Workhorse Soft Tissue Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction: 40 Years of Chang Gung Experience

Abstract

Microsurgical free flaps have become the cornerstone for soft tissue reconstruction in the head and neck following tumor resection, offering improved functional and aesthetic outcomes with reduced donor site morbidity compared to traditional techniques. This retrospective review of over 14,000 cases from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital spanning 40 years highlights evolving trends in flap selection and their associated microsurgical outcomes. The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap remains the dominant workhorse, with increased usage in recent years due to its versatility and reliability. The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has emerged as the second most commonly used flap, effectively replacing the radial forearm flap (RFF), whose use has largely declined because of donor site concerns and limited tissue bulk. While the medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap offers a pliable alternative, it carries a higher complication rate, underscoring the importance of surgical experience in its application. Our findings emphasize the importance of individualized flap selection based on defect characteristics, donor site considerations, and long-term reconstructive planning to optimize patient outcomes in head and neck microsurgical reconstruction.

Keywords

soft tissue free flap - head and neck reconstruction - microsurgery

Publication History

Article published online:
18 December 2025

• References

• 1 Neligan PC. Head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (02) 260e-269e
• 2 Wong CH, Wei FC. Microsurgical free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 2010; 32 (09) 1236-1245
• 3 Wu JC, Huang JJ, Tsao CK, Abdelrahman M, Kolios G, Cheng MH. Comparison of posteromedial thigh profunda artery perforator flap and anterolateral thigh perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (01) 257-266
• 4 Chana JS, Wei FC. A review of the advantages of the anterolateral thigh flap in head and neck reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57 (07) 603-609
• 5 De Virgilio A, Iocca O, Di Maio P. et al. Head and neck soft tissue reconstruction with anterolateral thigh flaps with various components: Development of an algorithm for flap selection in different clinical scenarios. Microsurgery 2019; 39 (07) 590-597
• 6 Allen Jr RJ, Disa JJ. Discussion: Suprafascial anterolateral thigh flap harvest: A better way to minimize donor-site morbidity in head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (03) 699-700
• 7 Koshima I, Fukuda H, Yamamoto H, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, Ohta S. Free anterolateral thigh flaps for reconstruction of head and neck defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92 (03) 421-428 , discussion 429–430
• 8 Lawson BR, Moreno MA. Head and neck reconstruction with chimeric anterolateral thigh free flap: Indications, outcomes, and technical considerations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 154 (01) 59-65
• 9 Yu P. Characteristics of the anterolateral thigh flap in a Western population and its application in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 2004; 26 (09) 759-769
• 10 Wong CH, Wei FC. Anterolateral thigh flap. Head Neck 2010; 32 (04) 529-540
• 11 Matsui C, Escandón JM, Mohammad A. et al. Clinical applications of the chimeric anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap in head and neck reconstruction. Acta Chir Belg 2023; 123 (05) 473-480
• 12 Hsieh YH, Fang TJ, Huang SF. et al. Synchronous reconstruction of esophageal defect and voice with J-flap after laryngopharyngectomy: Indications and outcomes. Oral Oncol 2020; 110: 104947
• 13 Ma C, Gao W, Zhu D. et al. Profunda artery perforator flaps from the posteromedial region of the thigh for head and neck reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 168 (03) 345-356
• 14 Marchi F, Iandelli A, Pace GM. et al. Surgical outcomes of profunda artery perforator flap in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck 2025; 47 (01) 98-111
• 15 Kehrer A, Hsu MY, Chen YT, Sachanandani NS, Tsao CK. Simplified profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap design using power Doppler ultrasonography (PDU): A prospective study. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (05) 512-523
• 16 Elia J, Hassidim A, Billig A. et al. Objective and quantifiable measuring mechanism for assessing flap pliability: Our experience with 92 patients. Head Neck 2019; 41 (09) 3348-3355
• 17 Fernández-Riera R, Hung SY, Wu JC, Tsao CK. Free profunda femoris artery perforator flap as a first-line choice of reconstruction for partial glossectomy defects. Head Neck 2017; 39 (04) 737-743
• 18 Liu WW, Li H, Guo ZM. et al. Reconstruction of soft-tissue defects of the head and neck: Radial forearm flap or anterolateral thigh flap?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268 (12) 1809-1812
• 19 Li W, Xu Z, Liu F, Huang S, Dai W, Sun C. Vascularized free forearm flap versus free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps for reconstruction in patients with head and neck cancer: Assessment of quality of life. Head Neck 2013; 35 (12) 1808-1813
• 20 Hoppe IC, Patel PP, Datiashvili RO. The radial forearm fasciocutaneous free flap for head and neck reconstruction: An examination of the effects of radiation therapy on outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (02) 379e-380e
• 21 Bertino G, Lepenne Y, Tinelli C. et al. Radial vs ulnar forearm flap: A preliminary study of donor site morbidity. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2019; 39 (05) 322-328
• 22 Hekner DD, Roeling TA, Van Cann EM. Perforator anatomy of the radial forearm free flap versus the ulnar forearm free flap for head and neck reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016; 45 (08) 955-959
• 23 Tornero J, Cruz-Toro P, Farré A. et al. Free radial forearm flap in head and neck: Our experience. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2014; 65 (01) 27-32
• 24 Kantar RS, Rifkin WJ, Cammarata MJ, Diaz-Siso JR, Farber SJ, Rodriguez ED. Free ulnar forearm flap: Design, elevation, and utility in microvascular nasal lining reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (06) 1594-1599
• 25 Kao HK, Chang KP, Chen YA, Wei FC, Cheng MH. Anatomical basis and versatile application of the free medial sural artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (04) 1135-1145
• 26 Kao HK, Chang KP, Wei FC, Cheng MH. Comparison of the medial sural artery perforator flap with the radial forearm flap for head and neck reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (04) 1125-1132
• 27 Zelken JA, Kang CJ, Huang SF, Liao CT, Tsao CK. Refinements in flap design and inset for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with free thigh flaps. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (02) 112-118
• 28 Tsao CK, Megias Barrera J, Loh CY. From flat into concave shape in soft tissue free flaps in oral cavity reconstruction: The origami technique. Oral Oncol 2016; 55: e11-e12