrum für seltene Erkrankungen, Uniklinik Köln
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 March 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Artikel erklärt den Zusammenhang von Dysfunktion und Dysgnathie am Beispiel von kranio- und orofazialen Fehlbildungen. Einerseits verhindert eine gestörte Form eine normale Funktion: bei Patienten mit Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalte beeinträchtigt die gestörte Morphologie Aussprache, Gehör, Zahn-/Kieferstellung, Ästhetik und soziales Verhalten. Die Rekonstruktion der gespaltenen Strukturen, d. h. der Form, steht im Zentrum der Rehabilitation und stellt eine wichtige Voraussetzung für das Erlangen einer ungestörten Funktion dar. Andererseits verschlechtert eine gestörte Funktion die Form: die Einlagerung der Zunge in den Spaltbereich verhindert ein sich Annähern der Spaltsegmente. Eine Gaumenplatte normalisiert die Zungenfunktion und durch gezieltes Einschleifen der Apparatur wird das Wachstum der Spaltsegmente gesteuert. Ausgeprägte Atemstörungen können bei Neugeborenen mit Pierre-Robin-Sequenz lebensbedrohlich sein. Eine modifizierte Gaumenplatte verhindert die Glossoptose und sichert den Atemweg; über die Normalisierung der Funktion wird, bei angeborener mandibulärer Retrognathie, ein koordinierter Ablauf von Ober- und Unterkieferwachstum ermöglicht. Das Zusammenspiel zwischen Form und Funktion zeigt sich in der Verstärkung der Dysmorphie durch Dysfunktion, aber auch in der wechselseitigen Verbesserung während der sehr frühen Therapie. Übertragen auf Patienten ohne angeborene Fehlbildung erklärt sich, weshalb gewisse Dysgnathien früh behandelt werden sollten.

Abstract

This article deals with the interaction of dysfunction and dysgnathia using the example of craniofacial and orofacial malformations. First, it lays out how abnormal form impedes a proper function: In patients with cleft lip and palate, the malformation negatively affects pronunciation, hearing, tooth and jaw position, aesthetics, and social behavior. To regain proper function, the form needs correction in terms of surgical reconstruction of the cleft tissues in the first year of life. Secondly, it shows that abnormal function can also impede a proper form: In patients with cleft lip and palate, the tongue penetrates the cleft area, preventing the cleft segments from converging. A palatal plate helps to normalize the function and steers the growth of the cleft segments. In a similar vein, in newborns with Pierre Robin sequence, a therapy with a pre-epiglottic baton plate can prevent life-threatening respiratory disorders. Born with a mandibular retrognathia, these patients profit from the recovered function providing a coordinated physiological upper and lower jaw growth. To summarize, the interaction between form and function becomes manifest in the reinforcement of the dysmorphia through dysfunction, but also in the reciprocal improvement during very early therapy. Applied to patients without congenital malformations, it explains why certain forms of dysgnathia should be treated at a very early stage.

Schlüsselwörter

kranio-/orofaziale Dysmorphien - Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalten - Pierre-Robin-Sequenz - (prächirurgische) kieferorthopädische Frühbehandlung

Key words

cranio-/orofacial malformations - cleft lip - cleft palate - Pierre Robin sequence - presurgical infant orthopedics
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Ehmer U. Ätiologie und Pathogenese von Dysgnathien. Praxis der Zahnheilkunde Kieferorthopädie I. Elsevier; München: 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Hanson ML, Cohen MS. Effect of form and function on swallowing and the developing dentition. Am J Orthod 1973; 64: 63-82 doi:10.1016/0002-9416(73)90281-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Grosen D, Chevrier C, Skytthe A. et al. A cohort study of recurrence patterns among more than 54000 relatives of oral cleft cases in Denmark: support for the multifactorial threshold model of inheritance. J Med Genet 2010; 47: 162-168. doi:10.1136/jmg.2009.069
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wang JC, Nagy L, Demke JC. Syndromic Craniosynostosis. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2016; 24: 531-543. doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2016.06.008
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Virchow R. Über den Cretinismus, namentlich in Franken, und über pathologische Schädelformen. Verh Phys Med Gesellsch, Würzburg 1851
    PubMed
  • 6 Renier D, Sainte-Rose C, Marchac D. et al. Intracranial pressure in craniostenosis. J Neurosurg 1982; 57: 370-377. doi:10.3171/jns.1982.57.3.0370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gault DT, Renier D, Marchac D. et al. Intracranial pressure and intracranial volume in children with craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90: 377-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Newman SA. Ophthalmic Features of Craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1991; 2: 587-610 doi:10.1016/S1042-3680(18)30721-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Reitsma JH, Ongkosuwito EM, Buschang PH. et al. Facial growth in patients with Apert and Crouzon syndromes compared to normal children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2010; 49: 185-193. doi:10.1597/10-021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Reitsma JH, Elmi P, Ongkosuwito EM. et al. A longitudinal study of dental arch morphology in children with the syndrome of Crouzon or Apert. Eur J Oral Sci 2013; 121: 319-327 doi:10.1111/eos.12051
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Driessen C, Joosten KFM, Bannink N. et al. How does obstructive sleep apnoea evolve in syndromic craniosynostosis? A prospective cohort study. Arch Dis Child 2013; 98: 538-543. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2012-302745
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Safi AF, Kreppel M, Grandoch A. et al. Clinical Evaluation of Standardized Fronto-Orbital Advancement for Correction of Isolated Trigonocephaly. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29: 72-75 doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000004058
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Zöller JE, Mischkowski RA, Speder B. Preliminary results of standardized occipital advancement in the treatment of lambdoid synostosis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2002; 30: 343-348 doi:10.1054/jcms.2002.0326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Marchac D, Renier D, Broumand S. Timing of treatment for craniosynostosis and faciocraniosynostosis: a 20-year experience. Br J Plast Surg 1994; 47: 211-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Joos U. Die Behandlung kraniofazialer Anomalien. Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 1995; 19: 165-173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kübler AC, Speder B, Zöller JE. Fronto-orbital advancement with simultaneous LeFort III-distraction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004; 32: 291-295 doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2004.04.009
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG. et al. Cleft lip and palate. The Lancet 2002; 374: 1773-1785. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hinrichsen K. The early development of morphology and patterns of the face in the human embryo. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 1985; 98: 1-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mangold E, Ludwig KU, Nothen MM. Breakthroughs in the genetics of orofacial clefting. Trends Mol Med 2011; 17: 725-733. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2011.07.007
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Uzel A, Alparslan ZN. Long-Term Effects of Presurgical Infant Orthopedics in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2011; 48: 587-595 doi:10.1597/10-008
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Ross Jr. EL. The Influence of Surgery and Orthopedic Treatment on Maxillofacial Growth and Maxillary Arch Development in Patients Treated for Orofacial Clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2000; 37: 1-12. doi:10.1597/1545-1569_2000_037_0527_tiosao_2.0.co_2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mishima K, Sugahara T, Mori Y. Three-Dimensional Comparison between the Palatal Forms in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate with and without Hotz Plate from Cheiloplasty to Palatoplasty. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996; 33: 312-317. doi:10.1597/1545-1569_1996_033_0312_tdcbtp_2.3.co_2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Goldwyn RM, Simon P. Hullihen: pioneer oral and plastic surgeon. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 52: 250-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sillman JH. Dimensional changes of the dental arches: Longitudinal study from birth to 25 years. Am J Orthod 1964; 50: 824-842. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(64)90040-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Georgiade NG, Latham RA. Maxillary arch alignment in the bilateral cleft lip and palate infant, using pinned coaxial screw appliance. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 56: 52-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Berkowitz S, Mejia M, Bystrik A. A comparison of the effects of the Latham-Millard procedure with those of a conservative treatment approach for dental occlusion and facial aesthetics in unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate: part I. Dental occlusion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 1-18. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000096710.08123.93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Henekn KO, Gundlach KK. Analysis of primary gingivoperiosteoplasty in alveolar cleft repair. Part I: Facial growth. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997; 25: 266-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hotz M, Gnoinski W. Comprehensive care of cleft lip and palate children at Zürich University: A preliminary report. Am J Orthod 1976; 70: 481-504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Winters JC, Hurwitz DJ. Presurgical orthopedics in the surgical management of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95: 755-764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ball JV, DiBiase DD, Sommerlad BC. Transverse maxillary arch changes with the use of preoperative orthopedics in unilateral cleft palate infants. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1995; 32: 483-488 doi:10.1597/1545-1569_1995_032_0483_tmacwt_2.3.co_2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Suzuki K, Yamaki Y, Nakakita N. The effect of preoperative use of an orthopedic plate on articulatory function in children with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006; 43: 406-414 doi:10.1597/04-006.1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Matsuo K, Hirose T, Otagiri T. et al. Repair of cleft lip with nonsurgical correction of nasal deformity in the early neonatal period. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83: 25-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Maull DJ, Grayson BH, Cutting CB. et al. Long-Term Effects of Nasoalveolar Molding on Three-Dimensional Nasal Shape in Unilateral Clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999; 36: 391-397 doi:10.1597/1545-1569_1999_036_0391_lteonm_2.3.co_2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Liou EJW, Subramanian M, Chen PKT. et al. The Progressive Changes of Nasal Symmetry and Growth after Nasoalveolar Molding: A Three-Year Follow-Up Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 858-864. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000133027.04252.7A
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Pai BCJ, Wen-Ching KoE, Huang CS. et al. Symmetry of the Nose after Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding in Infants with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Preliminary Study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005; 42: 658-663 doi:10.1597/04-126.1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Barillas I, Dec W, Warren S. et al. Nasoalveolar Molding Improves Long-Term Nasal Symmetry in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip–Cleft Palate Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 1002-1006. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318199f46e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Van der Heijden P, Dijkstra PU, Stellingsma C. et al. Limited Evience for the Effect of Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding in Unilateral Cleft on Nasal Symmetry: A Call for Unified Research. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131: 62e-71e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318267d4a5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Bush PG, Williams AJ. Incidence of the Robin anomalad (Pierre Robin syndrome). Br J Plast Surg 1983; 36: 434-437. doi:10.1016/0007-1226(83)90123-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Printzlau A, Andersen M. Pierre Robin Sequence in Denmark: A Retrospective Population-Based Epidemiological Study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004; 1: 47-52 doi:10.1597/02-055
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Robin P. Glossoptosis due to atresia and hypotrophy of the mandible. Am J Dis Child 1934; 48: 541-547 doi:10.1001/archpedi.1934.01960160063005
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Cohen Jr MM. Robin sequences and complexes: causal heterogeneity and pathogenetic/phenotypic variability. Am J Med Genet 1999; 84: 311-315 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990604)84:4<311: AID-AJMG1>3.0.CO;2-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Wilhelm L, Borgers H. The “Equals Sign” – A novel technique for detecting isolated fetal cleft palate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 439-444. doi:10.1002/uog.7704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Paladini D, Morra T, Teodoro A. et al. Objective diagnosis of micrognathia in the fetus: the jaw index. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 382-386
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Neuschulz J, Wilhelm L, Christ H. et al. Prenatal indices for mandibular retrognathia/micrognathia. J Orofac Orthop 2015; 76: 30-40. doi:10.1007/s00056-014-0257-1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Bacher M, Sautermeister J, Urschitz MS. et al. An Oral Appliance with Velar Extension for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Infants with Pierre Robin Sequence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2011; 48: 331-336. doi:10.1597/09-091
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Poets CF, Maas C, Buchenau W. et al. Multicenter study on the effectiveness of the pre-epiglottic baton plate for airway obstruction and feeding problems in Robin sequence. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2017; 12: 1-6 doi:10.1186/s13023-017-0602-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Proffit WR. Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Factors Influencing Position of the Teeth. Angle Orthod 1978; 48: 175-186. doi:10.1043/0003-3219
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Melsen B, Stensgaard K, Pedersen J. Sucking habits and their influence on swallowing pattern and prevalence of malocclusion. Eur J Orthod 1979; 1: 271-280. doi:10.1093/ejo/1.4.271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Harvold EP. The role of function in the etiology and treatment of malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1968; 54: 883-897
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Ogaard B, Larsson E, Lindsten R. The effect of sucking habits, cohort, sex, intercanine widths, and breast or bottle feeding on posterior crossbite in Norwegian and Swedish 3-year-old children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994; 106: 161-166. doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70034-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Langberg BJ, Arai K, Miner RM. Transverse skeletal and dental asymmetry in adults with unilateral lingual posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127: 6-15 doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.044
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Grabowski R, Stahl F, Gaebel M. et al. Relationship between Occlusal Findings and Orofacial Myofunctional Status in Primary and Mixed Dentition: Part I Prevalence of Malocclusions. J Orofac Orthop 2007; 68: 26-37 doi:10.1007/s00056-007-1606-0
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Grabowski R, Kundt G, Stahl F. Interrelation between Occlusal Findings and Orofacial Myofunctional Status in Primary and Mixed Dentition: Part III Interrelation between Malocclusions and Orofacial Dysfunctions. J Orofac Orthop 2007; 68: 462-476 doi:10.1007/s00056-007-0717-y
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar