Validation of the MetaMax II Portable Metabolic Measurement System

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of the MetaMax II portable metabolic measurement system against the Douglas Bag technique. Nine recreationally active male subjects were included in a validation at 100 W, 10 well-trained male subjects at 200 W and 10 well-trained males at 250 W and at maximal exercise (volitional fatigue at a mean workload of 325 W). All testing was performed on an electronically braked bicycle at 60 rpm. At 100 W, the influence on MetaMax II measurements of adding a Douglas Bag breathing valve in series to the MetaMax II was investigated. The oxygen uptake was, for the MetaMax II, at 100 W mean 0.03 l × min^-1 higher (p < 0.01), at 200 W mean 0.02 l × min^-1 (n. s.) lower, at 250 W mean 0.04 l × min^-1 (n. s.) higher, and at 325 W mean 0.11 l × min^-1 (p < 0.05) higher. The carbon dioxide excretion was, for the MetaMax II, at 100 W mean 0.06 l × min^-1 (p < 0.01) lower, at 200 W mean 0.11 l × min^-1 (p < 0.05) lower, at 250 W mean 0.03 l × min^-1 (n. s.) lower, and at 325 W mean 0.16 l × min^-1 (p < 0.05) lower. The addition of a breathing valve in series to the MetaMax II resulted in lower breathing frequency, a higher ventilated tidal volume, and an affected gas measurement validation. In conclusion, the MetaMax II was found to be valid for metabolic gas measurements between 100 and at least 250 W.

Key words

Ergospirometer - metabolic gas measurements - Douglas Bag - accuracy - precision - ergometry

References

• 1 Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between methods of clinical measurement.  Lancet. 1986;  8 307-310
• 2 Bland J M, Altman D G. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement.  Comput Biol Med. 1990;  20 337-340
• 3 Caretti D M, Whitley J A. Exercise performance during inspiratory resistance breathing under exhaustive constant load work.  Ergonomics. 1998;  41 501-511
• 4 Damato S, Cumming G. Tidal volume change and gas mixing in the lung.  Respiration. 1989;  56 173-181
• 5 Douglas C D. A method for determining the total respiratory exchange in man. Proceedings of the Physiological Society 1911; March 18. 
• 6 Hagan R D, Weis S E, Raven P B. Effect of pedal rate on cardiorespiratory responses during continuous exercise.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;  24 1088-1095
• 7 Hermansen L, Vokac Z, Lereim P. Respiratory and circulatory response to added air flow resistance during exercise.  Ergonomics. 1972;  15 15-24
• 8 Holmgren A, Hagsand V, Hollstein-Ströberg I. Gas- och blodgasanalys. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell 1968
• 9 Kawakami Y, Nozaki D, Matsuo A, Fukunaga T. Reliability of measurement of oxygen uptake by a portable telemetric system.  Eur J Appl Physiol . 1992;  65 409-414
• 10 King G A, McLaughlin J E, Howley E T, Bassett J r, Ainsworth B E. Validation of Aerosport KB1-C Portable Metabolic System.  Int J Sports Med. 1999;  20 304-308
• 11 Lucia A, Fleck S J, Gotshall R W, Kearney J T. Validity and reliability of the Cosmed K2 instrument.  Int J Sports Med. 1993;  14 380-386
• 12 Macfarlane D J. Automated metabolic gas analysis systems.  Sports Med. 2001;  31 841-861
• 13 McLaughlin J E, King G A, Howley E T, Bassett DR Jr, Ainsworth B E. Validation of the COSMED K4b² portable metabolic system.  Int J Sports Med. 2001;  22 280-284
• 14 Raurich J M, Ibanez J, Marse P. Validation of a new closed circuit indirect calorimetry method compared with the open Douglas Bag method.  Intensive Care Med. 1989;  15 274-278
• 15 Rietjens G JWM, Kuipers H, Kester A DM, Keizer H A. Validation of a computerized metabolic measurement system (Oxycon-Pro) during low and high intensity exercise.  Int J Sports Med. 2001;  22 291-294
• 16 Åstrand P-O, Rodahl K. Textbook of Work Physiology. Second Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill 1977