Viszeralchirurgie 2002; 37(1): 30-35
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-20325
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Schließmuskelersatz als Therapie der Inkontinenz

Anal Sphincter Replacement for fecal incontinenceE.  Berg
  • 1Koloproktologie Prosper-Hospital Recklinghausen
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 February 2002 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Schließmuskelersatzoperationen sind eine neue Therapieoption in der Behandlung der sonst therapierefraktären anorektalen Inkontinenz. Der Ersatz erfolgt durch eine elektrisch stimulierte Skelettmuskeltransposition, vorzugsweise des Musculus gracilis, oder durch einen künstlichen Schließmuskel. Beide Verfahren sind teuer und komplikationsträchtig. Eine Kontinenzverbesserung gelingt in 60 - 70 %.

Abstract

Anal sphincter replacement offers a new treatment option for patients with severe refractory fecal incontinence. The procedures are electrically stimulated skeletal muscle neosphincter, using especially the gracilis muscle and artificial anal sphincter. Both operations are expensive and can produce many complications. The success rate is 60 - 70 %.

Literatur

  • 1 Nelson R, Norton N, Cauteley E, Furner S. Communitybased prevalence of anal incontinence.  JAMA. 1995;  274 559-561
  • 2 Rothbarth J, Bememan W, Meijerink J H, Stiggelbout A M, Zwindermann A H, Buyze-Westerweel M E. et al . What is the impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 67-71
  • 3 Engel A F, Kamm M A, Sultan A H, Bartram C I, Nicholls R J. Anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 1231-1234
  • 4 Vaizey C J, Kamm M A, Nicholls R J. Recent advances in the surgical treatment of faecal incontinence.  Br J Surg. 1998;  85 596-603
  • 5 Pickrell K L, Broadbent T R, Masters F W, Metzger J T. Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal incontinence by transplanting the gracilis muscle: a report of four cases in children.  Ann Surg. 1952;  135 853-863
  • 6 Pickrell K L. Gracilis muscle transplant for the correction of neurogenic rectal incontinence.  Surg Clin North Am. 1959;  39 1405
  • 7 Yoshioka K, Keighley M RB. Clinical and manometric assessment of gracilis muscle transplant for faecal incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;  31 767-769
  • 8 Baeten C, Spaans F, Fluks A. An implanted neuromuscular stimulator for fecal continence following previously implanted gracilis muscle: report of a case.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;  31 134-137
  • 9 Baeten C G, Konsten J, Spaans F, Visser R, Habets A M, Bourgeois I M. et al . Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence.  Lancet. 1991;  338 1163-1165
  • 10 Williams N S, Patel J, George B D, Hallan R I, Watkins E S. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter.  Lancet. 1991;  338 1166-1169
  • 11 Konsten J, Baeten C G, Havenith M G, Soetrers P B. Morphology of dynamic graciloplasty compared with the anal sphincter.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 ;  36 559-563
  • 12 Cavina E, Seccia M, Evangelista G, Chiarugi M, Buccianti P, Chiricio A. et al . Construction of a perineal colostomy by using electrostimulated gracilis muscles after abdominoperineal resection: personal technique and experience with 32 cases.  It J Surg Sci. 1987;  17 305-314
  • 13 Williams N S, Hallan R I, Koeze T H, Watkins E S. Construction of a neorectum and neoanal sphincter following previous proctocolectomy.  Br J Surg. 1989;  76 1191-1194
  • 14 Geerdes B P, Heinemann E, Konsten J, Soeters P B, Baeten C G. Dynamic graciloplasty: complications and management.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 912-917
  • 15 Baeten C G, Bailey H R, Bakka A, Belliveau P, Berg E and the Dynamic Graciloplasty Study G roup. Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective multicenter trial.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 743-751
  • 16 Wexner S. The dynamic graciloplasty study group . Long-term efficacy and quality of life after dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  April A9
  • 17 Christiansen J, Rasmussen O, Lindorff-Larsen K. Dynamic graciloplasty for severe anal incontinence.  Br J Surg. 1998;  85 88-91
  • 18 Mavrarantonis C, Wexner S. Stimulated graciloplasty for treatment of intractable fecal incontinence: critical influence of the method of stimulation.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 497-504
  • 19 Konsten J, Rongen M J, Ogunbiyi O A, Darakhshan A, Baeten C G, Williams N S. Comparison of epineural or intramuscular nerve electrodes for stimulated graciloplasty.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 581-586
  • 20 Malone P S, Wheeler R A, Williams J E. Continence in patients with spina bifida: long term results.  Arch Dis Child. 1994;  70 433-438
  • 21 Cavina E. Outcome of restorative perineal graciloplasty with simultaneous excision of the anus and rectum for cancer. A ten-year experience with 81 patients.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 182-190
  • 22 Rongen M G, Dekker F A, Geerdes B P, Heinemann E, Baeten C G. Secondary pull-through and double dynamic graciloplasty after miles resection - feasible, but with a high morbidity.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 776-781
  • 23 Scott F B, Bradeley W E, Tim G W. Treatment of urinary incontinence by implantable prosthetic sphincter.  Urology. 1973;  1 252-259
  • 24 Leo M E, Barrett D M. Success of the narrow backed cuff design of the AMS800 artificial urinary sphincter: analysis of 144 patients.  J Urol. 1993;  150 1412-1414
  • 25 Christiansen J, Sparso B. Treatment of anal incontinence by an implantable prosthetic anal sphincter.  Ann Surg. 1992;  215 383-386
  • 26 Lehur P A, Roig J V, Duinslaeger M. Artificial anal sphincter: prospective clinical and manometric evaluation.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 1100-11006
  • 27 Wong W D, Jensen L L, Bartolo D C, Rothenberger D A. Artificial anal sphincter.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 1345-1351
  • 28 Lehur P A, Michot F, Denis Ph, Orise Ph, Leborgne J, Tenier P P. et al . Results of artificial sphincter in severe anal incontinence. Report of 14 consecutive implantations.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 1352-1355
  • 29 Vaizey C J, Kamm M A, Gold D M, Bartram C L, Halligan S, Nicholls R J. Clinical, physiological and radiological study of a new purpose-designed artificial bowel sphincter.  Lancet. 1998;  352 105-109
  • 30 O'Brien P E, Skinner S. Restoring control: the Acticon Neosphincter artificial bowel sphincter in the treatment of anal incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 1213-1216
  • 31 Jorge J M, Wexner S D. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;  36 77-97
  • 32 Wong W. The ABS clinical trial group . The artificial bowel sphincter - results of a multicenter clinical trial.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 A9
  • 33 Denkers D, Berg E. Artificial bowel sphincter in the treatment of severe anal incontinence, a four year experience. Vortrag 8th biennial Congress European Council of Coloproctology, Prag 2.5.2001
  • 34 Devesa J M, Vicente E, Enriquez J M, Nuno J, Bucheli P, de Blas G. et al . Total fecal incontinence a new method of gluteus maximus transposition: preliminary results and report of previous experience with similar procedures.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 339-349
  • 35 Matzel K E, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall F P. Electrical stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence.  Lancet. 1995;  346 1124-1127
  • 36 Matzel K E, Madoff R, La Fontaine L, Baeten C G, Buie D. The dynamic Graciloplasty Study Group . Complications of dynamic graciloplasty: incidence, management and impact of outcome.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1427-1435
  • 37 Madoff R, Baeten C G, Christiansen J, Rosen H, Williams N S, Heine J A. et al . Standards for anal sphincter replacement.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 135-141
  • 38 Giordano P, Renzi A, Efron J, Gervaz P, Vernava III A, Weiss E. et al . Previous sphincter repair does not effect the outcome of repeat repair.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 A10
  • 39 Riedel J G, Festge O A. Eine neue Behandlungsmethode bei schwerer Stuhlinkontinenz im Kindesalter.  Chirurg. 1999;  70 935-938
  • 40 Ruckauer. Dynamic graciloplasty in children with fecal incontinence: a preliminary report.  J Pediatr Surg. 2001;  7 1036-1039
  • 41 Korsgen S, Keighley M R. Stimulated gracilis neosphincter - not as good as previously thought. Report of four cases.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 1331-1333
  • 42 Adang E, Engel G L, Rutten F F, Geerdes B P, Baeten C G. Cost-effectiveness of dynamic graciloplasty in patients with fecal incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;  41 725-734
  • 43 Whitehead W E, Wald A, Norton N J. Treatment options for fecal incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 131-144

E. Berg

Koloproktologische Klinik, Prosper-Hospital

Mühlenstraße 27, 45659 Recklinghausen

Phone: 02361/54-2750

Fax: 02361/54-2756

Email: Eugen.Berg@Prosper-Hospital.de