CC BY 4.0 · World J Nucl Med 2023; 22(03): 217-225
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771287
Original Article

Impact of Wolfmet Tungsten Alloys as Parallel-Hole Collimator Material on Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Image Quality and Functional Parameters: A Simulating Medical Imaging Nuclear Detectors Monte Carlo Study

Maryam Darami
1   Medical Radiation Sciences Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
,
Babak Mahmoudian
2   Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
,
Michael Ljungberg
3   Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
,
4   Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
› Author Affiliations
Funding This work was financially supported by a grant from the Medical Radiation Sciences Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (Grant no # 65077).
 

Abstract

Objectives Collimators have a significant role in image quality and detectability in single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. Using an appropriate alloy that effectively absorbs scattered photons, without induced secondary x-rays, and with proper rigidity and weight may provide an effective approach to the image improvement that conventionally collimators made of lead (Pb).

Materials and Methods A Siemens E.CAM SPECT imaging system equipped with low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) collimator was simulated by the Simulating Medical Imaging Nuclear Detectors Monte Carlo program. Experimental and simulated data were compared based on a 2-mm 99mTc point source in an acrylic cylindrical Deluxe phantom (Data Spectrum, Inc). Seven types of tungsten (W) alloys (Wolfmet), with W content from 90 to 97% by weight, were then used as collimator materials of the simulated system. Camera parameters, such as energy- and spatial resolution, image contrast, and collimator-related parameters, such as fraction of septal penetration, scatter-to-primary ratios, and percentage of induced secondary x-rays, due to interactions in the collimator, were evaluated.

Results Acceptable conformity was found for the simulated and experiment systems in terms of energy spectra, 10.113 and 10.140%, full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the point spread function (PSF) curves, 8.78 and 9.06 mm, sensitivity, 78.46 and 78.34 cps/MBq, and contrast in images of 19.1 mm cold spheres in the Deluxe phantom, 79.17 and 78.97%, respectively. Results on the parameters of the simulated system with LEHR collimator made from the alloys showed that the alloy consisting of 90% W, 6% nickel, and 4% copper provided an FWHM of 8.76 mm, resulting in a 0.2% improvement in spatial resolution. Furthermore, all the Wolfmet collimators showed a 48% reduction in the amount of X-rays production compared to the Pb.

Conclusion A Wolfmet LEHR collimator, made by a combination of W (90%), Ni (6%), and Cu (6%) provides a better image quality and detectability compared to the Pb.


#

Introduction

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a substantial tomographic functional imaging modality used to detect and characterize a variety of diseases, including cancers and infections.[1] [2] SPECT is a cost-effective imaging modality[3] [4] [5] that improves diagnostic accuracy by facilitating three-dimensional information of the radiopharmaceutical distribution in in vivo and is also a preferable imaging approach due to radioisotope availability. However, SPECT images can be strongly influenced by penetration and scattering in the collimator walls and related X-ray emissions. Meanwhile, optimization of these effects may improve image quality and lesion detectability.[6] [7] The purpose of a collimator is to let only those photons that propagate in an appropriate direction along a collimator hole to pass through and interact in the scintillation crystal but stop others.[8] [9] However, not all photons will be stopped by the collimator walls. In order to improve collimator performance, the collimator absorption efficiency[10] [11] can be increased by using materials of high atomic numbers and mass density. Conventional nuclear medicine collimators are fabricated from lead (Pb) with small amounts of antimony (Sb). Pb is considered as effective shielding material for impinging photons because of its high density (11.35 g/cm3) and atomic number (Z = 82).[12] [13] In spite of other properties such as low cost and easy access, it is toxic, nonrigid, and produce secondary ionizing radiations of relatively high energies;[14] [15] Pb may not be a proper collimator material of imaging systems, at least when it is used on its own.

In addition to Pb, other materials that have been used or proposed as collimator materials are tungsten (W), gold (Au), uranium (U), and platinum (Pt). However, because of substantial costs, Pb and W are by far the most commonly used materials.[16]

In a study by Rajaee et al, on the effect of Au, Pb, U, and W as a high-energy-general-purpose parallel-hole collimator material on image quality, they demonstrated that the spatial resolution improved as the atomic number increased but with a cost of the system sensitivity.[10] Lee et al have shown from Monte Carlo simulations that the use of U provided about 3.19, 4.19, and 8.01% higher spatial resolution compared to Au, W, and Pb, although the system sensitivity of Pb was determined 4.25, 6.53, and 10.28% compared to the W, Au, and U, respectively.[17] In 2013, Weng et al, showed that imaging systems with a W parallel-hole collimator and cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) detectors compared to using Pb with a conventional NaI(Tl) detector have reduced the amount of septal penetration, image noise, and sharpness, and they concluded that the reduction may be attributed to W linear attenuation coefficient and also better energy resolution of CZT detector.[18] In another study by Lee et al, it was shown that the spatial resolution of U, with the same sensitivity, was better than Pb, W, and Au.[11] In this regard, it was suggested that the Pb–Sb alloy with a ratio of 98 and 2%, compared to the common Pb collimator, improves spatial resolution and energy resolution about 1.3 and 3%, respectively, with equal sensitivity.[11] They have also reported that the Pb–Sb alloy collimator improved the contrast and detection capability of the simulated cold and hot liver lesions of an NURBs based cardiac and torso (NCAT) Human Torso Phantom compared to the Pb alone.

In studies on metal alloys as pinhole collimator materials, Peterson et al used Rose's metal alloy, an alloy consisting of bismuth (Bi), Pb, and tin (Sn) with fractional weights of 50, 28, and 22%, respectively, in preclinical small‐animal imaging. Their studied parameters included penetration-to-scatter and penetration-to-total component ratios, system sensitivity, and the spatial resolution for two radionuclides, 99mTc and 125I.[19] The authors concluded that Rose's metal is an alternative to standard materials not only for low-energy photon imaging but also for medium-energy applications that require low-cost, flexible pinhole configurations and designs, and that can tolerate a degraded spatial resolution compared to Au and W.

Due to its high density of 19.26 g/cm3 and the atomic number of 74, W exhibits excellent absorption behavior against photon radiation such as X-rays and γ-radiation.[20] In an experimental study on shielding features of W–Cu, with weighting percentages of W85 wt%–Cu15 wt % and W75 wt%–Cu25 wt% composites, at low energy 0.266 MeV, Dong et al have found highest values of linear attenuation coefficient, 2.11 and 4.33 cm−1 for W75 wt%–Cu25 wt% and W85 wt%–Cu15 wt%, while they found the lowest values with high-energy 1.25 MeV x-rays, 0.44 and 0.48 cm−1 for W75 wt%–Cu25 wt% and W85 wt%–Cu15 wt%, respectively, so it is concluded that W–Cu composites are suitable to be used in several applications of radiation protection.[21]

Kaur et al presented in a review article the applicability of metallic alloys including W, Cu, Fe, Ni, and Pb-based alloys in γ-rays shielding and expressed this in terms of mass-attenuation coefficient (μm), effective atomic number (Zeff), electron density (Ne), mean-free path (mfp), half-value layer (HVL), tenth-value layer (TVL), exposure buildup factor, and energy exposure buildup factor, and they concluded that mass-attenuation coefficient values of Pb-based alloys and W-based alloys with lowest values of mfp, HVL, and TVL are comparable because they present high atomic numbers in a large weight percentage ratio than the other constituent elements. However, both the melting point and cost factor are high for W-based alloys.[22] Murty et al evaluated Zeff of different W–Cu alloys by exposure to photons with an energy range of 60–400 keV. They extended the study to also check the validation of the mixture rule and any energy dependency of effective atomic number in the energy range of 100 to 1,400 keV. Both studies showed no energy dependence of Zeff.[23] [24]

W alloy performs close to Au in terms of stopping power, with a better trade-off between performance and cost with 131I imaging.[25] In 2019, Nguyen et al compared the performance of Pb, W, Au, and depleted U pinhole collimators in terms of spatial resolution on EXIRAD-3D, a newly autoradiography technique based on a highly focusing multipinhole collimator that achieves micronresolution SPECT for cryo-cooled tissue samples, for different radioisotopes including 111In (171 keV and 245 keV), 99mTc (140 keV), 201Tl (71 keV), and 125I (27 keV).[26] They found that the image contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was improved with a higher atomic number in a range from 1.9 to 36.6%. They suggested W collimator to be a good choice to use for a wide ranges of SPECT radioisotopes.[26]

W alloys, including Wolfmet, do not only have a very high mass density, but are very good in attenuating ionizing radiation.[27] This makes the alloys ideal for shielding proposes in nuclear medicine or nuclear industry. [Fig. 1] demonstrates the photon absorption characteristics of Wolfmet HE 395, a composite of W (95%)–Ni (3.5%)–Fe (1.5%), and other shielding materials. The TVL is plotted as a function of photon energy assuming narrow beam exposure condition. The data were supplied by the National Physical Laboratory.[27] HE 395 and Pb have shown TVLs of 24.3 and 38.3 mm, against 60Co gamma rays (1,173.2 and 1,332.5 keV), with HVL thickness of 7.0 and 11.7 mm, respectively.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Comparative absorption data (10th value layer) of water, concrete, aluminum, iron, lead, Wolfmet® HE 395, as a function of the energy of incident narrow-beam photons. Data supplied by the National Physical Laboratory.[27]

Here, we evaluated the effects of Wolfmet tungsten alloys, as the LEHR collimator material, on the functional parameters and the image quality of an SPECT system.


#

Material and Methods

We used the Simulating Medical Imaging Nuclear Detectors (SIMIND) Monte Carlo program (developed by Prof. Michael Ljungberg, Lund University, Lund, Sweden) to simulate a Siemens E.CAM SPECT camera (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany).[28] [29] In brief, each of the two camera heads consisted of a removable low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) collimator, a thin NaI(Tl) scintillation crystal, a light-guide, and an array of photomultiplier tubes (PMTs). The geometry of LEHR collimator was included parallel hexagonal holes defined as 1.11-mm flat-to-flat hole diameter, 24.05 mm hole length, and 0.16-mm septal thickness. The NaI (Tl) crystal was rectangular in shape with the dimension of 59.1 × 44.5 × 0.95 cm. The light yield was 40k photons/MeV with a peak emission spectrum at 415 nm.[7] [29] The emitted light-photons from the various interactions in the NaI (Tl) crystal were collected by 59 PMTs where 53 of them had a diameter of 7.6 cm and the other six had a 5.1 cm diameter. The photocathode was of the bialkali type with a quantum efficiency of approximately 30%. The light guide with coupling grease ensured an effective light collecting and a good optical coupling between the scintillating crystal and PMTs to reduce nonlinearity and so contribute to spatial resolution. To consider the contribution of various structures attached to back of the crystal on backscattering of the emitted photons, mainly with high-energy gamma rays, a single slab of Pyrex was also substituted and included in the simulation.[30]

Experimental data were obtained to validate the SIMIND simulations and these were based on scanning (1) a 2 mm 99mTc point source with 3.7 MBq activity located at a distance of 10 cm from the detector, and (2) a clear Acrylic Plexiglass Deluxe ECT (model ECT/DLX/P) water-filled cylindrical phantom with cold spheres and rods ([Table 1]) in a hot-background using 370 MBq 99mTc.[31] The energy window was defined as 126 to 154 keV.

Table 1

Specification of the Deluxe phantom

Interior cylinder dimensions

216 mm ø x 186 mm

Cylinder wall thickness

3.2 mm

Cylinder volume

6.75 L

Cylinder volume with inserts

6.1 L

Cold rods insert height

88 mm

Sphere center from base plate

127 mm

Based on NEMA specifications on quality control procedures, the system spatial and energy resolution were determined from planar images of 99mTc point source acquiring at a distance of 10 cm from the collimator surface and center of the field of view. Matrix size was 128 × 128 matrix size with 0.27 mm pixel size, and 10 million counts per projection were collected.[32] [33] Additionally, the system sensitivity (cps/MBq) specified for a point source at 25 cm from the surface of the detector.

Image contrast and spatial resolution were evaluated by simulating the SPECT imaging of a digitized cylindrical Deluxe phantom.[31] In brief, SPECT projections along the axis of rotation were calculated for a situation with the phantom centrally positioned at 15 cm distance from the collimator surface using a matrix size of 128 × 128 with 0.39 cm pixel size, 128 projection views in a 360 degrees clockwise rotation with one million counts per projection. An OS-EM reconstruction algorithm was used to reconstruct the SPECT projections with eight iterations and four subsets. Compensation for photon attenuation was included. The spatial resolution and image contrast were determined visually from the smallest recognizable rods and 19.1 mm spheres in the reconstructed images, respectively.[7]

Simulations were conducted using the conventional LEHR collimator design with two Pb materials and multiple Wolfmet tungsten alloys ([Table 2]).

Table 2

Details on the Wolfmet alloys components as a LEHR collimator[35]

Collimator material

Composition (weight %)

Lead

Pb (100%)

Lead antimony

Pb (98%), Sb (2%)

Tungsten

W (100%)

W_ha190

W (90%), Ni (6%), Cu (4%)

W_ha193

W (93%), Ni (3.5%), Cu (3.5%)

W_ha195

W (95%), Ni (2.5%), Cu (2.5%)

W_he390

W (90%), Ni (5%), Fe (5%)

W_he395

W (95%), Ni (3.5%), Fe (1.5%)

W_he397

W (97%), Ni (1.5%), Fe (1.5%)

W_he3925

W (92.5%), Ni (3.8%), Fe (3.8%)

Abbreviation: LEHR, low-energy high-resolution.



#

Results

A comparison of measured and simulated energy pulse-height distributions yields an acceptable conformity in terms of the functional and image parameters ([Fig. 2]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Energy pulse-height distribution obtained from the 99mTc point source (140 keV) simulated by SIMIND (blue) and from measurement (red).

The calculated energy resolution (FWHM) from the 99mTc point source from simulation and measurement were calculated to 10.11 and 10.14%, respectively. The spatial resolution (FWHM) at 10 cm source to collimator distance was calculated to 8.78 and 9.06 mm for simulation and measurement and the system sensitivity was determined to be 78.46 and 78.34 cps/MBq, respectively.

Contrast measures from the cold sphere images of cylindrical Deluxe phantom were calculated according to the following equation:

Zoom Image

where Msp and Mcy correspond to the minimum pixel value of the cold spheres and the maximum pixel value in the Deluxe phantom cylinder, respectively. The results on contrast values of cold bodies in background of the Deluxe phantom cylinder are presented in [Table 3].

Table 3

Results on the calculated image contrast of Deluxe phantom cold spheres

System

Diameter of the Deluxe phantom cold spheres (mm)

9.5

12.7

15.9

19.1

25.4

31.8

Measurement

53.24

59.79

69.44

78.97

87.39

92.47

Simulation

51.92

56.48

68.89

79.17

83.03

89.21

Profiles on image uniformity, without attenuation correction as with the experimental, obtained from images of the Deluxe phantom are presented in [Fig. 3] for the experiment and simulated SPECT imaging systems.

Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Profiles of image uniformity obtained from mages of Deluxe phantom SPECT from measurement (blue) and simulation (red).

Results on the functional parameters of the simulated SPECT system equipped with 10 collimator materials from the 99mTc point source simulations are presented in [Table 4].

Table 4

Functional parameters of the simulated SPECT system from the 99mTc point source scanning with 10 different collimator materials

Material[a]

Sensitivity

(cps/MBq)

Efficiency

Spatial resolution (mm)

Window

Spectrum

FWHM

FWTM

Pb

78.459

0.7388

0.9336

8.780

15.52

Pb_Sb

78.635

0.7390

0.9334

8.807

15.58

W

77.233

0.7534

0.9323

8.751

15.42

W_ha190

78.266

0.7531

0.9321

8.762

15.50

W_ha193

77.927

0.7536

0.9324

8.771

15.51

W_ha195

77.824

0.7531

0.9325

8.781

15.48

W_he390

78.388

0.7535

0.9322

8.800

15.52

W_he395

77.629

0.7537

0.9322

8.766

15.48

W_he397

77.533

0.7535

0.9324

8.772

15.48

W_he3925

78.041

0.7531

0.9322

8.791

15.50

Abbreviation: FWHM, full width at half-maximum.


a Pb (lead), Sb (antimony), W (tungsten).


Results on the collimator-related parameters, including septal penetration, geometric photons, Compton scatter in collimator, and the ratio of the scattered-to-primary photons in the photopeak energy windows, besides, the percentage of the collimator-induced x-rays are shown in [Table 5]. The parameters were calculated by SIMIND during the simulation according to the related system, isotope, and phantom settings and, hence, were presented as data in the result files.

Table 5

Radiation interaction events of a 2 mm 99mTc point source with 3.7 MBq activity with the simulated SPECT system depend on collimator materials

Collimator

material

Penetration

(%)

Primary

(%)

Scatter

(%)

[c]X-Ray

(%)

Scatter/Total

×10−5

AC[a]

WEW[b]

AC

WEW

AC

WEW

AC

Total

Pb

6.21

4.62

87.62

93.95

2.20

1.43

3.96

535

Pb_Sb

6.29

4.73

87.57

93.84

2.21

1.44

3.93

536

W

3.88

3.42

91.15

94.16

1.81

1.44

2.05

538

W_ha190

4.79

4.27

92.93

95.60

1.97

1.57

2.09

536

W_ha193

4.54

4.02

91.44

94.45

1.94

1.53

2.09

538

W_ha195

4.38

3.87

91.60

94.62

1.91

1.51

2.11

536

W_he390

4.80

4.27

91.12

94.17

1.98

1.56

2.10

535

W_he395

4.29

3.83

91.76

94.67

1.87

1.88

2.07

536

W_he397

4.15

3.69

91.90

94.82

1.86

1.48

2.09

536

W_he3925

4.57

4.07

91.37

94.40

1.95

1.54

2.10

535

Abbreviation: SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography.


a Photons after collimator.


b Photons within energy windows.


c X-ray in collimator was equal zero for all collimators.


[Table 6] provides the measures of image contrast of the Deluxe phantom produced from the simulated SPECT system with different collimator materials. Reconstructed images of the cold spheres using the collimators are presented in [Fig. 4].

Table 6

The results on the SPECT image contrast of 19.1 mm cold sphere of Deluxe phantom with different collimator materials

Collimator material

Pb

Pb_Sb

W

W_ha190

W_ha193

W_ha195

W_he390

W_he395

W_he397

W_he3925

contrast (%)

79.17

79.25

77.97

79.00

80.49

79.15

78.76

78.76

80.33

80.18

Abbreviation: SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography.


Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Reconstructed images of the SIMIND simulated SPECT of cold spheres (slice 56) of Deluxe phantom by with the LEHR collimator made from lead (Pb), lead–antimony (Pb–sb), tungsten (w), and Wolfmet alloys. SPECT projections along the axis of rotation were calculated for a situation with the phantom centrally positioned at 15 cm distance from the collimator surface using a matrix size of 128 × 128 with 0.39 cm pixel size. 128 projection views in a FO clockwise rotation with 1M counts per projection. A OSEM reconstruction algorithm was used to reconstruct the SPECT projections with eight iterations and four subsets. Compensation for photon attenuation was included.

#

Discussion

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of W alloys as collimator material of SPECT imaging system on functional parameters of the system including spatial resolution, sensitivity, and so image quality by SIMIND Monte Carlo simulation.

In this regard, seven alloys of Wolfmet tungsten were used in the simulation of the potential benefits of LEHR W collimators for the current SPECT imaging system ([Table 2]). According to the results, W alloys collimators demonstrated less septal penetration, scatter radiation, and also a better primary ratio compared to the Pb which produces secondary ionizing radiations with relatively high energies especially at whole the energy spectra ([Table 5]). Furthermore, tungsten with a high density and atomic number of 19.26 g/cm3 and 74, respectively, may exhibit excellent absorption behavior against the photon radiations and hence on image contrast ([Table 6]).

Verification of the simulation with the conventional LEHR collimator confirmed the results of Azarm et al[29] [34] and Toossi et al.[29] Meanwhile, according to the obtained results, there were 1.40 and 1.18% reduction in system sensitivity with W_he397 alloy, compared to Pb–Sb and Pb alone ([Table 4]), respectively. Azarm et al, in a study on the effects of collimator material on spatial and energy resolution, have shown that the common collimator made of 98% Pb and 2% Sb could provide a better spatial and energy resolution, 7.68 mm and 9.87%, compared to 7.74 mm and 10.14% of Pb alone, respectively.[34] Our study also showed that Pb–Sb collimator improved the spatial resolution by 0.31% compared to Pb, and W_ha190 alloy further improved to about 0.2% compared to Pb and Sb. It must be mentioned that all the studied alloys showed a reduction in the penetration fraction, collimator-induced X-rays, and increased geometrical fraction compared to Pb. However, Collimator with W alone provides better results for the parameters compared to the studied materials ([Table 5]). In this regard, results on the evaluation of pinhole collimator materials for micronresolution ex vivo SPECT by Nguyen et al 2019 indicate that using materials with higher photon attenuation including U, Au, W, and Pb yields images with better CNR for the 125I, 201Tl, 99mTc, and 111In isotopes with improvements ranging from 1.9 to 36.6%.[26] They have suggested W collimator as a good choice for a wide range of SPECT isotopes, so our results also confirmed their findings. In a similar manner with photon-stopping power in terms of photon attenuation, increasing the linear attenuation coefficient was demonstrated to have potential effects on the improvement of the spatial resolution and, hence, on isotopic image quality, for example, image contrast, resolution, and detectability.[11] [17] It should be noted that linear attenuation coefficient is also influenced by the beam energy.[21] [22] Regarding image contrast, the value obtained for the 19.1 mm cold sphere inside the Deluxe phantom increased by 1.32, 1.16, and 1.01 with W_ha193, W_he397, and W_he3925 compared to the Pb, respectively ([Table 6] and [Fig. 4]). One explanation could be the penetration rate reduction.

Finally, the emergence of new production techniques, such as direct 3-D printing of metals or “cold casting” of W-composite materials, will open new possibilities for the fabrication of more tailored collimator designs that would be impossible or very expensive to construct by conventional methods of fabrication including casting hot Pb (microcast) or folding Pb foil (microlinear).


#

Conclusion

The present study showed that the use of a potential LEHR collimator made from Wolfmet tungsten alloys could a better spatial resolution, improved contrast, and image quality in general when comparing conventional Pb and Pb–Sb collimators.


#
#

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Steve Jeffery, Business Development Manager of WOLFMET®, for the information about the Wolfmet alloys.

Authors' Contribution

M.D. was responsible for writing—original draft, visualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, and conceptualization. B.M was responsible for writing—review and editing, supervision, formal analysis, and conceptualization. M.L. was responsible for providing materials for SIMIND simulation, review, and editing. J.P.I. was responsible for writing—review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition, and conceptualization.


  • References

  • 1 Lee SJ, Park HJ. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for radiotherapy planning in patients with lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2020; 10 (01) 14864
  • 2 Sadremomtaz A, Telikani Z. Validation and optimization studies of small animal SPECT using GATE Monte Carlo simulation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 2019; 915: 94-101
  • 3 Taherparvar P, Sadremomtaz A. Development of GATE Monte Carlo simulation for a CsI pixelated gamma camera dedicated to high resolution animal SPECT. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2018; 41 (01) 31-39
  • 4 Wang Y. . Development and applications of high-sensitivity and high-resolution fully three-dimensional SPECT imaging techniques using two different collimator designs. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2004.
  • 5 Baghani HR. Image quality parameters in brain imaging with fan-beam collimator: a Monte Carlo study on radiation scattering effects. Radiological Phys Technol 2019; 12 (02) 194-200
  • 6 McQuaid SJ, Southekal S, Kijewski MF, Moore SC. Joint optimization of collimator and reconstruction parameters in SPECT imaging for lesion quantification. Phys Med Biol 2011; 56 (21) 6983-7000
  • 7 Islamian JP, Toossi MT, Momennezhad M, Zakavi SR, Sadeghi R, Ljungberg M. Monte Carlo study of the effect of collimator thickness on T-99m source response in single photon emission computed tomography. World J Nucl Med 2012; 11 (02) 70-74
  • 8 Khorshidi A, Ashoor M, Hosseini SH, Rajaee A. Estimation of fan beam and parallel beam parameters in a wire mesh design. J Nucl Med Technol 2012; 40 (01) 37-43
  • 9 Khorshidi A, Ashoor M, Hosseini SH, Rajaee A. Evaluation of collimators' response: round and hexagonal holes in parallel and fan beam. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2012; 109 (03) 59-66
  • 10 Rajaee A, Shahriari M, Kamali AA, Hosseini S. Simulation study of the influence of collimator material on image quality improvement for high energy photons in nuclear medicine using MCNP code. J Theor Appl Phys 2011; 4 (04) 13-18
  • 11 Lee Y-J, Kim D-H, Kim H-J. The effect of high-resolution parallel-hole collimator materials with a pixelated semiconductor SPECT system at equivalent sensitivities: Monte Carlo simulation studies. J Korean Phys Soc 2014; 64: 1055-1062
  • 12 Gopal S, Sanjeevaiah B. A method to determine the γ-ray attenuation coefficients. Nucl Instrum Methods 1973; 107 (02) 221-225
  • 13 Rezaei-Ochbelagh D, Azimkhani S. Investigation of gamma-ray shielding properties of concrete containing different percentages of lead. Appl Radiat Isot 2012; 70 (10) 2282-2286
  • 14 Kobayashi S, Hosoda N, Takashima R. Tungsten alloys as radiation protection materials. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 1997; 390 (03) 426-430
  • 15 Directive E. Restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (RoHS). Off J Eur Communities 2013; 46: 19-23
  • 16 Van Audenhaege K, Van Holen R, Vandenberghe S, Vanhove C, Metzler SD, Moore SC. Review of SPECT collimator selection, optimization, and fabrication for clinical and preclinical imaging. Med Phys 2015; 42 (08) 4796-4813
  • 17 Lee Y-J, Ryu H-J, Lee S-W, Park S-J, Kim H-J. Comparison of ultra-high-resolution parallel-hole collimator materials based on the CdTe pixelated semiconductor SPECT system. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 2013; 713: 33-39
  • 18 Weng F, Bagchi S, Huang Q, Seo Y. . Design Studies of a CZT-based detector combined with a pixel-geometry-matching collimator for SPECT imaging. Paper presented at: 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC); 2013.
  • 19 Peterson M, Strand SE, Ljungberg M. Using Rose's metal alloy as a pinhole collimator material in preclinical small-animal imaging: a Monte Carlo evaluation. Med Phys 2015; 42 (04) 1698-1709
  • 20 Handtrack D, Tabernig B, Kestler H, Pohl P, Glatz W, Sigl L. . Tungsten heavy alloys for collimators and shieldings in the X-ray diagnostics. Paper presented at: Proceedings of 18th PLANSEE seminar on refractory metals and hard materials; 2013.
  • 21 Dong M, Tishkevich D, Hanfi M. et al. WCu composites fabrication and experimental study of the shielding efficiency against ionizing radiation. Radiat Phys Chem 2022; 200: 110175
  • 22 Kaur T, Sharma J, Singh T. Review on scope of metallic alloys in gamma rays shield designing. Prog Nucl Energy 2019; 113: 95-113
  • 23 Murty VR, Winkoun DP, Devan KR. Effective atomic numbers for W/Cu alloy using transmission experiments. Appl Radiat Isot 2000; 53 (4–5): 945-948
  • 24 Murty VR. Effective atomic numbers for W/Cu alloy for total photon attenuation. Radiat Phys Chemi 2004; 71 (3–4): 667-669
  • 25 Auer B, De Beenhouwer J, Kalluri K, Goding JC, Furenlid LR, King MA. . Preliminary investigation of design parameters of an innovative multi-pinhole system dedicated to brain SPECT imaging. Paper presented at: 2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Proceedings (NSS/MIC); 2018.
  • 26 Nguyen MP, Goorden MC, Kamphuis C, Beekman FJ. Evaluation of pinhole collimator materials for micron-resolution ex vivo SPECT. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64 (10) 105017
  • 27 Wolfmet. Wolfmet tungesten alloys radiation shielding data sheet. Accessed April 3, 2022 at: https://www.wolfmet.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wolfmet_Radiation_Shielding2.pdf 2017 .
  • 28 Ljungberg M, Strand S-E. A Monte Carlo program for the simulation of scintillation camera characteristics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1989; 29 (04) 257-272
  • 29 Bahreyni Toossi MT, Islamian JP, Momennezhad M, Ljungberg M, Naseri SH. SIMIND Monte Carlo simulation of a single photon emission CT. J Med Phys 2010; 35 (01) 42-47
  • 30 Islamian JP, Toossi MT, Momennezhad M, Zakavi SR, Sadeghi R. Monte Carlo study of the effect of backscatter material thickness on 99mTc source response in single photon emission computed tomography. Iran J Med Phys 2013; 10 (1–2): 69-77
  • 31 Pirayesh IJ, Bahreyni TMT, Momennezhad M, Naseri S, Ljungberg M. Simulation of a quality control Jaszczak phantom with SIMIND Monte Carlo and adding the phantom as an accessory to the program. Iran J Med Phys 2012; 9 (02) 135-140
  • 32 Blust J. Gamma camera acceptance testing: the first quality control. J Nucl Med Technol 1994; 22 (02) 58-61
  • 33 Busemann Sokole E, Płachcínska A, Britten A, Lyra Georgosopoulou M, Tindale W, Klett R. EANM Physics Committee ; EANM Working Group on Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation Quality Control. Routine quality control recommendations for nuclear medicine instrumentation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37 (03) 662-671
  • 34 Azarm A, Islamian JP, Mahmoudian B, Gharepapagh E. The effect of parallel-hole collimator material on image and functional parameters in SPECT imaging: A SIMIND Monte Carlo study. World J Nucl Med 2015; 14 (03) 160-164
  • 35 Wolfmet. Wolfmet tungsten alloys technical information. Accessed April 3, 2022 at: https://www.wolfmet.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wolfmet_Tungsten_Alloys_Technical_Information1.pdf .. 2019 .

Address for correspondence

Jalil Pirayesh Islamian, PhD, MSc, BSc
Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Attar Neyshaburi Str., Azadi Ave, Tabriz 5166614766
Iran   

Publication History

Article published online:
06 September 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

  • References

  • 1 Lee SJ, Park HJ. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for radiotherapy planning in patients with lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2020; 10 (01) 14864
  • 2 Sadremomtaz A, Telikani Z. Validation and optimization studies of small animal SPECT using GATE Monte Carlo simulation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 2019; 915: 94-101
  • 3 Taherparvar P, Sadremomtaz A. Development of GATE Monte Carlo simulation for a CsI pixelated gamma camera dedicated to high resolution animal SPECT. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2018; 41 (01) 31-39
  • 4 Wang Y. . Development and applications of high-sensitivity and high-resolution fully three-dimensional SPECT imaging techniques using two different collimator designs. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2004.
  • 5 Baghani HR. Image quality parameters in brain imaging with fan-beam collimator: a Monte Carlo study on radiation scattering effects. Radiological Phys Technol 2019; 12 (02) 194-200
  • 6 McQuaid SJ, Southekal S, Kijewski MF, Moore SC. Joint optimization of collimator and reconstruction parameters in SPECT imaging for lesion quantification. Phys Med Biol 2011; 56 (21) 6983-7000
  • 7 Islamian JP, Toossi MT, Momennezhad M, Zakavi SR, Sadeghi R, Ljungberg M. Monte Carlo study of the effect of collimator thickness on T-99m source response in single photon emission computed tomography. World J Nucl Med 2012; 11 (02) 70-74
  • 8 Khorshidi A, Ashoor M, Hosseini SH, Rajaee A. Estimation of fan beam and parallel beam parameters in a wire mesh design. J Nucl Med Technol 2012; 40 (01) 37-43
  • 9 Khorshidi A, Ashoor M, Hosseini SH, Rajaee A. Evaluation of collimators' response: round and hexagonal holes in parallel and fan beam. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2012; 109 (03) 59-66
  • 10 Rajaee A, Shahriari M, Kamali AA, Hosseini S. Simulation study of the influence of collimator material on image quality improvement for high energy photons in nuclear medicine using MCNP code. J Theor Appl Phys 2011; 4 (04) 13-18
  • 11 Lee Y-J, Kim D-H, Kim H-J. The effect of high-resolution parallel-hole collimator materials with a pixelated semiconductor SPECT system at equivalent sensitivities: Monte Carlo simulation studies. J Korean Phys Soc 2014; 64: 1055-1062
  • 12 Gopal S, Sanjeevaiah B. A method to determine the γ-ray attenuation coefficients. Nucl Instrum Methods 1973; 107 (02) 221-225
  • 13 Rezaei-Ochbelagh D, Azimkhani S. Investigation of gamma-ray shielding properties of concrete containing different percentages of lead. Appl Radiat Isot 2012; 70 (10) 2282-2286
  • 14 Kobayashi S, Hosoda N, Takashima R. Tungsten alloys as radiation protection materials. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 1997; 390 (03) 426-430
  • 15 Directive E. Restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (RoHS). Off J Eur Communities 2013; 46: 19-23
  • 16 Van Audenhaege K, Van Holen R, Vandenberghe S, Vanhove C, Metzler SD, Moore SC. Review of SPECT collimator selection, optimization, and fabrication for clinical and preclinical imaging. Med Phys 2015; 42 (08) 4796-4813
  • 17 Lee Y-J, Ryu H-J, Lee S-W, Park S-J, Kim H-J. Comparison of ultra-high-resolution parallel-hole collimator materials based on the CdTe pixelated semiconductor SPECT system. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 2013; 713: 33-39
  • 18 Weng F, Bagchi S, Huang Q, Seo Y. . Design Studies of a CZT-based detector combined with a pixel-geometry-matching collimator for SPECT imaging. Paper presented at: 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC); 2013.
  • 19 Peterson M, Strand SE, Ljungberg M. Using Rose's metal alloy as a pinhole collimator material in preclinical small-animal imaging: a Monte Carlo evaluation. Med Phys 2015; 42 (04) 1698-1709
  • 20 Handtrack D, Tabernig B, Kestler H, Pohl P, Glatz W, Sigl L. . Tungsten heavy alloys for collimators and shieldings in the X-ray diagnostics. Paper presented at: Proceedings of 18th PLANSEE seminar on refractory metals and hard materials; 2013.
  • 21 Dong M, Tishkevich D, Hanfi M. et al. WCu composites fabrication and experimental study of the shielding efficiency against ionizing radiation. Radiat Phys Chem 2022; 200: 110175
  • 22 Kaur T, Sharma J, Singh T. Review on scope of metallic alloys in gamma rays shield designing. Prog Nucl Energy 2019; 113: 95-113
  • 23 Murty VR, Winkoun DP, Devan KR. Effective atomic numbers for W/Cu alloy using transmission experiments. Appl Radiat Isot 2000; 53 (4–5): 945-948
  • 24 Murty VR. Effective atomic numbers for W/Cu alloy for total photon attenuation. Radiat Phys Chemi 2004; 71 (3–4): 667-669
  • 25 Auer B, De Beenhouwer J, Kalluri K, Goding JC, Furenlid LR, King MA. . Preliminary investigation of design parameters of an innovative multi-pinhole system dedicated to brain SPECT imaging. Paper presented at: 2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Proceedings (NSS/MIC); 2018.
  • 26 Nguyen MP, Goorden MC, Kamphuis C, Beekman FJ. Evaluation of pinhole collimator materials for micron-resolution ex vivo SPECT. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64 (10) 105017
  • 27 Wolfmet. Wolfmet tungesten alloys radiation shielding data sheet. Accessed April 3, 2022 at: https://www.wolfmet.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wolfmet_Radiation_Shielding2.pdf 2017 .
  • 28 Ljungberg M, Strand S-E. A Monte Carlo program for the simulation of scintillation camera characteristics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1989; 29 (04) 257-272
  • 29 Bahreyni Toossi MT, Islamian JP, Momennezhad M, Ljungberg M, Naseri SH. SIMIND Monte Carlo simulation of a single photon emission CT. J Med Phys 2010; 35 (01) 42-47
  • 30 Islamian JP, Toossi MT, Momennezhad M, Zakavi SR, Sadeghi R. Monte Carlo study of the effect of backscatter material thickness on 99mTc source response in single photon emission computed tomography. Iran J Med Phys 2013; 10 (1–2): 69-77
  • 31 Pirayesh IJ, Bahreyni TMT, Momennezhad M, Naseri S, Ljungberg M. Simulation of a quality control Jaszczak phantom with SIMIND Monte Carlo and adding the phantom as an accessory to the program. Iran J Med Phys 2012; 9 (02) 135-140
  • 32 Blust J. Gamma camera acceptance testing: the first quality control. J Nucl Med Technol 1994; 22 (02) 58-61
  • 33 Busemann Sokole E, Płachcínska A, Britten A, Lyra Georgosopoulou M, Tindale W, Klett R. EANM Physics Committee ; EANM Working Group on Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation Quality Control. Routine quality control recommendations for nuclear medicine instrumentation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37 (03) 662-671
  • 34 Azarm A, Islamian JP, Mahmoudian B, Gharepapagh E. The effect of parallel-hole collimator material on image and functional parameters in SPECT imaging: A SIMIND Monte Carlo study. World J Nucl Med 2015; 14 (03) 160-164
  • 35 Wolfmet. Wolfmet tungsten alloys technical information. Accessed April 3, 2022 at: https://www.wolfmet.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wolfmet_Tungsten_Alloys_Technical_Information1.pdf .. 2019 .

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Comparative absorption data (10th value layer) of water, concrete, aluminum, iron, lead, Wolfmet® HE 395, as a function of the energy of incident narrow-beam photons. Data supplied by the National Physical Laboratory.[27]
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Energy pulse-height distribution obtained from the 99mTc point source (140 keV) simulated by SIMIND (blue) and from measurement (red).
Zoom Image
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Profiles of image uniformity obtained from mages of Deluxe phantom SPECT from measurement (blue) and simulation (red).
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Reconstructed images of the SIMIND simulated SPECT of cold spheres (slice 56) of Deluxe phantom by with the LEHR collimator made from lead (Pb), lead–antimony (Pb–sb), tungsten (w), and Wolfmet alloys. SPECT projections along the axis of rotation were calculated for a situation with the phantom centrally positioned at 15 cm distance from the collimator surface using a matrix size of 128 × 128 with 0.39 cm pixel size. 128 projection views in a FO clockwise rotation with 1M counts per projection. A OSEM reconstruction algorithm was used to reconstruct the SPECT projections with eight iterations and four subsets. Compensation for photon attenuation was included.