Download PDF
Rofo 2003; 175(8): 1032-1041
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40909
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Embolisation bei symptomatischen Uterus-Myomen (UAE): Technik, Indikationsstellung und Ergebnisse

Embolization of Symptomatic Myomas (UAE): Technique, Indication and ResultsT.  J.  Vogl1 , V.  Jacobi1 , R.  Gätje2 , E.  Siebzehnrübl2 , S.  Zangos1
  • 1Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie J.-W.-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
  • 2Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe J.-W.-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 July 2003 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung:

Vorstellung der Indikationsstellung, der Technik und der Ergebnisse der Uterusarterienembolisation (UAE) bei symptomatischen Myomen. Interventionstechnische Voraussetzungen werden dargestellt, wie der Einsatz der DSA, der superselektiven Katheterisierung und der unterschiedlichen Embolisationsmaterialien wie Polyvinylalkohol (PVA) oder Microsphären, sowie Nachkontrollen nach UAE. Die technischen Erfolgsraten der UAE betragen zwischen 98 - 100 %. Die Ansprechraten liegen zwischen 85 - 94 % mit einem deutlichen oder kompletten Verlust der durch die Myome verursachten Symptomatik. Es wird eine Größenreduktion nach UAE von 48 bis zu 70 % der größten Myome erzielt. Bei Symptomen aufgrund der Größe der Myome erreicht man eine Besserung bei 85-96 %. Frauen die aufgrund von Menorrhagien mit der UAE behandelt werden, zeigen ein Ansprechen von 80 - 96 %. Die bisherigen Daten zur UAE belegen eine hohe Effektivität bei einer minimalen Komplikationsrate. Weitere Studien sind ausgerichtet auf die Langzeitergebnisse, den Einfluss auf die Fertilität und mögliche Spätkomplikationen.

Abstract

Presentation of indication, technique and results of transarterial uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of symptomatic myomas. Technical requirements are presented like DSA, catheters, superselective catheterisation and the different embolization materials as polyvinylalcohol (PVA) or microspheres, as well as the follow-up after UAE. The technical success rate of UAE is documented to range between 98 to 100 % and myomatous symptomatology disappears in 85 to 94 % of the cases. A reduction in the size of the myomata after UAE is observed between 48 to 70 %. A resolution of the hemorrhage disappears in 80 to 96 % of the cases immediately. Particulate embolization of the uterine artery is a new minimally invasive therapy in the management of symptomatic leiomyomas with a high efficiency and low rate of major complications. Further studies may prove the longterm results after UAE, the influence on fertility and possible late complications.

Key words

Leiomyoma - therapeutic embolization - uterus blood supply - treatment outcome

Literatur

  • 1 Buttram V C, Reiter R C. Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomatology, and management.  Fertil Steril. 1981;  36 433-445
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Stewart E A. Uterine fibroids.  Lancet. 2001;  357 293-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hausegger K A, Schreyer H, Bodhal H. Beckenarterienembolisation bei gynäkologischen Blutungen.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2002;  174 809-818
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ravina J H, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-Vigneron N, Bouret J M, Houdart E, Aymard A, Merland J J. Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata.  Lancet. 1995;  346 671-672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Günther R W, Siggelkow W, Vorwerk D, Neulen J, Rath W. Behandlung von Uterusmyomen durch perkutane Transkatherterembolisation.  Dtsch Arztebl. 2002;  99 1828-1835
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Watson G M, Walker W J. Uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic fibroids in 114 women: reduction in size of the fibroids and women’s views of the success of the treatment.  Bjog. 2002;  109 129-135
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Spies J B, Roth A R, Jha R C, Gomez-Jorge J, Levy E B, Chang T C, Ascher S A. Leiomyomata treated with uterine artery embolization: factors associated with successful symptom and imaging outcome.  Radiology. 2002;  222 45-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Siskin G P, Tublin M E, Stainken B F, Dowling K, Dolen E G. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: clinical response and evaluation with MR imaging.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;  177 297-302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hamm B. Stellenwert der MRT in der Diagnostik benigner und maligner Tumoren des Uterus.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 1999;  170 327-337
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Nikolic B, Spies J B, Lundsten M J, Abbara S. Patient radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization.  Radiology. 2000;  214 121-125
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Pelage J P, Soyer P, Le D ref, Dahan H, Coumbaras J, Kardache M, Rymer R. Uterine arteries: bilateral catheterization with a single femoral approach and a single 5-F catheter - technical note.  Radiology. 1999;  210 573-575
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Goodwin S C, McLucas B, Lee M, Chen G, Perrella R, Vedantham S, Muir S, Lai A, Sayre J W, DeLeon M. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata midterm results.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;  10 1159-1165
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Spies J B, Scialli A R, Jha R C, Imaoka I, Ascher S M, Fraga V M, Barth K H. Initial results from uterine fibroid embolization for symptomatic leiomyomata.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;  10 1149-1157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nikolic B, Spies J B, Campbell L, Walsh S M, Abbara S, Lundsten M J. Uterine artery embolization: reduced radiation with refined technique.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;  12 39-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kröncke T J, Gauruder-Burmester A, Hamm B. Transarterielle Embolisation von Uterusmyomen - Eine neue Therapieoption bei symptomatischem Uterus myomatosus.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2002;  174 1227-1235
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Pelage J P, Le Dref O, Soyer P, Jacob D, Kardache M, Dahan H, Lassau J P, Rymer R. Arterial anatomy of the female genital tract: variations and relevance to transcatheter embolization of the uterus.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;  172 989-994
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Shlansky-Goldberg R, Cope C. A new twist on the Waltman loop for uterine fibroid embolization.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;  12 997-1000
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pelage J P, Le Dref O, Soyer P, Kardache M, Dahan H, Abitbol M, Merland J J, Ravina J H, Rymer R. Fibroid-related menorrhagia: treatment with superselective embolization of the uterine arteries and midterm follow-up.  Radiology. 2000;  215 428-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bradley E A, Reidy J F, Forman R G, Jarosz J, Braude P R. Transcatheter uterine artery embolisation to treat large uterine fibroids.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;  105 235-240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Klein A, Schwartz M L. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine fibroids: an outpatient procedure.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  184 1556-1560 , discussion 1560 - 1553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Siskin G P, Stainken B F, Dowling K, Meo P, Ahn J, Dolen E G. Outpatient uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids: experience in 49 patients.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;  11 305-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hutchins F L, Worthington-Kirsch R, Berkowitz R P. Selective uterine artery embolization as primary treatment for symptomatic leiomyomata uteri.  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999;  6 279-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Worthington-Kirsch R, Fueredi G, Goodwin S, Machan L, Niedzwiecki G, Reidy J, Spies J, Walker W. Polyvinyl alcohol particle size for uterine artery embolization.  Radiology. 2001;  218 605-606
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Reidy J F, Bradley E A. Uterine artery embolization for fibroid disease.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1998;  21 357-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Katsumori T, Nakajima K, Mihara T, Tokuhiro M. Uterine artery embolization using gelatin sponge particles alone for symptomatic uterine fibroids: midterm results.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;  178 135-139
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Vashisht A, Studd J, Carey A, Burn P. Fatal septicaemia after fibroid embolisation.  Lancet. 1999;  354 307-308
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Spies J B, Benenati J F, Worthington-Kirsch R L, Pelage J P. Initial experience with use of tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;  12 1059-1063
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bendszus M, Klein R, Burger R, Warmuth-Metz M, Hofmann E, Solymosi L. Efficacy of trisacryl gelatin microspheres versus polyvinyl alcohol particles in the preoperative embolization of meningiomas.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;  21 255-261
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Beaujeux R, Laurent A, Wassef M, Casasco A, Gobin Y P, Aymard A, Rufenacht D, Merland J J. Trisacryl gelatin microspheres for therapeutic embolization, II: preliminary clinical evaluation in tumors and arteriovenous malformations.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;  17 541-548
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Laurent A, Beaujeux R, Wassef M, Rufenacht D, Boschetti E, Merland J J. Trisacryl gelatin microspheres for therapeutic embolization, I: development and in vitro evaluation.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;  17 533-540
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Nicholson T A, Pelage J P, Ettles D F. Fibroid calcification after uterine artery embolization: ultrasonographic appearance and pathology.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;  12 443-446
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 McLucas B, Perrella R, Goodwin S, Adler L, Dalrymple J. Role of uterine artery Doppler flow in fibroid embolization.  J Ultrasound Med. 2002;  21 113-120 ,  quiz 122 - 113
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Muniz C J, Fleischer A C, Donnelly E F, Mazer M J. Three-dimensional color Doppler sonography and uterine artery arteriography of fibroids: assessment of changes in vascularity before and after embolization.  J Ultrasound Med. 2002;  21 129-133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Burn P R, McCall J M, Chinn R J, Vashisht A, Smith J R, Healy J C. Uterine fibroleiomyoma: MR imaging appearances before and after embolization of uterine arteries.  Radiology. 2000;  214 729-734
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Li W, Brophy D P, Chen Q, Edelman R R, Prasad P V. Semiquantitative assessment of uterine perfusion using first pass dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for patients treated with uterine fibroid embolization.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;  12 1004-1008
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hagspiel K D, Matsumoto A H, Berr S S. Uterine fibroid embolization: assessment of treatment response using perfusion-weighted extraslice spin tagging (EST) magnetic resonance imaging.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;  13 982-986
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Murase E, Siegelman E S, Outwater E K, Perez-Jaffe L A, Tureck R W. Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment.  Radiographics. 1999;  19 1179-1197
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 deSouza N M, Williams A D. Uterine arterial embolization for leiomyomas: perfusion and volume changes at MR imaging and relation to clinical outcome.  Radiology. 2002;  222 367-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Tranquart F, Brunereau L, Cottier J P, Marret H, Gallas S, Lebrun J L, Body G, Herbreteau D, Pourcelot L. Prospective sonographic assessment of uterine artery embolization for the treatment of fibroids.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;  19 81-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Joyce A, Hessami S, Heller D. Leiomyosarcoma after uterine artery embolization. A case report.  J Reprod Med. 2001;  46 278-280
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Worthington-Kirsch R L, Popky G L, Hutchins F L. Uterine arterial embolization for the management of leiomyomas: quality-of-life assessment and clinical response.  Radiology. 1998;  208 625-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Goodwin S C, Walker W J. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine fibroids.  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  10 315-320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Brunereau L, Herbreteau D, Gallas S, Cottier J P, Lebrun J L, Tranquart F, Fauchier F, Body G, Rouleau P. Uterine artery embolization in the primary treatment of uterine leiomyomas: technical features and prospective follow-up with clinical and sonographic examinations in 58 patients.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;  175 1267-1272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Machan L, Goodwin S, Worthingthon-Kirsch R, Spies R. Fibroid embolization: Periprocedural care.  Seminars in Interventional Radiology. 2000;  17 247-254
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Vott S, Bonilla S M, Goodwin S C, Chen G, Wong G C, Lai A, Yegul T, DeLeon M. CT findings after uterine artery embolization.  J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;  24 846-848
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Abbara S, Spies J B, Scialli A R, Jha R C, Lage J M, Nikolic B. Transcervical expulsion of a fibroid as a result of uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;  10 409-411
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Razavi M K, Wolanske K A, Hwang G L, Sze D Y, Kee S T, Dake M D. Angiographic classification of ovarian artery-to-uterine artery anastomoses: initial observations in uterine fibroid embolization.  Radiology. 2002;  224 707-712
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Forsman L, Lundberg J, Scherten T. Conservative treatment of uterine arteriovenous fistula.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982;  61 85-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Stancato-Pasik A, Mitty H A, Richard H M, Eshkar N. Obstetric embolotherapy: effect on menses and pregnancy.  Radiology. 1997;  204 791-793
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Poppe W, van Assche F A, Wilms G, Favril A, Baert A. Pregnancy after transcatheter embolization of a uterine arteriovenous malformation.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;  156 1179-1180
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Vedantham S, Goodwin S C, McLucas B, Mohr G. Uterine artery embolization: an underused method of controlling pelvic hemorrhage.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;  176 938-948
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Ravina J H, Vigneron N C, Aymard A, Le D ref, Merland J J. Pregnancy after embolization of uterine myoma: report of 12 cases.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  73 1241-1243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 McLucas B, Goodwin S, Adler L, Rappaport A, Reed R, Perrella R. Pregnancy following uterine fibroid embolization.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;  74 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Vashisht A, Smith J R, Thorpe-Beeston G, McCall J. Pregnancy subsequent to uterine artery embolization.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  75 1246-1248
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Spies J, Niedzwiecki G, Goodwin S, Patel N, Andrews R, Worthington-Kirsch R, Lipman J, Machan L, Sacks D, Sterling K, Lewis C. Training standards for physicians performing uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: consensus statement developed by the Task Force on Uterine Artery Embolization and the standards division of the Society of Cardiovascular & Interventional Radiology - August 2000.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;  12 19-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Andersen P E, Lund N, Justesen P, Munk T, Elle B, Floridon C. Uterine artery embolization of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Initial success and short-term results.  Acta Radiol. 2001;  42 234-238
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 McLucas B, Reed R A, Goodwin S, Rappaport A, Adler L, Perrella R, Dalrymple J. Outcomes following unilateral uterine artery embolisation.  Br J Radiol. 2002;  75 122-126
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Spies J B, Ascher S A, Roth A R, Kim J, Levy E B, Gomez-Jorge J. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata.  Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  98 29-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Ravina J H, Aymard A, Ciraru-Vigneron N, Ledreff O, Merland J J. [Arterial embolization of uterine myoma: results apropos of 286 cases].  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2000;  29 272-275
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 LaMorte A I, Lalwani S, Diamond M P. Morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy.  Obstet Gynecol. 1993;  82 897-900
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Iverson R E, Chelmow D, Strohbehn K, Waldman L, Evantash E G. Relative morbidity of abdominal hysterectomy and myomectomy for management of uterine leiomyomas.  Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  88 415-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Carlson K J, Miller B A, Fowler F J. The Maine Women’s Health Study: Outcomes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1994 83: 556-565
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Lumsden M A. Embolization versus myomectomy versus hysterectomy: which is best, when?.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17 253-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Graves E J. National hospital discharge survey. Vital Health Stat 13 1992: 1-62
    Google Scholar

Dr. med. Stephan Zangos

Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
J.-W.-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt

Theodor-Stern-Kai 7

60590 Frankfurt

Email: Zangos@em.uni-frankfurt.de

      >