Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1812306
[18F]FDG PET/CT Mapping of Metastatic Spread in Left Testicular Carcinoma: A Rare Visualization of Lymphatic Pathway
Authors
Abstract
We report a rare case of metabolic visualization of the entire left testicular lymphatic drainage pathway by [18F]FDG-PET/CT (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography) in a 22-year-old male with biopsy-proven non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) of the left testis, presenting with extensive metastases to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes (RPLNs), liver, lungs, and skeleton. Primary staging with [18F]FDG-PET/CT demonstrated intense radiotracer uptake in both the primary tumor and multiple metastatic sites. Notably, a rare linear pattern of [18F]FDG avidity was observed along the left testicular lymphatic drainage pathway, following the course of the left testicular vein. While the anatomical pathway of lymphatic dissemination in testicular malignancies is well-characterized and [18F]FDG avidity in RPLNs has been previously reported, direct metabolic visualization of the entire lymphatic drainage pathway on [18F]FDG-PET/CT has not been documented. This case further underscores the utility of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in the initial staging of advanced NSGCT, particularly in detecting skeletal metastases that may be subtle or occult on conventional imaging, bearing important clinical and prognostic implications.
Introduction
Testicular malignancy is a rare tumor, accounting for 0.51% of all tumors affecting males in the United States in 2022.[1] However, it is the most common nonhematological malignancy among young males aged 15 to 40 years.[2] It has a propensity for lymphatic as well as hematological dissemination, with retroperitoneal lymph nodes (RPLNs) being the first echelon nodes, followed by distant metastasis to other lymph nodal stations, lungs, liver, brain, and bones.[3] The staging of testicular malignancy, as outlined in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines, is comprehensive and incorporates clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings along with levels of circulating serum tumor markers.[4] Currently, the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines recommends the use of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) only for restaging patients with seminomatous germ cell tumors (GCTs). However, its use is not advised for restaging of non-seminomatous GCTs [NSGCTs] or for primary staging of either tumor subtype owing to its similar detection rate as conventional imaging.[5] Considering the excellent prognosis of this entity, accurate staging is crucial for optimal management. Lymphatic dissemination occurs early in the disease and its accurate detection alters staging and hence management. Currently, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CeCT) of abdomen and thorax is indicated for primary staging. The lymphatic dissemination for left- and right-sided testicular masses is anatomically distinct.[6] Although it has been extensively described in the literature,[7] [8] with multiple case reports and studies describing [18F]FDG uptake in RPLN, the actual visualization of this entire lymphatic drainage pathway by metabolic imaging has not been documented.
Case Report
A 22-year-old male presented with fever, significant weight loss, severe back pain, and a left-sided painless testicular swelling for 2 months. He also suffered from multiple episodes of vomiting, reduced urine output, dry cough, and fatigue. His blood workup showed leukocytosis (13,000/mm3), anemia (9 g/dL), and raised serum creatinine (4.8 mg/dL). Scrotal ultrasonography revealed an enlarged, heterogeneous left testis, along with thickening of the left epididymis and spermatic cord, with moderate hydrocele. Abdominal and thoracic CeCT demonstrated multiple enlarged, conglomerated RPLNs resulting in bilateral ureteric compression and hydronephrosis, a well-defined hypodense lesion in liver segment VII, and multiple soft tissue nodular opacities distributed throughout bilateral lung fields. CT-guided biopsy from para-aortic lymph nodes showed pleomorphic cells with a high nuclear–cytoplasmic ratio and necrosis. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers were positive for AE1/AE3, CD30, SALL4, and Oct 3/4, and negative for D2-40, confirming a NSGCT, likely embryonal carcinoma ([Fig. 1]). His concurrent serum tumor markers were as follows: serum alpha-fetoprotein of 3,253 ng/mL (normal ≤ 7 ng/mL) and serum beta-HCG of 3,381 mIU/mL (normal ≤ 2.6 mIU/mL).


A staging whole-body [18F]FDG-PET/CT showed lower radiotracer uptake in the brain (SUVmax: 11.03) consequent to increased radiotracer concentration in the extensive metastatic lesions ([Fig. 2]). High-grade [18F]FDG concentration was seen in the heterogeneous left testicular mass (SUVmax: 30.41) with thickened epididymis and spermatic cord. A linear pattern of [18F]FDG uptake was observed from the left testicular mass extending along the epididymis and spermatic cord (SUVmax: 12.76) up to the internal inguinal ring and then continuing along the course of the left testicular vein within the retroperitoneum, ultimately draining into the enlarged para-aortic lymph nodes (SUVmax: 21.29; [Fig. 2]). Intense radiotracer concentration was also noted in liver (SUVmax: 34.12) and lung (SUVmax: 25.87) lesions. Additionally, focal [18F]FDG uptake in an area of subtle sclerosis in the left iliac wing was also noted (SUVmax: 16.5). Considering the advanced stage and poor prognosis, the patient was planned for systemic therapy with Bleomycin–Etoposide–Cisplatin chemotherapy.


Discussion
NSGCTs, with the exception of choriocarcinoma, show lymphatic dissemination. Typically, testicular lymphatics course along the respective testicular veins. While the left testicular vein drains into the left renal vein, the right testicular vein drains directly into the inferior vena cava. Hence, the primary lymph nodal station involved in left testicular malignancy is the para-aortic group at the level of the left renal vein, whereas on the right side it is the inter-aortocaval nodes inferior to the right renal vessels.[3] [9] However, bulky disease can cross over and involve contralateral retroperitoneal nodes. Although this lymphatic pathway has been previously described in the literature with studies showing good [18F]FDG uptake in discrete and conglomerated RPLN,[7] [8] this case visually highlights the entire lymphatic pathway through metabolic imaging and reinforces our understanding.
[18F]FDG-PET/CT for initial staging in NSGCT has not been incorporated in the EAU 2024 guidelines owing to multiple studies showing similar diagnostic capabilities as compared to conventional imaging like CeCT or MRI.[10] [11] However, considering its ability to assess residual viable tumor cells in RPLN masses seen in patients post-chemotherapy, few studies have suggested its role in this particular clinical scenario, especially when CeCT is equivocal and serum tumor markers are stable.[12] This patient was staged as IIIb according to the 2016 TNM classification with poor prognosis in accordance with the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification.[5] Though [18F]FDG-PET/CT is not indicated for initial staging of NSGCT, it revealed metabolically active metastatic disease in the RPLN, lung, liver, and a single skeletal lesion. The abdominopelvic CeCT showed subtle sclerosis, which was noted retrospectively after performing [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Skeletal metastasis in NSGCT is rare—around 3% at initial diagnosis and 9% in recurrent cases,[13] mostly involving vertebrae (71%) and pelvis (24%).[14] Presence of osseous metastasis can worsen the prognosis in the IGCCCG poor prognosis category patients. Update from a study by Gillessen et al in 2021 demonstrated an improvement in outcomes for patients in the poor prognosis category, with progression-free survival (PFS) increasing from 41 to 54% and overall survival (OS) improving from 48 to 67%, when compared to the original IGCCCG 1997 prognostic score.[15] However, if the same category was associated with osseous metastasis, there was a significant reduction of PFS and OS to 34% and 45%, respectively.[14] Hence, [18F]FDG-PET/CT in this case, by means of detecting an osseous lesion with very subtle sclerosis not visualized clearly on CeCT, played a significant role in staging and prognostication.
Conclusion
The present case illustrates a rare metabolic visualization of the lymphatic dissemination pathway in left-sided testicular embryonal carcinoma and shows the role of [18F]FDG PET/CT-PET/CT imaging in the primary staging of advanced NSGCT. The case presents a clinically relevant and visually good example of metastatic testicular cancer evaluated via [18F]FDG PET/CT and highlights a rare imaging phenomenon: metabolic visualization of the testicular lymphatic drainage pathway.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
Authors' Contributions
A.S. and S.S.: Case data accumulation, case report drafting and revision. S.M.: Providing histopathology details including IHC findings. S.B.: Case discussion, concept guidance, and draft finalization.
-
References
- 1 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72 (01) 7-33
- 2 Oldenburg J, Berney DM, Bokemeyer C. et al; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org, EURACAN. Testicular seminoma and non-seminoma: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2022; 33 (04) 362-375
- 3 Coursey Moreno C, Small WC, Camacho JC. et al. Testicular tumors: what radiologists need to know–differential diagnosis, staging, and management. Radiographics 2015; 35 (02) 400-415
- 4 Canete Portillo S, Rais-Bahrami S, Magi-Galluzzi C. Updates in 2022 on the staging of testicular germ cell tumors. Hum Pathol 2022; 128: 152-160
- 5 EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Madrid 2025. ISBN 978-94-92671-29-5
- 6 Paño B, Sebastià C, Buñesch L. et al. Pathways of lymphatic spread in male urogenital pelvic malignancies. Radiographics 2011; 31 (01) 135-160
- 7 Sharma A. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography for diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62 (09) 861
- 8 Hung TJ, McLean L, Mitchell C. et al. The role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in evaluating retroperitoneal masses -keeping your eye on the ball!. Cancer Imaging 2019; 19 (01) 28
- 9 Kreydin EI, Barrisford GW, Feldman AS, Preston MA. Testicular cancer: what the radiologist needs to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200 (06) 1215-1225
- 10 Huddart RA, O'Doherty MJ, Padhani A. et al; NCRI Testis Tumour Clinical Study Group. 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the prediction of relapse in patients with high-risk, clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: preliminary report of MRC Trial TE22–the NCRI Testis Tumour Clinical Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 (21) 3090-3095
- 11 de Wit M, Brenner W, Hartmann M. et al. [18F]-FDG-PET in clinical stage I/II non-seminomatous germ cell tumours: results of the German multicentre trial. Ann Oncol 2008; 19 (09) 1619-1623
- 12 Ayati N, Askari E, Fotouhi M. et al. Nuclear medicine imaging in non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: lessons learned from the past failures. Cancer Imaging 2024; 24 (01) 156
- 13 Gille R, Allignet B, Izarn F, Peyrat P, Boyle H, Fléchon A. Bone metastases in non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: a 20-year retrospective analysis. J Clin Med 2024; 13 (11) 3280
- 14 Oing C, Oechsle K, Necchi A. et al. Impact of primary metastatic bone disease in germ cell tumors: results of an International Global Germ Cell Tumor Collaborative Group G3 Registry Study. Ann Oncol 2017; 28 (03) 576-582
- 15 Gillessen S, Sauvé N, Collette L. et al; International Germ Cell Cancer Classification Update Consortium. Predicting outcomes in men with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT): results from the IGCCCG Update Consortium. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39 (14) 1563-1574
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
14 October 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72 (01) 7-33
- 2 Oldenburg J, Berney DM, Bokemeyer C. et al; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org, EURACAN. Testicular seminoma and non-seminoma: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2022; 33 (04) 362-375
- 3 Coursey Moreno C, Small WC, Camacho JC. et al. Testicular tumors: what radiologists need to know–differential diagnosis, staging, and management. Radiographics 2015; 35 (02) 400-415
- 4 Canete Portillo S, Rais-Bahrami S, Magi-Galluzzi C. Updates in 2022 on the staging of testicular germ cell tumors. Hum Pathol 2022; 128: 152-160
- 5 EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Madrid 2025. ISBN 978-94-92671-29-5
- 6 Paño B, Sebastià C, Buñesch L. et al. Pathways of lymphatic spread in male urogenital pelvic malignancies. Radiographics 2011; 31 (01) 135-160
- 7 Sharma A. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography for diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62 (09) 861
- 8 Hung TJ, McLean L, Mitchell C. et al. The role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in evaluating retroperitoneal masses -keeping your eye on the ball!. Cancer Imaging 2019; 19 (01) 28
- 9 Kreydin EI, Barrisford GW, Feldman AS, Preston MA. Testicular cancer: what the radiologist needs to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200 (06) 1215-1225
- 10 Huddart RA, O'Doherty MJ, Padhani A. et al; NCRI Testis Tumour Clinical Study Group. 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the prediction of relapse in patients with high-risk, clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: preliminary report of MRC Trial TE22–the NCRI Testis Tumour Clinical Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 (21) 3090-3095
- 11 de Wit M, Brenner W, Hartmann M. et al. [18F]-FDG-PET in clinical stage I/II non-seminomatous germ cell tumours: results of the German multicentre trial. Ann Oncol 2008; 19 (09) 1619-1623
- 12 Ayati N, Askari E, Fotouhi M. et al. Nuclear medicine imaging in non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: lessons learned from the past failures. Cancer Imaging 2024; 24 (01) 156
- 13 Gille R, Allignet B, Izarn F, Peyrat P, Boyle H, Fléchon A. Bone metastases in non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: a 20-year retrospective analysis. J Clin Med 2024; 13 (11) 3280
- 14 Oing C, Oechsle K, Necchi A. et al. Impact of primary metastatic bone disease in germ cell tumors: results of an International Global Germ Cell Tumor Collaborative Group G3 Registry Study. Ann Oncol 2017; 28 (03) 576-582
- 15 Gillessen S, Sauvé N, Collette L. et al; International Germ Cell Cancer Classification Update Consortium. Predicting outcomes in men with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT): results from the IGCCCG Update Consortium. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39 (14) 1563-1574





