Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol 2022; 39(03): 226-233
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1751294
Review Article

Back to the Basics: Inferior Vena Cava Filters

Brian Covello
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Aventura Hospital and Medical Center, Aventura, Florida
,
Martin Radvany
2   Department of Neurointerventional Radiology, Aventura Hospital and Medical Center, Aventura, Florida
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Inferior vena cava filters are an important therapeutic option for patients with venous thromboembolism and contraindication to anticoagulation. Indications for filter placement have varied over the previous decades. This article discusses the history of inferior vena cava filter use, with a basic overview of technology and specific devices. Finally, this article reviews emerging filter design and technology. Understanding the basics of inferior vena cava filters is critical to building more robust clinical data for the purpose of improving patient outcomes.

Keywords

inferior vena cava filters - deep venous thrombosis - pulmonary embolism - interventional radiology


Publication History

Article published online:
31 August 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Bikdeli B, Wang Y, Minges KE. et al. Vena caval filter utilization and outcomes in pulmonary embolism: Medicare hospitalizations from 1999 to 2010. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67 (09) 1027-1035
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Marron RM, Rali P, Hountras P, Bull TM. Inferior vena cava filters: past, present, and future. Chest 2020; 158 (06) 2579-2589
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cundiff DK. Anticoagulation therapy for venous thromboembolism. MedGenMed 2004; 6 (03) 5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kinney TB. Update on inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14 (04) 425-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hussain SA. Kazi Mobin-Uddin, 1930-1999. J Vasc Surg 2000; 32 (02) 406-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Mobin-Uddin K, Callard GM, Bolooki H, Rubinson R, Michie D, Jude JR. Transvenous caval interruption with umbrella filter. N Engl J Med 1972; 286 (02) 55-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Greenfield LJ, McCurdy JR, Brown PP, Elkins RC. A new intracaval filter permitting continued flow and resolution of emboli. Surgery 1973; 73 (04) 599-606
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Tadavarthy SM, Castaneda-Zuniga W, Salomonowitz E. et al. Kimray-Greenfield vena cava filter: percutaneous introduction. Radiology 1984; 151 (02) 525-526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kinney TB. Inferior vena cava filters. Semin Intervent Radiol 2006; 23 (03) 230-239
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mohan CR, Hoballah JJ, Sharp WJ, Kresowik TF, Lu CT, Corson JD. Comparative efficacy and complications of vena caval filters. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21 (02) 235-245 , discussion 245–246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wada H, Sakakura K, Kubo N. et al. Complications of temporary vena cava filter placement. J Cardiol 2012; 60 (04) 306-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Epstein DH, Darcy MD, Hunter DW. et al. Experience with the Amplatz retrievable vena cava filter. Radiology 1989; 172 (01) 105-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Desai KR, Laws JL, Salem R. et al. Defining prolonged dwell time: when are advanced inferior vena cava filter retrieval techniques necessary? An analysis in 762 procedures. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10 (06) e003957
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 DeYoung E, Minocha J. Inferior vena cava filters: guidelines, best practice, and expanding indications. Semin Intervent Radiol 2016; 33 (02) 65-70
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F. et al. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 338 (07) 409-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Saeed MJ, Turner TE, Brown DL. Trends in inferior vena cava filter placement by indication in the United States from 2005 to 2014. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177 (12) 1861-1862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Reddy S, Lakhter V, Zack CJ, Zhao H, Chatterjee S, Bashir R. Association between contemporary trends in inferior vena cava filter placement and the 2010 US Food and Drug Administration Advisory. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177 (09) 1373-1374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lee MJ, Valenti D, de Gregorio MA, Minocha J, Rimon U, Pellerin O. The CIRSE Retrievable IVC Filter Registry: retrieval success rates in practice. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015; 38 (06) 1502-1507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kaufman JA, Barnes GD, Chaer RA. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology Clinical Practice Guideline for inferior vena cava filters in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolic disease: developed in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, American Heart Association, Society for Vascular Surgery, and Society for Vascular Medicine. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31 (10) 1529-1544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gillespie DL, Spies JB, Siami FS, Rectenwald JE, White RA, Johnson MS. Predicting the safety and effectiveness of inferior vena cava filters study: design of a unique safety and effectiveness study of inferior vena cava filters in clinical practice. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020; 8 (02) 187-194 .e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Deso SE, Idakoji IA, Kuo WT. Evidence-based evaluation of inferior vena cava filter complications based on filter type. Semin Intervent Radiol 2016; 33 (02) 93-100
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ghatan CE, Ryu RK. Permanent versus retrievable inferior vena cava filters: rethinking the “one-filter-for-all” approach to mechanical thromboembolic prophylaxis. Semin Intervent Radiol 2016; 33 (02) 75-78
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Dake MD, Murphy TP, Krämer AH. et al; SENTRY Trial Investigators. Final two-year outcomes for the Sentry bioconvertible inferior vena cava filter in patients requiring temporary protection from pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31 (02) 221-230 .e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sweeney TJ, Van Aman ME. Deployment problems with the titanium Greenfield filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1993; 4 (05) 691-694
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Reed RA, Teitelbaum GP, Taylor FC. et al. Incomplete opening of LGM (Vena Tech) filters inserted via the transjugular approach. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1991; 2 (04) 441-445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Le Blanche AF, Benazzouz A, Reynaud P. et al; European VenaTech LP Vena Cava Filter Study Group. The VenaTech LP permanent caval filter: effectiveness and safety in the prevention of pulmonary embolism – a European multicenter study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (04) 509-515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Poletti PA, Becker CD, Prina L. et al. Long-term results of the Simon nitinol inferior vena cava filter. Eur Radiol 1998; 8 (02) 289-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Athanasoulis CA, Kaufman JA, Halpern EF, Waltman AC, Geller SC, Fan CM. Inferior vena caval filters: review of a 26-year single-center clinical experience. Radiology 2000; 216 (01) 54-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Nicholson AA, Ettles DF, Paddon AJ, Dyet JF. Long-term follow-up of the Bird's Nest IVC filter. Clin Radiol 1999; 54 (11) 759-764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Keller IS, Meier C, Pfiffner R, Keller E, Pfammatter T. Clinical comparison of two optional vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18 (04) 505-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kalva SP, Wicky S, Waltman AC, Athanasoulis CA. TrapEase vena cava filter: experience in 751 patients. J Endovasc Ther 2006; 13 (03) 365-372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Vilanilam GK, Maynard NK, Palmer AW, Moore J, Kamran M, Radvany MG. Chronic inferior vena cava filter thrombosis presenting with low back pain and radiculopathy: treatment with thrombolysis, filter removal, and stenting. Clin Imaging 2021; 76: 160-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Given MF, McDonald BC, Brookfield P. et al. Retrievable Gunther Tulip inferior vena cava filter: experience in 317 patients. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2008; 52 (05) 452-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Montgomery JP, Kaufman JA. A critical review of available retrievable inferior vena cava filters and future directions. Semin Intervent Radiol 2016; 33 (02) 79-87
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Nicholson W, Nicholson WJ, Tolerico P. et al. Prevalence of fracture and fragment embolization of Bard retrievable vena cava filters and clinical implications including cardiac perforation and tamponade. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170 (20) 1827-1831
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hohenwalter EJ, Stone JR, O'Moore PV. et al. Multicenter trial of the VenaTech convertible vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28 (10) 1353-1362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Cadavid CA, Gil B, Restrepo A. et al. Pilot study evaluating the safety of a combined central venous catheter and inferior vena cava filter in critically ill patients at high risk of pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (04) 581-585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Taccone FS, Bunker N, Waldmann C. et al. A new device for the prevention of pulmonary embolism in critically ill patients: results of the European Angel Catheter Registry. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015; 79 (03) 456-462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Eggers MD, Reitman CA. In vitro analysis of polymer candidates for the development of absorbable vascular filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23 (08) 1023-1030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Zhao H, Zhang F, Liang G. et al. Preparation and experimental research into retrievable rapamycin- and heparin-coated vena cava filters: a pilot study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2016; 41 (03) 422-432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar