Download PDF
Endoscopy 2008; 40(10): 849-854
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1077593
DDW highlights

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic ultrasound

D.  Gilbert1 , I.  D.  Penman1
  • 1Gastroenterology Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 September 2008 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Introduction

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) continues to challenge the boundaries of current applications in clinical practice, but as we anticipate new therapeutic roles in linear-array EUS, challenges remain in established diagnostic roles, especially in relation to pancreatic disease. With parallel advances in endoscopic and cross-sectional imaging, re-evaluation of the role of EUS in cancer staging is also necessary. Furthermore, quality and safety issues are increasingly being highlighted. A focused review of the important themes emerging from this year’s DDW meeting is presented here.

References

  • 1 Muthusamy R, Rastogi A, Edmundowicz S. et al . The utility of EUS in patients with Barretts oesophagus and high grade dysplasia: analysis of the AIM Dysplasia Trial experience.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB99
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Pech O, Guenter E, Dusemund F. et al . Value of high frequency miniprobes and conventional radial EUS in the staging of early Barrett’s carcinoma: a randomised prospective controlled trial with a cross over design.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB198
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Nguyen T, Lee C, Whang C. et al . A comparison of the diagnostic yield and specimen adequacy between 22 and 25 gauge needles for EUS guided FNA of solid pancreatic lesions: is bigger better?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB100
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Gill K, Al-Haddad M, Krishna M. et al . Cytologic evaluation of cystic pancreatic lesions: comparison of echobrush vs standard EUS-FNA techniques in a blinded prospective study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB97
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Hocke M, Dietrich C, Stallmach A. The use of contrast enhanced EUS in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB200-AB201
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Ohno E, Hirooka Y, Itoh A. et al . Usefulness of contrast enhanced EUS in the diagnosis of mural nodules in IPMN’s of the pancreas. The comparison of the CE-EUS findings with the pathological findings.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB209
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F. et al . Neural network analysis of dynamic sequences of EUS elastography used for the differential diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.  Gastrointest Endsosc. 2008;  67 AB97
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Gonda T, Shah S, Stavropoulos S. et al . Use of molecular markers in clinically low risk cystic lesions of the pancreas.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB217
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Zolotarevsky E, Kwon R, Elta G. et al . Fluid CEA level is more influential than DNA mutational analysis in guiding clinical management of pancreatic cystic lesions.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB214
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Wang D, Jin Z, Li Z. et al . Measuring mesothelin protein level in EUS guided FNA specimens – a novel method in pancreatic adenocarcinoma detection.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB96
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Hernandez L, Sahai A, Brugge W. et al . Standardized weighted criteria for EUS features of chronic pancreatitis: the Rosemount Classification.  Gastrointest Endsoc. 2008;  67 AB96
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Catalano M, Hernandez L, Kaul V. et al . EUS diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: Comparison of the current criteria versus the new ”Rosemount criteria“ developed by an international consensus conference.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB215
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Varadarajulu S, Christein J, Tamhane A. et al . Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and gastroscopy for transmural drainage of pancreatic cysts.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB110
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Maranki J, Shami V, Hernandez A. et al . Interventional EUS-guided cholangiography: long term experience of an emerging alternative to percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB224
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Sanders M, Khalid A, Fasanella K. et al . EUS-guided fiducial placement for stereotactic radiosurgery in pancreatic cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB201
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Meenan J, Mesenas S, Mahon B. et al . Multicenter feasibility study on the use of an EUS-delivered P32-labeled liquid based brachytherapy implant in advanced pancreatic cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB109
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Muthusamy R, Ashida R, Lee J. et al . The safety and feasibility of EUS-guided fine needle injection of local biologic anti-tumor agents in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB109-AB110
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Coe S, Raimondo M, Woodward T. et al . Quality in EUS: an assessment of baseline compliance and performance improvement using the ASGE-ACG quality indicators.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB206
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Cleveland P, Coe S, Woodward T. et al . Validation of ASGE quality metrics in EUS: association with clinical outcomes.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB197-198
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Whang C, Lee C, Thong N. et al . In patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and high grade dysplasia (HGD), does endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) provide additional information beyond esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) alone?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB199
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kwan V, Eisendrath P, Laethem J-L. et al . A prospective randomised cross-over comparison of standard and high negative pressure suction techniques for EUS-FNA.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB203
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Napoleon B, Gincoul R, Lefort C. et al . Contrast enhanced EUS in solid tumors of the pancreas: results of a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB202
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Fusaroli P, Patrizi F, Grillo A. et al . Enhancing accuracy of EUS with Sonovue and a dedicated contrast harmonic echo: a preliminary experience.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB201-AB202
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Hirooka Y, Itoh A, Kawashima H. et al . Use of contrast enhanced EUS in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease using perflubutane microbubbles.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB214
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Fumihide I, Itoi T, Moriyasu F. et al . Usefulness of the characterization of tissue hardness of pancreatic masses using elastography EUS – first trial of the quantification using strain ratio.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB212
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Poley J-W, Kuipers E. Endoscopic elastography is highly predictive of definite pathology.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB99
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Sawhney M, Devarajan S, O’Farrell R. et al . Comparison of CEA and DNA analysis in 100 consecutive patients with pancreatic cysts.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB209
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Ashida R, Nakata B, Shigekawa M. et al . Gene analysis of advanced pancreatic carcinoma using EUS-guided FNA with focused DNA array: possible predictor of the chemotherapeutic efficacy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB96
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Fasanella K, McGrath K, Sanders M. et al . DNA microsatellite loss in EUS-guided FNA from pancreatic endocrine tumors is associated with increased mortality.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB96
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Moon S-H, Lee S, Park D. et al . Comparison of EUS-guided one step transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts and conventional transmural drainage: a prospective non-blinded, single center randomised study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB225
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Kim Y, Mallery J, Lai R. EUS rendez-vous for transpapillary biliary access after unsuccessful ERCP; 9 years experience at a single center.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB156
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Thong H, Lee C, Whang C. Therapeutic EUS access and/or stenting of pancreatobiliary system after failed conventional ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB227
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Chang K. Endoscopic choledocho-duodenostomy for the treatment of biliary obstruction using prototype compression coil and interventional endosonography: a ”proof of principle“ canine study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB109
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Yan B, Schellenberg D, Koong A. et al . EUS-guided fiducial insertion for image guided radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB225
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Albashir S, Sawhney S, Pleskow D. et al . EUS-guided fiducial placement for cyberknife treatment of pancreatic cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB223
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Yang J, Deshpande A, Sussman D. et al . EUS-guided fiducial placement prior to targeted radiation therapy in abdominal and pelvic tumors.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB202-203
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Oh H-C, Seo D, Lee S. et al . EUS guided ethanol lavage with paclitaxel injection for cystic tumors of the pancreas: follow up study with analysis of response and its predictor.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB222
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar

I. D. Penman MD, FRCP 

Gastroenterology Unit
Western General Hospital

Edinburgh
EH4 2XU
UK

Fax: +44-131-5371007

Email: ian.penman@luht.scot.nhs.uk