Endoscopy 2007; 39(9): 802-806
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966724
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Case series of transpancreatic septotomy as precutting technique for difficult bile duct cannulation

D.  Kapetanos1 , G.  Kokozidis1 , D.  Christodoulou2 , K.  Mistakidis1 , K.  Dimakopoulos1 , E.  Katodritou1 , G.  Kitis1 , E.  V.  Tsianos2
  • 1Gastroenterology Department, George Papanikolaou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
  • 21st Division of Internal Medicine, Hepato-Gastroenterology Unit and Therapeutic Endoscopy Unit, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Greece
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 13 February 2007

accepted after revision 12 June 2007

Publication Date:
17 August 2007 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

See also:

Commentaire de travail de D. Kapetanos et al., pp. 802Endoscopy 2007; 39(09): 931-932
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1308869

Background and study aims: Transpancreatic septotomy can be used instead of other precut techniques to facilitate bile duct cannulation after multiple failed attempts. Within the framework of a prospective randomized study on pentoxifylline, precut cases were retrospectively analyzed.

Patients and methods: Of 320 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) in 306 patients with various indications who had a naïve papilla, 34 cases of transpancreatic septotomy were identified and compared with 15 needle-knife sphincterotomies; six patients had received both techniques for bile duct access. Complications were defined according to consensus criteria.

Results: In the 55 patients in whom precutting techniques were employed, the use of both techniques alone or in combination resulted in a final common bile duct cannulation rate of 81.8 %. Five patients developed complications (9.1 %). Of the two cases of pancreatitis (3.6 %), one was mild and one severe (combined group). Of the three cases with hemorrhage, one was mild (transpancreatic septotomy) and two severe (needle knife). In patients who underwent conventional pull-type sphincterotomy (n = 242), 6.2 % developed complications (nine pancreatitis and six hemorrhage).

Conclusion: In cases of difficult bile duct cannulation, transpancreatic septotomy seems to be a safe alternative to needle-knife precutting with reasonable success rates. It should be studied in prospective randomized trials.

References

  • 1 Goff J S. Common bile duct pre-cut sphincterotomy: transpancreatic sphincter approach.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  41(5) 502-505
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Hookey L C, RioTinto R, Delhaye M. et al . Risk factors for pancreatitis after pancreatic sphincterotomy: a review of 572 cases.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 670-676
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Kapetanos D, Kokozidis G, Christodoulou D. et al . A randomised controlled trial of pentoxifylline for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  in press
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Cotton P B, Lehman G, Vennes J. et al . Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 383-393
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Akashi R, Kiyozumi T, Jinnouchi K. et al . Pancreatic sphincter precutting to gain selective access to the common bile duct: a series of 172 patients.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 405-410
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Bruins Slot W, Schoeman M N, Disario J A. et al . Needle-knife sphincterotomy as a precut procedure: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications.  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 334-339
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Siegel J H, Ben-Zvi J S, Pullano W. The needle knife: a valuable tool in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 499-503
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Freeman M L, Guda N M. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 112-125
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Cotton P B. Precut papillotomy - a risky technique for experts only.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 578-579
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G. et al . Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, Testoni P A. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 830-834
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Vandervoort J, Carr-Locke D L. Needle-knife access papillotomy: an unfairly maligned technique?.  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 365-366
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Binmoeller K F, Seifert H, Gerke H. et al . Papillary roof incision using the Erlangen-type pre-cut papillotome to achieve selective bile duct cannulation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 689-695
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 de Weerth A, Seitz U, Zhong Y. et al . Primary precutting versus conventional over-the-wire sphincterotomy for bile duct access: a prospective randomized study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 1235-1240
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Goff J S. Long-term experience with the transpancreatic sphincter pre-cut approach to biliary sphincterotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 642-645
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Catalano M F, Linder J D, Geenen J E. Endoscopic transpancreatic papillary septotomy for inaccessible obstructed bile ducts: comparison with standard pre-cut papillotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 557-561
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Kahaleh M, Tokar J, Mullick T. et al . Prospective evaluation of pancreatic sphincterotomy as a precut technique for biliary cannulation.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 971-977
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Jakobs R, Benz C, Leonhardt A. et al . Pancreatic endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with chronic pancreatitis: a single-center experience in 171 consecutive patients.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 551-554
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Freeman M L, DiSario J A, Nelson D B. et al . Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 425-434
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Cheng C L, Sherman S, Watkins J L. et al . Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 139-147
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Elton E, Howell D A, Parsons W G. et al . Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy: indications, outcome, and a safe stentless technique.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 240-249
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Costamagna G, Gabrielli G, Mutignai M. et al . Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy (EPS): is this a safe procedure? Results in 128 EPS (abstract).  Gastroenterology. 1996;  110 A383
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Esber E, Sherman S, Earle D. et al . Complications of major papilla endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy: a review of 236 patients (abstract).  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 405
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Kozarek R A, Ball T J, Patterson D J. et al . Endoscopic pancreatic duct sphincterotomy: indications, technique, and analysis of results.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 592-598
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Deviere J. Using the pancreas for common bile duct cannulation?.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 750-751
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Gonzalez Lama Y, Abreu L, Calleja J L. et al . Selective biliary cannulation using pancreatic guide-wire placement: further evidence needed to support the use of an already known technique.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 457; author reply 458.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Lella F, Bagnolo F, Colombo E, Bonassi U. A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 830-834
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Singh P, Das A, Isenberg G. et al . Does prophylactic pancreatic stent placement reduce the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of controlled trials.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 544-550
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Smithline A, Silverman W, Rogers D. et al . Effect of prophylactic main pancreatic duct stenting on the incidence of biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis in high-risk patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 652-657
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Sherman S, Bucksot E, Esber E. et al . Does leaving a main pancreatic duct stent in place reduce the incidence of precut biliary sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis? Randomized prospective study (abstract).  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 241
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Tarnasky P R, Palesch Y Y, Cunningham J T. et al . Pancreatic stenting prevents pancreatitis after biliary sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.  Gastroenterology. 1998;  115 1518-1524
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Fogel E L, Eversman D, Jamidar P. et al . Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: pancreaticobiliary sphincterotomy with pancreatic stent placement has a lower rate of pancreatitis than biliary sphincterotomy alone.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 280-285
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Fazel A, Quadri A, Catalano M F. et al . Does a pancreatic duct stent prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 291-294
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Aizawa T, Ueno N. Stent placement in the pancreatic duct prevents pancreatitis after endoscopic sphincter dilation for removal of bile duct stones.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 209-213
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

D. Kapetanos, MD

George Papanikolaou Hospital

Gastroenterology Department

Thessaloniki

Greece 57010

Fax: +30-2310-359217

Email: dkapetan@otenet.gr