Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729487
Uncommon Iatrogenic Devices Seen on Chest Radiographs
Abstract
Chest radiograph (CXR) is the most common imaging performed for both inpatients and outpatients. With advances in medicine and technology, newer devices/prosthesis are being used in the treatment of cardiothoracic conditions. Some of these are common while others are seen only in a handful of cases, especially in patients being treated or referred from tertiary care centers. It is important to know about these devices, their functionality, and radiographic appearances. Many of these devices also help us in understanding the clinical condition of the patient, as some are only used in unstable patients. Newer methods of life support are now available in intensive care units and these also can be seen on CXRs. In this review, we present various iatrogenic devices that we come across on a CXR and highlight important features to determine their correct placement and potential complications. The review looks at cardiac temporary and permanent pacing devices, cardiac interventional devices used to treat congenital heart disease, newer cardiac monitoring devices, and unusual surgical devices that one may come across on a CXR. We also suggest a stepwise algorithm to assess these devices on a CXR.
#
Introduction
The chest radiograph (CXR) is the most common imaging performed with almost all patients attending the hospital having one. CXR is performed “round the clock” due to its clinical utility and easy availability. Clinicians are expected to review these radiographs, make a preliminary diagnosis, and treat patients accordingly. It is very important to make an accurate assessment of the radiographs as it will not only impact the clinical management but may also streamline the need for other investigations. Most of the clinicians and radiologists are comfortable in reviewing a CXR; however, it can be a daunting task to some juniors. A logical process of interpretation of CXR involves a review of iatrogenic foreign bodies (IFB) first (lines and drains), followed by a review of the mediastinum, the lungs, and finally the bony architecture.
With advances in the field of cardiothoracic surgery and increased usage of percutaneous procedures for placement of devices, more and more IFB are seen on CXRs. Every doctor interpreting these images needs to be aware of these procedures, normal appearances of the prosthesis, and should be able to recognize potential complications relating to these devices/IFB.
In this review, we present a selection of findings on CXR that includes postoperative appearances, cardiothoracic devices, and their complications. We will review these devices according to their location within the body, that is, cardiac, vascular, thoracic, musculoskeletal, and miscellaneous. Some of the well-known devices/lines (central venous line/chest drains) are not covered in this review.
#
Cardiac Devices
Defibrillator and Pacemaker
Cardiovascular implantable electronic device is nowadays commonly seen on CXR and includes permanent pacemaker and implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD). These devices are implanted in patients with cardiac rhythm disturbances, to improve cardiac function and/or prophylactically in patients susceptible to life-threatening arrhythmias. These are important devices and can have varied appearances on a CXR. These consist of a pulse generator and some transvenous pacing leads. The pulse generator is often implanted in a subcutaneous pocket within the pectoralis muscle or in the abdomen ([Fig. 1]). Abdominal placement is preferred in children to accommodate their growth. Pacemaker leads (generally 1–3) are metallic wires with silicone or polyurethane insulation. Cephalic or subclavian veins are commonly used access points with jugular and femoral veins being other alternatives. The right ventricular (RV) lead courses along the lateral wall of the right atrium, passes through the tricuspid valve with its tip at the ventricular apex directed anteriorly and inferiorly, just to the left of the spine.[1] On the lateral film, the lead should be directed anteriorly and inferiorly, to differentiate it from coronary sinus or left ventricular lead. The right atrial (preferably within the atrial appendage) lead on the frontal CXR should terminate over the right upper heart border, with a J-shaped curve and tip-directed upward.[2] On a lateral radiograph, the lead should follow a smooth anterior curve in the midportion of the heart with its tip angled cephalad into the right atrial appendage[3] ([Figs. 2 ]and [3]). In case of a biventricular pacemaker or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device, the left ventricular lead is placed through the coronary sinus into a cardiac vein, usually along the lateral or posterior free wall of the left ventricle ([Fig. 4]). The left ventricular lead will course inferiorly and laterally on a frontal radiograph (cannot distinguish from a lead in RV apex) and posteriorly on the lateral view (RV lead is anterior in location on this view).[4] ICDs are most often composed of a single lead with two shock coils (located in the region of the brachiocephalic vein–superior vena cava junction and in the RV).[4] The shock coils appear as cylindrical thickening in the lead and can be used to differentiate ICD from a pacemaker ([Fig. 5]). CRT may also have a defibrillator component (CRT-D) ([Fig. 6]). Pacemaker leads may also be placed along the epicardial surface of the heart rather than the transvenous position ([Figs. 7 ]and [8]). Important complications of pacemaker insertion include malpositioned/retained or fractured wires/leads, pneumothorax, Twiddler syndrome, and cardiac perforation ([Figs. 9 ]and [10]). Aberrant vascular anatomy may also simulate malpositioned leads ([Fig. 11]). In patients who may have thrombosis of the upper limb veins, congenital heart anomalies, or in children who have pacing generator in the abdomen, a transhepatic route for the wires may be undertaken. In this, venous access is achieved via the hepatic vein via transcutaneous puncture. The leads are then passed into the inferior vena cava and then the cardiac chambers.
#
Epicardial Pacing
Epicardial pacing can be either permanent or temporary. Permanent epicardial pacing involves surgical placement of the epicardial leads directly on the epicardium. The leads are then tunneled through the chest wall and connected to the pacing box usually in the subcutaneous pocket of the upper abdomen[5] ([Fig. 12]). Currently, they are used only in unusual circumstances such as patients with recurrent dislodgement of transvenous systems, patients with prosthetic tricuspid valves or congenital anomalies such as tricuspid atresia, and in patients underlying CRT in whom the coronary sinus lead placement was unsuccessful.[5]
Temporary epicardial pacing is commonly used following cardiothoracic surgery in which the pacemaker leads are attached to the epicardium of the atrium and/or ventricle and then connected to the external pacer.[6] These leads are generally used in temporary treatment of arrhythmias in the perioperative period, and usually removed by 4 to 5 days after cardiac surgery by transcutaneous retraction.[7] They are seen on radiographs as coiled up thin wires over the cardiac silhouette and connected to two small cylindrical external metallic connectors on the surface ([Fig. 13]). Retained surgical swab can sometimes mimic epicardial-pacing wires. At discharge, most of these leads are removed but some portion of the wires may be retained within the deeper tissues. Such wires are often left behind without any major impact or complication.
#
Temporary Transvenous Ventricular Pacing
Patients with acute hemodynamic compromise caused by bradycardia and/or episodes of asystole should be considered for temporary cardiac pacing.[8] This often occurs in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. Transvenous pacing is superior to the transcutaneous method because of patient comfort and stability of pacing.[6] Central venous access is gained through femoral vein (in some cases via the jugular system) and the pacing lead is advanced into the right atrium and then across the tricuspid valve with the tip in the RV. On CXR, the lead can be seen coming along the right paravertebral aspect and then angling along the diaphragm with the tip toward the cardiac apex ([Fig. 14]). The lead may be displaced with the tip either along the RV outflow tract or in the atrium.
#
Loop Recorder
Loop recorder or reveal device is an insertable cardiac monitor used to record electrocardiogram (ECG). These devices are used when long-term monitoring of cardiac rhythm is required. These are patient-activated or automatically activated monitoring systems wherein the recorded data are analyzed later for the evaluation of suspected cardiac arrhythmias.[7] Reveal devices are subcutaneously placed on the anterior chest wall (usually left parasternal area extending to the midclavicular line between the first intercostal space and the fourth rib or in the lower chest—V3 area, between the fourth and fifth rib) ([Fig. 15]). These devices are usually magnetic resonance imaging compatible and can be confused as a USB device in patients clothing. There are often no complications related to these devices. Newer ECG monitoring/recording devices are also being tried in various institutes as a mode of remote monitoring of patients in postoperative period ([Fig. 16])
#
Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) Closure Device
Atrial septal defects (ASD) can be closed by open surgical techniques or by percutaneous catheter-guided means avoiding thoracotomy/sternotomy. The decision on closing of an ASD depends on the patient symptoms and the amount of shunt from left to the right. Smaller defects with insignificant shunts are often medically managed. Various types of percutaneous ASD closure devices are in use, which are placed in position under fluoroscopic, transesophageal echocardiographic (TOE), or intracardiac echocardiographic imaging guidance. These are generally self-centering devices constructed from thin nitinol wires tightly woven onto two flat discs with a connecting waist (sizes 4–40 mm). Polyester mesh is sewn into each disc and mesh to induce stasis and thrombosis. On CXRs, they appear as one or two discs or two dots (corresponding to the ends of the waist of the device)[4] ([Fig. 17]). The position of the device is described with respect to the thoracic vertebral bodies on both frontal and lateral radiographs and with respect to the hilar–caval line (drawn from anterior margin of right hilum to posterior margin of inferior vena cava on the lateral view—expected position of the interatrial septum). In children, these are generally projected over T7 to T9 vertebrae with the centers at or just to the right of the vertebral spinous process.[4] On the lateral radiograph, the waist of the occluder is usually seen on the hilar–caval line.
#
Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) Closure Device
VSD is the most common congenital cardiac defect (it can be seen as an isolated anomaly or in association with various other complex cardiac anomalies). Here again, catheter-based closure devices can be used besides direct surgical closure. On CXR, VSD occluder appears similar to ASD closure device (one or two radiopaque discs or two dots) but in the region of the interventricular septum ([Fig. 17]).
#
Prosthetic Cardiac Valves
Prosthetic cardiac valves are implanted surgically or via transcutaneous route to treat valvular stenosis or regurgitant pathologies. In younger patients, valve-sparing surgeries are preferred wherever possible. Correct identification of prosthetic cardiac valves is easy when clinical details or echocardiography reports are available. In emergency, correct identification of the valve (without any prior history) on a CXR may be useful as aortic valves are more susceptible to endocarditis and the mitral valves to thrombotic complications.[9] On a posteroanterior CXR, an imaginary line is drawn from right cardiophrenic angle to inferior aspect of left hilum and the aortic valve should lie above and the mitral valve below this line. This however is not very reliable on an anteroposterior CXR.[9] The aortic valves are often oriented horizontally and valve orifice is often in profile. In comparison, the mitral valve is vertical in location and the valve orifice appears en face. The pulmonary valve prosthesis is much higher and lateral to the other valves along the outflow tract. The tricuspid valve prosthesis is also seen en face on frontal CXR and is seen along the right paravertebral region ([Fig. 18] and [Table 1]). Lateral views are also helpful in differentiating one valve from the other but are often not performed in routine clinical practice.[10]
#
Ventricular Assist Device
Ventricular assist devices (VAD) are used to support the mechanical function of a failing heart and can be biventricular or only for the left ventricle. They are used for short term/temporary use (wherein the pump and controller are generally outside the patient) or long term (in such situations the pump is implanted in a peritoneal or abdominal wall pocket with external control and power). These devices have inflow cannulae placed in the cardiac apex/right atrium/atrial appendage and outflow cannulae placed in the aorta/main pulmonary artery or right pulmonary artery depending on whether they are left or RV assist devices, respectively ([Fig. 19]). Biventricular assist devices have both sets of cannulae ([Fig. 20]). On CXR, these appear as short radiopaque cylindrical structures (especially the left ventricular assist device [LVAD] inflow cannula at the LV apex on frontal CXR) when seen enface or as radiopaque rings when seen end-on (the other mentioned cannulae on the frontal CXR). Chest/mediastinal drains that mimic these cannulae are long tubes with breaks in the radiopaque line indicating side holes. The pump, external controls, and battery pack may or may not be seen on the CXR depending on where they are located. Computed tomography (CT) may be a better modality for the assessment of complications related to the LVAD, which include thrombosis and misplacement of the cannula ([Fig. 20]). CXR is useful in assessing the position of the device on serial films and associated complications such as pleural effusions/pneumothorax.
#
Vascular Devices
Intraaortic Balloon Pump
Intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) is a simple, cost-effective, and easily implantable circulatory support device in patients requiring hemodynamic support either in cardiogenic chock or at a higher risk of hemodynamic decompression during a high-risk coronary intervention.[11] The pump inflates during cardiac diastole along with aortic valve closure, thereby displacing the blood from the aorta into the peripheral vessels. Then it rapidly deflates before the onset of systole. This results in improved diastolic pressure, reduced systolic aortic pressure, and myocardial oxygen demand.[11] The tip of the IABP should be distal to the left subclavian artery and the proximal portion of the balloon above the origin of the renal arteries. On CXR, the tip of the IABP (seen as a linear radiopaque) should be above the carina at the level of the arch. If the tip is lower than this, then the abdominal visceral branches of the aorta can be compressed during inflation of the pump leading to visceral hypoxia ([Fig. 21])
#
PDA Closure Device
Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is one of the causes of pulmonary arterial hypertension. It contributes to 10% of the congenital cardiac anomalies.[1] It is more common in premature babies and females. Obstructive pulmonary diseases and heart failure are the complications of untreated PDA. Surgical closure is the treatment of choice when medical treatment fails. Surgical/interventional closure can be done either by clips or coils. On frontal CXR, it is seen on left side of the spine below the aortic arch. Different types of devices may be seen ([Fig. 22]).
#
Coarctation Stent
Coarctation of aorta accounts for 5 to 8% of congenital cardiac anomalies. Congestive cardiac failure, stroke, aortic rupture, and infective endocarditis are associated with late complications in untreated aortic coarctation.[12] Endovascular treatment avails minimally invasive alternative techniques to conventional open surgeries with shorter hospital stay.
Intravascular stent grafts can be seen on plain radiographs as tubular mesh-like radio-opacity. We should look for its position, extent, and continuity or any break ([Fig. 23]).
#
Pulmonary Artery Stent
Branch pulmonary artery stenosis can be seen in isolation or part of the other congenital cardiac defects. RV hypertrophy and failure are the delayed complications. RV systolic pressure >50% of aortic pressure or ipsilateral lung perfusion <35% are the indications for intervention.[13] Balloon dilatation or stent placement is the treatment option. Early postoperative pulmonary stenosis, postoperative kinking, external compression, elastic recoil, and intimal tear are some of the indications for stenting. Stents may also be placed in the RV outflow tract in cases of Tetralogy of Fallot. These stents can be seen on plain radiographs as tubular mesh-like radio-opacity ([Fig. 24]). Complications of stenosis or underlying thrombosis are not properly seen on CXR and CT is better for this.
#
Arteriovenous Malformation/Embolization Clip
Transcatheter intervention for hemoptysis is now becoming the first line of management in most cases. Bronchial artery and arteriovenous malformations are often the cause of hemoptysis and these can be well visualized on CT and/or catheter angiography.[14] Different materials can be instilled into the culprit vessels such as glue (N-butyl cyanoacrylate) or metallic clips. The glue is not radiopaque but is mixed with Lipiodol, which is radiopaque and can be seen on CXR. The clips on the other hand are radiopaque on their own and can be seen as well-defined structures along the path of intervention ([Fig. 25]).
#
#
Musculoskeletal Implants/Devices
Pectus Bar
Pectus excavatum is the most common congenital deformity of the chest wall accounts for 1: 400 births. It is four times more common in males. The deformity is more pronounced during the adolescent stage of life. Many are asymptomatic. Symptoms that can occur in severe cases include dyspnea, chest pain, exercise intolerance, and psychological problems.[15] Surgery in most of the cases is for cosmetic reasons. The main aim of surgery is to correct the chest deformity, which improves the self-acceptance, breathing, and cardiac function.[16] Two commonly used correction methods are highly modified Ravitch’s repair and Nuss procedure. In both procedures, metallic bar is placed behind the sternum. Wound infection, pneumothorax, overcorrection, and bar displacement/migration are some of the associated complications.[17] Nuss procedure involves the placement of a U-shaped rod with lateral anchor points and are well recognized. The Ravitch’s bar is a linear metal density bar with no anchor points ([Fig. 26]). It can be confused as a foreign body if clinical history is not known.
#
Spinal Fixation
Spinal instrumentation is done commonly to restore the spinal stability, correcting the deformities, in degenerative diseases, trauma, infection, and neoplasms. These can be anterior spinal fixation devices, posterior or posterolateral spinal fixation devices, and interbody grafts.[18] These are easily recognized due to their paravertebral location ([Fig. 27]).
#
Sternotomy
Standard median sternotomy sutures are seen along the sternum and are well spaced out. These are seen as a coiled metal wire without any breaks ([Figs. 3 ]and [5]). It is essential to ensure continuity of each of the wire knots and to make note of any broken wire. In some cases, break in the sternal wires is often ignored, if the patient has no symptoms. In patients who have infections along the sternum, elaborate operations are often required for osteomyelitis and different varieties of sternal fixation may be seen ([Figs. 28 ]and [29]).
#
Rotator Cuff Anchors
Full-thickness rotator cuff tear repair is performed using suture anchors that produce secure and effective soft tissue fixation to bone. Both metallic and biodegradable suture anchors can be used and have similar results.[19] On CXR, they are projected over the humeral head and can be confused with clothing artifacts ([Fig. 30]).
#
#
Miscellaneous
Tracheobronchial Stents
Airway stenting is performed to relieve airway obstruction/strictures that are not suitable for resection and reconstruction. They are made of metal or silicon. Some of the silicon stents are not radiopaque and hence may not be seen on CXRs. Stents can be covered or uncovered (appears like a mesh with perforations to allow for epithelial growth). Some stents are expandable for easy insertion. The choice of stent type depends on the location and type of lesion to be tackled. When seen on CXRs, they appear like a cylinder within the lumen of trachea/bronchus ([Fig. 31]). It is useful to compare previous radiographs for ensuring the stent has not migrated from its intended location.
#
Surgical Clips/Suture Material
Radiopaque surgical clips/suture materials can be seen in different locations. These may be seen in lung parenchyma postthoracic surgery or open lung biopsy ([Fig. 32]). These may also be seen along the mediastinum in patients postcoronary artery bypass surgeries whereby the clips are put in vessels ([Fig. 5]).
#
Breast Implants
Prosthetic breast implants are increasingly used for breast augmentation surgeries, postmastectomy, and cosmetic augmentation.[20] On CXR, these are recognized as areas of increased density in the lower part of the chest and in many cases, they are not apparent. Nipple prosthesis may also be present and are well recognized on CXR as radiopaque material. On long standing or following untreated rupture of the prosthesis, there may be calcification of the breast prosthesis where these can be well seen on CXR ([Figs. 27 ]and [33]).
#
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides circulatory support to patients with respiratory, cardiac, or combined failure for days to a week. Two types of ECMO are used VV (venovenous) system is used to support the lungs and give them time to recover and VA (venoarterial) system is used for cases of cardiac or cardiopulmonary failure.[21] On CXR, the ECMO cannulae are different from the normal lines because of their corrugated appearance/large size. The cannulation for the VV ECMO is usually in the jugular vein and femoral vein. The cannulation in the VA ECMO can be obtained centrally (right atrium and ascending aorta) or peripherally (jugular/femoral vein and carotid or femoral artery) ([Fig. 34]).
#
Deep Brain Stimulator
Deep brain stimulation is a well-established therapy for movement disorders. In this technique, thin wires are placed intracranially and are connected to a neurostimulator (very similar to the pacing box in the pacemaker) via an insulated wire that is implanted under the skin. The stimulator is placed in the subcutaneous tissue of the chest wall and can be seen on the CXR with wires leading along the neck superiorly ([Fig. 35]).
#
Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe
There is increasing use of TOE in routine practice especially in sick patients or during cardiac surgeries. Some ill patients often have a TOE probe in situ for a longer time and the probes may be seen in a CXR. It is seen as a linear structure along the path of the esophagus and is much thicker and denser compared with a nasogastric tube ([Fig. 36]).
#
Surgical Gauze
Retained surgical gauze material after cardiothoracic surgery can be a major complication and needs to be identified at the earliest. It is customary to do a swab count at the end of the surgery to avoid such a mishap but such mistakes can still happen. CXR is a good test in depicting these surgical gauze materials as they are embedded with radiopaque linear structures. These radiopaque materials are irregular and do not follow any vascular anatomy ([Fig. 37]).
#
#
#
Conclusion
Various IFB may be seen on a CXR. It is important to recognize them and any complications associated with it. This review will act as a ready reckoner and guide for radiologists and clinicians when they come across uncommon/unusual prosthesis on a CXR.
#
#
Conflicts of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Financial Support and Sponsorship
Nil.
-
References
- 1 Edwards NC, Varma M, Pitcher DW. Routine chest radiography after permanent pacemaker implantation: is it necessary?. J Postgrad Med 2005; 51 (02) 92-96, discussion 96–97
- 2 Costelloe CM, Murphy WA Jr, Gladish GW, Rozner MA. Radiography of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (06) 1252-1258
- 3 Hertzberg BS, Chiles C, Ravin CE. Right atrial appendage pacing: radiographic considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985; 145 (01) 31-33
- 4 Lee EY, Siegel MJ, Chu CM, Gutierrez FR, Kort HW. Amplatzer atrial septal defect occluder for pediatric patients: radiographic appearance. Radiology 2004; 233 (02) 471-476
- 5 Belott P, Reynolds D. Permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter- defibrillator implantation in adults. In: Ellenbogen K, Kay GN, Auricchio A, et al.,eds. Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy. 5th edition.. Philadelphia: Elsevier 2017; 631-691
- 6 Sovari AA, Zarghamravanbakhsh P, Shehata M. Temporary cardiac pacing. In: Brown DL, ed. Cardiac Intensive Care. 3rd edition.. Philadelphia: Elsevier 2019; 456-460
- 7 Hunter TB, Taljanovic MS, Tsau PH, Berger WG, Standen JR. Medical devices of the chest. Radiographics 2004; 24 (06) 1725-1746
- 8 Gammage MD. Temporary cardiac pacing. Heart 2000; 83 (06) 715-720
- 9 Foot CL, Coucher J, Stickley M, Mundy J, Venkatesh B. The imaginary line method is not reliable for identification of prosthetic heart valves on AP chest radiographs. Crit Care Resusc 2006; 8 (01) 15-18
- 10 Saxena P, Bhan A, Sharma RK, Mehta Y. Which valve is which?. Ann Card Anaesth 2015; 18 (04) 587-588
- 11 Khan TM, Siddiqui AH. Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP). Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls 2020
- 12 Turner DR, Gaines PA. Endovascular management of coarctation of the aorta. Semin Intervent Radiol 2007; 24 (02) 153-166
- 13 Mercieca V, Grech V, Degiovanni J. Use of stents for correction of pulmonary artery branch stenosis. Images Paediatr Cardiol 2004; 6 (03) 1-10
- 14 Sopko DR, Smith TP. Bronchial artery embolization for hemoptysis. Semin Intervent Radiol 2011; 28 (01) 48-62
- 15 Johnson WR, Fedor D, Singhal S. Systematic review of surgical treatment techniques for adult and pediatric patients with pectus excavatum. J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 9: 25
- 16 Tocchioni F, Ghionzoli M, Messineo A, Romagnoli P. Pectus excavatum and heritable disorders of the connective tissue. Pediatr Rep 2013; 5 (03) e15
- 17 Tahmassebi R, Ashrafian H, Salih C, Deshpande RP, Athanasiou T, Dussek JE. Intra-abdominal pectus bar migration–a rare clinical entity: case report. J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 3: 39
- 18 Nouh MR. Spinal fusion-hardware construct: basic concepts and imaging review. World J Radiol 2012; 4 (05) 193-207
- 19 Longo UG, Petrillo S, Loppini M. et al. Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20 (01) 477
- 20 Shah AT, Jankharia BB. Imaging of common breast implants and implant-related complications: a pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2016; 26 (02) 216-225
- 21 Squiers JJ, Lima B, DiMaio JM. Contemporary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy in adults: fundamental principles and systematic review of the evidence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 152 (01) 20-32
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
31 May 2021
© 2021. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India
-
References
- 1 Edwards NC, Varma M, Pitcher DW. Routine chest radiography after permanent pacemaker implantation: is it necessary?. J Postgrad Med 2005; 51 (02) 92-96, discussion 96–97
- 2 Costelloe CM, Murphy WA Jr, Gladish GW, Rozner MA. Radiography of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (06) 1252-1258
- 3 Hertzberg BS, Chiles C, Ravin CE. Right atrial appendage pacing: radiographic considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985; 145 (01) 31-33
- 4 Lee EY, Siegel MJ, Chu CM, Gutierrez FR, Kort HW. Amplatzer atrial septal defect occluder for pediatric patients: radiographic appearance. Radiology 2004; 233 (02) 471-476
- 5 Belott P, Reynolds D. Permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter- defibrillator implantation in adults. In: Ellenbogen K, Kay GN, Auricchio A, et al.,eds. Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy. 5th edition.. Philadelphia: Elsevier 2017; 631-691
- 6 Sovari AA, Zarghamravanbakhsh P, Shehata M. Temporary cardiac pacing. In: Brown DL, ed. Cardiac Intensive Care. 3rd edition.. Philadelphia: Elsevier 2019; 456-460
- 7 Hunter TB, Taljanovic MS, Tsau PH, Berger WG, Standen JR. Medical devices of the chest. Radiographics 2004; 24 (06) 1725-1746
- 8 Gammage MD. Temporary cardiac pacing. Heart 2000; 83 (06) 715-720
- 9 Foot CL, Coucher J, Stickley M, Mundy J, Venkatesh B. The imaginary line method is not reliable for identification of prosthetic heart valves on AP chest radiographs. Crit Care Resusc 2006; 8 (01) 15-18
- 10 Saxena P, Bhan A, Sharma RK, Mehta Y. Which valve is which?. Ann Card Anaesth 2015; 18 (04) 587-588
- 11 Khan TM, Siddiqui AH. Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP). Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls 2020
- 12 Turner DR, Gaines PA. Endovascular management of coarctation of the aorta. Semin Intervent Radiol 2007; 24 (02) 153-166
- 13 Mercieca V, Grech V, Degiovanni J. Use of stents for correction of pulmonary artery branch stenosis. Images Paediatr Cardiol 2004; 6 (03) 1-10
- 14 Sopko DR, Smith TP. Bronchial artery embolization for hemoptysis. Semin Intervent Radiol 2011; 28 (01) 48-62
- 15 Johnson WR, Fedor D, Singhal S. Systematic review of surgical treatment techniques for adult and pediatric patients with pectus excavatum. J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 9: 25
- 16 Tocchioni F, Ghionzoli M, Messineo A, Romagnoli P. Pectus excavatum and heritable disorders of the connective tissue. Pediatr Rep 2013; 5 (03) e15
- 17 Tahmassebi R, Ashrafian H, Salih C, Deshpande RP, Athanasiou T, Dussek JE. Intra-abdominal pectus bar migration–a rare clinical entity: case report. J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 3: 39
- 18 Nouh MR. Spinal fusion-hardware construct: basic concepts and imaging review. World J Radiol 2012; 4 (05) 193-207
- 19 Longo UG, Petrillo S, Loppini M. et al. Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20 (01) 477
- 20 Shah AT, Jankharia BB. Imaging of common breast implants and implant-related complications: a pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2016; 26 (02) 216-225
- 21 Squiers JJ, Lima B, DiMaio JM. Contemporary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy in adults: fundamental principles and systematic review of the evidence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 152 (01) 20-32