RISK FACTORS FOR SYMPTOMATIC UTERINE RUPTURE DURING A TRIAL OF LABOR: THE 1990s

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to identify pregnancy and labor factors that place women at increased risk for symptomatic uterine rupture during trial of labor following cesarean section. The study population consisted of 16 women with uterine rupture after a trial of labor who were compared with 32 women without uterine rupture after a trial of labor. Using a case-control study design with a 1:2 match, we examined risk factors that might be associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture. Cases were more likely to have an induction of labor with the use of oxytocin and/or amniotomy (56 vs. 34%) and more likely to undergo augmentation with oxytocin (25 vs. 19%) in comparison with controls. In addition, cases were more likely to be given oxytocin (for either induction or augmentation) (75 vs. 50%) and cervical ripening agents (31 vs. 9%) versus controls. Neonates born after uterine rupture had a higher rate of significant acidosis (pH < 7.0, 57 vs. 0%, p = 0.0002) and lower Apgar scores. There was a significantly higher risk of maternal infection (36 vs. 3%, p = 0.003), transfusion (13 vs. 0%, p = 0.03), and longer length of stay in patients with uterine rupture. There is a trend for increased use of augmentation and induction agents to be associated with uterine rupture. Serious maternal and fetal morbidities are increased following uterine rupture.

KEYWORD

Uterine rupture - uterine contractile agents - trial of labor

REFERENCES

• 1 Martins M E. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.  Clin Perinatol . 1996;  23 141-152
• 2 Miller D A, Diaz F G, Paul R H. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 10-year experience.  Obstet Gynecol . 1994;  84 255-258
• 3 Phelan J P, Clark S L, Diaz F, Paul R H. Vaginal birth after cesarean.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1987;  157 1510-1515
• 4 Leung A S, Leung E K, Paul R H. Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: maternal and fetal consequences.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1993;  169 945-950
• 5 Lavin J P, Stephens R J, Miodovnik M. Vaginal delivery in patients with a prior cesarean section.  Obstet Gynecol . 1982;  59 135-148
• 6 Flamm B L, Goings J R, Liu Y, Wolde-Tsadik G. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study.  Obstet Gynecol . 1994;  83 927-932
• 7 McMahon M, Luther E R, Bowes W A, Olshan A F. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section.  NEJM . 1996;  335 689-695
• 8 Leung A S, Farmer R M, Leung E K, Medearis A L, Paul R H. Risk factors associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery: a case-control study.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1993;  168 1358-1363
• 9 Paul R H, Miller D A. Cesarean birth: how to reduce the rate.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1995;  172 1903-1907
• 10 Fraser W, Maunsell E, Hodnett E, Moutquin J, and the Childbirth Alternatives Post-Cesarean Study Group. Randomized controlled trial of a prenatal vaginal birth after cesarean section education and support program.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1997;  176 419-425
• 11 Flamm B L, Dunnett C, Fischerman E, Quilligan E J. Vaginal delivery following cesarean sections: use of oxytocin augmentation and epidural anesthesia with internal tocodynamic and internal fetal monitoring.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1984;  148 759-763
• 12 Phelan J P, Korst L M, Settles D K. Uterine activity patterns in uterine rupture: a case-control study.  Obstet Gynecol . 1998;  92 394-397
• 13 Rosen M G, Dickinson J C, Westhoff C L. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality.  Obstet Gynecol . 1991;  77 465-470
• 14 Wing D A, Lovett K, Paul R H. Disruption of prior uterine incision following misoprostol for labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery.  Obstet Gynecol . 1998;  91 828-830
• 15 Cunningham F G, MacDonald P C, Gant N F. Williams Obstetrics.  20th ed. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1997