Facial Plast Surg 2024; 40(04): 472-475
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772195
Original Research

Management of the Congenital Cleft Earlobe with a Conchal Cartilage Graft

Amitabh Thacoor
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and Great Ormond Street Institute for Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
,
Neil Bulstrode
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and Great Ormond Street Institute for Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
 

Abstract

Congenital earlobe clefts are the most common lower auricular malformations. They represent a unique reconstructive challenge. The goal of surgery includes restoration of a natural lobular contour and volume as well as a fine surgical scar. Several surgical techniques have been described, most of which only address the cleft deformity but not the soft tissue deficiency. We hereby describe a technique which addresses both the cleft and improves soft tissue deficiency through a conchal cartilage graft.


#

Congenital lobular malformations occur in 1:15,000 live births.[1] Earlobe clefts are the most common lower auricular malformation and are often unilateral.[2] They result from a failure of fusion or insufficient accretion between hillocks 1 and 6, which contribute to the anterior and posterior earlobe.[3] In contrast to acquired traumatic earlobe defects, the congenital cleft earlobe poses a unique challenge: addressing the cleft as well as any soft tissue deficiency. Presentations range from simple notching to extensive soft tissue deficiency. The goal of surgery includes restoration of a natural lobular contour and volume as well as a fine surgical scar. Several surgical techniques have been described, most of which only address the cleft deformity. We hereby describe a technique which addresses both the cleft and improves soft tissue deficiency through a conchal cartilage graft.

Surgical Technique

The design of the surgical approach to the cleft earlobe depends on presenting anatomy ([Fig. 1]). The soft tissues of the cleft earlobe are shared and redistributed so that the abnormal contour is corrected creating an unbroken curve and often lowering the point at which the lobe meets the cheek. A graft of conchal cartilage is harvested from the same ear via an anterior approach ([Fig. 2]). The donor site is closed with 6/0 Monocryl (Ethicon Inc., Somerville, NJ) and 6/0 Vicryl Rapide (Ethicon Inc.) sutures and a bolster of paraffin-gauze dressing is used to reduce the chance of hematoma formation and to help ensure the resulting concavity. The conchal cartilage is shaped to maintain the soft tissues. A portion of the cartilage is removed from the center ([Fig. 3]) to facilitate future ear lobe piercing which may be performed 3 months following reconstruction. The cartilage graft is then placed within the lobe and the skin is sutured anteriorly and posteriorly ([Fig. 4]) with 6/0 Monocryl (Ethicon Inc.) and 6/0 Vicryl Rapide sutures (Ethicon Inc.).

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Preoperative view of the congenital cleft earlobe.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Harvesting of conchal cartilage graft through anterior approach.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Central portion of conchal cartilage removed.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Final postoperative result.

#

Discussion

The auricle begins development during the end of the fourth week of embryonic life from the first and second branchial arches. By the fifth week, six prominences or hillocks develop. The anterior three hillocks develop from the first branchial arch and the posterior three hillocks develop from the second branchial arch. Hillock 1 contributes to the anterior part of the lobule and hillock 6 contributes to the posterior part of the lobule. Failure of fusion of these two hillocks may result in a cleft earlobe.[1]

Several classifications of congenital cleft earlobes have been described. Kitayama et al[4] categorized deformities into four anatomical groups: longitudinal cleft, transverse cleft, triple lobe type, and defective lobe. Yamada et al[5] classified deformities into three subtypes: anterior, posterior, and double-lobe types. Kurihara[6] classified cleft lobes into four groups: type I (vertical cleft with anterior and posterior parts), type II (horizontal cleft with superior and inferior parts), type III (mixed-type cleft), and type IV (lobular hypoplasia, dysplasia, or agenesis). In our experience, we believe that these classifications serve a descriptive purpose primarily and contribute little to our surgical approach to the cleft earlobe.

Hypoplastic or defective type cleft earlobes demand surgical techniques which recruit extra tissue to address the volume-deficient earlobe. Several techniques to repair congenital cleft earlobes have been described. Ultimately, the common surgical goal is to reconstruct a naturally appearing lobule with a smooth unbroken contour and thin volume, associated with a fine surgical scar. Simple cleft defects with little soft tissue deficiency can be repaired with Z-plasty, 7-plasty (or inverted L-plasty), or local flaps such as triangular flap, V-Y advancement flap, rectangular flap, or a hinge flap.[1] More complex techniques include preauricular tissue such as the cheek-neck flap, a two-stage reconstruction using a tubularized preauricular flap, and a preauricular bilobed flap or postauricular tissue such as a chondrocutaneous postauricular flap.[1] [7] [8] [9] Several of these techniques result in extensive scar contractures and a bulky earlobe, often with noticeable donor sites. Our technique provides a simple and reliable way of using readily available conchal cartilage for grafting and avoiding preauricular scarring. The thin conchal cartilage assists in augmenting a volume-deficient cleft earlobe and more importantly assists in maintaining the shape of the repaired lobule by helping to create and maintain an unbroken curve. A visible notch may develop in cases where a hypoplastic cleft earlobe is repaired without the use of a conchal cartilage graft ([Fig. 5]). It provides structural support to the new earlobe and permits safe earlobe piercing ([Fig. 6]). Finally, it results in an acceptable surgical scar on the earlobe and an inconspicuous donor scar ([Fig. 7]). We, however, acknowledge that it may result in a stiffer earlobe in certain cases, although this improves over time.

Zoom Image
Fig. 5 Visible helical notch (white arrow) from lack of conchal cartilage graft.
Zoom Image
Fig. 6 Safe earlobe piercing postoperatively.
Zoom Image
Fig. 7 Postoperative photographs at 2 weeks showing inconspicuous scars.

#

Conclusion

Congenital cleft earlobe deformities are rare and represent a unique reconstructive challenge. Presentations vary from simple cleft to severe volume-deficient hypoplastic earlobes. All cases, however, share common reconstructive goals of a natural-looking lobule with minimal scarring. We present a simple, reliable technique to reconstruct a volume-deficient cleft earlobe through the use of conchal cartilage grafting.


#
#

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

  • References

  • 1 Borman H, Deniz M, Ertas NM, Seyhan T, Caglar B. 7-plasty technique for the surgical treatment of congenital longitudinal ear lobe cleft. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19 (06) 1643-1644
  • 2 Park C. Lower auricular malformations: their representation, correction, and embryologic correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (01) 29-40
  • 3 Park C, Roh TS. Anatomy and embryology of the external ear and their clinical correlation. Clin Plast Surg 2002; 29 (02) 155-174 , v
  • 4 Kitayama Y, Yamamoto M, Tsukada S. Classification of congenital cleft ear lobe. Jpn J Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 23: 663
  • 5 Yamada A, Fukuda O, Soeda S. et al. The evaluation of cleft earlobe. Jpn J Plast Reconstr Surg 1967; 19: 171-175
  • 6 Kurihara K. Congenital deformities of the external ear. In: Cohen M. ed. Mastery of Surgery: Mastery of Plastic and Re- constructive Surgery. Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co; 1994: 776-799
  • 7 Fidalgo Rodríguez F, Navarro Cecilia J, Rioja Torrejón L. Earlobe reconstruction with a modified bilobed flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (01) 23e-24e
  • 8 Yotsuyanagi T, Yamashita K, Sawada Y. Reconstruction of congenital and acquired earlobe deformity. Clin Plast Surg 2002; 29 (02) 249-255 , vii
  • 9 Okada E, Maruyama Y. A simple method for earlobe reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101 (01) 162-166

Address for correspondence

Amitabh Thacoor, MBChB, MRCS
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and Great Ormond Street Institute for Child Health, University College London
Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH
United Kingdom   

Publication History

Article published online:
08 August 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

  • References

  • 1 Borman H, Deniz M, Ertas NM, Seyhan T, Caglar B. 7-plasty technique for the surgical treatment of congenital longitudinal ear lobe cleft. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19 (06) 1643-1644
  • 2 Park C. Lower auricular malformations: their representation, correction, and embryologic correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (01) 29-40
  • 3 Park C, Roh TS. Anatomy and embryology of the external ear and their clinical correlation. Clin Plast Surg 2002; 29 (02) 155-174 , v
  • 4 Kitayama Y, Yamamoto M, Tsukada S. Classification of congenital cleft ear lobe. Jpn J Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 23: 663
  • 5 Yamada A, Fukuda O, Soeda S. et al. The evaluation of cleft earlobe. Jpn J Plast Reconstr Surg 1967; 19: 171-175
  • 6 Kurihara K. Congenital deformities of the external ear. In: Cohen M. ed. Mastery of Surgery: Mastery of Plastic and Re- constructive Surgery. Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co; 1994: 776-799
  • 7 Fidalgo Rodríguez F, Navarro Cecilia J, Rioja Torrejón L. Earlobe reconstruction with a modified bilobed flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (01) 23e-24e
  • 8 Yotsuyanagi T, Yamashita K, Sawada Y. Reconstruction of congenital and acquired earlobe deformity. Clin Plast Surg 2002; 29 (02) 249-255 , vii
  • 9 Okada E, Maruyama Y. A simple method for earlobe reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101 (01) 162-166

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Preoperative view of the congenital cleft earlobe.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Harvesting of conchal cartilage graft through anterior approach.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Central portion of conchal cartilage removed.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Final postoperative result.
Zoom Image
Fig. 5 Visible helical notch (white arrow) from lack of conchal cartilage graft.
Zoom Image
Fig. 6 Safe earlobe piercing postoperatively.
Zoom Image
Fig. 7 Postoperative photographs at 2 weeks showing inconspicuous scars.