Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-822728
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Inzidenz und Einteilung postoperativer Wundinfektionen in der Viszeralchirurgie
Incidence and Classification of Postoperative Wound Infections in Visceral SurgeryPublication History
Publication Date:
08 July 2004 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/viszeralchirurgie/200403/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-2004-822728-1.jpg)
Zusammenfassung
Postoperative Wundinfektionen (WI) sind in chirurgisch ausgerichteten Abteilungen ein essenzielles Problem im Hinblick auf Morbidität und Mortalität des Patienten. Die WI stellen die dritthäufigste nosokomiale Infektion dar. Die daraus resultierende längere Verweildauer führt zu einer deutlichen Erhöhung der Behandlungskosten.
Die relativ hohe Rate von WI in der Viszeralchirurgie begründet sich in der Spezifität der Eingriffe. Für den ausgedehnten viszeralchirurgischen Eingriff bleibt auch in naher Zukunft die Laparotomie der Standard. Die meist notwendige Eröffnung von Hohlorganen und die damit einhergehende Kontamination bleiben für das Auftreten von WI ein Problem. Mit Entwicklung der minimalinvasiven chirurgischen Techniken und eines immer umfassenderen Wundmanagements konnten in den letzten Jahren gute Ergebnisse hinsichtlich der WI erzielt werden.
Das zeitige Erkennen aller Arten von Wundinfektionen hat für den postoperativen Behandlungsverlauf große Bedeutung. Die Standardisierung etwaiger Komplikationen und eine damit verbundene Therapieeinleitung sind daher unablässig. Die entwickelten Definitionen und Klassifikationen sind hilfreich.
In großen Studien zur Surveillance postoperativer Wundinfektionen werden Methoden aufgezeigt, die eine Einschätzung des eigenen postoperativen Wundinfektionsrisikos zulassen.
Abstract
Postoperative wound infections (WI) in surgically oriented departments are a major problem regarding morbidity and mortality of the patient. They represent the third most nosocomial infection.
Consequently, the prolonged duration of stay in the hospital leads to a significant increase of treatment costs.
The relatively high rate of WI in visceral surgery is due to the specific nature of the performed procedures. For the near future, the standard for broad inverventions (operations) will remain to the laparatomy. The usually necessary opening of visceral organs and the consecutive contamination remain the common cause of WI. During the last years, significantly lower rates of WI were achieved by developing minimally invasive surgical techniques and more elaborated wound management. The early recognition of all types of WI is of great importance to the postoperative healing process. Standardizing possible complications and related treatment guidelines are therefore inevitable.
The existing definitions and classifications are helpful. In broad surveillance studies of postoperative wound infections methods are shown which allow the estimation of the individual risk of developing WI.
Schlüsselwörter
Wundinfektionen - Surveillance - nosokomiale Infektionen - Infektionsmanagement - Oberflächeninfektion
Key words
Wound infection - surveillance - nosocomial infection - management of infection - incisional infection
Literatur
- 1 Glenister H M, Taylor L J, Cooke E M. et al .A study of surveillance methods for detecting hospital infection. Public Health Laboratory Service 1992; 1-98
- 2 Peel A L, Taylor E W. Surgical Infection Study Group . Proposed definitions for the audit of postoperative infection: a discussion paper. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991; 73 385-388
- 3 Ayliffe G A, Casewell M W, Cookson B D. National prevalence survey of hospital acquired infections: A preliminary report of the Steering Group of the second National Prevalence Survey. J Hosp Infect. 1993; 24 69-76
- 4 Garner J S, Jarvis W R, Emori T G. et al . CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. Am J Infect Control. 1988; 16 128-140
- 5 Horan T C, Gaynes R P, Martone W J, Jarvis W R, Emori T G. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992; 13 (10) 606-608
- 6 Fleischer G M, Rennert A, Ruehmer M. Die infizierte Bauchdecke und der Platzbauch. Chirurg. 2000; 71 754-762
- 7 Anielski R, Barczynski M. Postoperative wound infections. I. Population data and risk factors. Przegl Lek. 1998; 55 101-108
- 8 Renvall S, Niinikoski J, Aho A J. Wound infections in abdominal surgery. A prospective study of 696 operations. Acta Chir Scand. 1980; 146 25-30
- 9 Rogy M, Fugger R, Riedl E. et al . Etiology and consequences of postoperative wound infection. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1991; 376 172-175
- 10 Altemeier W A, Burke J F, Pruitt B A. et al .Definitions and classifications of surgical wound infection. In: Manual Control of Infection in Surgical Patients. JB Lippincott Company, Philadelphia 1976; 20-29
- 11 National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council . Postoperative wound infections: the influence of ultraviolet irradiation of the operating room and of various other factors. Ann Surg. 1964; 160 1-132
- 12 Garner J S. Guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985. Infect Control. 1986; 7 193-200
- 13 Weiss C A, Statz C L, Dahms R A. et al . Six years of surgical wound infection surveillance at a tertiary care center: review of the microbiologic and epidemiological aspects of 20 007 wounds. Arch Surg. 1999; 134 1041-1048
- 14 Barber G R, Miransky J, Brown A E. et al . Direct observations of surgical wound infections at a comprehensive cancer center. Arch Surg. 1995; 130 042-047
- 15 Haley R W, Culver D H, Morgan W M. et al . Identifying patients at high risk of surgical wound infection: a simple multivariate index of patient susceptibility and wound contamination. Am J Epidemiol. 1985; 121 206-215
- 16 Culver D H, Horan T C, Gaynes R P. et al . Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. Am J Med. 1991; 91 (Suppl 3 B) 152-157
- 17 Mintjes-de Groot A J, van den Berg J M, Veermann-Brenzikofer M L. et al . Incidence of the postoperative wound infections in The Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998; 142 22-26
- 18 Perl T M, Roy M C. Postoperative wound infections: risk factors and role of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage. J Chemother. 1995; 7 29-35
- 19 Lizan-Garcia M, Garcia-Caballero J, Asensio-Vegas A. Risk factors for surgical-wound infection in general surgery: prospective study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997; 18 310-315
- 20 Mishriki S F, Law D J, Jeffrey P J. Factors affecting the incidence of postoperative wound infection. J Hosp Infect. 1990; 16 223
- 21 Gaynes R P, Culver D H, Horan T C. et al . Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Rates in the United States, 1992-1998: The National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System Basic SSI Risk Index. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2001; 33 69-77
- 22 Steinbrecher E, Sohr D, Hansen S. et al . Surveillance postoperativer Wundinfektionen-Referenzdaten des Krankenhaus-Infektions-Surveillance-Systems (KISS). Chirurg. 2002; 73 76-82
P. Stübs
Klinik für Chirurgie · Medizinische Fakultät der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität
Leipziger Straße 44
39120 Magdeburg
Phone: 03 91/6 71 55 00
Fax: 03 91/6 71 55 70
Email: patrick.stuebs@medizin.uni-magdeburg.de