CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2023; 08(02): e97-e113
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777098
Original Article

“P6LAND”: An Educational Tool for Free Flaps

Natalia Ziolkowski
1   Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Siba Haykal
1   Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2   Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada
3   Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
 

Abstract

Background Microsurgical education requires both technical skill and didactic knowledge. Learners are frequently asked to describe free flaps and their knowledge tested in clinical work and during exams.

Methods We have created an educational tool that will aid learners in remembering important information related to flaps.

Results “P6LAND” which divides and organizes information into three parts: Preoperative considerations, Pedicle, Position, LANDmarks, Plane of dissection, Protection and Postoperative considerations.

Conclusion The aim of this paper is to further describe this educational tool and to provide a compendium for the most common fasciocutaneous, muscle, perforator, and bone flaps based on the literature. This tool was also prevalidated among a group of learners.


#

Microsurgical education predominantly focuses on skill acquisition with numerous courses,[1] simulators, and nonbiological and biological models[2] [3] [4] [5] described. There is little emphasis on the microsurgical literature regarding study techniques to better understand how to raise and inset flaps safely. There are several Web sites that help provide useful summaries,[6] seminal papers,[7] and excellent textbooks.[8] [9] Many of these references can be overwhelming and do not provide a succinct and structured way to organize this large volume of information. In addition, there is a lack of structure to learn this information, specifically, a lack of flap study mnemonics. Study mnemonics are a useful way to organize large amounts of data. “P6LAND” divides information into three parts: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations. This organization helps highlight the important aspects of raising flaps in a succinct way. The aim of this paper is to highlight the specifics of the mnemonic and provide an appendix for the most common fasciocutaneous, muscle, perforator, and bone flaps. The mnemonic has been referred to as P6LAND: Preoperative, Position, Pedicle, LANDmarks, Plane, Protection, Postoperative.

The order of the mnemonic refers to the steps of the procedure. For example, preoperative workup must come first and includes any physical examination maneuvers or special investigations that needs to be completed before a surgical intervention may commence. The next five focus on important steps intraoperatively including the position of the patient, the main pedicle (and corresponding venous supply and nerve supply), landmarks of the flap (markings, and proximal and distal landmarks), the dissection plane, and anatomic structures to protect when operating. Finally, the postoperative phase refers to important tests, monitoring, or investigations to monitor the viability of the flap. Below, will be a more thorough discussion of each factor.

Preoperative Considerations

The preoperative workup includes any physical examination tools or special investigations that need to be completed before a surgical intervention may commence. Special tests (such as an Allen's test), use of Dopplers to mark out any perforators, and imaging (i.e., computed tomography) are some examples of preoperative considerations.


#

Intraoperative Considerations

Position

Position information describes the position of the patient intraoperatively. Most flaps can be procured with the patient in supine position. Variants include lateral decubitus (such as for scapular/parascapular, latissimus dorsi [LD] flaps), prone, or modifications of supine (e.g., “frog-legged” for the gracilis flap).


#

Pedicle

Pedicle information relates to the artery, veins, and possible innervation of the flap. Pedicle information, first and foremost, describes the main arterial blood inflow and the main venous outflow.


#

Landmarks

“Land” stands for landmarks of the flap, which include general markings, proximal, distal, and possible medial and lateral landmarks. This provides information related to the general anatomic boundaries of the flaps. For example, the proximal landmark of an anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) is the anterior superior iliac spine while the distal landmark is the lateral border of the patella.


#

Plane

The plane describes the dissection plane such as suprafascial, subfascial, intramuscular, submuscular and can refer to compartments.


#

Protection

Protection refers to structures that must be protected which may be encountered during the dissection. These structures include the pedicle itself as well as other neurovascular structures or areas that may result in complications. For example, in the LD flap procurement, the thoracolumbar fascia must be carefully preserved to prevent painful postoperative lumbar hernias.


#
#

Postoperative Considerations

Finally postoperative describes the care including flap checks (timing, assessment), need for a stepdown bed, and any other monitoring (i.e., donor site). It also refers to the position of the patient to prevent pressure at the pedicle or donor. For example, for the supraclavicular flap, the recommendation is to decrease pedicle strain by ensuring the neck is in a semiflexed position. Alternatively, after a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) harvest, the patient sits in a flexed position to prevent undue tension or pressure on the abdominal donor and incision.

Please see [Table 1]: P6LAND mnemonic details for a concise summary. Also, see Appendix A: Flap mnemonic examples, for use of this mnemonic in common free flaps.

Table 1

P6LAND mnemonic details

Considerations

Preoperative

Special tests (Allen's test, Doppler), imaging (i.e., computed tomography angiogram)

Intraoperative

Position

Patient position

Pedicle

Involving arteries/veins (and number) ± nerves

Landmarks

Markings

Proximal

Distal

Other

Plane

Dissection plane

Protection

Of neurovascular and anatomic structures during dissection

Postoperative

Flap checks, stepdown, monitoring devices, drains, positioning of patient


#

Prevalidation of P6LAND

We have attempted validation of this mnemonic with trainees. Residents from levels 2 to 5 and fellows were included in the validation process. We randomized 40 learners into “control” and “experimental” groups with training levels considered during randomization. Both groups were asked to provide information on five most common free flaps: (1) DIEP, (2) LD, (3) ALT, (4) fibula, (5) radial free forearm flap. The “experimental” group was shown the P6LAND mnemonic. Trainees were asked to then provide information that they would typically give to examiners when asked about each flap. They were timed during the process. The trainees in the control group scored 33.8 ± 10.2% when describing key information regarding the flaps including but not limited to pedicle, preoperative assessment, and protection of key structures, whereas the trainees in the experimental group scored 72.9 ± 10.2%. The control group took approximately 10 minutes to discuss five free flaps, whereas the experimental group took approximately 14 minutes.


#

Conclusion

In conclusion, this mnemonic, P6LAND, represents a good educational tool for trainees and residents to help in remembering keys points when discussing flaps. The aim of this work was to create a mnemonic that makes logical sense and follows the natural sequence of flap procurement. This would prove to be helpful not only when learning these flaps but also when discussed in formal exams. It provides an organized way that ultimately will allow them to remember the key points when assessing patients and performing these procedures both efficiently and safely. We believe that this manuscript is additive to the plastic surgery education literature. Much of our tools rely on memorization with the amount of information available for flaps being quite daunting. This mnemonic is helpful to distill this information therefore making it a useful adjunct.


#
Appendix A: Flap mnemonic examples

Table of contents

Flap type

Anatomic location

Flap

Fasciocutaneous

Scalp

Temporoparietal fascia

Trunk

Scapular

Parascapular

Groin

Upper extremity

Deltopectoral

Supraclavicular

Lateral arm

Muscle

Trunk

Latissimus dorsi

Pectoralis major

Rectus abdominis

Lower extremity

Gluteus maximus

Gracilis

Gastrocnemius

Bone

Trunk

Iliac crest

Lower extremity

Fibula

Perforator

Trunk

Superficial inferior epigastric artery

Thoracodorsal artery perforator

Deep inferior epigastric perforator

Upper extremity

Free radial forearm

Lower extremity

Superior gluteal artery perforator

Inferior gluteal artery perforator

Tensor fascia lata

Anterolateral thigh flap

Anteromedial thigh flap

Fasciocutaneous

Scalp

Temporoparietal fascia flap

Preoperative (preop)

Doppler superficial temporal artery (STA)

Position

Supine, gel donut, head turned away

Pedicle

STA and vein

N: auriculotemporal nerve

Landmarks

Markings

• Pitanguy's line

• Preauricular incision extending cephalad toward vertex for 12 cm with Y-extension

• Boundaries between zygomatic arch and temporal fusion line (within temporal fossa)

Proximal

Zygomatic arch

Distal

Temporal fusion line

Plane

Subsuperficial temporal fascia, supra/subdeep temporal fascia

Protection

Frontal branch, auriculotemporal n, middle temporal branch; alopecia (minimal cautery use); bony prominences—padding

Postoperative (postop)

No direct pressure

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Sources: Adapted from.[10] [11]


Trunk

Scapular

Preop

Doppler pedicle

Position

Lateral decubitus (with sandbag)/prone

Pedicle

Circumflex scapular artery (and vein)—transverse branch

N: none

Landmarks

Markings

• Triangular space:

 - 1st line: midpoint of scapular spine to tip of scapula

 - 2nd line: at upper 2/5th of line 1, to lateral border of scapula

• Center axis on axis (transverse flap): laterally between axilla and lateral scapular border, medially midway between medial border of scapula and midline

• Pinch test for primary closure

Proximal

Midline/scapular spine (midway between medial border of scapula and midline)

Distal

Posterior axillary line/midback (laterally between axilla and lateral scapular border)

Plane

Subfascial plane toward triangular space (medial to lateral)

Protection

• Bony prominences—padding

• Prone—globe protection, gel rolls, pillow under ankles, foam around face, arms abducted < 90 degrees and externally rotated on arm boards above head

Postop

No direct pressure on flap

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Sources: Adapted from.[12] [13] [14]


Parascapular

Preop

Doppler pedicle

Position

Lateral decubitus (with sandbag)/prone

Pedicle

Circumflex scapular artery (and vein)—vertical branch

N: none

Landmarks

Markings

• Triangular space localization landmarks

 - 1st line: midpoint of scapular spine to tip of scapula

 - 2nd line: at upper 2/5th of line 1, to lateral border of scapula

• Center skin on axis; superiorly just inferior to triangular space, inferiorly midway between tip of scapula and posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) (oblique line)

• Pinch test for primary closure

Proximal

Superiorly just inferior to triangular space

Distal

Inferiorly midway between tip of scapula and PSIS (oblique line)

Plane

Subfascial plane distal to proximal

Protection

• Bony prominences—padding

• Prone—globe protection, gel rolls, pillow under ankles, foam around face, arms abducted < 90 degrees and externally rotated on arm boards above head

Postop

No direct pressure

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Sources: Adapted from.[12] [13] [14]:


Groin

Preop

Femoral artery pulse, Doppler

Position

Supine with sandbag under hip

Pedicle

Superficial circumflex iliac artery (and vein)

N: none

Landmarks

Markings

• Line: 2.5 cm inferior and parallel to line from pubic tubercle to anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS)

• Flap: centered over line, 2.5 cm above and 5 cm below inguinal ligament (1/3rd above and 2/3rd below)

Proximal

Lateral (ASIS)

Distal

Medial border of sartorius

Plane

Suprafascial plane to lateral border of sartorius then subfascial plane to medial border of sartorius

Protection

Femoral vessels, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve

Postop

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Sources: Adapted from.[15] [16] [17] [18]


Upper extremity

Deltopectoral

Preop

Not applicable (N/A)

Position

Supine

Pedicle

1st to 3rd (2nd most dominant) perforating branches of the internal mammary artery (and veins)

N: 2nd–4th intercostal nerves

Landmarks

Markings

• Mark: sternum, infraclavicular line, deltopectoral groove, anterior axillary line, and nipple

• Boundaries between sternum to anterior axillary line

 - Superiorly from infraclavicular line to 4th intercostal space (above nipple)

• Narrower the pedicle = more arc of rotation

Proximal

Deltopectoral groove/anterior axillary line

Distal

Sternum/infraclavicular line (to 4th intercostal space above nipple) supraclavicular

Plane

Subfascial (lateral to medial)

Protection

Cephalic vein

Postop

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

No direct pressure

Sources: Adapted from.[19] [20] [21] [22] [23]


Supraclavicular

Preop

Doppler, computed tomography angiogram (CTA)

Position

Supine with bolster under shoulders, head to contralateral side

Pedicle

Supraclavicular artery (with venae comitantes)

N: supraclavicular nerve branches

Landmarks

Markings

• Triangle: inferiorly by clavicle, medially by posterior border of SCM, laterally by external jugular vein (origin of supraclavicular artery)

• Skin island: elliptical/fusiform design over supraclavicular and shoulder/upper arm

• Pinch test for primary closure

Proximal

Infraclavicular/base of neck

Distal

Mid-deltoid

Plane

Subfascial

Protection

Spinal accessory nerve and supraclavicular nerves

Postop

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

 ± drain/s

Position to decrease pedicle strain (i.e., semiflexed neck position)

Sources: Adapted from.[24] [25] [26]


Abbreviation: SCM, sternocleidomatoid.


Lateral arm

Preop

Doppler, tourniquet

Position

Supine or lateral decubitus

Pedicle

Posterior radial collateral artery (venous system: superficial—cephalic vein; deep—venae comitantes)

N: posterior brachial cutaneous and posterior antebrachial cutaneous

Landmarks

Markings

• Line between deltoid insertion and lateral epicondyle

• Skin pedicle: centered over the axis ± cephalic vein if possible

• Pinch test for primary closure

Proximal

Deltoid insertion

Distal

Lateral epicondyle of humerus

Plane

Subfascial dissection

Protection

Radial nerve, cephalic vein

Postop

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Posterior elbow splint

Sources: Adapted from.[27] [28] [29]


Muscle

Trunk

Latissimus dorsi

Preop

N/A

Position

Lateral decubitus (sterile mayo stand with pillow and free arm draped)

Pedicle

Thoracodorsal artery and vein; n: thoracodorsal nerve

Landmarks

Markings

• Mark posterior axillary line, posterior iliac crest, dorsal midline, scapula tip, T7 (uppermost medial origin), superior and lateral borders of muscle

• Skin paddle design: transverse, vertical or oblique

• Most inferior limit is 8 cm from PSIS

Proximal

Axillae

Distal

PSIS/dorsal midline

Medial

Posterior midline

Lateral

Posterior axillary line

Plane

Supramuscular and submuscular

Protection

Thoracolumbar fascia (thoracolumbar hernia)

Bony prominences (gel pads), axillary roll, pillow between knees

Postop

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Drain/s in back donor

Sources: Adapted from.[30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35]


Pectoralis major

Preop

N/A

Position

Supine with shoulder bump, arms at sides

Pedicle

Thoracoacromial artery and vein

N: lateral + medial pectoral n

Landmarks

Markings

• Mark axis, sternal border, clavicle, anterior axillary line, 6th intercostal space (lower border of pectoralis major), template of deltopectoral flap (to preserve as salvage)

• Mark skin paddle:

 -Females: horizontal line in IMF

 - Males: designed medial to NAC in males

• Boundaries of skin > any skin overlying muscle

Proximal

Clavicle/lateral border of sternum

Distal

Sternocostal head

Plane

Supramuscular plane, submuscular plane

Protection

Internal mammary artery perforators

Postop

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Drains

Sources: Adapted from.[36]


Abbreviations: IMF, Inframmary Fold; NAC, nipple areolar complex.


Rectus abdominis

Preop

Doppler

Position

Supine

Pedicle

Superior and deep inferior epigastric arteries, corresponding veins

Innervation: intercostal nerves (7–12th)

Landmarks

Markings

• Mark midline, xyphoid, costal margin, umbilicus, pubis, ASIS

• Mark skin paddle:

 - TRAM: superior incision above umbilicus to include perforators

  1. Pinch test: inferior incision marked

 - VRAM: median straight line (leaving umbilicus in situ), curvilinear laterally, directly over muscle

  2. Pinch test: for primary closure

  3. Center paddle over muscle (or laterally if diastasis)

Proximal

Inframammary fold/costal margin

Distal

Pubis crease

Plane

• Above arcuate line: only anterior sheath

• Below arcuate line: only muscle harvested

Protection

Note any diastasis rectus, hernias, abdominal incisions

Postop

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Drains

Sources: Adapted from.[37] [38] [39] [40]


Abbreviations: TRAM, transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous; VRAM, vertical rectus abdominus myocutaneous.


Lower extremity

Gluteus maximus

Preop

CTA, magnetic resonance angiography, Doppler

Position

Prone, lateral decubitus, or jackknife

Pedicle

Superior and inferior gluteal arteries and veins, first perforator of profunda femoris artery and venae comitantes

N: inferior gluteal nerve

Landmarks

Markings

• Mark gluteal crease

 • Four lines:

 - Line 1: PSIS—coccyx

 - Line 2: PSIS—ischial tuberosity

 - Line 3: PSIS—greater trochanter

 - Line 4: greater trochanter to midpoint Line 1 (PSIS—coccyx)

• SGA = junction of medial and middle 1/3rd of Line 3 (PSIS—troch)

• IGA = intersection Line 2 (PSIS—ischial tub) and Line 4 (greater troch to mid Line 1)

• Line 4: piriformis muscle

• SGA perforators above piriformis and lateral to SGA >> major perforator in triangle lateral to SGA and between Lines 3 and 4

• IGA perforators below piriformis and above gluteal crease

• Skin paddle: designed as large V-Y design (if future readvancement needed) centered over perforators if possible/over muscle

• Rotation: inferior-based rotation with pivot point at medial base of muscle

Proximal

Third from PSIS to trochanter

Distal

Midline (gluteal cleft)

Plane

Supramuscular, submuscular

Protection

Sciatic nerve, posterior femoral cutaneous nerve

Postop

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Drain

Sources: Adapted from.[41] [42]


Abbreviations: SGA, superior gluteal artery; IGA, inferior gluteal artery.


Gracilis

Preop

N/A

Position

Supine frog-leg, lithotomy

Pedicle

Medial circumflex femoral artery (with venae comitantes)

N: obturator nerve, anterior femoral cutaneous nerve

Landmarks

Markings

• ID adductor longus tendon

• Mark axis, perforators, estimated pedicle entry, obturator nerve (2–3 cm proximal to pedicle and enters at 45 degrees angle), and skin paddle

• Skin paddle boundaries: proximal 2/3rd of thigh, 2–3 cm on each side of muscle

• Pinch for primary closure

• TUG: skin paddle located transversely over perforators ∼ 10 cm distal to pubic tubercle

 - Placed slightly posterior to gracilis to capture the bulky tissue in gluteal region

 - o Anterior limit is femoral triangle

Proximal

Medial tibial condyle

Distal

Pubis

Plane

Subfascial

Protection

Greater saphenous vein

Postop

Drain

Sources: Adapted from.[43] [44] [45]


Abbreviation: TUG, transverse upper gracilis


Gastrocnemius

Preop

Tourniquet

Position

Supine with leg internally/externally rotated, lateral decubitus

Pedicle

Medial and lateral sural arteries (w/venae comitantes)

N: branches of the tibial nerve

Landmarks

Markings

• Direct access thru vertical incision 2 cm posterior to tibial border for medial, 2 cm posterior to fibula for lateral incision is in upper 1/3rd

• Access thru existing wound

Proximal

• Medial head: medial condyle of femur

• Lateral head: lateral condyle of femur

Distal

Achilles tendon

Plane

Areolar plane, submuscular plane

Protection

Lesser saphenous vein, sural nerve

Postop

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Elevation of lower extremity ± gentle compression dressings

Sources: Adapted from.[46] [47] [48] [49]


Bone

Trunk

Iliac crest (deep circumflex iliac artery flap)

Preop

Doppler

Position

Supine with bump below hip, hip slightly flexed

Pedicle

Deep circumflex iliac artery and venae comitantes

Landmarks

Markings

• Markings of ASIS, inguinal ligament, femoral vessels, iliac crest, flap axis

• Medial incision from lateral to femoral pulse to ASIS

• Lateral incision over crest (or skin paddle)

• Skin paddle boundaries 2/3rd above and 1/3rd below crest, from ASIS to posterior axillary line

Proximal

Medial incision over inguinal ligament—lateral to femoral pulse to ASIS

Distal

Iliac crest/gluteus medius/tensor fascia lata

Plane

Suprafascial over external oblique

Protection

Lateral femoral cutaneous, genitofemoral, ilioinguinal, and iliohypogastric nerves; external iliac vessels

Postop

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Activity modifications

Sources: Adapted from.[50] [51]


Lower extremity

Fibula

Preop

Tourniquet, CTA (especially in traumatic injuries)

Position

Supine or lateral decubitus

Pedicle

Peroneal artery, lateral inferior genicular artery, anterior tibial perforator, and venae comitantes

N: superficial peroneal nerve

Landmarks

Markings

Proximal

Head of fibula

Distal

Lateral malleolus

Plane

Supraperiosteal, subperiosteal, intramuscular

Protection

Compartments: lateral (common peroneal nerve, around neck of fibula), anterior compartment (anterior tibial artery), posterior (deep; peroneal artery); ankle stability (leave > 6 cm of bone proximal to lateral malleolus for ankle stability)

Postop

Leg in splint, activity modifications, no direct pressure

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Sources: Adapted from.[52] [53] [54]


Scapula—please see above


Sources: Adapted from.[3] [4] [5]


Perforator

Trunk

Superficial inferior epigastric artery

Preop

CTA, Doppler

Position

Supine

Pedicle

Superficial inferior epigastric artery and venae comitantes

N: segmental intercostals T10–T12

Landmarks

Markings

Proximal

ASIS/pubic tubercle

Distal

Umbilicus

Plane

Suprafascial to external oblique + internal oblique, deep to Scarpa's fascia

Protection

Femoral vessels

Postop

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

No full hip extension

Sources: Adapted from.[55] [56] [57]


Thoracodorsal artery perforator

Preop

Doppler, color Doppler ultrasonography, or CTA

Position

Lateral decubitus with shoulder abduction and 90 degree of elbow flexion (axillary roll, pillow between knees, sterile mayo stand with pillow, and arm free draped)

Pedicle

Thoracodorsal artery (descending/vertical branch)

N: posterior rami of lateral cutaneous branches of intercostal nerves

Landmarks

Markings

• Standard latissimus dorsi landmarks

• Line: starting 8 cm below axilla (vascular hilum of latissimus dorsi) to PSIS

• Skin island: centered at ant border of latissimus dorsi

• Pinch test: identify widest portion of skin paddle to close by primary closure

Proximal

Lateral border of inframammary fold

Distal

Latissimus dorsi muscle

Plane

Suprafascial, subfascial

Protection

Thoracodorsal nerve

Postop

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

No full abduction of shoulder

Sources: Adapted from.[58]


Deep inferior epigastric perforator

Preop

CTA of the abdomen, Doppler

Position

Supine

Pedicle

Deep inferior epigastric artery, two veins

N: 10th–12th intercostal n cutaneous branch/s

Landmarks

Markings

• Mark superior incision above umbilicus to include perforators

• Pinch test: inferior incision marked tentatively

Proximal

Superior portion of the umbilicus

Distal

6–8 cm superior to the vaginal cleft

Plane

Subfascial/submuscular

Protection

Superficial inferior epigastric artery/venae

Postop

Position: flexion of trunk

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Sources: Adapted from.[59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65]


Upper extremity

Free radial forearm

Preop

Allen's test, tourniquet

Position

Supine

Pedicle

Radial artery + vein (venae comitantes ×2, cephalic vein)

 ± lateral/medial antebrachial ± lateral/medial cutaneous nerves

Landmarks

Markings

• 1 cm distal to antecubital fossa to scaphoid tubercle

• Skin boundaries between antecubital fossa and wrist crease

• Width up to 2/3rd of forearm circumference with 1/3rd lateral to radial artery to include cephalic vein

Proximal

Midforearm

Distal

Wrist crease

Ulnar

Flexor carpi radialis tendon

Radial

Brachioradialis tendon

Plane

Suprafacial and subfascial

Protection

Flexor carpi radialis and brachioradialis tendons and paratenon; dorsal branch of the radial nerve

Postop

Splint (if osseocutaneous), split-thickness graft for donor coverage

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Sources: Adapted from.[66] [67]


Lower extremity

Superior gluteal artery perforator

Preop

Doppler

Position

Prone/lateral decubitus

Pedicle

Superior gluteal artery (and vein)

N: inferior gluteal nerve

Landmarks

Markings

• Mark gluteal crease

• Mark three lines:

 - Line 1: PSIS—coccyx

 - Line 2: PSIS—greater trochanter

 - Line 3: greater trochanter to midpoint Line 1

• SGA = junction of medial and middle 1/3rd of Line 2

• Piriformis muscle = Line 3

• SGA perforators above piriformis and lateral to SGA, major perforator in triangle lateral to SGA and between Lines 3 and 4

• Skin paddle: oriented obliquely in superolateral direction

• Skin pinch for primary closure

Proximal

Trochanter

Distal

Midline (gluteal cleft)

Plane

Subfascial

Protection

Sciatic nerve, inferior gluteal vessels

Postop

Drain

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Sources: Adapted from.[68]


Inferior gluteal artery perforator

Preop

Doppler

Position

Prone/lateral decubitus

Pedicle

Inferior gluteal artery (and vein)

N: inferior gluteal nerve

Landmarks

Markings

• Mark gluteal crease

• Mark four lines:

 - Line 1: PSIS—coccyx

 - Line 2: PSIS—ischial tuberosity

 - Line 3: PSIS—greater trochanter

 - Line 4: greater trochanter to midpoint Line 1 (PSIS—coccyx)

• IGA = intersection Line 2 (PSIS—ischial tuberosity) and Line 4 (greater trochanter to mid Line 1)

• Piriformis muscle = Line 4

• IGA perforators below piriformis and above gluteal crease.

• Skin paddle: transverse paddle, 2 cm below gluteal crease; superior incision determined by pinch test and include perforators (1ry closure <= 10 cm)

Proximal

Trochanter

Distal

Midline (gluteal cleft)

Plane

Subfascial

Protection

Sciatic nerve, superior gluteal vessels

Postop

Drain

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Sources: Adapted from.[69]


Tensor fascia lata

Preop

Doppler

Position

Supine

Pedicle

Ascending or transverse branch lateral circumflex femoral artery and venae comitantes

N: superior gluteal n, lateral cutaneous branch of T12 and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve of the thigh

Landmarks

Markings

• Mark: ASIS, lateral femoral condyle, axis, perforators

• Skin paddle: ASIS to 10 cm proximal to knee; greater trochanter posteriorly to lateral edge of rectus femoris border medially

 -Leave distal 10 cm of Iliotibial tract to maintain knee stability.

• Pinch (< 9 cm can close by primary intention)

Proximal

Greater trochanter

Distal

Lateral condyle of tibia

Plane

Subfascial plane, submuscular plane

Protection

Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve

Postop

Hip flexion (if pedicled), drains

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Sources: Adapted from.[70] [71] [72]


Anterolateral thigh flap

Preop

Doppler

Position

Supine

Pedicle

Descending branch of lateral circumflex femoral artery and vena comitantes

N: lateral femoral cutaneous nerve

Landmarks

Markings

• Lines:

 -ASIS to superolateral patella

 -At midpoint, draw circle with 3 cm radius.

• Skin island: medial edge of rectus femoris to lateral edge of vastus lateralis

 - Proximally 10 cm inferior to ASIS and distally 7 cm superior to patella

• Pinch test: width of 10 cm can be taken for primary closure

Proximal

ASIS

Distal

Superolateral border of the patella

Plane

Supra- or subfascial

Protection

Intermuscular septum (between rectus femoris and vastus lateralis muscles) to protect vessels

Postop

Skin graft for donor, drain/s

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Sources: Adapted from.[73] [74]


Anteromedial thigh flap

Preop

Doppler

Position

Supine

Pedicle

Lateral circumflex femoral descending artery—septocutaneous branch

Landmarks

Markings

• Lines:

 -ASIS to superolateral patella

• Skin island: medial edge of rectus femoris to lateral edge of vastus lateralis

 - Proximally 10 cm inferior to ASIS and distally 7 cm superior to patella

• Pinch test: width of 10 cm can be taken for primary closure

Proximal

ASIS

Distal

Superolateral border of the patella

Plane

Subfascial

Protection

Great saphenous vein

Saphenous nerve

Postop

Drain/s

Flap checks (Doppler, color, cap refill, temp, turgor)

Sources: Adapted from.[75] [76] [77] [78]



#

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Acknowledgments

We thank current and previous University of Toronto trainees for their participation in the validation process.

  • References

  • 1 Singh M, Ziolkowski N, Ramachandran S, Myers SR, Ghanem AM. Development of a five-day basic microsurgery simulation training course: a cost analysis. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (03) 213-217
  • 2 Loh CYY, Wang AYL, Tiong VTY. et al. Animal models in plastic and reconstructive surgery simulation-a review. J Surg Res 2018; 221: 232-245
  • 3 Pafitanis G, Ghanem AM, Myers S. Experimental pork belly : a simulation training model for intramuscular perforator dissection. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (01) 1-6
  • 4 Pafitanis G, Cooper L, Hadjiandreou M, Ghanem A, Myers S. Microvascular anastomotic coupler application learning curve: a curriculum supporting further deliberate practice in ex-vivo simulation models. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (02) 203-210
  • 5 Pafitanis G, Hadjiandreou M, Miller R. et al. The use of mobile computing devices in microsurgery. Arch Plast Surg 2019; 46 (02) 102-107
  • 6 Buntic R, Buntic R. Atlas of Microsurgery Techniques and Principles. Accessed September 5, 2021 at: https://www.microsurgeon.org/
  • 7 Joyce CW, Carroll SM. Microsurgery: the top 50 classic papers in plastic surgery: a citation analysis. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (02) 153-157
  • 8 Shokrollahi K, Whitaker IS, Nahai F. Flaps. 1st ed.. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.; 2017
  • 9 Zenn M, Jones G. Reconstructive Surgery: Anatomy, Technique, and Clinical Applications. St. Louis, Missouri: Quality Medical Publishing; 2012
  • 10 Horen SR, Jahromi AH, Konofaos P. Temporoparietal fascial free flap: a systematic review. 2021; 87 (06) e189-e200
  • 11 Collar RM, Zopf D, Brown D, Fung K, Kim J. The versatility of the temporoparietal fascia flap in head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (02) 141-148
  • 12 Tang AL, Bearelly S, Mannion K. The expanding role of scapular free-flaps. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 25 (05) 411-415
  • 13 Ferrari S, Ferri A, Bianchi B. Scapular tip free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 23 (02) 115-120
  • 14 Powell DK, Nwoke F, Urken ML. et al. Scapular free flap harvest site: recognising the spectrum of radiographic post-operative appearance. Br J Radiol 2013; 86 (1023): 20120574
  • 15 Cobb ARM, Koudstaal MJ, Bulstrode NW, Lloyd TW, Dunaway DJ. Free groin flap in hemifacial volume reconstruction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 51 (04) 301-306
  • 16 Amouzou KS, Berny N, El Harti A, Diouri M, Chlihi A, Ezzoubi M. The pedicled groin flap in resurfacing hand burn scar release and other injuries: a five-case series report and review of the literature. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 2017; 30 (01) 57-61
  • 17 Al Bayati MJ, Samaha MJ, Samaha G, Habal MB, Thaller SR, Panthaki ZJ. The groin flap revisited: remembering the contributions of Dr Ian Jackson to plastic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2021; 32 (3, Suppl 3): 1207-1209
  • 18 Al-Qattan MM, Al-Qattan AM. Defining the indications of pedicled groin and abdominal flaps in hand reconstruction in the current microsurgery era. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (09) 917-927
  • 19 Hwang K. The origins of deltopectoral flaps and the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (07) 1845-1848
  • 20 Chan RCL, Chan JYW. Deltopectoral flap in the era of microsurgery. Surg Res Pract 2014; 420892
  • 21 Andrews BT, McCulloch TM, Funk GF, Graham SM, Hoffman HT. Deltopectoral flap revisited in the microvascular era: a single-institution 10-year experience. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2006; 115 (01) 35-40
  • 22 Mikami T, Kagimoto S, Yabuki Y. et al. Deltopectoral flap revisited for reconstruction surgery in patients with advanced thyroid cancer: a case report. BMC Surg 2017; 17 (01) 101
  • 23 Bakamjian VY. A two-stage method for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with a primary pectoral skin flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 36: 173-184
  • 24 Wirtz NE, Khariwala SS. Update on the supraclavicular flap. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 25 (05) 439-444
  • 25 Trautman J, Gore S, Potter M. et al. Supraclavicular flap repair in the free flap era. ANZ J Surg 2018; 88 (06) 540-546
  • 26 Hamidian Jahormi A, Horen SR, Miller EJ, Konofaos P. A comprehensive review on the supraclavicular flap for head and neck reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 88 (06) e20-e32
  • 27 Ullah S, Asif M, Ubaid M, Khalid A, Khan M, Rahman MF. Lateral arm flap: its usage as pedicle and free flap. Cureus 2020; 12 (12) e12136
  • 28 Kokkalis ZT, Papanikos E, Mazis GA, Panagopoulos A, Konofaos P. Lateral arm flap: indications and techniques. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2019; 29 (02) 279-284
  • 29 Amin JD, Amin N, Hatten KM. The lateral arm free flap for head and neck reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 28 (05) 365-369
  • 30 Tan O, Aydin OE, Cinal H. et al. Latissimus dorsi flap harvest with a short incision. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (03) 203-206
  • 31 Abdelmofeed AM, Fadey MA, Seif O, Abdelhalim MH, Younes MT. Usefulness of nerve-sparing pedicled segmental latissimus dorsi muscle flap combined with lateral thoracic skin flap for partial volume reconstruction in laterally located breast cancer. Eur J Plast Surg 2023; 46: 541-550
  • 32 Lin CH, Wei FC, Levin LS, Chen MC. Donor-site morbidity comparison between endoscopically assisted and traditional harvest of free latissimus dorsi muscle flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (04) 1070-1077 , quiz 1078
  • 33 Chung J-H, You H-J, Kim H-S, Lee BI, Park SH, Yoon ES. A novel technique for robot assisted latissimus dorsi flap harvest. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (07) 966-972
  • 34 Djordjevic ML, Bumbasirevic MZ, Vukovic PM, Sansalone S, Perovic SV. Musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi free transfer flap for total phalloplasty in children. J Pediatr Urol 2006; 2 (04) 333-339
  • 35 Chiang I-H, Wang C-H, Tzeng Y-S. et al. Breast reconstruction using pedicled latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps in Asian patients with small breasts. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78 (3, Suppl 2): S95-S101
  • 36 Patel K, Lyu DJ, Kademani D. Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2014; 26 (03) 421-426
  • 37 Grinsell D, Lonie S, Wilson KC, Choong PFM. The innervated rectus abdominis flap for quadriceps reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (06) 941-945
  • 38 Radwan RW, Tang AM, Harries RL, Davies EG, Drew P, Evans MD. Vertical rectus abdominis flap (VRAM) for perineal reconstruction following pelvic surgery: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (03) 523-529
  • 39 Van Vliet A, Girardot A, Bouchez J. et al. How big is too big? The effect of defect size on postoperative complications of vertical rectus abdominis flap reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86 (6S, Suppl 5): S571-S574
  • 40 Buchel EW, Finical S, Johnson C. Pelvic reconstruction using vertical rectus abdominis. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 52 (01) 22-26
  • 41 Sinnott CJ, Stavrides S, Boutros C, Kuruvilla A, Glickman LT. Dual-plane gluteal myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of ischial tuberosity pressure wounds. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 85 (S1, Suppl 1): S23-S27
  • 42 Han HH, Choi EJ, Moon SH, Lee YJ, Oh DY. Combined V-Y fasciocutaneous advancement and gluteus maximus muscle rotational flaps for treating sacral sores. BioMed Res Int 2016; 8714713
  • 43 Doi K, Hattori Y, Soo-Heong T, Hiura Y, Kawakami F. Endoscopic harvesting of the gracilis muscle for reinnervated free-muscle transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (07) 1817-1823
  • 44 Zukowski M, Lord J, Ash K, Shouse B, Getz S, Robb G. The gracilis free flap revisited: a review of 25 cases of transfer to traumatic extremity wounds. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 40 (02) 141-144
  • 45 Dornseifer U, Kleeberger C, Kargl L. et al. Perfusion controlled mobilization after lower extremity free flaps-pushing the limits of time and intensity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (03) 179-185
  • 46 Walton Z, Armstrong M, Traven S, Leddy L. Pedicled rotational medial and lateral gastrocnemius flaps: surgical technique. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017; 25 (11) 744-751
  • 47 Houdek MT, Wagner ER, Wyles CC. et al. Long-term outcomes of pedicled gastrocnemius flaps in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (10) 850-856
  • 48 Gkiatas I, Korompilia M, Kostas-Agnantis I, Tsirigkakis SE, Stavraki M, Korompilias A. Gastrocnemius pedicled muscle flap for knee and upper tibia soft tissue reconstruction. A useful tool for the orthopaedic surgeon. Injury 2021; 52 (12) 3679-3684
  • 49 Padberg FT, Johnston MV, Sisto SA. Structured exercise improves calf muscle pump function in chronic venous insufficiency: a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39 (01) 79-87
  • 50 Reece EM, Raghuram AC, Bartlett EL. et al. Vascularized iliac bone graft for complex closure during spinal deformity surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (07) e2345
  • 51 Zhao D, Wang B, Liu B. Vascularized iliac bone flap transfer for early and middle stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. JBJS Essential Surg Tech 2019; 9 (01) e5
  • 52 Al Deek NF, Kao HK, Wei FC. The fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap: concise review, goal-oriented surgical technique, and tips and tricks. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (06) 913e-923e
  • 53 Awad ME, Altman A, Elrefai R, Shipman P, Looney S, Elsalanty M. The use of vascularized fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction; a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the observational studies. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019; 47 (04) 629-641
  • 54 Guo L, Ferraro NF, Padwa BL, Kaban LB, Upton J. Vascularized fibular graft for pediatric mandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (06) 2095-2105
  • 55 Sarik JR, Bank J, Wu LC, Serletti JM. Superficial inferior epigastric artery: learning curve versus reality. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (01) 1e-6e
  • 56 Grünherz L, Wolter A, Andree C. et al. Autologous breast reconstruction with SIEA flaps: an alternative in selected cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (02) 299-306
  • 57 Chevray PM. Update on breast reconstruction using free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Semin Plast Surg 2004; 18 (02) 97-104
  • 58 Mangialardi ML, Baldelli I, Salgarello M, Raposio E. Thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in partial breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (10) e3104
  • 59 Beugels J, Cornelissen AJM, van Kuijk SMJ. et al. Sensory recovery of the breast following innervated and noninnervated DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (02) 178e-188e
  • 60 Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (02) 436-444 , discussion 445–446
  • 61 Tan BKH, Newman MI, Swartz KA, Samson MC. Subfascial perforator dissection for DIEP flap harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (03) 1001-1002
  • 62 Tregaskiss A, Perez-Temprano A, Morris RJ. The subfascial perforator dissection for DIEP flap harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (05) 145e-146e
  • 63 Feingold RS. Improving surgeon confidence in the DIEP flap: a strategy for reducing operative time with minimally invasive donor site. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (05) 533-537
  • 64 Gravvanis A, Niranjan NS. Retrograde dissection of the vascular pedicle of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60 (04) 395-397
  • 65 Xue EY, Cen N, Reece E, Chu CK, Winocour S. A standardized approach to deep inferior epigastric perforator flap marking. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (10) e2479
  • 66 Médard de Chardon V, Balaguer T, Chignon-Sicard B. et al. The radial forearm free flap: a review of microsurgical options. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (01) 5-10
  • 67 Avery CME. Review of the radial free flap: is it still evolving, or is it facing extinction? Part one: soft-tissue radial flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 48 (04) 245-252
  • 68 Hunter C, Moody L, Luan A, Nazerali R, Lee GK. Superior gluteal artery perforator flap: the beauty of the buttock. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (May, Suppl 3): S191-S195
  • 69 Mirzabeigi MN, Au A, Jandali S, Natoli N, Sbitany H, Serletti JM. Trials and tribulations with the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap in autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2011; 128 (06) 614-624
  • 70 Tsuihiji K, Daniel BW, Kageyama T. et al. Free tensor fascia lata true-perforator flap transfer for reconstruction of the calcaneal soft tissue defect complicated with osteomyelitis in a patient with alcohol-induced Charcot foot: a case report and literature review. Microsurgery 2021; 41 (05) 473-479
  • 71 Singh R, Wadhwani J, Rohilla RK, Kaur K. Proximal femoral resection and tensor fascia lata flap for recalcitrant trochanteric pressure ulcers. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 2019; 5: 15
  • 72 Zeidler KR, Son JH, Carey JN, Watt AJ, Ho OH, Lee GK. Transverse tensor fascia lata myocutaneous flap for microvascular breast reconstruction: case report and review of the literature. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70 (04) 438-441
  • 73 Graboyes EM, Hornig JD. Evolution of the anterolateral thigh free flap. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 25 (05) 416-421
  • 74 Wong C-H, Wei F-C. Anterolateral thigh flap. Head Neck 2010; 32 (04) 529-540
  • 75 Schoeller T, Huemer GM, Shafighi M, Gurunluoglu R, Wechselberger G, Piza-Katzer H. Free anteromedial thigh flap: clinical application and review of literature. Microsurgery 2003; 24 (01) 43-48
  • 76 Hoshal SG, Bewley AF. The anteromedial thigh free flap: a primary reconstructive option or second best?. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 26 (05) 312-318
  • 77 Zhou X, Wang J, Qiang L, Rui Y, Xue M. Outcomes of using a modified anteromedial thigh perforator flap for repairing the anterolateral thigh free flap donor site: a retrospective clinical review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (16) e0491
  • 78 Gong ZJ, Zhang S, Ren ZH, Zhu ZF, Liu JB, Wu HJ. Application of anteromedial thigh flap for the reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72 (06) 1212-1225

Address for correspondence

Siba Haykal, MD, PhD, FRCSC, FACS
Toronto General Hospital
8N-869, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C
Canada   

Publication History

Received: 19 November 2022

Accepted: 31 July 2023

Article published online:
28 November 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

  • References

  • 1 Singh M, Ziolkowski N, Ramachandran S, Myers SR, Ghanem AM. Development of a five-day basic microsurgery simulation training course: a cost analysis. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (03) 213-217
  • 2 Loh CYY, Wang AYL, Tiong VTY. et al. Animal models in plastic and reconstructive surgery simulation-a review. J Surg Res 2018; 221: 232-245
  • 3 Pafitanis G, Ghanem AM, Myers S. Experimental pork belly : a simulation training model for intramuscular perforator dissection. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (01) 1-6
  • 4 Pafitanis G, Cooper L, Hadjiandreou M, Ghanem A, Myers S. Microvascular anastomotic coupler application learning curve: a curriculum supporting further deliberate practice in ex-vivo simulation models. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (02) 203-210
  • 5 Pafitanis G, Hadjiandreou M, Miller R. et al. The use of mobile computing devices in microsurgery. Arch Plast Surg 2019; 46 (02) 102-107
  • 6 Buntic R, Buntic R. Atlas of Microsurgery Techniques and Principles. Accessed September 5, 2021 at: https://www.microsurgeon.org/
  • 7 Joyce CW, Carroll SM. Microsurgery: the top 50 classic papers in plastic surgery: a citation analysis. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (02) 153-157
  • 8 Shokrollahi K, Whitaker IS, Nahai F. Flaps. 1st ed.. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.; 2017
  • 9 Zenn M, Jones G. Reconstructive Surgery: Anatomy, Technique, and Clinical Applications. St. Louis, Missouri: Quality Medical Publishing; 2012
  • 10 Horen SR, Jahromi AH, Konofaos P. Temporoparietal fascial free flap: a systematic review. 2021; 87 (06) e189-e200
  • 11 Collar RM, Zopf D, Brown D, Fung K, Kim J. The versatility of the temporoparietal fascia flap in head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (02) 141-148
  • 12 Tang AL, Bearelly S, Mannion K. The expanding role of scapular free-flaps. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 25 (05) 411-415
  • 13 Ferrari S, Ferri A, Bianchi B. Scapular tip free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 23 (02) 115-120
  • 14 Powell DK, Nwoke F, Urken ML. et al. Scapular free flap harvest site: recognising the spectrum of radiographic post-operative appearance. Br J Radiol 2013; 86 (1023): 20120574
  • 15 Cobb ARM, Koudstaal MJ, Bulstrode NW, Lloyd TW, Dunaway DJ. Free groin flap in hemifacial volume reconstruction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 51 (04) 301-306
  • 16 Amouzou KS, Berny N, El Harti A, Diouri M, Chlihi A, Ezzoubi M. The pedicled groin flap in resurfacing hand burn scar release and other injuries: a five-case series report and review of the literature. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 2017; 30 (01) 57-61
  • 17 Al Bayati MJ, Samaha MJ, Samaha G, Habal MB, Thaller SR, Panthaki ZJ. The groin flap revisited: remembering the contributions of Dr Ian Jackson to plastic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2021; 32 (3, Suppl 3): 1207-1209
  • 18 Al-Qattan MM, Al-Qattan AM. Defining the indications of pedicled groin and abdominal flaps in hand reconstruction in the current microsurgery era. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (09) 917-927
  • 19 Hwang K. The origins of deltopectoral flaps and the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (07) 1845-1848
  • 20 Chan RCL, Chan JYW. Deltopectoral flap in the era of microsurgery. Surg Res Pract 2014; 420892
  • 21 Andrews BT, McCulloch TM, Funk GF, Graham SM, Hoffman HT. Deltopectoral flap revisited in the microvascular era: a single-institution 10-year experience. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2006; 115 (01) 35-40
  • 22 Mikami T, Kagimoto S, Yabuki Y. et al. Deltopectoral flap revisited for reconstruction surgery in patients with advanced thyroid cancer: a case report. BMC Surg 2017; 17 (01) 101
  • 23 Bakamjian VY. A two-stage method for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with a primary pectoral skin flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 36: 173-184
  • 24 Wirtz NE, Khariwala SS. Update on the supraclavicular flap. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 25 (05) 439-444
  • 25 Trautman J, Gore S, Potter M. et al. Supraclavicular flap repair in the free flap era. ANZ J Surg 2018; 88 (06) 540-546
  • 26 Hamidian Jahormi A, Horen SR, Miller EJ, Konofaos P. A comprehensive review on the supraclavicular flap for head and neck reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 88 (06) e20-e32
  • 27 Ullah S, Asif M, Ubaid M, Khalid A, Khan M, Rahman MF. Lateral arm flap: its usage as pedicle and free flap. Cureus 2020; 12 (12) e12136
  • 28 Kokkalis ZT, Papanikos E, Mazis GA, Panagopoulos A, Konofaos P. Lateral arm flap: indications and techniques. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2019; 29 (02) 279-284
  • 29 Amin JD, Amin N, Hatten KM. The lateral arm free flap for head and neck reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 28 (05) 365-369
  • 30 Tan O, Aydin OE, Cinal H. et al. Latissimus dorsi flap harvest with a short incision. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (03) 203-206
  • 31 Abdelmofeed AM, Fadey MA, Seif O, Abdelhalim MH, Younes MT. Usefulness of nerve-sparing pedicled segmental latissimus dorsi muscle flap combined with lateral thoracic skin flap for partial volume reconstruction in laterally located breast cancer. Eur J Plast Surg 2023; 46: 541-550
  • 32 Lin CH, Wei FC, Levin LS, Chen MC. Donor-site morbidity comparison between endoscopically assisted and traditional harvest of free latissimus dorsi muscle flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (04) 1070-1077 , quiz 1078
  • 33 Chung J-H, You H-J, Kim H-S, Lee BI, Park SH, Yoon ES. A novel technique for robot assisted latissimus dorsi flap harvest. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (07) 966-972
  • 34 Djordjevic ML, Bumbasirevic MZ, Vukovic PM, Sansalone S, Perovic SV. Musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi free transfer flap for total phalloplasty in children. J Pediatr Urol 2006; 2 (04) 333-339
  • 35 Chiang I-H, Wang C-H, Tzeng Y-S. et al. Breast reconstruction using pedicled latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps in Asian patients with small breasts. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78 (3, Suppl 2): S95-S101
  • 36 Patel K, Lyu DJ, Kademani D. Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2014; 26 (03) 421-426
  • 37 Grinsell D, Lonie S, Wilson KC, Choong PFM. The innervated rectus abdominis flap for quadriceps reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (06) 941-945
  • 38 Radwan RW, Tang AM, Harries RL, Davies EG, Drew P, Evans MD. Vertical rectus abdominis flap (VRAM) for perineal reconstruction following pelvic surgery: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (03) 523-529
  • 39 Van Vliet A, Girardot A, Bouchez J. et al. How big is too big? The effect of defect size on postoperative complications of vertical rectus abdominis flap reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86 (6S, Suppl 5): S571-S574
  • 40 Buchel EW, Finical S, Johnson C. Pelvic reconstruction using vertical rectus abdominis. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 52 (01) 22-26
  • 41 Sinnott CJ, Stavrides S, Boutros C, Kuruvilla A, Glickman LT. Dual-plane gluteal myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of ischial tuberosity pressure wounds. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 85 (S1, Suppl 1): S23-S27
  • 42 Han HH, Choi EJ, Moon SH, Lee YJ, Oh DY. Combined V-Y fasciocutaneous advancement and gluteus maximus muscle rotational flaps for treating sacral sores. BioMed Res Int 2016; 8714713
  • 43 Doi K, Hattori Y, Soo-Heong T, Hiura Y, Kawakami F. Endoscopic harvesting of the gracilis muscle for reinnervated free-muscle transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (07) 1817-1823
  • 44 Zukowski M, Lord J, Ash K, Shouse B, Getz S, Robb G. The gracilis free flap revisited: a review of 25 cases of transfer to traumatic extremity wounds. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 40 (02) 141-144
  • 45 Dornseifer U, Kleeberger C, Kargl L. et al. Perfusion controlled mobilization after lower extremity free flaps-pushing the limits of time and intensity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (03) 179-185
  • 46 Walton Z, Armstrong M, Traven S, Leddy L. Pedicled rotational medial and lateral gastrocnemius flaps: surgical technique. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017; 25 (11) 744-751
  • 47 Houdek MT, Wagner ER, Wyles CC. et al. Long-term outcomes of pedicled gastrocnemius flaps in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (10) 850-856
  • 48 Gkiatas I, Korompilia M, Kostas-Agnantis I, Tsirigkakis SE, Stavraki M, Korompilias A. Gastrocnemius pedicled muscle flap for knee and upper tibia soft tissue reconstruction. A useful tool for the orthopaedic surgeon. Injury 2021; 52 (12) 3679-3684
  • 49 Padberg FT, Johnston MV, Sisto SA. Structured exercise improves calf muscle pump function in chronic venous insufficiency: a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39 (01) 79-87
  • 50 Reece EM, Raghuram AC, Bartlett EL. et al. Vascularized iliac bone graft for complex closure during spinal deformity surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (07) e2345
  • 51 Zhao D, Wang B, Liu B. Vascularized iliac bone flap transfer for early and middle stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. JBJS Essential Surg Tech 2019; 9 (01) e5
  • 52 Al Deek NF, Kao HK, Wei FC. The fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap: concise review, goal-oriented surgical technique, and tips and tricks. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (06) 913e-923e
  • 53 Awad ME, Altman A, Elrefai R, Shipman P, Looney S, Elsalanty M. The use of vascularized fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction; a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the observational studies. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019; 47 (04) 629-641
  • 54 Guo L, Ferraro NF, Padwa BL, Kaban LB, Upton J. Vascularized fibular graft for pediatric mandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (06) 2095-2105
  • 55 Sarik JR, Bank J, Wu LC, Serletti JM. Superficial inferior epigastric artery: learning curve versus reality. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (01) 1e-6e
  • 56 Grünherz L, Wolter A, Andree C. et al. Autologous breast reconstruction with SIEA flaps: an alternative in selected cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (02) 299-306
  • 57 Chevray PM. Update on breast reconstruction using free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Semin Plast Surg 2004; 18 (02) 97-104
  • 58 Mangialardi ML, Baldelli I, Salgarello M, Raposio E. Thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in partial breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (10) e3104
  • 59 Beugels J, Cornelissen AJM, van Kuijk SMJ. et al. Sensory recovery of the breast following innervated and noninnervated DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (02) 178e-188e
  • 60 Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (02) 436-444 , discussion 445–446
  • 61 Tan BKH, Newman MI, Swartz KA, Samson MC. Subfascial perforator dissection for DIEP flap harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (03) 1001-1002
  • 62 Tregaskiss A, Perez-Temprano A, Morris RJ. The subfascial perforator dissection for DIEP flap harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (05) 145e-146e
  • 63 Feingold RS. Improving surgeon confidence in the DIEP flap: a strategy for reducing operative time with minimally invasive donor site. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (05) 533-537
  • 64 Gravvanis A, Niranjan NS. Retrograde dissection of the vascular pedicle of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60 (04) 395-397
  • 65 Xue EY, Cen N, Reece E, Chu CK, Winocour S. A standardized approach to deep inferior epigastric perforator flap marking. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (10) e2479
  • 66 Médard de Chardon V, Balaguer T, Chignon-Sicard B. et al. The radial forearm free flap: a review of microsurgical options. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (01) 5-10
  • 67 Avery CME. Review of the radial free flap: is it still evolving, or is it facing extinction? Part one: soft-tissue radial flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 48 (04) 245-252
  • 68 Hunter C, Moody L, Luan A, Nazerali R, Lee GK. Superior gluteal artery perforator flap: the beauty of the buttock. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (May, Suppl 3): S191-S195
  • 69 Mirzabeigi MN, Au A, Jandali S, Natoli N, Sbitany H, Serletti JM. Trials and tribulations with the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap in autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2011; 128 (06) 614-624
  • 70 Tsuihiji K, Daniel BW, Kageyama T. et al. Free tensor fascia lata true-perforator flap transfer for reconstruction of the calcaneal soft tissue defect complicated with osteomyelitis in a patient with alcohol-induced Charcot foot: a case report and literature review. Microsurgery 2021; 41 (05) 473-479
  • 71 Singh R, Wadhwani J, Rohilla RK, Kaur K. Proximal femoral resection and tensor fascia lata flap for recalcitrant trochanteric pressure ulcers. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 2019; 5: 15
  • 72 Zeidler KR, Son JH, Carey JN, Watt AJ, Ho OH, Lee GK. Transverse tensor fascia lata myocutaneous flap for microvascular breast reconstruction: case report and review of the literature. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70 (04) 438-441
  • 73 Graboyes EM, Hornig JD. Evolution of the anterolateral thigh free flap. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 25 (05) 416-421
  • 74 Wong C-H, Wei F-C. Anterolateral thigh flap. Head Neck 2010; 32 (04) 529-540
  • 75 Schoeller T, Huemer GM, Shafighi M, Gurunluoglu R, Wechselberger G, Piza-Katzer H. Free anteromedial thigh flap: clinical application and review of literature. Microsurgery 2003; 24 (01) 43-48
  • 76 Hoshal SG, Bewley AF. The anteromedial thigh free flap: a primary reconstructive option or second best?. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 26 (05) 312-318
  • 77 Zhou X, Wang J, Qiang L, Rui Y, Xue M. Outcomes of using a modified anteromedial thigh perforator flap for repairing the anterolateral thigh free flap donor site: a retrospective clinical review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (16) e0491
  • 78 Gong ZJ, Zhang S, Ren ZH, Zhu ZF, Liu JB, Wu HJ. Application of anteromedial thigh flap for the reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72 (06) 1212-1225