Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1077437
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Comparison of white light and narrow band high definition images in predicting colon polyp histology, using standard colonoscopes without optical magnification
Publication History
submitted 17 December 2007
accepted after revision 15 May 2008
Publication Date:
30 July 2008 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoscopy/200810/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-2008-1077437-1.jpg)
Background and study aims: Narrow band imaging (NBI) with optical magnification is useful in predicting colon polyp histology. As magnifying endoscopes are not routinely available, we investigated the use of NBI and high definition white light imaging in determining polyp histology, using images obtained with colonoscopes without optical magnification.
Patients and methods: Images (white light and NBI) of colon polyps less than 10 mm in diameter were collected prospectively from patients undergoing screening colonoscopy and digitally stored. Two endoscopists later reviewed all images and predicted polyp histology as neoplastic or non-neoplastic using a modified Kudo classification. Comparison was made with histopathology.
Results: Separate white light and NBI images of 80 polyps (49 neoplastic, 31 non-neoplastic) from 63 patients were recorded. Mean polyp size was 5.1 ± 2.1 mm (5.4 ± 2.2 neoplastic; 4.4 ± 1.8 non-neoplastic; P = 0.02). In a pooled analysis, NBI correctly predicted neoplastic histology in 93 of 98 images (sensitivity 95 %, positive predictive value [PPV] 94 %) whereas white light did so in 58 of 98 images (sensitivity 59 %, PPV 79 %). NBI correctly predicted non-neoplastic histology in 56 of 62 images (specificity 90 %, negative predictive value [NPV] 92 %) whereas white light did so in 47 of 62 images (specificity 76 %, NPV 54 %).
Conclusions: NBI without optical magnification was more accurate in predicting colon polyp histology compared with white light imaging. Image quality and confidence in histology were significantly higher in the NBI group. NBI without optical magnification may be useful in predicting colon polyp histology.
References
- 1 Winawer S, Zauber A, Ho M. et al . Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329 1977-1981
- 2 Church J. Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004; 47 481-485
- 3 Butterly L, Chase M, Pohl H. et al . Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 4 343-348
- 4 Emura F, Saito Y, Matsuda T. et al . Colorectal cancers less than 10 mm: should we look at small lesions during screening colonoscopy?. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63 AB199
- 5 Chen S, Mouchli A, Chadalawada V. et al . Histopathology of small polyps removed in the videoendoscopic era. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63 AB199
- 6 Rex D, Helbig C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2007; 133 42-47
- 7 Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T. et al . Colorectal tumors and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol. 1994; 47 880-885
- 8 Su M Y, Ho Y P, Chen P C. et al . Magnifying colonoscopy in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions. Dig Dis Sci. 2004; 49 1123-1127
- 9 Mitooka H, Shirakawa K, Naka Y. et al . Differentiation of diminutive neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps by the pit patterns observed by magnifying colonoscope (abstract). Gastrointest Endosc. 1994; 40 95
- 10 Konishi K, Kaneko K, Kurahashi T. et al . A comparison of magnifying and nonmagnifying colonoscopy for diagnosis of colorectal polyps: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57 48-53
- 11 Davies J, Burke D, Olliver J R. et al . Methylene blue but not indigo carmine causes DNA damage to colonocytesin vitro and in vivo at concentrations used in clinical chromoendoscopy. Gut. 2007; 56 155-156
- 12 Kondering M A, Fait E, Gaumann A. 3D microvascular architecture of pre-cancerous lesions and invasive carcinomas of the colon. Br J Cancer. 2001; 84 1354-1362
- 13 Gono K, Obi T, Yamaguchi M. et al . Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2004; 9 568-577
- 14 Chiu H M, Chang C Y, Chen C C. et al . A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Gut. 2007; 56 373-379
- 15 Su M Y, Hsu C M, Ho Y P. et al . Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101 2711-2716
- 16 Machida H, Sano Y, Hamamoto Y. et al . Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2004; 36 1094-1098
- 17 Muto T, Bussey H J, Morson B C. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer. 1975; 36 2251-2270
- 18 East J E, Suzuki N, Swain D. et al . Vascular pattern intensity: a new classification system to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions in the colon using narrow band imaging with magnification. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63 AB238
B. BanerjeeMD
Division of Gastroenterology
Washington University School of Medicine
660, South Euclid Avenue
Campus Box 8124
St. Louis, MO 63110
USA
Fax: +1-314-454-8289
Email: bbanerje@im.wustl.edu