Future Technology: Colography and the Wireless Capsule

ABSTRACT

This review of current available diagnostic modalities for evaluating neoplasms of the colon and rectum presents information on new techniques used in the examination of the colon and rectum, including colography and the wireless capsule. Colography may be performed using computed tomography or magnetic resonance. Both modalities look at two-dimensional and three-dimensional images of the colon and rectum. The ability of colography to detect neoplasms of the bowel is under investigation, and there are no conclusive data regarding the sensitivity or specificity of this technique. Advantages include patient compliance and minimal risk of complications. Disadvantages include the need for a full bowel preparation and inconclusive data regarding accuracy and cost. The wireless capsule is in its infancy. Very few data in human models exist. It is swallowed and painlessly propelled by peristalsis throughout the bowel. It has the ability to look at the small bowel as well as the colon and rectum. Both modalities hold promise, but they will need to be investigated further before any conclusions can be drawn about their diagnostic use.

KEYWORD

Computed tomography colography - magnetic resonance colography - wireless capsule

REFERENCES

• 1 Stevenson G W. Colorectal cancer imaging: a challenge for radiologists.  Radiology . 2000;  214 615-621
• 2 Gordon P H, Nivatvongs S. Principles and Practice of Surgery for the Colon, Rectum, and Anus, 2nd ed. St.  Louis: Quality Medical Publishers 1999: 814-817
• 3 Beck D E. CT Colonography or virtual colonoscopy-what's in a name. Editorial.  Clin Colon Rect Surg . 2001;  14 5
• 4 Vining D J, Gelfand D W, Bechtold R E, Schareling E S, Grishaw E K, Shifrin R Y. Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality (abstract).  AJR . 1994;  162 104
• 5 Johnson C D, Ahlquist D A. Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screening.  Gut . 1999;  44 301-305
• 6 Hara A K, Johnson C D, Reed J E. Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography.  AJR . 1997;  168 1181-1184
• 7 Hara A K, Johnson C D, Reed J E. Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity.  Radiology . 1997;  205 59-65
• 8 Hara A K, Johnson C D, Reed J E. Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two-versus three-dimensional techniques.  Radiology . 1996;  200 49-54
• 9 Royster A P, Fenlon H M, Clarke P D. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.  AJR . 1997;  169 1237-1242
• 10 Fenlon H M, Nunes D P, Clarke P D. Colorectal neoplasm detection using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study.  Gut . 1998;  43 806-811
• 11 Fenlon H M, Nunes D P, Schroy III C P. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.  N Engl J Med . 1999;  341 1496-1503
• 12 Rex D K, Vining D, Kopecky K K. An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy).  Gastrointest Endosc . 1999;  50 309-313
• 13 Pescatore P, Glucker T, Delarive J. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy).  Gut . 2000;  47 126-129
• 14 Fenlon H M, McAneny D B, Nunes D P. Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon.  Radiology . 1999;  210 423-428
• 15 Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli F M. Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions.  Gatroenterology . 2000;  119 300-304
• 16 Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S. Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography.  Radiology . 2000;  216 383-388
• 17 Luboldt W, Luz O, Vonthein R. Three-dimensional double-contrast MR colonography: a display method simulating double-contrast barium enema.  AJR . 2001;  176 930-932
• 18 Schoenenberg A W, Bauerfeind P, Krestin G P. Virtual colonoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging: in vitro evaluation of a new concept.  Gatroenterology . 1997;  112 1863-1870
• 19 Sonnenberg A W, Delco F, Bauerfeind P. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost- effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?.  Am J Gastroenterol . 1999;  94 2268-2274
• 20 Vining D. Virtual endoscopy: is it reality?.  Radiology . 1996;  200 30-31
• 21 Scheck A. DG Dispatch-DDW: capsule-like camera visualizes, records GI images. Doctor's Guide May 25, 2000
• 22 Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A. Wireless capsule endoscopy.  Nature . 2000;  405 417
• 23 Appleyard M, Fireman Z, Glukhovsky A. A randomized trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy for the detection of small-bowel lesions.  Gastroenterology . 2000;  119 1431-1438
• 24 Appleyard M, Glukhousky A, Swain P. Wireless-capsule diagnostic endoscopy for recurrent small-bowel bleeding.  N Engl J Med . 2001;  344 232-233