CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR 2023; 07(01): 003-007
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1751034
Original Article

Catheter Lock Anchor Technique for Placement of Retrogradely Tunneled Implantable Ports

Dayananda Lingegowda
1   Department of Radiology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
,
Bharat Gupta
1   Department of Radiology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
,
Anisha Gehani
1   Department of Radiology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
,
Saugata Sen
1   Department of Radiology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
,
Priya Ghosh
1   Department of Radiology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
› Author Affiliations
Funding This study was not supported by any funding.
 

Abstract

Purpose Groshong valved catheters require retrograde tunneling and a port chamber needs to be attached to the catheter after trimming. During this process, working space constraints are generally faced by operators. We describe a novel technique to improve the comfort of the operator while working in a constrained space.

Materials and Methods The port catheter with the distal valve is retrogradely tunneled and trimmed. Thread from absorbable surgical suture is used to anchor the catheter lock. Anchored catheter lock is comfortably pushed over the catheter into the subcutaneous tunnel without it being migrated proximally. Once the port chamber is attached to the catheter, the catheter lock is retrieved back and moved to the locking position. We retrospectively analyzed implantable ports for smoothness of curves and outcomes in terms of catheter days.

Results Technical success was achieved in all patients. There were no periprocedural complications. Clinical success was achieved in 27/29 cases. Early port removal was done due to infection in one patient and for nonhealing of the wound in one patient.

Conclusion The catheter lock anchor is a safe and useful technique for the placement of valved ports. A satisfactory catheter-nut angle can be achieved with this technique.


#

Introduction

Retrograde port placement technique is required for port catheters that have distal valve.[1] The advantages of retrograde tunneling include accurate tip placement and the distal valve has the theoretical advantage of an antireflux mechanism.[2] [3] Post-tunneling, the catheter is attached to the port chamber and the port chamber is placed in a subcutaneous pocket, without any kinking or angulations. While trimming the catheter length, a balance needs to be achieved between the operator comfort and avoiding the kink due to excess length. Maintaining the optimum length of the catheter to prevent angulations or kinks is essential to mitigate long-term port dysfunction.[4] [5] This is technically challenging because of the restricted working space at the pocket site. We describe a modified technique that gives more comfort to the operator during attaching the port to the catheter.


#

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of implantable ports that were placed using this technique. All of the procedures were performed in an interventional radiology suite. Informed consent was obtained before the procedure. The laboratory parameters like an international normalized ratio of < 1.5 and a platelet count of more than 70,000 were desirable in all cases. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered 30 minutes before the procedure as per the hospital protocol. Groshong valved implantable port (X-port isp, BARD, single lumen venous catheter, 8F) was used in all cases. Undertaking all aseptic precautions, the internal jugular vein (IJV) was accessed under ultrasound (US) guidance. Right IJV was the preferred venous access. In cases where right chest wall malignancy or thrombosis/stenosis precluded right internal jugular access, left jugular access was selected. The patient is positioned supine with the head turned toward the opposite side of the catheter insertion site. A standard surgical scrub technique is performed in all cases. Skin is anesthetized with 1% lidocaine. IJV is punctured in its inferior part under real-time US guidance. After blood is aspirated to confirm the satisfactory position, a 0.035-inch guidewire was inserted into the right atrium then to inferior vena cava under fluoroscopic guidance. Adequate blunt dilation of the track was done before advancing the peel-apart sheath. Peel-away sheath and dilator assembly were advanced over the guidewire as a single unit. Once the peel-away sheath was adequately advanced, the dilator and J wire was removed. The port catheter with stiffener wire was then advanced over the peel-away sheath. The peel-away sheath is removed leaving the catheter in situ.

A subcutaneous pocket was created in the upper chest, preferably over the upper ribs. Pocket creation was made in the upper lateral quadrant to facilitate a smooth curve in the entire course of the port. Pocket size was made intentionally smaller so that the port would snuggly fit into the pocket. Adequacy of the pocket size was checked by introducing the port inside the subcutaneous pocket. The port was removed from the subcutaneous pocket after checking the adequacy of the pocket size.

A subcutaneous tunnel was created from the port pocket to the venous access by advancing the metallic tunneler. The catheter stiffener is removed and the end of the catheter is attached to the tunneler barb with a twisting motion. Once the catheter end was mounted on the tunneler, the tunneler was pulled out at the port pocket side. Using fluoroscopy, the catheter was pulled back leaving the distal tip at the superior vena cava-right atrial junction. Excess catheter length on the tunneler side was trimmed. Suture thread (synthetic absorbable surgical suture, 3–0, 2 metrics, Vicryl, braided coated polyglactin 910 violets, Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson Private Limited) was passed into the catheter lock, and catheter lock was threaded over the catheter ([Figs. 1] and [2]). The catheter lock was pushed back to the subcutaneous tunnel leaving adequate space for the attachment of the port. Port stem was advanced into the catheter after proper alignment. Once the catheter tip is advanced up to midway of the port stem, the catheter lock was pulled back close to the stem using the suture loop. The thread loop was then removed after securing the lock. The catheter lock is advanced over the catheter toward the port and moved to the locked position. The port is now placed into a pocket created distal to incision. Stay sutures for the port base were not used.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 (A) Clinical radiograph of the catheter lock anchoring technique. Implantable port placement in progress. The tunneled port catheter is exiting from the chest wall incision. (B) The catheter lock is anchored with the suture and threaded over the catheter. (C) The port chamber is connected to the catheter after trimming. The catheter lock is pushed deep in the subcutaneous tunnel for creating better working space. (D) Position of catheter lock after the catheter is connected to port chamber. (E) The catheter lock is pulled out from the subcutaneous tunnel. (F) The suture thread is removed and the catheter lock is advanced into the final position.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 (A) Pictoral illustration of the catheter lock anchoring technique. Implantable port placement in progress. The catheter is tunneled and trimmed. (B) Enlarged view of the operating area. (C) Catheter lock is anchored over the suture thread and mounted over the catheter. (D) The catheter lock is pushed back into the subcutaneous plane. (E) The catheter is connected to the port chamber stem. (F) The catheter lock is pulled back near the port chamber stem and the suture thread is removed. (G) The catheter lock is advanced to the final locking position. (H) The port chamber is pushed into the port pocket.

Port functioning was assessed using a noncoring needle and a 10-mL syringe for free flow or leak. The port pocket was flushed with normal saline to clear out blood. Heparin lock solution was injected before removal of the noncoring needle. The incision site of the port chamber was closed in two layers using Ethicon Vicryl 2–0 absorbable sutures. The neck incision was closed with sutures.

A chest radiograph was taken to assess the catheter-nut angle. Catheter-nut angle is defined as the angle between the port stem to the catheter. Patients were followed up till the completion of treatment or till death with fully functional port (clinical success). Early port removal secondary to infection or port dysfunction were also noted, and if any, was also made note of (clinical failure)

Post-port care: The first dressing is changed after 48 hours and the second dressing is changed 1 week after the procedure. All patients were reviewed after 7 days of suture removal if not absorbed spontaneously. Nursing staff were advised to use a 10-mL syringe for flushing the port. The push and pause technique is recommended during flushing. After medication, flushing with 10 mL of normal saline and after every blood withdrawal flush with 20 mL of normal saline flush was suggested. When the port was not in use, a flush with 10 mL of normal saline every 4 weeks was suggested.


#

Results

Total 29 patients underwent port placement with catheter lock anchor technique. Clinical success was achieved in 27/29 (93.1%) patients (i.e., port maintained till completion of treatment or death) ([Table 1]). In one patient, the port was removed early after 30 days due to port site infection. In another patient, the port was removed due to the nonhealing of the wound. One patient reported withdrawal malfunction but was able to complete the treatment with no further intervention required. There were no periprocedural complications, and there have been no other late complications.

Table 1

Summary of cases

No of patients

29

M: F

4:25

Median

52 (21-75 yr)

Diagnosis

Ca breast

Ca ovary

Ca lung

Ca colon

Ca pancreas

Sarcoma

17

2

1

5

1

3

Site

 Right IJV

 Left IJV

Catheter-nut angle

 >170

 <170

27

2

29

0

Total catheter days

Average catheter days

Patients died during follow up

The patient completed treatment or maintained port till death

12016

414 (11–1718)

4

27

Malfunction

 Inability to draw blood samples

 Inability to inject

 Complete Obstruction of the line

1

0

0

Pinch-off syndrome

0

Late catheter break-embolization

0

Dislocation

0

Venous thrombosis

0

Port infection

Cutaneous site infection

Port-related bacteraemia plus pocket infection

1

0

Non-healing

1

Leak

0

Toddlers syndrome

0


#

Discussion

Many port-related complications can be avoided with good placement techniques.[1] The construction of gentle curves along the entire length of the implantable port and optimal tip positioning helps to prevent long-term problems. The port pocket should be made as small and as tight as possible to prevent movement of the port inside the patient.[6] [7] [8]

Trimming the length of the catheter is very important; otherwise, the excessive length may lead to kinks and abnormal catheter-nut angle.

When port pockets are made smaller, the working space during port placement is constrained especially for retrograde port placement, since the port chamber needs to be attached to the catheter toward the end of the procedure. The problem of limited space is more exaggerated after the lock is mounted over the stump of the catheter. The lock needs to be pushed into a subcutaneous tunnel to get an adequate working length to connect to the port chamber. There is always the risk of migration and losing the catheter lock in the subcutaneous tunnel while working on attaching the port chamber to the catheter.

Our catheter lock anchor technique addresses this issue faced by operators during the placement of retrograde implantable ports. The lock which is anchored with suture thread can be pushed into the subcutaneous tunnel deeply to create working space for the port chamber attachment. This technique eliminates the fear of migration of lock deep inside the subcutaneous tunnel, during attachment of port chamber to the catheter in constrained space. Operators need not cut extra length to become comfortable during chamber attachment which may cause the abnormal catheter-nut angle.[9]

The catheter-nut angle in our series is below 170 degrees suggesting a smooth curve at the port chamber end.[10] In our series, it was possible to achieve this angle due to our suture anchor technique. The suture anchor technique provides extra working space for port attachment, which otherwise requires extra catheter length. The extra length may cause the abnormal catheter-nut angle when the final port chamber is planted in a subcutaneous pocket. Because of the catheter lock technique, we never had to trim the extra length and did not encounter any kinks in our series. This modified technique is simple, cheap, and elegant.

Accurate placement of the catheter tip was achieved in all cases. No cases of leak, detachment, catheter damage, and toddle syndrome were noted in our series. One case of withdrawal dysfunction was noted, with maintained forward flow. This case was managed conservatively. One case of nonhealing of the wound was noted in an old patient. This was most likely due to patient-related comorbid factors and chemotherapy, rather than modified technique. She was treated with port removal and secondary suturing of the wound after refreshing wound edges.[11]

One case of infection was noted 1 month after the placement which resulted in port removal. We give prophylaxis intravenous antibiotics that are usually administered before the port placement.[12] Whenever possible chemotherapy is delayed for a week until the wound heals (7 days).[13] These might have contributed to good infection control in our series.

Open-ended catheters are generally preattached before antegrade tunneling. Hence, working space constraint is not a major issue with preattached open-ended catheters.

To the best of my knowledge, this technique has never been described in the literature.


#

Conclusion

The catheter lock anchor technique is a safe and handy technique for the placement of the port requiring retrograde tunnelling. Excellent catheter-nut angle can be achieved with this technique.


#
#

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Ethical Approval

For this type of study formal consent is not required.


Informed Consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.


  • References

  • 1 Nishinari K, Wolosker N, Bernardi CV. et al. Totally implantable ports connected to valved catheters for chemotherapy: experience from 350 Groshong devices. J Vasc Access 2010; 11: 17-22
  • 2 Davanzo WJ. Efficacy and safety of a retrograde tunnelled hemodialysis catheter: 6-month clinical experience with the Cannon Catheter chronic hemodialysis catheter. J Vasc Access 2005; 6: 38-44
  • 3 Biffi R, Pittiruti M, Gillet JP. et al. Valved central venous catheter connected to subcutaneous port: a multicenter phase IV study based on a cohort of 50 oncology patients. J Vasc Access 2002; 3: 147-153
  • 4 Wu C-Y, Fu J-Y, Feng P-H. et al. Catheter fracture of intravenous ports and its management. World J Surg 2011; 35 (11) 2403-2410
  • 5 Wu C-Y, Hu H-C, Ko P-J. et al. Risk factors and possible mechanisms of superior vena cava intravenous port malfunction. Ann Surg 2012; 255 (05) 971-975
  • 6 Charles HW, Miguel T, Kovacs S, Gohari A, Arampulikan J, McCann JW. Chest port placement with use of the single-incision insertion technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20 (11) 1464-1469
  • 7 Mauro MA, Jaques PF. Radiologic placement of long-term central venous catheters: a review. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1993; 4 (01) 127-137
  • 8 Simpson KR, Hovsepian DM, Picus D. Interventional radiologic placement of chest wall ports: results and complications in 161 consecutive placements. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997; 8 (02) 189-195
  • 9 Chou P-L, Fu J-Y, Cheng C-H. et al. Current port maintenance strategies are insufficient: View based on actual presentations of implanted ports. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (44) e17757
  • 10 Wu C-Y, Fu J-Y, Wu C-F. et al. Superior vena cava port catheter tip confirmation: quantified formula for intravascular catheter length versus anatomic landmark reference. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 60: 193-202
  • 11 Zawacki WJ, Walker TG, DeVasher E. et al. Wound dehiscence or failure to heal following venous access port placement in patients receiving bevacizumab therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20 (05) 624-627 , quiz 571
  • 12 van de Wetering MD, van Woensel JBM. Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing early central venous catheter Gram positive infections in oncology patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (02) CD003295
  • 13 Erinjeri JP, Fong AJ, Kemeny NE, Brown KT, Getrajdman GI, Solomon SB. Timing of administration of bevacizumab chemotherapy affects wound healing after chest wall port placement. Cancer 2011; 117 (06) 1296-1301

Address for correspondence

Dayananda Lingegowda, MBBS, DNB, PDCC
Department of Radiology, Tata Medical Center
14 Arterial Road, Newtown, Kolkata -700160, West Bengal
India   

Publication History

Article published online:
14 July 2022

© 2022. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

  • References

  • 1 Nishinari K, Wolosker N, Bernardi CV. et al. Totally implantable ports connected to valved catheters for chemotherapy: experience from 350 Groshong devices. J Vasc Access 2010; 11: 17-22
  • 2 Davanzo WJ. Efficacy and safety of a retrograde tunnelled hemodialysis catheter: 6-month clinical experience with the Cannon Catheter chronic hemodialysis catheter. J Vasc Access 2005; 6: 38-44
  • 3 Biffi R, Pittiruti M, Gillet JP. et al. Valved central venous catheter connected to subcutaneous port: a multicenter phase IV study based on a cohort of 50 oncology patients. J Vasc Access 2002; 3: 147-153
  • 4 Wu C-Y, Fu J-Y, Feng P-H. et al. Catheter fracture of intravenous ports and its management. World J Surg 2011; 35 (11) 2403-2410
  • 5 Wu C-Y, Hu H-C, Ko P-J. et al. Risk factors and possible mechanisms of superior vena cava intravenous port malfunction. Ann Surg 2012; 255 (05) 971-975
  • 6 Charles HW, Miguel T, Kovacs S, Gohari A, Arampulikan J, McCann JW. Chest port placement with use of the single-incision insertion technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20 (11) 1464-1469
  • 7 Mauro MA, Jaques PF. Radiologic placement of long-term central venous catheters: a review. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1993; 4 (01) 127-137
  • 8 Simpson KR, Hovsepian DM, Picus D. Interventional radiologic placement of chest wall ports: results and complications in 161 consecutive placements. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997; 8 (02) 189-195
  • 9 Chou P-L, Fu J-Y, Cheng C-H. et al. Current port maintenance strategies are insufficient: View based on actual presentations of implanted ports. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (44) e17757
  • 10 Wu C-Y, Fu J-Y, Wu C-F. et al. Superior vena cava port catheter tip confirmation: quantified formula for intravascular catheter length versus anatomic landmark reference. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 60: 193-202
  • 11 Zawacki WJ, Walker TG, DeVasher E. et al. Wound dehiscence or failure to heal following venous access port placement in patients receiving bevacizumab therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20 (05) 624-627 , quiz 571
  • 12 van de Wetering MD, van Woensel JBM. Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing early central venous catheter Gram positive infections in oncology patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (02) CD003295
  • 13 Erinjeri JP, Fong AJ, Kemeny NE, Brown KT, Getrajdman GI, Solomon SB. Timing of administration of bevacizumab chemotherapy affects wound healing after chest wall port placement. Cancer 2011; 117 (06) 1296-1301

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 (A) Clinical radiograph of the catheter lock anchoring technique. Implantable port placement in progress. The tunneled port catheter is exiting from the chest wall incision. (B) The catheter lock is anchored with the suture and threaded over the catheter. (C) The port chamber is connected to the catheter after trimming. The catheter lock is pushed deep in the subcutaneous tunnel for creating better working space. (D) Position of catheter lock after the catheter is connected to port chamber. (E) The catheter lock is pulled out from the subcutaneous tunnel. (F) The suture thread is removed and the catheter lock is advanced into the final position.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 (A) Pictoral illustration of the catheter lock anchoring technique. Implantable port placement in progress. The catheter is tunneled and trimmed. (B) Enlarged view of the operating area. (C) Catheter lock is anchored over the suture thread and mounted over the catheter. (D) The catheter lock is pushed back into the subcutaneous plane. (E) The catheter is connected to the port chamber stem. (F) The catheter lock is pulled back near the port chamber stem and the suture thread is removed. (G) The catheter lock is advanced to the final locking position. (H) The port chamber is pushed into the port pocket.