Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809382
Imaging after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: How Can the Radiologist Help the Surgeon
Authors
Funding None.
Abstract
Pancreaticoduodenectomy is the one of the most complex surgeries done for periampullary pathologies. Computed tomography is the imaging modality of choice in the postoperative period. The radiologist should have the knowledge regarding normal findings and complications that can be encountered postsurgery. This will help in quick decision making and timely management of these complex cases.
Introduction
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard surgical management for malignancies of the head of pancreas, distal common bile duct (CBD), periampullary region, and duodenum which are deemed to be resectable and is also performed in management of selected benign pathologies. As a highly complex surgery, PD, known commonly as Whipple procedure, is associated with very high morbidity.
PD can be performed in two different surgical techniques: classic or conventional Whipple procedure, which involves the resection of pylorus, and pylorus-preserving PD. These surgical techniques are followed by creation of three anastomoses: pancreatojejunostomy (PJ), gastrojejunostomy (GJ)/duodenojejunostomy, and hepaticojejunostomy (HJ; [Fig. 1]).


With rapid advancement in the surgical techniques and postoperative patient care, the mortality rates have reportedly decreased to <10% from >25% a few decades ago.[1] As operative mortality of this procedure has decreased, postoperative complications both early and late have become more important to identify and therefore require early management. Complications related to PD can postpone the adjuvant treatment of cancer patients and have high health care burden on patients as well as on centers.
Complications post-PD include postoperative abdominal abscesses, hemorrhage, biliary tract injuries or stricture, pancreatic fistulae, hepatic infarction, anastomosis leakage, delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and chyle leak. Computed tomography (CT) represents the standard imaging modality in the evaluation of complications after Whipple procedure due to its availability and lesser acquisition time and its ability to acquire high spatial resolution images of abdominal cavity. Magnetic resonance imaging has a limited role in early postoperative period due to difficulty in respiratory motion management as patients may not cooperate due to pulmonary issues. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is superior to CT for confirmation of leaks, cholangitis, and strictures.[2]
Imaging findings and complications may differ depending upon the surgical technique used. Hence distinguishing normal postoperative changes from complications and tumor recurrence becomes a challenge.
Expected Postoperative Findings
Postoperative changes can be divided into early and late postoperative findings. Early expected findings reflect the initial postoperative inflammation in the surgical bed which can be seen on imaging within the first 3- to 6-month period after surgery ([Fig. 2]). During the later period (after 3–6 months), inflammatory changes usually subside or may even persist with emergence of new findings. The expected postoperative findings are listed in [Table 1].[3] [4]
Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; SMV, superior mesenteric vein.


Postoperative Complications after Post-pancreaticoduodenectomy
[Table 2] highlights the clinical presentation, complications, and imaging findings post-PD.[5] [6] [7]
Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; GJ, gastrojejunostomy; HJ, hepaticojejunostomy; PJ, pancreaticojejunostomy; USG, ultrasound.
Pancreaticobiliary Complications
Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreatic leak is the most common cause of pathologic fluid collection after surgery.[8] It is also referred to as postoperative pancreatic fistula and occurs when pancreatic secretions leak into the abdominal cavity, either due to leakage from the pancreatic anastomotic site or from the raw pancreatic surface ([Fig. 3]).


Postpancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis
Postsurgical changes and elevated amylase and lipase levels in the postoperative period make it difficult to detect early postoperative acute pancreatitis especially in milder cases. Severe and delayed cases are much easier to diagnose with CT imaging showing inflammatory changes and/or collections in the peripancreatic region.[9]
Pancreaticojejunostomy Stricture
Recurrent episodes of acute pancreatitis, features of pancreatic exocrine, and endocrine insufficiency with imaging findings of pancreatic ductal dilatation and abrupt narrowing at the PJ site should suggest the diagnosis of stricture ([Fig. 4]).[9]


Hepaticojejunostomy Leak
Bile leak can occur after PD due to anastomotic leakage or iatrogenic biliary injury and can lead to abscess formation and peritonitis. Risk factors for HJ leak include preoperative hypoalbuminemia, small caliber of the bile duct, and anastomosis of the jejunal loop to CBD rather than the common hepatic duct. HJ leak typically presents with bilious drainage with bilirubin concentration from the surgical drain over three times the level of serum bilirubin, from the third postoperative day ([Fig. 5]).[10]


Hepaticojejunostomy Stricture
Clinically, patients present with increased serum bilirubin and later on the patient can develop cholangitis and abscess formation. CT imaging shows abrupt narrowing at the HJ site with upstream dilatation of intrahepatic ducts, enhancement of wall of bile ducts, and liver abscesses ([Fig. 6]).[3]


Nonvascular Complications
Delayed Gastric Emptying
Requirement of nasogastric tube even after 1 week post-surgery is indirect evidence of DGE ([Fig. 7]).[11]


Gastrojejunostomy Leak
Although relatively rare, anastomotic leak at the gastrojejunostomy site needs early identification as it can cause localized abscess and peritonitis. On CT, collection with gas foci can be seen adjacent to the anastomotic site.
Gastrojejunostomy Stricture and Marginal Ulcer
Ischemia and necrosis can cause scarring leading to stricture formation in the late postoperative period. Gastric contents can cause ulcer formation distal to the GJ site with diagnosis usually dependent on endoscopic findings, while sometimes CT imaging can show edematous gastrojejunostomy site and fat stranding.
Afferent Limb Syndrome
Duodenojejunal loop proximal to the gastrojejunal anastomosis is the site of bilio-pancreatic secretions and this bowel section is called an afferent limb. Afferent limb syndrome is a type of closed loop bowel obstruction due to variable causes including tumor recurrence, postoperative edema, adhesions, and stricture development ([Fig. 8]).[3]


Abscess/Collection
Abscess formation after Whipple procedure occurs when postoperative collections get infected and this can be seen as low-attenuation collection with rim enhancement on CT imaging.[12]
Tumor Recurrence
Recurrence usually occurs as metastatic disease and less commonly as isolated disease recurrence at the surgical bed. On CT imaging, local recurrence manifests as infiltrative soft-tissue thickening in the surgical bed or surrounding the mesenteric or the celiac axis/hepatic vasculature or sometimes as regional lymph nodal enlargement ([Fig. 8]).[3] Comparison with previous imaging and tumor markers is the most important tool to differentiate tumor recurrence from perivascular cuffing. Previous histopathology report of positive surgical margin is also an important predictor of tumor recurrence. Postoperative 18F-FDG uptake in the surgical bed beyond 3 months post-surgery is usually indicative of residual tumor or recurrence.[13] Positron emission tomography/CT has moderate advantage over contrast-enhanced CT by demonstrating 18F-FDG uptake in equivocal or nonenlarged nodes.[14]
Vascular Complications
Post-pancreatectomy Hemorrhage
Early-onset hemorrhage is usually due to surgical factors including inadequate hemostasis, slipped ligature, or fresh bleeding at a surgical site. Late-onset hemorrhage occurs days or weeks after the surgery. Major causes for late-onset hemorrhage includes anastomotic leakages, abscess (causing vascular erosions), pseudoaneurysms, and anastomotic ulcers ([Fig. 9]).[8]


Vascular Thrombosis, Stenosis, and Pseudoaneurysms
The portal vein and the superior mesenteric vein are the most common sites of venous thrombosis after pancreatic surgery. Reconstruction by using prosthetic grafts and a longer duration of surgery are two known risk factors. Thrombosis requires an aggressive course of management as it can lead to ischemia of the affected organs ([Figs. 10] and [11]).




Organ Ischemia and Infarction
Dual blood supply of liver makes this a very infrequent complication. Factors that predispose to hepatic infarction include hypotension, long duration of clamping of the vessels, known arterial disease or atherosclerotic burden, thrombosis, and intraoperative injuries to vessel.[3] [12] As the biliary tree is supplied only by the arterial system, an arterial compromise can lead to ischemic cholangitis, biliary strictures, or bilomas ([Fig. 12]).


Conclusion
Understanding the spectrum of normal expected findings and complications post-PD is important for radiologists since imaging has become vital for postoperative evaluation. Better patient care and management is dependent upon early recognition of the complications and differentiating them from normal expected findings that are inherent to the complex anatomy of pancreas and complexity of the surgery itself.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Dr. Selvakumar, Dr. Peeyush, and Dr. Lokesh for their support.
Author's Contributions
B.S., S.C., T.S. were involved in conceptualizing the topic, case collection and manuscript preparation. T.Y. was involved in manuscript editing and case collection. V.K.V., S.C.S., J.R.V. were involved in data acquisition, clinical case collection and manuscript review. A.A. was involved in manuscript editing. B.S. is the guarantor of the manuscript.
-
References
- 1 Emekli E, Gündoğdu E. Computed tomography evaluation of early post-operative complications of the Whipple procedure. Pol J Radiol 2020; 85: e104-e109
- 2 Maino C, Cereda M, Franco PN. et al. Cross-sectional imaging after pancreatic surgery: the dialogue between the radiologist and the surgeon. Eur J Radiol Open 2024; 12: 100544
- 3 Gaballah AH, Kazi IA, Zaheer A. et al. Imaging after pancreatic surgery: expected findings and postoperative complications. Radiographics 2024; 44 (01) e230061
- 4 McEvoy SH, Lavelle LP, Hoare SM. et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: expected post-operative anatomy and complications. Br J Radiol 2014; 87 (1041): 20140050
- 5 Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C. et al; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 2017; 161 (03) 584-591
- 6 Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C. et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007; 142 (01) 20-25
- 7 Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R. et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 2011; 149 (05) 680-688
- 8 Malleo G, Vollmer Jr CM. Postpancreatectomy complications and management. Surg Clin North Am 2016; 96 (06) 1313-1336
- 9 Raman SP, Horton KM, Cameron JL, Fishman EK. CT after pancreaticoduodenectomy: spectrum of normal findings and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201 (01) 2-13
- 10 Qiu H, Zhang J, Qian HG, Leng JH, Wu JH. Hepaticojejunostomy leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Int Surg J 2016; 3: 1234-1238
- 11 Simon R. Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Clin North Am 2021; 101 (05) 865-874
- 12 Florentin LM, Dulcich G, López Grove R, Paladini JI, Spina JC. Imaging assessment after pancreaticoduodenectomy: reconstruction techniques-normal findings and complications. Insights Imaging 2022; 13 (01) 170
- 13 Jha P, Bijan B. PET/CT for pancreatic malignancy: potential and pitfalls. J Nucl Med Technol 2015; 43 (02) 92-97
- 14 Sahani DV, Bonaffini PA, Catalano OA, Guimaraes AR, Blake MA. State-of-the-art PET/CT of the pancreas: current role and emerging indications. Radiographics 2012; 32 (04) 1133-1158 , discussion 1158–1160
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
27 May 2025
© 2025. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Emekli E, Gündoğdu E. Computed tomography evaluation of early post-operative complications of the Whipple procedure. Pol J Radiol 2020; 85: e104-e109
- 2 Maino C, Cereda M, Franco PN. et al. Cross-sectional imaging after pancreatic surgery: the dialogue between the radiologist and the surgeon. Eur J Radiol Open 2024; 12: 100544
- 3 Gaballah AH, Kazi IA, Zaheer A. et al. Imaging after pancreatic surgery: expected findings and postoperative complications. Radiographics 2024; 44 (01) e230061
- 4 McEvoy SH, Lavelle LP, Hoare SM. et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: expected post-operative anatomy and complications. Br J Radiol 2014; 87 (1041): 20140050
- 5 Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C. et al; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 2017; 161 (03) 584-591
- 6 Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C. et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007; 142 (01) 20-25
- 7 Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R. et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 2011; 149 (05) 680-688
- 8 Malleo G, Vollmer Jr CM. Postpancreatectomy complications and management. Surg Clin North Am 2016; 96 (06) 1313-1336
- 9 Raman SP, Horton KM, Cameron JL, Fishman EK. CT after pancreaticoduodenectomy: spectrum of normal findings and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201 (01) 2-13
- 10 Qiu H, Zhang J, Qian HG, Leng JH, Wu JH. Hepaticojejunostomy leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Int Surg J 2016; 3: 1234-1238
- 11 Simon R. Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Clin North Am 2021; 101 (05) 865-874
- 12 Florentin LM, Dulcich G, López Grove R, Paladini JI, Spina JC. Imaging assessment after pancreaticoduodenectomy: reconstruction techniques-normal findings and complications. Insights Imaging 2022; 13 (01) 170
- 13 Jha P, Bijan B. PET/CT for pancreatic malignancy: potential and pitfalls. J Nucl Med Technol 2015; 43 (02) 92-97
- 14 Sahani DV, Bonaffini PA, Catalano OA, Guimaraes AR, Blake MA. State-of-the-art PET/CT of the pancreas: current role and emerging indications. Radiographics 2012; 32 (04) 1133-1158 , discussion 1158–1160

























