CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2022; 57(01): 113-119
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731362
Artigos Originais
Mão

Madelung Deformity – Esthetic and Functional Outcomes from the Surgical Treatment with Distal Radial Dome Osteotomy and Vickers Ligament Section[*]

Article in several languages: português | English
1   Serviço de Ortopedia Pediátrica, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Pedro Sá Cardoso
1   Serviço de Ortopedia Pediátrica, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Cristina Alves
1   Serviço de Ortopedia Pediátrica, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Inês Balacó
1   Serviço de Ortopedia Pediátrica, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Tah Pu Ling
1   Serviço de Ortopedia Pediátrica, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Gabriel Matos
1   Serviço de Ortopedia Pediátrica, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
› Author Affiliations
 

Abstract

Objective The present study aimed to evaluate esthetic and functional outcomes from the surgical treatment of Madelung deformity in children.

Method This is a retrospective study of pediatric patients with Madelung deformity who were surgically treated with dome osteotomy of the distal radius and Vickers ligament section from 2015 to 2018. Patients with a minimum postoperative follow-up period of 12 months were included. Demographic data, surgical technique, clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed. Pre and postoperative radiographic evaluation consisted of ulnar tilt, lunate subsidence lunate fossa angle, and palmar carpal displacement measurements. The postoperative clinical evaluation consisted of ranges of motion of the wrist, visual analog scale (VAS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score.

Results Four patients were included, two with idiopathic Madelung deformity and two with bone dysplasia. All patients were females and presented bilateral disease. Six wrists were operated on. The median age at surgery was 15.5 years old, and the median postoperative follow-up time was of 37.5 months. The postoperative radiographic analysis revealed an average correction of 8.8 ± 7.5° for ulnar tilt, 3.0 ± 3.9 mm for lunate subsidence 8.2 ± 6.6° for lunate fossa angle, and 4.7 ± 2.6 mm for palmar carpal displacement. Average postoperative ranges of motion of the wrist joint were 75.8 ± 3.4° for flexion, 62.5 ± 14.1° for extension, 25.7 ± 2.9° for radial deviation, 40.0 ± 2.9° for ulnar deviation, 88.3 ± 2.4° for pronation, and 82.5 ± 2.5° for supination. The median VAS was 1 for residual pain, 0 for functional deficit, 0 for esthetic impairment, and 10 for recommending the surgical procedure. The median DASH score was 0.

Conclusion Madelung deformity treatment using dome osteotomy of the distal radius and Vickers ligament section results in excellent esthetic and functional outcomes.


#

Introduction

Madelung deformity is characterized by an ulnar deviation of the articular surface of the distal radius, volar subluxation, and ulnar impaction of the carpus. It represents 1.7% of all congenital anomalies of the upper limb.[1] [2] [3] Its onset is attributed to the partial closure of the medial and volar portion of the distal physis of the radius, which is potentially associated with the local presence of a thickened fibrous band (corresponding to the short radiolunate ligament), the so-called Vickers ligament.[4] [5] This ligament has a restrictive, compressive effect over the growth of the distal radius, worsening the deformity.[4] [6] The progressive anatomical change results in a modification of the radiocarpal and ulnocarpal joint congruence, which evolves from an initial phase of mere esthetic perception to potentially significant pain at the wrist level, limited range of motion, grip strength loss, and a marked impact on daily life activities.[7] [8] [9] This deformity is more common in female adolescents and it is often bilateral. Madelung deformity is etiologically classified as idiopathic and associated with bone dysplasia, chromosomal abnormalities, or post-trauma situations.[10] [11] [12] Hereditary, autosomal dominant inheritance is frequently described, with genetic screening for X-linked and SHOX gene mutations usually employed to exclude conditions such as Turner syndrome or Léri-Weill dyschondrosteosis.[6] [11] [12] [13]

Clinical evaluation of affected patients often reveals a prominent distal ulna and volar carpal subluxation in relation to the forearm. Wrist extension and forearm supination may vary depending on the severity of the deformity, and the distal radioulnar joint may be loose or unstable. In the presence of clinical suspicion, a radiographic evaluation is usually requested and peremptory for diagnostic confirmation. Validated diagnostic criteria consider different clinical characteristics and/or radiographic variables, including ulnar tilt, lunate subsidence lunar fossa angle, palmar carpal displacement, and ulnar variance.[14] [15] [16] There are several options for surgical treatment according to the severity of the deformity and the age of the patient. Surgery is usually indicated in cases with persistent pain, functional limitation, and progressive bone deformity in a skeletally immature subject.[2] [17]

The present study aimed to evaluate esthetic and functional outcomes from the surgical treatment of Madelung deformity in pediatric patients using the distal radial dome osteotomy technique and Vickers ligament section.


#

Materials and Methods

Retrospective descriptive study analyzing clinical files from patients with Madelung deformity who were surgically treated from 2015 to 2018.The inclusion criteria were age < 18 years old, surgical treatment consisting in dome osteotomy of the distal radius and Vickers ligament section, and a minimum postoperative follow-up period of 12 months. The primary surgical indication was wrist progressive deformity with (radial/ulnocarpal) pain refractory to reduced activity, anti-inflammatory medication, orthosis, or physical therapy for a minimum period of 6 months.

The following parameters were analyzed: demographic data (gender, age at diagnosis, and laterality), age at surgery, surgical technique, bone healing time, and radiographic and clinical outcomes. The pre and postoperative radiographic evaluation consisted in ulnar tilt, lunate subsidence lunar fossa angle, and palmar carpal displacement measurements,[14] which were determined using radiographic images of the wrist and the forearm (in anteroposterior and lateral views) obtained at our institution. Preoperative radiographies were those closest to the date of surgery. A postoperative clinical evaluation was carried out in a medical visit and consisted of the ranges of motion of the wrist and forearm joints, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, functional deficit, esthetic impact, and surgical treatment recommendation, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score.[18] The present study was authorized by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital, and patients and their families signed an informed consent form.

Surgical Technique

The patient was placed in the supine position, and antibiotic prophylaxis was administered (usually with intravenous cefazolin at a 30 mg/kg dose). A tourniquet was placed at the proximal region of the arm and was inflated at 200 mm/Hg.

A volar approach to the radius was performed through a longitudinal incision ( ± 7 cm), exploring the space between the flexor carpi radialis and the radial artery. The pronator quadratus muscle was identified and a distal based “L” flap was elevated to expose the volar face of the radius. The Vickers ligament was identified, divided, and excised ([Figure 1]). Under direct observation and fluoroscopic support, the metaphyseal region of the radius soon to be osteotomized was identified, avoiding damage to the distal radioulnar joint and the radial distal physis (when present). A circumferential radial subperiosteal dissection was performed and the dome (distally concave) fenestration of the distal volar and dorsal metaphysis cortex began using a 1.2/1.6 mm Kirshner (K) wire ([Figure 2]). Two 2.0/2.4 mm K wires were placed percutaneously in parallel or diverging position through the radial styloid and oriented towards the fenestrated region of the osteotomy, without passing beyond it ([Figure 3]). Radial dome osteotomy was performed using curved osteotomes ([Figure 4]); next, a reduction maneuver was performed with longitudinal traction, radial deviation, pronation, and dorsal deviation of the distal fragment. While the main surgeon sustained this reduction, the assistant surgeon advanced the K wires through the osteotomy focus up to the cortical fixation at the proximal fragment. Reduction and fixation were confirmed fluoroscopically ([Figure 5]). The K wires were folded and cut, leaving an end outside the skin to allow their removal during a medical visit. A limited volar fasciotomy was performed prophylactically, and closure began by partially reapproximating the pronator quadratus flap with absorbable sutures. Subcutaneous tissue and skin were closed with absorbable sutures. The limb was immobilized with a split short arm plaster cast to prevent postsurgical edema/compartment syndrome.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Volar approach to the radius for identification, section, and excision of the Vickers ligament.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Dome fenestration of the distal concavity of the volar and dorsal cortex of the metaphyseal region of the distal radius with a Kirschner wire (1.6 mm).
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Introduction of two Kirschner wires (2.0/2.4 mm) parallel or divergent to each other at the level of the radial styloid, towards the metaphyseal region of the previously fenestrated distal radius, without passing beyond it.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Osteotomy at the distally concave dome of the metaphyseal region of the distal radius with curved osteotomes.
Zoom Image
Fig. 5 Fluoroscopic control of the reduction and fixation achieved during the metaphyseal osteotomy at the dome of the distal radius with Kirschner wires (anteroposterior and lateral views).

#

Postoperative Protocol

The immediate postoperative period focused on limb elevation, neurovascular surveillance, and active finger mobility. The average postsurgical length of stay in our institution was of 3 days, and the patients met the discharge criteria when they were comfortable with the plastered immobilization and with no pain at rest, digital edema, or neurovascular deficits. At a visit 5 to 6 weeks postsurgery, the plastered immobilization was removed, the surgical wounds were verified, and the K wires were removed without the need for an anesthetic procedure. During this visit, a radiograph of the forearm (in anteroposterior and lateral views) was performed to evaluate the reduction obtained and the quality of the bone callus/consolidation. When callus formation was deemed incipient, another short arm cast was placed and maintained until achieving unequivocal bone consolidation. The patients were subsequently evaluated clinically and radiographically in visits at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery and then once a year.


#
#

Results

From 2015 to 2018, 4 children with Madelung deformity were surgically treated at our institution. Two of these patients had an idiopathic deformity and two subjects presented it in the context of bone dysplasia due to Léri-Weill dyschondrosteosis. All patients were females with bilateral disease. Six wrists were operated on. The primary indication for surgery was disabling pain. The median follow-up time was 37.5 months (range, 2 to 44 months). The median age at the 1st visit was 13 years old (range: 11 to 15 years old) and the median age at surgery was 15.5 years old (range: 13 to 17 years old). The surgical approach consisted of a dome osteotomy of the distal radius with Vickers ligament section, fixation with Kirshner wires and plaster cast immobilization. These procedures were performed by three specialized surgeons. The mean bone healing time up to the removal of the plastered immobilization was 11.6 ± 2.4 weeks. The radiographic evaluation comparing pre and postoperative findings revealed an average correction of 8.8 ± 7.5° for ulnar tilt, 3.0 ± 3.9 mm for lunate subsidence 8.2 ± 6.6° for lunate fossa angle, and 4.7 ± 2.6 mm for palmar carpal displacement ([Table 1]). Average postoperative ranges of motion of the wrist joint were 75.8 ± 3.4° for flexion, 62.5 ± 14.1° for extension, 25.7 ± 2.9° for radial deviation, 40.0 ± 2.9° for ulnar deviation, 88.3 ± 2.4° for pronation, and 82.5 ± 2.5° for supination ([Figure 6]; [Table 1]). Postoperatively, the median VAS was 1 for residual pain (range: 0 to 4), 0 for functional deficit (range: 0 to 2), 0 for negative esthetic impact (range: 0 to 3), and 10 for recommending the surgical procedure to other patients (range: 8 to 10) ([Table 1]). The median DASH score was 0 (range: 0 to 5), including for its specific sport module (range: 0 to 50). There was a minor postoperative complication of decreased sensitivity at the radial edge of the wrist, with complete spontaneous resolution in 8 weeks.

Zoom Image
Fig. 6 Clinical photograph of postoperative wrist and forearm mobility. A - patient submitted to a bilateral surgical procedure; B - patient submitted to a bilateral surgical procedure; C - patient submitted to a surgical procedure on the left wrist; D - patient submitted to a surgical procedure on the right wrist.
Table 1

Pre- and Postoperative Radiographic Assessment

Wrist 1

Wrist 2

Wrist 3

Wrist 4

Wrist 5

Wrist 6

Average ∆ Correction

Pre-

Post-

Pre-

Post-

Pre-

Post-

Pre-

Post-

Pre-

Post-

Pre-

Post-

Ulnar tilt (°)

39

17

49

48

66

64

24

16

29

24

45

30

8.8 °

Lunate subsidence (mm)

15

4

10

10

9

4

8

7

4

3

0

0

3 mm

Lunate fossa angle (°)

27

25

54

53

68

58

41

32

51

30

41

35

8.2 °

Palmar carpal displacement (mm)

25

20

29

20

21

15

21

20

21

16

21

19

4.7 mm

Postoperative Clinical Evaluation

Wrist 1

Wrist 2

Wrist 3

Wrist 4

Wrist 5

Wrist 6

Average

Joint mobility ( ° )

Flexion/extension

80/70

75/60

75/35

75/80

80/60

70/70

75.8 ° /62.5 °

Radial/ulnar deviation

25/40

30/40

25/40

25/45

25/40

20/35

25 ° /40 °

Pronation/supination

90/80

90/80

85/85

90/85

85/80

90/85

88.3 ° /82.5 °

Wrist 1

Wrist 2

Wrist 3

Wrist 4

Wrist 5

Wrist 6

Median

DASH Score [0-100]

0

0

0

0

5

1,7

0

VAS [0-10]

Residual pain

0

1

1

0

4

1

1

Negative esthetic impact

0

0

0

0

1

2

0

Functional deficit

0

0

0

0

1

2

0

Surgical procedure recommendation

10

10

10

10

8

10

10


#

Discussion

The patients with Madelung deformity included in our study showed a gender and age trend similar to that described in the literature, with a predominance of female adolescents and bilateral disease.[7] [17] [19] Etiologically, two patients presented a deformity associated with bone dysplasia (Léri-Weill dyschondrosteosis); both were referred to a genetic consultation due to the clinical picture of wrist deformity, short stature, mesomelic limb shortening, and family history of a similar phenotype. One of these patients also had lunate-pyramidal synostosis in agreement with the spectrum of bone dysplasia-associated skeletal anomalies.[20] According to the literature and consistent with our work, these patients have a more severe condition affecting the entire radius.[21] One of the patients underwent a genetic study that revealed a heterozygous mutation at the SHOX gene. The other patient did not undergo a genetic study, and she was instructed on the dominant character of the disease and the risk of transmitting it in a future parental project. There is no mandatory orientation for immediate genetic testing of these patients, since the added information does not imply in a relevant benefit for their lives; in addition, apart from the skeletal changes described, apparently there are no complications of associated systemic diseases.[17] On the other hand, in some patients with Madelung deformity of unknown etiology and clinical characteristics that are not part of the usual clinical spectrum, a genetic study should be considered to identify any potential chromosomal change.[2] Our service offers a multidisciplinary approach with genetics consultation for patients with Madelung deformity and a phenotype suggesting bone dysplasia or atypical clinical characteristics. The decision to request genetic testing is up to our colleagues at the Medical Genetics service from our hospital. Surgical indication varies in the literature, and it considers different factors such as pain, age, esthetic impact, functional limitation, deformity progression, compressive nerve injury, or associated tendon rupture.[2] [17] [22] [23] In the present study, the primary surgical indication for all patients was disabling wrist pain. Regarding surgical procedures, adolescents with symptomatology and structured deformity such as those in the present study often are submitted to corrective osteotomies, and the distal radial dome osteotomy is one of the most attractive options due to good clinical and radiographic outcomes.[24] [25] [26] [27] Dome osteotomy allows an intraoperative, three-dimensional, partial or total restitution of the radiocarpal and radioulnar alignment and a decreased ulnar variance by distal translation of the lunate facet associated with a distal radius segment rotation.[26] [27] In addition, in cases of greater severity with ulnocarpal impaction, ulnar shortening can be performed at the same time or at a second procedure for wrist balance and to minimize ulnocarpal or distal radioulnar joint pain.[7] The present study did not consider the need for additional ulnar procedures, maintaining the absence of ulnar pain or ulnocarpal impaction symptoms during the median postoperative follow-up period of 37.5 months. It is worth mentioning that distal ulna epiphysiodesis with radius osteotomy remains an option in skeletally immature patients > 10 years old because it minimizes the likelihood of worsening of the ulnocarpal deformity and the potential need for late ulnar shortening osteotomies.[27] Some surgeons also indicate a prophylactic surgery in asymptomatic, skeletally immature subjects with no marked deformity, opting for a distal radius physiolysis (Langenskiöld procedure) and Vickers ligament section as an approach to minimize or prevent deformity onset or progression.[4] [28] The radiographic evaluation revealed a pre and postoperative variation with correction of all parameters evaluated, consistent with other studies considering the same procedure and some of the same parameters.[24] [26] The literature reports studies with a wide range of surgical procedures and radiographic analysis based on different radiological criteria;[4] [15] [16] therefore, comparative analysis is necessarily limited. It should be noted that, although with no marked correction of these radiographic parameters, surgical treatment was associated with excellent clinical and functional outcomes (median VAS of 0 for residual pain and functional deficit). This data suggests the importance of factors other than bone correction of the deformity for the clinical outcome, such as radiolunate decompression through section of the Vickers ligament. At the postoperative clinical evaluation, all patients reported an important reduction in pain and improvement in joint range of motion, consistent with the description of Peymani in a systematic review about different approaches to the surgical treatment of Madelung deformity.[2] Patient satisfaction with the surgical procedure is also highlighted, with a median VAS of 0 for esthetic impact and 10 for recommending the treatment to other patients. The median DASH score was also maximum, including for its specific sport module, reflecting the enormous postsurgical satisfaction and functionality. A neuropraxia of the sensitive radial nerve, with spontaneous resolution after 8 weeks, was the single complication in our patients. Although K wires were introduced percutaneously, avoiding the presumed nerve territory and advanced with the motor in oscillatory mode, the literature states that the translation of distal radial fragment shifts the orientation of the K wires to a longitudinal position, which may be enough to create a local nervous compressive effect during reduction.[4] This compressive effect usually is transitory and tends to resolve after extraction of the K wires, as in our case. The limitations of the present study included the lack of a clinical evaluation for range of motion and preoperative DASH score determination. As an improvement and future guidance on data standardization for further studies on Madelung deformity, we will adopt the protocol proposed by Peymani[2] in our service.


#

Conclusions

The surgical treatment of Madelung deformity is associated with excellent clinical and functional outcomes. The degree of radiographic correction of the deformity through a dome osteotomy of the distal radius does not seem to be the single determining factor for clinical outcomes, suggesting the importance of other factors associated with osteotomy and deformity correction, such as radiolunate decompression by section of the Vickers ligament. In our experience, the dome osteotomy of the distal radius with Vickers ligament section in symptomatic adolescents with structured Madelung deformity results in excellent esthetic outcomes, high satisfaction, and excellent functional outcomes.


#
#

Conflito de Interesses

Os autores declaram não haver conflito de interesses.

* Study developed at the Pediatric Orthopedic Service, Hospital Pediátrico – Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal


  • Referências

  • 1 Flatt AE. The Care of Congenital Hand Anomalies. St Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby Co; 1994
  • 2 Peymani A, Johnson R, Dowlatshahi AS. et al. Surgical Management of Madelung Deformity: A Systematic Review. Hand (N Y) 2019; 14 (06) 725-734
  • 3 Arora AS, Chung KC, Otto W. Madelung and the recognition of Madelung's deformity. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (02) 177-182
  • 4 Vickers D, Nielsen G. Madelung deformity: surgical prophylaxis (physiolysis) during the late growth period by resection of the dyschondrosteosis lesion. J Hand Surg Br 1992; 17 (04) 401-407
  • 5 Kim HK. Madelung deformity with Vickers ligament. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39 (11) 1251
  • 6 Knutsen EJ, Goldfarb CA. Madelung's Deformity. Hand (N Y) 2014; 9 (03) 289-291
  • 7 dos Reis FB, Katchburian MV, Faloppa F, Albertoni WM, Laredo Filho Jr J. Osteotomy of the radius and ulna for the Madelung deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80 (05) 817-824
  • 8 Fagg PS. Wrist pain in the Madelung's deformity of dyschondrosteosis. J Hand Surg Br 1988; 13 (01) 11-15
  • 9 Houshian S, Schrøder HA, Weeth R. Correction of Madelung's deformity by the Ilizarov technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (04) 536-540
  • 10 Henry A, Thorburn MJ. Madelung's deformity. A clinical and cytogenetic study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1967; 49 (01) 66-73
  • 11 Belin V, Cusin V, Viot G. et al. SHOX mutations in dyschondrosteosis (Leri-Weill syndrome). Nat Genet 1998; 19 (01) 67-69
  • 12 Clement-Jones M, Schiller S, Rao E. et al. The short stature homeobox gene SHOX is involved in skeletal abnormalities in Turner syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9 (05) 695-702
  • 13 Schwartz RP, Sumner TE. Madelung's deformity as a presenting sign of Turner's syndrome. J Pediatr 2000; 136 (04) 563
  • 14 McCarroll Jr HR, James MA, Newmeyer 3rd WL, Manske PR. Madelung's deformity: diagnostic thresholds of radiographic measurements. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (05) 807-812
  • 15 Dannenberg M, Anton JI, Spiegel MB. Madelung's Deformity: consideration of its roentgenological diagnostic criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1939; 42: 671-676
  • 16 Steyers CM, Blair WF. Measuring ulnar variance: a comparison of techniques. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14 (04) 607-612
  • 17 Waters PM, Bae DS. Pediatric Hand and Upper Limb Surgery. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2012
  • 18 Disabilities of the Arm. Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score. Available from: http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/scoring
  • 19 Schmidt-Rohlfing B, Schwöbel B, Pauschert R, Niethard FU. Madelung deformity: clinical features, therapy and results. J Pediatr Orthop B 2001; 10 (04) 344-348
  • 20 Langer LO. Dyschondrosteosis, a heritable bone dysplasia with characteristic roentgenographic features. Am J Roentgen Radium Ther. Nucl Med (Stuttg) 1965; 95: 178-188
  • 21 Zebala LP, Manske PR, Goldfarb CA. Madelung's deformity: a spectrum of presentation. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (09) 1393-1401
  • 22 Luchetti R, Mingione A, Monteleone M, Cristiani G. Carpal tunnel syndrome in Madelung's deformity. J Hand Surg Br 1988; 13 (01) 19-22
  • 23 Schulstad I. Madelung's deformity with extensor tendon rupture. Case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1971; 5 (02) 153-155
  • 24 Harley BJ, Brown C, Cummings K, Carter PR, Ezaki M. Volar ligament release and distal radius dome osteotomy for correction of Madelung's deformity. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (09) 1499-1506
  • 25 Carter PR, Ezaki M. Madelung's deformity. Surgical correction through the anterior approach. Hand Clin 2000; 16 (04) 713-721
  • 26 Steinman S, Oishi S, Mills J, Bush P, Wheeler L, Ezaki M. Volar ligament release and distal radial dome osteotomy for the correction of Madelung deformity: long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (13) 1198-1204
  • 27 Farr S, Kalish LA, Bae DS, Waters PM. Radiographic Criteria for undergoing an ulnar shortening osteotomy in Madelung deformity: A long-term experience from a single institution. J Pediatr Orthop 2016; 36 (03) 310-315
  • 28 Otte JE, Popp JE, Samora JB. Treatment of Madelung deformity with Vicker ligament release and radial physiolyses: a case series. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44 (02) 158.e1-158.e9

Endereço para correspondência

Marcos Carvalho, MD, MSc
Av. Afonso Romão, Coimbra, 3000-602
Portugal   

Publication History

Received: 03 June 2020

Accepted: 08 January 2021

Article published online:
01 October 2021

© 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

  • Referências

  • 1 Flatt AE. The Care of Congenital Hand Anomalies. St Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby Co; 1994
  • 2 Peymani A, Johnson R, Dowlatshahi AS. et al. Surgical Management of Madelung Deformity: A Systematic Review. Hand (N Y) 2019; 14 (06) 725-734
  • 3 Arora AS, Chung KC, Otto W. Madelung and the recognition of Madelung's deformity. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (02) 177-182
  • 4 Vickers D, Nielsen G. Madelung deformity: surgical prophylaxis (physiolysis) during the late growth period by resection of the dyschondrosteosis lesion. J Hand Surg Br 1992; 17 (04) 401-407
  • 5 Kim HK. Madelung deformity with Vickers ligament. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39 (11) 1251
  • 6 Knutsen EJ, Goldfarb CA. Madelung's Deformity. Hand (N Y) 2014; 9 (03) 289-291
  • 7 dos Reis FB, Katchburian MV, Faloppa F, Albertoni WM, Laredo Filho Jr J. Osteotomy of the radius and ulna for the Madelung deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80 (05) 817-824
  • 8 Fagg PS. Wrist pain in the Madelung's deformity of dyschondrosteosis. J Hand Surg Br 1988; 13 (01) 11-15
  • 9 Houshian S, Schrøder HA, Weeth R. Correction of Madelung's deformity by the Ilizarov technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (04) 536-540
  • 10 Henry A, Thorburn MJ. Madelung's deformity. A clinical and cytogenetic study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1967; 49 (01) 66-73
  • 11 Belin V, Cusin V, Viot G. et al. SHOX mutations in dyschondrosteosis (Leri-Weill syndrome). Nat Genet 1998; 19 (01) 67-69
  • 12 Clement-Jones M, Schiller S, Rao E. et al. The short stature homeobox gene SHOX is involved in skeletal abnormalities in Turner syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9 (05) 695-702
  • 13 Schwartz RP, Sumner TE. Madelung's deformity as a presenting sign of Turner's syndrome. J Pediatr 2000; 136 (04) 563
  • 14 McCarroll Jr HR, James MA, Newmeyer 3rd WL, Manske PR. Madelung's deformity: diagnostic thresholds of radiographic measurements. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (05) 807-812
  • 15 Dannenberg M, Anton JI, Spiegel MB. Madelung's Deformity: consideration of its roentgenological diagnostic criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1939; 42: 671-676
  • 16 Steyers CM, Blair WF. Measuring ulnar variance: a comparison of techniques. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14 (04) 607-612
  • 17 Waters PM, Bae DS. Pediatric Hand and Upper Limb Surgery. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2012
  • 18 Disabilities of the Arm. Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score. Available from: http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/scoring
  • 19 Schmidt-Rohlfing B, Schwöbel B, Pauschert R, Niethard FU. Madelung deformity: clinical features, therapy and results. J Pediatr Orthop B 2001; 10 (04) 344-348
  • 20 Langer LO. Dyschondrosteosis, a heritable bone dysplasia with characteristic roentgenographic features. Am J Roentgen Radium Ther. Nucl Med (Stuttg) 1965; 95: 178-188
  • 21 Zebala LP, Manske PR, Goldfarb CA. Madelung's deformity: a spectrum of presentation. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (09) 1393-1401
  • 22 Luchetti R, Mingione A, Monteleone M, Cristiani G. Carpal tunnel syndrome in Madelung's deformity. J Hand Surg Br 1988; 13 (01) 19-22
  • 23 Schulstad I. Madelung's deformity with extensor tendon rupture. Case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1971; 5 (02) 153-155
  • 24 Harley BJ, Brown C, Cummings K, Carter PR, Ezaki M. Volar ligament release and distal radius dome osteotomy for correction of Madelung's deformity. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (09) 1499-1506
  • 25 Carter PR, Ezaki M. Madelung's deformity. Surgical correction through the anterior approach. Hand Clin 2000; 16 (04) 713-721
  • 26 Steinman S, Oishi S, Mills J, Bush P, Wheeler L, Ezaki M. Volar ligament release and distal radial dome osteotomy for the correction of Madelung deformity: long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (13) 1198-1204
  • 27 Farr S, Kalish LA, Bae DS, Waters PM. Radiographic Criteria for undergoing an ulnar shortening osteotomy in Madelung deformity: A long-term experience from a single institution. J Pediatr Orthop 2016; 36 (03) 310-315
  • 28 Otte JE, Popp JE, Samora JB. Treatment of Madelung deformity with Vicker ligament release and radial physiolyses: a case series. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44 (02) 158.e1-158.e9

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Abordagem volar do rádio com identificação, secção e excisão do ligamento de Vickers.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Fenestração em cúpula de concavidade distal do córtex volar e dorsal da região metafisária do rádio distal com fio de Kirschner (1.6 mm).
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Introdução de 2 fios de Kirschner (2.0/2.4mm) paralelos ou divergentes ao nível da estilóide radial e orientados no sentido da região metafisária do rádio distal previamente fenestrada, sem a ultrapassar.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Realização da osteotomia em cúpula de concavidade distal da região metafisária do rádio distal com osteótomos curvos.
Zoom Image
Fig. 5 Controle fluoroscópico da redução e fixação alcançadas pela osteotomia metafisária em cúpula do rádio distal com fios de Kirschner (anteroposterior e perfil).
Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Volar approach to the radius for identification, section, and excision of the Vickers ligament.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Dome fenestration of the distal concavity of the volar and dorsal cortex of the metaphyseal region of the distal radius with a Kirschner wire (1.6 mm).
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Introduction of two Kirschner wires (2.0/2.4 mm) parallel or divergent to each other at the level of the radial styloid, towards the metaphyseal region of the previously fenestrated distal radius, without passing beyond it.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Osteotomy at the distally concave dome of the metaphyseal region of the distal radius with curved osteotomes.
Zoom Image
Fig. 5 Fluoroscopic control of the reduction and fixation achieved during the metaphyseal osteotomy at the dome of the distal radius with Kirschner wires (anteroposterior and lateral views).
Zoom Image
Fig. 6 Fotografia clínica da mobilidade pós-operatória do punho e antebraço. A – paciente com procedimento cirúrgico bilateral; B – paciente com procedimento cirúrgico bilateral; C – paciente com procedimento cirúrgico à esquerda; D – paciente com procedimento cirúrgico à direita.
Zoom Image
Fig. 6 Clinical photograph of postoperative wrist and forearm mobility. A - patient submitted to a bilateral surgical procedure; B - patient submitted to a bilateral surgical procedure; C - patient submitted to a surgical procedure on the left wrist; D - patient submitted to a surgical procedure on the right wrist.