Few predictors of massive deep vein thrombosis

Summary

Factors that predispose to thrombus propagation from the femoropopliteal veins to the pelvic veins are poorly understood. Our goal was to determine whether there are characteristics that identify patients with massive deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We compared the 122 (2.5%) patients presenting with massive DVT (pelvic plus lower-extremity DVT) to the 4,674 (97.5%) patients with isolated lower-extremity DVT from a prospective United States multicenter DVT registry. Patients with massive DVT were younger (59.4±18.9 years vs. 64.3±16.8 years; p<0.01), less likely to have hypertension (40% vs. 51%; p=0.02), and more likely to smoke (21% vs. 13%; p=0.02) and have on- going radiation therapy (7% vs. 3%; p=0.02). The massive DVT group more commonly presented with extremity edema (80% vs. 69%; p<0.01) and erythema (21% vs. 12%; p<0.01) than the isolated lower-extremity DVT group. However, after multivariable logistic regression analysis, extremity erythema (adjusted odds ratio 1.86; 95% CI 1.13–3.04) was the only independent sequela of massive DVT and younger age (adjusted odds ratio 1.17 per decreasing decade of age; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.34) was the only independent predictor of massive DVT. Thrombus propagation from the femoropopliteal system cannot be reliably predicted using demographic or clinical characteristics.

Keywords

Deep vein thrombosis - ultrasound / diagnosis - clinical / epidemiological studies

• References

• 1 Volturo GA, Repeta Jr. RJ. Non-lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2001; 19: 877-93 vi.
• 2 Stamatakis JD, Kakkar VV, Lawrence D. et al. The origin of thrombi in the deep veins of the lower limb: a venographic study. Br J Surg 1978; 65: 449-51.
• 3 Dorfman GS, Cronan JJ. Venous ultrasonography. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30: 879-94.
• 4 Kakkar VV, Howe CT, Flanc C. et al. Natural history of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1969; 2: 230-2.
• 5 Nicolaides AN. Investigation of chronic venous insufficiency: A consensus statement (France, March 5–9, 1997). Circulation 2000; 102: E126-63.
• 6 Galle C, Papazyan JP, Miron MJ. et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism extent by clinical findings, D-dimer level and deep vein thrombosis shown by ultrasound. Thromb Haemost 2001; 86: 1156-60.
• 7 Augustinos P, Ouriel K. Invasive approaches to treatment of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2004; 110 (Suppl. 91) I27-34.
• 8 Goldhaber SZ, Tapson VF. A prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound-confirmed deep vein thrombosis. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 259-62.
• 9 Lensing AW, Prandoni P, Brandjes D. et al. Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time Bmode ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 342-5.
• 10 White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107 (Suppl. 231) I4-8.
• 11 Borst-Krafek B, Fink AM, Lipp C. et al. Proximal extent of pelvic vein thrombosis and its association with pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37: 518-22.
• 12 Lusiani L, Visona A, Bonanome A. et al. The characteristics of the thrombi of the lower limbs, as detected by ultrasonic scanning, do not predict pulmonary embolism. Chest 1996; 110: 996-1000.
• 13 Meignan M, Rosso J, Gauthier H. et al. Systematic lung scans reveal a high frequency of silent pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 159-64.
• 14 Kucher N, Tapson VF, Goldhaber SZ. Risk factors associated with symptomatic pulmonary embolism in a large cohort of deep vein thrombosis patients. Thromb Haemost 2005; 93: 494-8.
• 15 Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R. et al. Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 969-77.
• 16 Fraser DG, Moody AR, Morgan PS. et al. Diagnosis of lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: a prospective blinded study of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 89-98.