Intensive training over 5 days improves colonoscopy skills long-term

Background and aims: Poor standards in colonoscopy services and the introduction of a colorectal cancer screening program in the United Kingdom have highlighted the need to establish high-quality training and competency assessments in colonoscopy. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness of a 1-week hands-on colonoscopy course utilizing novel assessment tools.

Methods: Twenty-one doctors with varying colonoscopy experience who attended an accelerated colonoscopy training week (ACTW) were prospectively studied. They were trained and assessed in key aspects of colonoscopy. Knowledge was assessed with a multiple choice question (MCQ) paper. Practical hand skills were taught and evaluated using a computer simulator and live case teaching. Actual colonoscopy performance was assessed using Direct Observation of Procedural Skills scores (DOPS) and an objective tri-split video score of insertion technique. Two independent trainers taught and assessed the trainees at the start and end of the ACTW and at a median of 9 months’ follow-up.

Results: Following training there were significant improvements in the MCQ score (P < 0.001), the simulator test case times (P = 0.02, P = 0.003), and the global DOPS score (P ≤ 0.02). All improvements following the accelerated training were sustained at a median follow-up of 9 months.

Conclusions: This study is the first in the literature to describe the positive, sustained impact of an intensive hands-on colonoscopy training course. Measurements of performance in key areas of skill acquisition improved following training.

References

• 1 Teague R, Soehendra N, Carr-Locke D. et al . Setting standards for colonoscopic teaching and training.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;  17(Suppl) S50-S53
• 2 Bowles C J, Leicester R, Romaya C. et al . A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?.  Gut. 2004;  53 277-283
• 3 Thomas-Gibson S, Saunders B P. Colonoscopy training in the UK, the trainees’ perspective.  CME Gastroenterology. 2004;  6 44-47
• 4 Bisschops R, Wilmer A, Tack J. A survey on gastroenterology training in Europe.  Gut. 2002;  50 724-729
• 5 Wilkins T, Jester D, Kenrick J, Dahl J. The current state of colonoscopy training in family medicine residency programs.  Fam Med. 2004;  36 407-411
• 6 Rex D K. Three Challenges: Propofol, colonoscopy by undertrained physicians, and CT colonography.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 510-513
• 7 Stranc M F, McDiarmid J G, Stranc L C. Video assessment of surgical technique.  Br J Plast Surg. 1991;  44 65-68
• 8 Taffinder N, Smith S, Jansen J. et al . Objective measurement of surgical dexterity-validation of the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD).  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Techn. 1998;  7(Suppl 1) 11
• 9 Schwid H A, O’Donnell D. Anesthesiologists’ management of simulated critical incidents.  Anesthesiology. 1992;  76 495-501
• 10 Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker S K, Darzi A. Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery.  Br Med J. 2003;  327 1032-1037
• 11 Cass O W, Freeman M L, Peine C J. et al . Objective evaluation of endoscopy skills during training.  Ann Intern Med. 1993;  118 40-44
• 12 Tassios P S, Ladas S D, Grammenos I. et al . Acquisition of competence in colonoscopy: the learning curve of trainees.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 702-706
• 13 Axon A T, Aabakken L, Malfertheiner P. et al . Recommendations of the ESGE Workshop on Ethics in Teaching and Learning Endoscopy. First European Symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Kos, Greece, June 2003.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 761-764
• 14 Thomas-Gibson S, Saunders B P. Development and validation of a multiple-choice question paper in basic colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 821-826
• 15 Sedlack R E, Kolars J C. Validation of a computer-based colonoscopy simulator.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 214-218
• 16 Shah S G, Thomas-Gibson S, Brooker J C. et al . Use of video and magnetic endoscope imaging for rating competence at colonoscopy: validation of a measurement tool.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 568-573
• 17 Thomas-Gibson S, Shah S G, Swain D. et al . Performance in colonoscopy can be reliably scored in the first 8 minutes of insertion; further evidence for a video assessment tool.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 AB121
• 18 Peyton J WR. Teaching and learning in medical practice. 1 ed. Rickmansworth, UK; Manticore Europe Ltd 1998
• 19 Reznick R K. Teaching and testing technical skills.  Am J Surg. 1993;  165 358-361
• 20 Wragg A, Wade W, Fuller G. et al . Assessing the performance of specialist registrars.  Clin Med. 2003;  3 131-134
• 21 Williams S M, Parry B R, Schlup M M. Quality control: an application of the cusum.  Br Med J. 1992;  304 1359-1361
• 22 Parry B R, Williams S M. Competency and the colonoscopist: a learning curve.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1991;  61 419-422