The Implementation of an Integrated Information System for Substance Use Screening in General Medical Settings

Summary

The Massachusetts Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (MASBIRT) Program, a substance use screening program in general medical settings, created a web-based, point-of-care (POC), application – the MASBIRT Portal ( the “Portal”) to meet program goals.

Objectives: We report on development and implementation of the Portal.

Methods: Five year program process outcomes recorded by an independent evaluator and an anonymous survey of Health Educator’s (HEs) adoption, perceptions and Portal use with a modified version of the Technology Readiness Index are described. [8] Specific management team members, selected based on their roles in program leadership, development and implementation of the Portal and supervision of HEs, participated in semi-structured, qualitative interviews.

Results: At the conclusion of the program 73% (24/33) of the HEs completed a survey on their experience using the Portal. HEs reported that the Portal made recording screening information easy (96%); improved planning their workday (83%); facilitated POC data collection (84%); decreased time dedicated to data entry (100%); and improved job satisfaction (59%). The top two barriers to use were “no or limited wireless connectivity” (46%) and “the tablet was too heavy/bulky to carry” (29%). Qualitative management team interviews identified strategies for successful HIT implementation: importance of engaging HEs in outlining specifications and workflow needs, collaborative testing prior to implementation and clear agreement on data collection purpose, quality requirements and staff roles.

Discussion: Overall, HEs perceived the Portal favorably with regard to time saving ability and improved workflow. Lessons learned included identifying core requirements early during system development and need for managers to institute and enforce consistent behavioral work norms.

Conclusion: Barriers and HEs’ views of technology impacted the utilization of the MASBIRT Portal. Further research is needed to determine best approaches for HIT system implementation in general medical settings.

Citation: Shanahan CW, Sorensen-Alawad A, Carney BL, Persand I, Cruz A, Botticelli M, Pressman K, Adams WG, Brolin M, Alford DP. The implementation of an integrated information system for substance use screening in general medical settings. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 878–894

http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2014-03-RA-0025

Keywords

Health information technology - database - medical informatics - technology acceptance - substance abuse - SBIRT

 

Conflicts Of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

• References

• 1 Doebbeling BN, Flanagan ME. Emerging perspectives on transforming the healthcare system: key conceptual issues. Med Care 2011; 49 Suppl. S3-S5. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821920e0.
• 2 Casalino L, Gillies RR, Shortell SM, Schmittdiel JA, Bodenheimer T, Robinson JC, Rundall T, Oswald N, Schauffler H, Wang MC. External incentives, information technology, and organized processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases. JAMA 2003; 289 (04) 434-441. doi:10.1001/jama.289.4.434
• 3 Bodenheimer T, Wang MC, Rundall TG, Shortell SM, Gillies RR, Oswald N, Casalino L, Robinson JC. What are the facilitators and barriers in physician organizations’ use of care management processes?. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2004; 30 (09) 505-514.
• 4 Asaro PV. Boxerman SB Effects of Computerized Provider Order Entry and Nursing Documentation on Workflow. Academic Emergency Medicine 2008; 15 (Suppl. 10) 908-915. doi: 10.1111/j.1553–2712.2008.00235.x.
• 5 Bell DS, Cretin S, Marken RS, Landman AB. A conceptual framework for evaluating outpatient electronic prescribing systems based on their functional capabilities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (Suppl. 01) 60-70.
• 6 Gooch P, Roudsari A. Computerization of workflows, guidelines, and care pathways: a review of implementation challenges for process-oriented health information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18 (06) 738-748. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010–000033.
• 7 Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovation 4th Ed. 1995. The Free Press; New York NY USA: pg. 21. ISBN 0–02–926671-8.
• 8 Parasuraman A. Technology Readiness Index. Journal of Service Research; 2000; 4: 307-320.
• 9 Hill HK, Stewart DC, Ash JS. Health Information Technology Systems profoundly impact users: a case study in a dental school. J Dent Educ 2010; 74 (04) 434-445.
• 10 Herald LR, Alexander JA, Beich J, Mittler JN, O’Hora JL. Barriers and strategies to align stakeholders in healthcare alliances. The American Journal of Managed Care 2012; 18 (06) s148-155. PMID:23286710
• 11 Rose GL, MacLean CD, Skelly J, Badger GJ, Ferraro TA, Heizer JE. Interactive voice response technology can deliver alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25 (04) 340-344. doi: 10.1007/s11606–009–1233–0.
• 12 Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance –Use Conditions. Quality Chasm Series, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. 2006. National Academies Press; Washington, DC:
• 13 DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, American Psychiatric Association. 4th edition (May 1994) ISBN-10: 0890420610.
• 14 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings, NSDUH Series H-46, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 13–4795. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration,; 2013
• 15 Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States. 2000. JAMA. 2004; 291 (10) 1238-1245.
• 16 Grant BF, Stinson FS, Dawson DA, Chou P, Dufour MC, Compton W, Pickering RP, Kaplan K. Prevalence and Co-occurrence of Substance Use Disorders and Independent Mood and Anxiety Disorders Results From the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61 (08) 807-816.
• 17 Screening and Behavioral Counseling Interventions in Primary Care to Reduce Alcohol Misuse U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement AHRQ Publication No. 12–05171-EF-3. Accessed March 2014. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf12/alcmisuse/alcmisusefinalrs.htm
• 18 WHO ASSIST Working Group.. The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility. Addiction 2002; 97 (09) 1183-1194.
• 19 Humeniuk RE, Ali RA, Babor TF, Farrell M, Formigoni ML, Jittiwutikarn J, Boerngen de Larcerda R, Ling W, Marsden J, Monteiro M, Nhiwhatiwa S, Pal H, Poznyak V, & Simon S. Validation of the Alcohol Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). Addiction 2008; 103 (06) 1039-1047. doi: 10.1111/j.1360–0443.2007.02114.x.
• 20 Knight JR, Lon S, Harris SK, Chang G. Validity of the CRAFFT Substance Abuse Screening Test Among Adolescent Clinic Patients. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2002; 156: 607-614.
• 21 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) –A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
• 22 SPSS Inc. Released 2009. PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc
• 23 Glaser BG, Strauss AL. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. 1967. Chicago: Aldine;
• 24 Charmaz K. “Discovering” chronic illness: Using grounded theory procedures and techniques. Social Science and Medicine 1990; 30 (11) 1161-1172.
• 25 Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. 1990. New York: Sage Publications;
• 26 Health Information Technology (HITECH Act) Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act or the ‘‘HITECH Act’’ American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). 2009 p. 112-164.
• 27 Liljander V, Gillberg F, Gummerus J, van Riel A. Technology readiness and the evaluation and adoption of self-service technologies. J of Retailing and Consumer Services 2006; 13 (03) 177-191.
• 28 Lin JSC, Hsieh PL. The role of technology readiness in customers’ perception and adoption of self-service technologies. International Journal of Service Industry Management 2006; 17 (05) 497-517.
• 29 Rees David W. Health beliefs and compliance with alcoholism treatment. J of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 1985; 46 (06) 517.
• 30 Patnaik S, Brunskill E, Thies W. „Evaluating the accuracy of data collection on mobile phones: A study of forms, SMS, and voice,“ Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD), 2009 International Conference on, pp.74, 84, 17–19. April 2009 doi: 10.1109/ICTD.2009.5426700
• 31 Shang-Wei Wang, Wun-Hwa Chen, Chorng-Shyong Ong, Li Liu, Yun-Wen Chuang. „RFID Application in Hospitals: A Case Study on a Demonstration RFID Project in a Taiwan Hospital,“System Sciences, 2006. HICSS ’06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on. vol. 8, pp.184a,184a, 04–07. Jan. 2006 doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2006.422
• 32 Aziz M, Bickmore TW, Vardoulakis LP, Shanahan CW, Paasche-Orlow MK. Hospital Buddy: A Persistent Emotional Support Companion Agent for Hospital Patients (Intelligent Virtual Agents Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Volume 7502, 2012, pp 492–495 12th International Conference IVA 2012 Santa Cruz, CA; USA: September, 12–14, 2012. Proceedings
• 33 Mikael Palmblad, Brian Tiplady. Electronic diaries and questionnaires: Designing user interfaces that are easy for all patients to use. Quality of Life Research 2004; 13 (07) 1199-1207.