CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Diabetes and Endocrine Practice 2022; 05(03): 104-111
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759643
Original Article

Diagnosis and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Survey of Physicians from the Middle East and Africa

1   Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
2   Department of Medicine, Dubai Medical College, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
3   Department of Medicine, Yas Clinic Khalifa City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
,
Mohammed Bashir
4   Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar Metabolic Institute, Doha, Qatar
,
Aishah Ekhzaimy
5   Endocrinology Division, Department of Medicine, King Saud University, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
,
6   Faiha Specialized Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolism Center (FDEMC), University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq
,
Huda E. Mustafa
7   Health Plus Center for Diabetes and Endocrinology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
,
Nancy Elbarbary
8   Pediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
,
Ghina Ghazeeri
9   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
,
Hisham Mohamed Abdel Rahim
10   Department of Medicine, Ribat University Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan
,
Dima K. Abdelmannan
2   Department of Medicine, Dubai Medical College, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
› Author Affiliations
Funding and Sponsorship No funding was received in the publication of this study.
 

Abstract

Background Studies from several regions examined the approach to diagnosing and managing polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Limited data are available from the Middle East and Africa (MEA).

Objective The aim of this study was to understand the practice pattern for diagnosing and managing PCOS by relevant specialists across the MEA region.

Methods We used an online survey consisting of an established questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions grouped to capture information on (a) the characteristics of the respondents, (b) patients with PCOS seen by respondents, (c) the diagnostic criteria, (d) biochemical parameters for differential diagnosis of hyperandrogenism, (e) long-term concerns, and, finally (f) management choices.

Results A total of 190 questionnaires were available for final analysis; 73.7% of the respondents were senior physicians; 59.5% and 17.4% were endocrinologists and gynecologists, respectively. Menstrual irregularity was the most frequent criterion used for the diagnosis of PCOS (90.5%), followed by hirsutism (75.7%), and biochemical hyperandrogenism (71.4%). Dehydroepiandrosterone was the most frequent biochemical parameter used for the differential diagnosis of hyperandrogenism (52.4%) followed by total testosterone (45.4%). Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus were the principal long-term concerns for PCOS (45.1%), followed by infertility (29.9%). Metformin was the most commonly prescribed treatment (43.8%), followed by lifestyle modification (27.0%), and oral contraceptives (18.9%). Infertility treatments include metformin alone, clomiphene citrate alone, or their combination prescribed by 23.1, 9.9, or 52.7%, respectively, whereas only 3.8% contemplated ovulation induction. Some differences and similarities were observed in previous studies, including gynecologists and endocrinologists.

Conclusions This survey provides a baseline for the perspective in diagnosing and treating PCOS in the MEA region. Some deviation is observed from mainline recommended practices. More education on PCOS diagnostic criteria and treatment of PCOS is needed in line with the recently published evidence international guideline.


#

Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine–metabolic disorder in women of reproductive age.[1] [2] PCOS is characterized by clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenism, anovulation, and polycystic ovaries.[1] [2] [3]

Women with PCOS are at increased risk of various metabolic, atherosclerotic, and gynecological disorders. Metabolic complications include impaired glucose tolerance, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hepatic steatosis, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Atherosclerotic complications include vascular thrombosis, cerebrovascular accidents, and ischemic heart disease. Gynecological complications include subfertility and a high risk of miscarriage, gestational diabetes, endometrial atypia or carcinoma, and possibly ovarian malignancy.[1] [2] [3] [4] Hence, it is critical that health care professionals understand the complexity of this condition and the need for accurate diagnosis, appropriate management, and coordinated care.

Evaluation of patients suspected of having PCOS includes clinical assessment for the presence of hirsutism, ovarian ultrasonography, and laboratory hormonal assessment to confirm hyperandrogenism and oligo-anovulation and to exclude other similar disorders.[1] [2] [3] [4] Traditionally, the treatment of patients with PCOS has focused on the relief of symptoms and is set according to the management goal: relief of hyperandrogenic symptoms, regulation of menstruation, and restoration of fertility.[1] [2] [3] [4] Despite significant progress in understanding the pathophysiology of PCOS over the past two decades, it remains underdiagnosed by many practitioners.[1] Management of PCOS is complex and should include the relief of symptoms and the screening and treatment of chronic metabolic, atherosclerotic, and gynecological complications.[5]

Due to the different phenotypes of women with PCOS and the different interests of expert groups, guidelines have pointed physicians in different directions to diagnose and manage PCOS.[6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] To ascertain the practice pattern of relevant physicians, several studies from Europe, Australia, and North America have examined the awareness and management of PCOS among various groups of physicians.[12] [13] [14] [15] [16] However, results from these studies may not be generalizable. Therefore, we surveyed to understand the common approach in diagnosing and managing PCOS by relevant specialists across the Middle East and Africa (MEA) region. We aimed to establish the baseline practice and identify areas for improvement and future research. Furthermore, we aimed to compare the results from the MEA region with those from European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) survey.[13]


#

Materials and Methods

Objectives

We aimed to document current practices in the general approach to diagnosing and managing PCOS by physicians from the MEA region in relevant specialities and also compare the practice in MEA with published guidelines.


#

Target Population

In the absence of a single MEA regional endocrine society with a membership list that can define a study population, the target population was identified from a list of electronic mails pooled from continuous professional development delegates, speakers, authors, or members of various scientific groups or forums in various parts of the MEA region in addition to personal contacts of the authors who are identified to practice in the target disciplines. Consequently, several questions were added to the PCOS survey to help define the demographic and professional profiles of the respondents and their practices, similar to our previously published surveys (17–20).


#

Survey Management

We used a web-based commercial survey management service (Survey Monkey, Palo Alto, California, United States). All participants received an initial email or a link that explained the rationale of the survey and what was required from the consented respondents, followed by three subsequent reminder emails/messages during the study period. Each message included the principal investigator's full credentials and contact details and a unique email-specific electronic link to the questionnaire. The survey web site was open for 2 months from 1st February 2020 to 31st March 2020. Finally, survey responses were collected and stored electronically for an anonymous analysis.


#

Survey Questionnaire

The questionnaire was anonymous. The detailed questionnaire is included in the supplementary material ([Supplementary Appendix 1], available in the online version). The PCOS survey questions were adapted from ESE PCOS Special Interest Group's Questionnaire,[13] also used in the Nordic survey.[16] It included general information about respondents, respondents' general information about PCOS, diagnostic criteria for PCOS, clinical management, and long-term health implications.

Table 1

The respondents' demographic and professional profiles

Questions and predetermined responses

Results[a]

Sex

Male

105 (55.3%)

Female

85 (44.7%)

Age group

<30 years

28 (14.8%)

31–40 years

59 (31.1%)

41–50 years

67 (35.2%)

51–60 years

39 (20.7%)

> 60 years.

18 (9.5%)

Region of residence and practice

Arabian Gulf

123 (64.7%)

Rest of the Middle East

35 (18.4%)

North Africa

20 (10.5%)

Sub-Saharan Africa

12 (6.3%)

Practice setting

University/tertiary hospital

132 (69.5%)

Community hospital or nonteaching

35 (18.4%)

Primary care

18 (9.5%)

Special services

5 (2.6%)

Type of practice

Mainly public

158 (82.1%)

Mainly private

34 (17.9%)

Specialty

Endocrinology

113 (59.5%)

Obstetrics and gynecology

33 (17.4%)

Family medicine/General practice

16 (8.4%)

General medicine and subbranches

15 (7.9%)

Other

13 (6.8%)

Career stage (grade)

Senior

140 (73.7%)

Mid-grade

50 (26.3%)

Sex

Male

55.3%105

Female

44.7%85

Number of PCOS patients seen previous year

<25

86 (45.3%)

25–50

60 (31.6%)

50–100

21 (11.1%)

101–200

15 (7.9%)

>200

8 (4.2%)

Abbreviation: PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.


a Responses are expressed as absolute frequency (numbers) and relative frequencies (%).



#

Data Analysis

Responses from outside the target group (e.g., students, nurses, and those from outside the MEA regions) or substantially incomplete not including adequate information on the PCOS were excluded (n = 60). The rest (n = 190) were included. Summary statistics were prepared for responses to each question. Because not every participant answered all questions, the percentage of respondents providing a given answer was calculated individually for each question, using the number of respondents to that question as the denominator.


#
#

Results

General Characteristics of the Respondents

A total of 250 agreed to participate, and one-hundred ninety responses were included in the final analysis. No data were available on nonrespondents, and those with substantially incomplete questionnaires were excluded from the analysis. Most of the responses were from the Arabian Gulf (64.7%), followed by the rest of the Middle East (18.4%) and North Africa (10.5%) ([Table 1]). However, most of the responses were from four countries: Saudi Arabia (59), Qatar (33), Iraq (33), and the United Arab Emirates (22). This was followed in decreasing order by Egypt (7), Sudan (6), South Africa (5), Libya (5), Bahrain (4), Nigeria (3), Lebanon (2), Morocco (2), Oman (2), Kenya (2), Kuwait (2), Mali (1), Uganda (1), and Zimbabwe (1). They were 105 males (55.3%) and 85 females (44.7%). The majority were between 41 to 50 and 31 to 40 (35.2 and 31.1%, respectively) ([Table 1]). Most of the respondents (82.1%) work in public services in tertiary hospitals (69.5%). Endocrinologists were the most common specialty 113 (59.5%), followed by obstetrics and gynecology 33 (17.4%) ([Table 1]).


#

Awareness of the PCOS Clinical, Psychosocial, and Lifestyle Management

Infertility was the most common reason for clinic attendance for PCOS. The second most common reason for clinic attendance was obesity and T2DM ([Table 2]). Scalp hair loss was the least reported feature of PCOS ([Table 2]).

Table 2

The respondents' awareness of the clinical features, psychosocial well-being, and lifestyle management and comorbidities of PCOS

Questions and predetermined responses

Responses[a]

Frequency of symptoms and signs believed to be associated with PCOS?

Irregular menstrual cycles/periods

185 (97.4%)

Excess hair growth

171 (90.0%)

Acne

155 (81.6%)

Increased tendency for weight gain

141 (74.2%)

Improvement of symptoms after weight loss

133 (70.0%)

Difficulty losing weight

125 (65.8%)

Scalp hair loss/male pattern-baldness

94 (49.5%)

Body image dissatisfaction

92 (48.4%)

Depression

91 (47.9%)

Reduced quality of life

68 (35.8%)

Improvement of symptoms with exercise

64 (33.7%)

Anxiety

64 (33.7%)

Improvement of symptoms with a low GI diet

58 (30.5%)

Premenstrual syndrome

15 (7.9%)

Migraines

10 (5.3%)

Which of the following consequences are associated with PCOS?

Insulin resistance

180 (94.7%)

Reduced fertility

168 (88.4%)

Increased risk of type 2 diabetes

157 (82.6%)

Hormone imbalance

150 (78.9%)

High blood androgen levels

136 (71.6%)

Increased risk of gestational diabetes

109 (57.4%)

Increased risk of cardiovascular disease risk factors

106 (55.8%)

Infertility

100 (52.6%)

Cysts on ovaries

98 (51.6%)

Fatty liver

95 (50.0%)

Sleep apnea and snoring

70 (36.8%)

Endometrial cancer

59 (31.1%)

Complications of pregnancy

52 (27.4%)

Surgery for ovarian cysts

32 (16.8%)

Ovarian cancer

15 (7.9%)

Abbreviations: GI, glycemic index; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.


a Responses are expressed as absolute frequency (numbers) and relative frequencies (%).


Tendency to gain weight and trouble losing weight in affected women was commonly recognized as well as the effect of weight loss and exercise on PCOS symptoms. The most common comorbidities were reduced fertility, T2DM, gestational diabetes, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Compared with other features related to PCOS, the reduction of psychosocial well-being in PCOS was less recognized by health professionals. Indeed, depression and especially anxiety were commonly ranked low in the context of psychosocial features of PCOS. Fatty liver, sleep apnea, pregnancy complications, and risk for endometrial cancer were less commonly known features. The doctors were generally well informed that ovarian cancer is unrelated to PCOS. About 16.8% of the participants reported an association between surgery for ovarian cysts and PCOS ([Table 2]). The patient's age at the first visit and diagnosis was less than 20 years for 14.8.% of the respondents, between 20 and 30 years for 82.0%, and more than 30 years for the remainder. The irregular menstrual cycle was the most commonly reported clinical feature ([Table 3]).

Table 3

The respondents' views on the diagnosis of PCOS

Questions and predetermined responses

Responses[a]

The perceived age of diagnosis of PCOS

 20–30

155 (82.0%)

 < 20

28 (14.8%)

 > 30

6 (3.2%)

Criteria used to diagnose PCOS

 Rotterdam

118 (62.1%)

 I don't know

30 (15.8%)

 Original National Institutes of Medicine (NIH)

23 (12.1%)

 Androgen excess and PCOS Society

17 (8.9%)

 Other

2 (1.1%)

The most common reason for clinic attendance of patients who were diagnosed with PCOS

 Menstrual disturbances

79 (41.8%)

 Hirsutism

63 (33.3%

 Infertility

25 (13.2%)

 Obesity

16 (8.5%)

 Metabolic disorders

6 (3.2%)

The biochemical parameters used in the differential diagnosis of hyperandrogenism? [185]

 Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS)

97 (52.4%)

 Total testosterone

84 (45.4%)

 17-Hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP)

64 (34.6%)

 Free testosterone (direct measurement)

56(30.3%)

 Prolactin

32(17.3%)

 Androstenedione

25 (13.5%)

 Free androgen index (FAI)

23 (12.4%)

Abbreviation: PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.


a Responses are expressed as absolute frequency (numbers) and relative frequencies (%). Responses are reordered in decreasing frequencies.



#

Diagnostic Criteria of PCOS

As summarized in [Table 4], respondents selected menstrual irregularity as the most common and useful criterion for diagnosing PCOS (90.5%), followed by hirsutism and biochemical hyperandrogenism (75.7 and 71.4%, respectively). Ovarian ultrasonography was routinely used by 63.2% of the respondents. While anti-Müllerian hormone is not included in the diagnostic workup of PCOS by any professional recommendations, it was ordered “sometimes” or “often” by 29.5% of the respondents ([Table 4]).

Table 4

Frequency in the use of categorical criteria to diagnose PCOS in the present study and the 2014 ESE survey

Criterion

Respondents

Responses (%)

Never

Rarely

Sometimes

Often

MEA

ESE

MEA

ESE

MEA

ESE

MEA

ESE

MEA

ESE

Hirsutism

189

351

2.6%

1.7%

1.1%

4.3%

20.6%

23.6%

75.7%

70.4%

Menstrual disturbances

190

352

0.5%

0.9%

0.0%

0.3%

8.9%

11.4%

90.5%

87.5%

Biochemical hyperandrogenism

189

354

0.0%

0.8%

5.3%

3.9%

23.3%

16.1%

71.4%

79.1%

Ovarian ultrasonography

190

350

1.1%

2.9%

9.5%

8.9%

26.3%

24.9%

63.2%

63.4%

Anti-Müllerian hormone

190

345

41.2%

56.8%

29.4%

25.%

20.9%

12.2%

8.6%

5.2%

Abbreviations: PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; MEA, Middle East and Africa, Euro (European data (Conway et al 2014).



#

Differential Diagnosis of Hyperandrogenism

The question about the two most common biochemical indices to be used in the differential diagnosis of hyperandrogenism produced some heterogeneity in the responses, leading to wide different choices ([Table 3]). However, respondents did not abide by selecting only two answers. The common three choices included dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), total testosterone and 17 hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) in decreasing order ([Table 3]). Notably, 56 (21.4%) of the respondents included direct measurement of free testosterone. In general, respondents chose the combination of DHEAS with total testosterone (25.7%) and DHEAS with17-OHP (18.3%) and the combination of total testosterone and 17-OHP (13.1%) to perform the differential diagnosis of hyperandrogenism. Other combinations were less commonly recommended.


#

Burden and Concerns about PCOS

The prevalence in participants' countries was estimated as lower than 10% for 21.6% of the respondents, between 10 and 20% for 57.9% of them and, finally, as higher than 20% for the remainder ([Table 5]). About 44.2% of participants thought PCOS is underdiagnosed, and 25.8% thought it is overdiagnosed. The majority (93.9%) replied that, in each patient, they enquired about a family history of PCOS and T2DM and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The number of patients with PCOS seen by the respondents in the previous year ranged from less than 25 in 45% of respondents, from 25 to 50 in 31.6% of cases, from 50 to 200 in 19.0% of cases, and more than 200 in the remainder ([Table 5]). The results are shown for the present survey in [Table 5] and in comparison with the ESE survey (14) and Nordic survey (17) in [Fig. 1]. Obesity and T2DM were the principal long-term concerns for PCOS (45.1%). Less concern was afforded to infertility (29.9%). The risk of CVDs was also taken into account by 12.0% of respondents. In contrast, very few respondents selected endometrial cancer or psychosocial problems as primary concerns ([Table 5], [Fig. 1]).

Table 5

The respondents' views on the burden and long-term concerns of PCOS

Questions and predetermined responses

Responses[a]

The prevalence of PCOS in your country

 11–20%

110 (57.9%)

 0–10%

41 (21.6%)

 21–30%

39 (20.5%)

Do you think that women with PCOS are correctly diagnosed?

 No, I think PCOS is under-diagnosed

84 (44.2%)

 Yes, I think that PCOS is correctly diagnosed

49 (25.8%)

 No, I think PCOS is over-diagnosed

49 (25.8%)

 I don't know

8 (4.2%)

What is the most important long-term concern about PCOS? (184)

 Obesity a type 2 diabetes

83 (45.1%)

 Infertility

55 (29.9%)

 Cardiovascular diseases

22 (12.0%)

 Endometrial cancer

16 (8.7%)

 Psychosocial problems

4 (2.2%)

 Other

4 (2.2%)

Enquiring from patients about family history of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and/or PCOS? (185)

 Yes

172 (93.0%)

 No

13 (7.0%)

Importance of training in managing PCOS? (184)

 Very important

124 (67.4%)

 Important

53 (28.8%)

 Neutral

6 (3.3%)

 Unimportant

0 (0.0%)

 Very unimportant

1 (0.5%)

Abbreviation: PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.


a Results are expressed as frequency (Percentage) in decreasing order whenever appropriate.


Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Comparison between the present study (Middle East and Africa, MEA), the Nordic polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) survey (Nordic) the 2014 ESE European survey (ESE) for the perceived important long-term complications of PCOS.

#

Treatment Choices

The reported treatment choices are shown for the present survey in [Table 6] and in comparison with the ESE survey (14) and Nordic survey (17) in [Fig. 2]. For the overall treatment of PCOS, the respondents' first choice was metformin (43.8%), followed by lifestyle modification (27.0%) and oral contraceptives (18.9%). Antiandrogens were prescribed by 10.3%, and none of the respondents chose cosmetic procedures for hirsutism ([Table 6]). Metformin with clomiphene citrate or metformin was chosen as a first-line intervention for fertility problems by 52.7 and 23.1% of respondents, respectively. Lifestyle modification and clomiphene only were used less often (10.4 and 9.9%, respectively). Only 3.8% used other methods for ovulation induction ([Table 6]). However, most respondents selected multiple treatments for each of the two questions. [Fig. 2] shows the comparison of the present study, the Nordic PCOS Survey, and the 2014 European survey for the general treatment of PCOS regardless of fertility and treatment for fertility

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Comparison between the present study (Middle East and Africa, MEA), the Nordic polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) survey (Nordic) the 2014 ESE European survey (ESE) for the general treatment of PCOS regardless of fertility (A) and treatment for fertility (B).
Table 6

The respondents' views on the long-term concerns and the management of PCOS

Questions and predetermined responses

Responses[a]

Treatments prescribed for patients with PCOS (not specifically for fertility)? (185)

 Metformin

81 (43.8%)

 Lifestyle

50 (27.0%)

 Oral contraceptives

35(18.9%)

 Antiandrogens

19(10.3%)

 Laser depilation

0 (0.0%)

Treatments prescribed for patients with PCOS regarding fertility? (182)

 Clomiphene citrate + metformin

96 (52.7%)

 Metformin

42 (23.1%

 Lifestyle modifications

19 (10.4%

 Clomiphene citrate

18 (9.9%)

 Ovulation inductors

7(3.8%)

Abbreviation: PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.


a Results are expressed as frequency (Percentage) in decreasing order whenever appropriate.



#
#

Discussion

Worldwide, there is an increasing interest among doctors in disorders characterized by androgen excess in women and specifically PCOS. Gynecologists retain a major interest in the subject, as documented by the major diagnostic consensus on PCOS. On the other hand, androgen excess per se and related metabolic issues are typical areas of endocrinological interest. The current survey by an endocrine group reflects the interest of endocrinologists in the MEA region in the field.

Irregular menstrual cycle and clinical hyperandrogenism were the commonest symptoms and signs in the present survey, similar to the ESE survey's finding of PCOS by specialists across Europe.[14] This is plausible since the prevalence of PCOS is the most common cause of hirsutism in women of Arab descent.[17] Although the general prevalence of PCOS in MEA is not widely studied, the perception of the prevalence of the condition in the majority of the participants is 20% consistent with some published data[18] Therefore, treating physicians should be conversant with the updated diagnostic and management guidelines. Nonetheless, the international guidelines have a wide gap in knowledge about the diagnostic criteria and the recommended biochemical and radiological investigations.

The various surveys of PCOS included different proportions of gynecologists and endocrinologists. For instance, in the present survey, most respondents were endocrinologists, similar to the ESE study[13] in North America.[14] However, the majority (70.2%) were ObGyn, and nearly two-thirds (64.4%) were females, similar to the Nordic study.[15] Most of the North American survey respondents reported a prevalence of 10 to 20%, which is similar to the prevalence reported by most of our respondents. Regarding diagnostic criteria of PCOS, Rotterdam criteria were used by 65.6% in the Dokras study and by 90% of the respondents in our survey. However, as Dokras et al focused on comparing gynecologists and endocrinologists throughout the paper, thus we could not make a direct comparison with their findings. On the other hand, the use of an identical survey instrument allowed comparison of the results of the present study with those of the ESE and the Nordic surveys, as illustrated in [Figs. 1] and [2].[13] [15] First, the present study did not follow the consensus on the recommendations of the diagnostic criteria of PCOS. In contrast, National Institute of Health (NIH) guidelines were followed by the European respondents, and Rotterdam criteria were predominantly used in the Nordic study. Second, the management of PCOS patients, regardless of fertility, was prescribed Metformin in the present study. On the other hand, Nordic physicians often recommended lifestyle modification and oral contraceptive pill. Concerning fertility issues in PCOS patients, physicians from the MEA region recommended clomiphene combination with metformin, while European physicians still preferred lifestyle modification primarily to clomiphene and metformin therapy. These are some of the marked differences identified in diagnosing and managing PCOS between the MEA and European studies. Possible explanations for these differences may be linked to cultural barriers in managing fertility issues or environmental barriers in suggesting lifestyle management. However, further research is recommended to identify the rationale and the potential reasons for these differences. Nevertheless, the current study found similarities in the context of long-term consequences related to obesity, diabetes, and infertility as the top three comorbidities and long-term effects of PCOS. However, there was a considerable difference in the prevalence of the comorbidities. Obesity and diabetes were lesser in the MEA region compared with the European region, while infertility was higher in patients with PCOS in MEA.

The study is limited by its survey nature of what respondents state rather than a true quality assurance exercise assessing true practices. Yet, physicians' surveys do provide new information when applied to new settings.[19] [20] [21] The relatively small sample size also limits the survey. However, it remains a valid exploratory exercise to scope the perception of an important clinical condition in our region.[17] [18] Furthermore, the sample is imbalanced, with more endocrinologists than gynecologists. The latter was also in the ESE survey[13] in contrast to the Nordic survey.[16] However, all three surveys provide complementary information. Nonetheless, a comparison between endocrinologists and gynecologists was not the primary objective of the present study, and it has been specifically addressed in previous studies.[22] [23] [24] Other limitations include introducing a selection bias as only those interested in PCOS could have attempted the survey. It is worth noting that the low response rate may have been attributed to the study period, which coincided with the initial outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and the generally reduced attention to research activities beyond the pandemic Furthermore, the wide difference in the responses concerning the ultrasound criteria can be attributed to the potential phrasing ambiguity in identifying PCO morphology by ultrasound by transabdominal versus transvaginal approaches.


#

Conclusion

This survey provides a baseline for the perspective in diagnosing and treating PCOS in the MEA region. This study emphasizes some heterogeneity in managing PCOS by endocrinologists across the MEA region. It underscores the uncertainties regarding diagnosis and therapeutic approaches to this common but multifaceted condition. Furthermore, the survey produced some useful information. It is noteworthy that a substantial majority of the MEA endocrinologists think they are following the Rotterdam criteria for diagnosing and managing PCOS. In contrast, their actual practice is not consistently so. In addition, the long-term metabolic risks for obesity and T2DM have been well recognized. The popularity of metformin-associated lifestyle intervention may reflect endocrinologists' appreciation of these long-term risks. Finally, although there was an imbalance in the sample with fewer gynecologists than endocrinologists in this study, the findings support previous reports that practice patterns differ by specialty, which might support practice-specific diagnostic criteria for PCOS. Some deviation is observed from internationally recommended practices. More education on PCOS diagnostic criteria and treatment of PCOS is in line with the recently published evidence international guideline. There is also a need for more collaboration among gynecologists and endocrinologists to homogenize and standardize the treatment practices in the MEA.


#
#

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Acknowledgment

The authors are most grateful to all colleagues who participated in the survey.

Authors' Contributions

The named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this manuscript (conception, data collection, and drafting/revision of the article). They take responsibility for the integrity of the work and have given final approval for the version of the manuscript.


Compliance with Ethical Principles

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE. Informed consent was received from the participants before they take the questionnaire.


Supplementary Material

  • References

  • 1 Azziz R. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (02) 321-336
  • 2 Meier RK. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Nurs Clin North Am 2018; 53 (03) 407-420
  • 3 Escobar-Morreale HF. Polycystic ovary syndrome: definition, aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2018; 14 (05) 270-284
  • 4 Bednarska S, Siejka A. The pathogenesis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: what's new?. Adv Clin Exp Med 2017; 26 (02) 359-367
  • 5 Ortiz-Flores AE, Luque-Ramírez M, Escobar-Morreale HF. Polycystic ovary syndrome in adult women. Med Clin (Barc) 2019; 152 (11) 450-457
  • 6 The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 41-47
  • 7 Legro RS, Arslanian SA, Ehrmann DA. et al; Endocrine Society. Diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98 (12) 4565-4592
  • 8 Goodman NF, Cobin RH, Futterweit W, Glueck JS, Legro RS, Carmina E. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), American College of Endocrinology (ACE), Androgen Excess and PCOS Society. American College of Endocrinology (ACE); Androgen Excess and PCOS Society. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Androgen Excess and Pcos Society Disease State Clinical Review: Guide to the Best Practices in the Evaluation and Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - Part 2. Endocr Pract 2015; 21 (12) 1415-1426
  • 9 Ibáñez L, Oberfield SE, Witchel S. et al. An International Consortium Update: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome in adolescence. Horm Res Paediatr 2017; 88 (06) 371-395
  • 10 Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF. et al; International PCOS Network. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2018; 110 (03) 364-379
  • 11 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 194: polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131 (06) e157-e171
  • 12 Abdel-Rahman MY, Jackson LW, Rodewald KJ, Abdellah MA, Ismail SA, Hurd WW. Polycystic ovary syndrome and diabetes screening: a survey of gynecologists and reproductive endocrinologists. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 162 (02) 178-181
  • 13 Conway G, Dewailly D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E. et al; ESE PCOS Special Interest Group. European survey of diagnosis and management of the polycystic ovary syndrome: results of the ESE PCOS Special Interest Group's Questionnaire. Eur J Endocrinol 2014; 171 (04) 489-498
  • 14 Dokras A, Saini S, Gibson-Helm M, Schulkin J, Cooney L, Teede H. Gaps in knowledge among physicians regarding diagnostic criteria and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2017; 107 (06) 1380-1386.e1
  • 15 Gibson-Helm M, Dokras A, Karro H, Piltonen T, Teede HJ. Knowledge and practices regarding polycystic ovary syndrome among physicians in Europe, North America, and internationally: an online questionnaire-based study. Semin Reprod Med 2018; 36 (01) 19-27
  • 16 Piltonen TT, Ruokojärvi M, Karro H. et al. Awareness of polycystic ovary syndrome among obstetrician-gynecologists and endocrinologists in Northern Europe. PLoS One 2019; 14 (12) e0226074 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226074.
  • 17 Al-Ruhaily AD, Malabu UH, Sulimani RA. Hirsutism in Saudi females of reproductive age: a hospital-based study. Ann Saudi Med 2008; 28 (01) 28-32
  • 18 Sharif E, Rahman S, Zia Y, Rizk NM. The frequency of polycystic ovary syndrome in young reproductive females in Qatar. Int J Womens Health 2016; 9: 1-10
  • 19 Beshyah SA, Sherif IH, Mustafa HE, Saadi HF. Patterns of clinical management of hypothyroidism in adults: an electronic survey of physicians from the Middle East and Africa. J Diabetes Endocr Pract 2021; 4: 75-82
  • 20 Beshyah SA, Ali KF. Management of adrenal insufficiency: a survey of perceptions and practices of physicians from the Middle East and North Africa. J Diabetes Endocr Pract 2021; 4 (03) 125-130
  • 21 Beshyah SA, Khalil A. Clinical practice patterns in the management of thyroid nodules: the first survey from the Middle East and Africa. J Diabetes Endocr Pract 2021; 04 (04) 167-174
  • 22 Alzamil H, Aloraini K, AlAgeel R. et al. Disparity among endocrinologists and gynaecologists in the diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2020; 20 (03) e323-e329
  • 23 Cussons AJ, Stuckey BG, Walsh JP, Burke V, Norman RJ. Polycystic ovarian syndrome: marked differences between endocrinologists and gynaecologists in diagnosis and management. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2005; 62 (03) 289-295
  • 24 Yan D, Yan-Fang W, Shi-Yang Z. et al. Is polycystic ovary syndrome appropriately diagnosed by obstetricians and gynaecologists across China: a nationwide survey. J Ovarian Res 2021; 14 (01) 25 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-021-00780-6.

Address for correspondence

Salem A. Beshyah, PhD, FRCP, FACE
Department of Medicine, Yas Clinic Khalifa City
Street 20, Khalifa City, Abu Dhabi, SW11
United Arab Emirates   

Publication History

Article published online:
22 December 2022

© 2023. Gulf Association of Endocrinology and Diabetes (GAED). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

  • References

  • 1 Azziz R. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (02) 321-336
  • 2 Meier RK. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Nurs Clin North Am 2018; 53 (03) 407-420
  • 3 Escobar-Morreale HF. Polycystic ovary syndrome: definition, aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2018; 14 (05) 270-284
  • 4 Bednarska S, Siejka A. The pathogenesis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: what's new?. Adv Clin Exp Med 2017; 26 (02) 359-367
  • 5 Ortiz-Flores AE, Luque-Ramírez M, Escobar-Morreale HF. Polycystic ovary syndrome in adult women. Med Clin (Barc) 2019; 152 (11) 450-457
  • 6 The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 41-47
  • 7 Legro RS, Arslanian SA, Ehrmann DA. et al; Endocrine Society. Diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98 (12) 4565-4592
  • 8 Goodman NF, Cobin RH, Futterweit W, Glueck JS, Legro RS, Carmina E. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), American College of Endocrinology (ACE), Androgen Excess and PCOS Society. American College of Endocrinology (ACE); Androgen Excess and PCOS Society. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Androgen Excess and Pcos Society Disease State Clinical Review: Guide to the Best Practices in the Evaluation and Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - Part 2. Endocr Pract 2015; 21 (12) 1415-1426
  • 9 Ibáñez L, Oberfield SE, Witchel S. et al. An International Consortium Update: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome in adolescence. Horm Res Paediatr 2017; 88 (06) 371-395
  • 10 Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF. et al; International PCOS Network. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2018; 110 (03) 364-379
  • 11 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 194: polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131 (06) e157-e171
  • 12 Abdel-Rahman MY, Jackson LW, Rodewald KJ, Abdellah MA, Ismail SA, Hurd WW. Polycystic ovary syndrome and diabetes screening: a survey of gynecologists and reproductive endocrinologists. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 162 (02) 178-181
  • 13 Conway G, Dewailly D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E. et al; ESE PCOS Special Interest Group. European survey of diagnosis and management of the polycystic ovary syndrome: results of the ESE PCOS Special Interest Group's Questionnaire. Eur J Endocrinol 2014; 171 (04) 489-498
  • 14 Dokras A, Saini S, Gibson-Helm M, Schulkin J, Cooney L, Teede H. Gaps in knowledge among physicians regarding diagnostic criteria and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2017; 107 (06) 1380-1386.e1
  • 15 Gibson-Helm M, Dokras A, Karro H, Piltonen T, Teede HJ. Knowledge and practices regarding polycystic ovary syndrome among physicians in Europe, North America, and internationally: an online questionnaire-based study. Semin Reprod Med 2018; 36 (01) 19-27
  • 16 Piltonen TT, Ruokojärvi M, Karro H. et al. Awareness of polycystic ovary syndrome among obstetrician-gynecologists and endocrinologists in Northern Europe. PLoS One 2019; 14 (12) e0226074 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226074.
  • 17 Al-Ruhaily AD, Malabu UH, Sulimani RA. Hirsutism in Saudi females of reproductive age: a hospital-based study. Ann Saudi Med 2008; 28 (01) 28-32
  • 18 Sharif E, Rahman S, Zia Y, Rizk NM. The frequency of polycystic ovary syndrome in young reproductive females in Qatar. Int J Womens Health 2016; 9: 1-10
  • 19 Beshyah SA, Sherif IH, Mustafa HE, Saadi HF. Patterns of clinical management of hypothyroidism in adults: an electronic survey of physicians from the Middle East and Africa. J Diabetes Endocr Pract 2021; 4: 75-82
  • 20 Beshyah SA, Ali KF. Management of adrenal insufficiency: a survey of perceptions and practices of physicians from the Middle East and North Africa. J Diabetes Endocr Pract 2021; 4 (03) 125-130
  • 21 Beshyah SA, Khalil A. Clinical practice patterns in the management of thyroid nodules: the first survey from the Middle East and Africa. J Diabetes Endocr Pract 2021; 04 (04) 167-174
  • 22 Alzamil H, Aloraini K, AlAgeel R. et al. Disparity among endocrinologists and gynaecologists in the diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2020; 20 (03) e323-e329
  • 23 Cussons AJ, Stuckey BG, Walsh JP, Burke V, Norman RJ. Polycystic ovarian syndrome: marked differences between endocrinologists and gynaecologists in diagnosis and management. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2005; 62 (03) 289-295
  • 24 Yan D, Yan-Fang W, Shi-Yang Z. et al. Is polycystic ovary syndrome appropriately diagnosed by obstetricians and gynaecologists across China: a nationwide survey. J Ovarian Res 2021; 14 (01) 25 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-021-00780-6.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Comparison between the present study (Middle East and Africa, MEA), the Nordic polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) survey (Nordic) the 2014 ESE European survey (ESE) for the perceived important long-term complications of PCOS.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Comparison between the present study (Middle East and Africa, MEA), the Nordic polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) survey (Nordic) the 2014 ESE European survey (ESE) for the general treatment of PCOS regardless of fertility (A) and treatment for fertility (B).