Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-16-07-0115
Conformation of the proximal tibia and cranial cruciate ligament disease in small breed dogs
Publication History
Received:
30 July 2016
Accepted:
31 January 2017
Publication Date:
23 December 2017 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00035023/201703/lookinside/thumbnails/10-3415-vcot-16-07-0115-1.jpg)
Summary
Objectives: To investigate the conformation of the proximal tibia in small breed dogs with and without cranial cruciate ligament disease (CCLD) and to identify morphologic abnormalities that may predispose to development of CCLD.
Methods: Mediolateral radiographs of the entire tibia of dogs <15 kg with surgically confirmed CCLD were retrospectively evaluated. Proximal tibial width (PTW), tibial plateau length (TPL), tibial plateau angle as described by Slocum and Slocum (sTPA), proximal tibial tuberosity angle (PTTA), tibial plateau angle as described by Inauen and colleagues (nTPA), and diaphyseal tibial width (DTW) were measured. The same variables were obtained from mediolateral radiographs of the entire tibia of dogs <15 kg without CCLD. In addition, a quotient nTPA/ PTW, relative tibial tuberosity width (rTTW), and relative body weight (rBW) were calculated for each dog. Independent two-sample t-test (p = 0.05) was used to compare mean ± SD of all measured variables between the two groups.
Results: Gender, age, and weight mean ± SD were not significantly different between the two groups of dogs (p <0.05). Dogs with CCLD had significantly greater sTPA (p = 0.015) and rBW (p = 0.016).
Clinical significance: In dogs of small breeds, a combination of an excessively steep tibial plateau and an increased relative body weight may predispose to early CCLD development. The slope of the tibial plateau was found to be caused by an abnormal caudal angulation of the proximal tibia, a phenomenon previously associated with CCLD development in small breed dogs in individual cases.
-
References
- 1 Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ, Pozzi A. Stifle joint. In Tobias Karen M, Johnston SA. Editors Veterinary Surgery Small Animal. St. Louis, Mo.: Elsevier; 2012: 908-996.
- 2 Ness MG, Abercromby RH, May C. et al. A survey of orthopaedic conditions in small animal veterinary practice in Britain. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1996; 9: 43-52.
- 3 Johnson JA, Austin C, Breur GJ. Incidence of canine appendicular musculoskeletal disorders in 16 veterinary teaching hospitals from 1980 to 1989. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 7: 56-59.
- 4 Vasseur PB, Pool RR, Arnoczky SP. et al. Correlative biomechanical and histologic study of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1985; 46: 1842-1854.
- 5 Hayashi K, Manley PA, Muir P. Cranial cruciate ligament pathophysiology in dogs with cruciate disease: a review. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2004; 40: 385-390.
- 6 Comerford EJ, Smith K, Hayashi K. Update on the aetiopathogenesis of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 91-98.
- 7 De Rooster H, De Bruin T, Van Bree H. Morphologic and functional features of the canine cruciate ligaments. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 769-780.
- 8 Griffon DJ. A review of the pathogenesis of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease as a basis for future preventive strategies. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 399-409.
- 9 Wilke VL, Conzemius MG, Kinghorn BP. et al. Inheritance of rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in Newfoundlands. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006; 228: 61-64.
- 10 Duerr FM, Duncan CG, Savicky RS. et al. Risk factors for excessive tibial plateau angle in large-breed dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007; 231: 1688-1691.
- 11 Comerford EJ, Tarlton JF, Avery NC. et al. Distal femoral intercondylar notch dimensions and their relationship to composition and metabolism of the canine anterior cruciate ligament. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14: 273-278.
- 12 Comerford EJ, Tarlton JF, Innes JF. et al. Metabolism and composition of the canine anterior cruciate ligament relate to differences in knee joint mechanics and predisposition to ligament rupture. J Orthop Res 2005; 23: 61-66.
- 13 Whitehair JG, Vasseur PB, Willits NH. Epidemiology of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 203: 1016-1019.
- 14 Duval JM, Budsberg SC, Flo GL. et al. Breed, sex, and body weight as risk factors for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in young dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 215: 811-814.
- 15 Read RA, Robins GM. Deformity of the proximal tibia in dogs. Vet Rec 1982; 111: 295-298.
- 16 Mostafa AA, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW. et al. Morphometric characteristics of the pelvic limbs of Labrador Retrievers with and without cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Vet Res 2009; 70: 498-507.
- 17 Clements DN, Carter SD, Innes JF. et al. Gene expression profiling of normal and ruptured canine anterior cruciate ligaments. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16: 195-203.
- 18 Guerrero TG, Geyer H, Hässig M. et al. Effect of conformation of the distal portion of the femur and proximal portion of the tibia on the pathogenesis of cranial cruciate ligament disease in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68: 1332-1337.
- 19 Bojrab MJ. Pathophysiology in Small Animal Surgery. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger. 1981. pg. xxii 906.
- 20 Hayashi K, Frank JD, Dubinsky C. et al. Histologic changes in ruptured canine cranial cruciate ligament. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 269-277.
- 21 Slocum B, Devine T. Cranial tibial thrust: a primary force in the canine stifle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983; 183: 456-459.
- 22 Warzee CC, Dejardin LM, Arnoczky SP. et al. Effect of tibial plateau leveling on cranial and caudal tibial thrusts in canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifles: An in vitro experimental study. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 278-286.
- 23 Tepic S, Damur D, Montavon P. Biomechanics of the stifle joint. Proceedings of the 1st World Orthopeadic Veterinary Congress ESVOT-VOS. Munich, Germany: 2002. September 5-8 189-190.
- 24 Miller JM, Shires PK, Lanz OI. et al. Effect of 9 mm tibial tuberosity advancement on cranial tibial translation in the canine cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 335-340.
- 25 Apelt D, Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ. Effect of tibial tuberosity advancement on cranial tibial subluxation in canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifle joints: An in vitro experimental study. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 170-177.
- 26 Kipfer NM. et al. Effect of tibial tuberosity advancement on femorotibial shear in cranial cruciate-deficient stifles: An in vitro study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 385-390.
- 27 Dennler R, Kipfer NM, Tepic S. et al. Inclination of the patellar ligament in relation to flexion angle in stifle joints of dogs without degenerative joint disease. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 1849-1854.
- 28 Morris E, Lipowitz AJ. Comparison of tibial plateau angles in dogs with and without cranial cruciate ligament injuries. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 218: 363-366.
- 29 Osmond CS. et al. Morphometric assessment of the proximal portion of the tibia in dogs with and without cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006; 47: 136-141.
- 30 Inauen R, Koch D, Bass M. et al. Tibial tuberosity conformation as a risk factor for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 16-20.
- 31 Schwandt CS, Bohorquez-Vanelli A, Tepic S. et al. Angle between the patellar ligament and tibial plateau in dogs with partial rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 1855-1860.
- 32 Vedrine B, Guillemot A, Fontaine D. et al. Comparative anatomy of the proximal tibia in healthy Labrador Retrievers and Yorkshire Terriers. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 266-270.
- 33 Wilke VL. et al. Comparison of tibial plateau angle between clinically normal Greyhounds and Labrador Retrievers with and without rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 221: 1426-1429.
- 34 Cabrera SY, Owen TJ, Mueller MG. et al. Comparison of tibial plateau angles in dogs with unilateral versus bilateral cranial cruciate ligament rupture: 150 cases (2000-2006). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 232: 889-892.
- 35 Reif U, Probst CW. Comparison of tibial plateau angles in normal and cranial cruciate deficient stifles of Labrador retrievers. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 385-389.
- 36 Guastella DB, Fox DB, Cook JL. Tibial plateau angle in four common canine breeds with cranial cruciate ligament rupture, and its relationship to meniscal tears. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 125-128.
- 37 Venzin C, Howard J, Rytz U. et al. Tibial plateau angles with and without cranial cruciate ligament rupture: Comparison between different dog populations and a wolf population. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004; 17: 232-236.
- 38 Aertsens A, Alvarez JR, Poncet CM. et al. Comparison of the tibia plateau angle between small and large dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28: 1-6.
- 39 Ocal MK, Sabanci SS, Onar V. Variation of tibial plateau geometry and cruciate ligament coordinates in six breeds of dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 110-116.
- 40 Ragetly CA. et al. Multivariate analysis of morphometric characteristics to evaluate risk factors for cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in Labrador Retrievers. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 327-333.
- 41 Bennett D, Tennant B, Lewis DG. et al. A reappraisal of anterior cruciate ligament disease in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1988; 29: 275-297.
- 42 Macias C. et al. Caudal proximal tibial deformity and cranial cruciate ligament rupture in small-breed dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2002; 43: 433-438.
- 43 Selmi AL, Padilha Filho JG. Rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament associated with deformity of the proximal tibia in five dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2001; 42: 390-393.
- 44 Witte PG. Tibial anatomy in normal small breed dogs including anisometry of various extracapsular stabilizing suture attachment sites. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28: 331-338.
- 45 Slocum B, Slocum TD. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993; 23: 777-795.
- 46 Mostafa AA. et al. Proximodistal alignment of the canine patella: Radiographic evaluation and association with medial and lateral patellar luxation. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 201-211.
- 47 Reif U, Hulse DA, Hauptman JG. Effect of tibial plateau leveling on stability of the canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifle joint: An in vitro study. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 147-154.
- 48 Glassman M, Hofmeister E, Weh JM. et al. Radiographic quantitative assessment of caudal proximal tibial angulation in 100 dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 830-838.
- 49 Comerford E, Forster K, Gorton K. et al. Management of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in small dogs: A questionnaire study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 266: 493-497.
- 50 Gordon-Evans WJ, Griffon DJ, Bubb C. et al. Comparison of lateral fabellar suture and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy techniques for treatment of dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013; 243: 675-680.
- 51 Murphy S. Prospective comparison of tibial tuberosity advancement and TPLO. Proceedings of the 17th European Society of Veterinary Orthopaedics and Traumatology Congress. Venice, Italy: 2014. October 2-4 203-205.
- 52 Cosenza G, Reif U, Martini FM. Tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in 69 small breed dogs using conically coupled 1.9/2.5 mm locking plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28: 347-354.
- 53 Caylor KB, Zumpano CA, Evans LM. et al. Intra- and interobserver measurement variability of tibial plateau slope from lateral radiographs in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2001; 37: 263-268.
- 54 Fettig AA, Rand WM, Sato AF. et al. Observer variability of tibial plateau slope measurement in 40 dogs with cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joints. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 471-478.
- 55 Unis MD. et al. Evaluation of intra- and interobserver variability and repeatability of tibial plateau angle measurements with digital radiography using a novel digital radiographic program. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 187-194.
- 56 Witsberger T, Villamil J. Prevalence of and risk factors for hip dysplasia and cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 232: 1818-1824.