Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1707321
Potassium tert-Butoxide Promoted Synthesis of 4,5-Diaryl-2H-1,2,3-triazoles from Tosylhydrazones and Nitriles
Abstract
Intermolecular cycloaddition of tosylhydrazones with nitriles was investigated. t-BuOK was shown to be an excellent base for increasing the effectiveness of the reaction in this protocol, and homocoupling of the tosylhydrazones was significantly inhibited by using xylene as a solvent. Through this transformation, a variety of 4,5-diaryl-2H-1,2,3-triazoles were prepared in good to excellent yields and with high purities. The process is azide-free and transition-metal-free.
#
NH-1,2,3-Triazoles, as a class of special 1,2,3-triazoles, are found in a number of bioactive molecules (for examples, see Figure [1]).[1] Consequently, their synthesis has become an important issue in 1,2,3-triazole chemistry and medicinal chemistry.[2] Since the discovery of the copper-catalyzed Huisgen cycloaddition of azides and alkynes for the synthesis of 1,2,3-triazoles with exclusive regioselectivity and high efficiency,[3] several elegant protocols have been used to prepare NH-1,2,3-triazoles from azides through cycloaddition reactions of azides,[4] multicomponent reactions,[5] and other reactions.[6] Although various NH-1,2,3-triazole motifs have been synthesized, 4,5-diaryl-NH-1,2,3-triazoles have received little attention.
Generally, 4,5-diaryl-NH-1,2,3-triazoles have been synthesized by [3+2]-cycloaddition of diarylalkynes with trimethylsilyl azide[7] or sodium azide[8] (Scheme [1a]). Because of the potential explosivity and toxicity of azides,[9] the concept of azide-free synthesis has been widely adopted in the synthesis of 1,2,3-triazoles.[10] This progress has also influenced the synthesis of NH-1,2,3-triazoles.[11] It is therefore imperative to explore azide-free protocols for the synthesis of 4,5-diaryl-1,2,3-triazoles. In 1988, Grundon and Khan reported that the reactions of aryldiazomethanes with arylaldehyde azines or aryl nitriles gave the corresponding 4,5-diaryl-NH-1,2,3-triazoles in moderate yields (Scheme [1b]).[12] Perhaps, the instability, hazardous nature, and difficulty in handling of diazo compounds has restricted the use of this cycloaddition reaction and, consequently, this work is rarely mentioned in the literature on 1,2,3-triazoles.
In recent decades, tosylhydrazones have attracted intense interest from the organic-synthesis community,[4d] [5b] [13] and they have been widely used in many reactions as excellent and safe precursors of diazo compounds.[14] Furthermore, the use of tosylhydrazones as versatile synthons has been explored in many novel reactions to afford various heterocycles, including 1,2,3-triazoles.[15] Recently, the groups of Sakač and Mani reported a synthesis of NH-1,2,3-triazoles through 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of diazo compounds generated in situ from tosylhydrazones.[16] Obviously, the preparation of 4,5-diaryl-NH-1,2,3-triazoles by 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of nitriles with diazo compounds generated in situ from tosylhydrazones would constitute an elegant protocol.
In 2017, the group of Maity and Manna described regioselective syntheses of 1,2,3-triazoles and pyrazoles from tosylhydrazones.[17] They succeeded in synthesizing 4,5-diaryl-NH-1,2,3-triazoles in moderate to good yields by coupling tosylhydrazones. They also showed that the electronic nature of tosylhydrazone influenced the coupling process. As the results, when cross-couplings of different tosylhydrazones were carried out, the corresponding homocoupled NH-triazoles were obtained as byproducts and reduced the purity of the desired products. The authors also explored the intermolecular reactions of tosylhydrazones with nitriles to provide two 4,5-diaryl-NH-1,2,3-triazoles,[17] in which homocoupling of the tosylhydrazones similarly decreased the yields and the purities of the products (Scheme [1c]).[17] The challenge therefore remained of inhibiting the homocoupling cyclization of tosylhydrazones to provide 4,5-diaryl-NH-1,2,3-triazoles with high efficiency and high purity. Because of our continuing interest in 1,2,3-triazoles,[18] we decide to explore further the azide-free reaction of tosylhydrazones with nitriles (Scheme [1d]).
Entry |
Base (equiv) |
Yieldb (%) |
1 |
K2CO3 (2.0) |
n.d. |
2 |
DBU (2.0) |
n.d. |
3 |
t-BuOK (2.0) |
38 |
4 |
Cs2CO3 (3.0) |
30 |
5 |
t-BuOK (3.0) |
90 |
a Reaction conditions: 1a (1.0 mmol), 2a (1.2 mmol), DMF (6 mL), 90 °C, 4 h, under Ar.
b Isolated yield; n.d. = not detected.
Initially, we chose benzaldehyde tosylhydrazone (1a) and benzonitrile (2a) as model substrates for the optimization of the reaction conditions (Table [1]). K2CO3, generally suitable as a base in intramolecular cycloadditions,[16] did not facilitate the intermolecular reaction. However, when 2.0 equivalents of t-BuOK were used as the base, the desired product was isolated in 38% yield, along with benzaldehyde azine[19] as a byproduct in a yield of 35% (entry 3). Encouraged by this result, and with the aim of restraining the formation of the benzaldehyde azine byproduct, we increased the amount of t-BuOK to 3.0 equivalents, and this gave the desired product in an excellent yield of 90%. Cs2CO3 as a base gave a lower yield of 30%. When we screened other bases (see Supporting Information), we found that the use of t-BuOK as a strong base is critical in improving the efficiency of this intermolecular reaction.
Having increased the efficiency of the intermolecular reaction of the tosylhydrazone and nitrile, we turned our interest to the inhibition of the homocoupling of the tosylhydrazone. When the reaction of benzaldehyde tosylhydrazone (1a) and 4-methylbenzonitrile 2b was carried out, the 4,5-diphenyl- 2H-1,2,3-triazole (3a) homocoupling byproduct could not be separated from the desired product 3b by flash column chromatography on silica gel. When DMF was used as the solvent, the isolated product contained 6.1% of homocoupling product. When toluene or xylene was used, however, the proportion of 3a (as determined by HPLC) was significantly reduced, and xylene was found to give the best result in terms of the yield and the selectivity. We surmised that, in comparison with Cs2CO3, the greater basicity of t-BuOK is a critical factor in relation to the deprotonation of the tosylhydrazone to transfer anions or diazo compounds, thereby markedly inhibiting the homocoupling of the tosylhydrazone. Therefore the optimal reaction conditions are: tosylhydrazone (1.0 mmol), nitrile (1.2 mmol), t-BuOK (3.0 mmol) for four hours at 90 °C under an Ar atmosphere.
Entry |
Solvent |
Yieldb of 3b (%) |
3a/3b c |
1 |
DMF |
90 |
6.1: 93.9 |
2 |
toluene |
93 |
0.7: 99.3 |
3 |
xylene |
93 |
0.5: 99.5 |
a Reaction conditions: 1a (1.0 mmol), 2b (1.2 mmol), solvent (6 mL), 4 h, under Ar.
b Based on the isolated mixture of 3a and 3b.
c Determined by HPLC.
With these optimized conditions in hand, we extended the scope of the method to the reactions of 1a with various nitriles 2 (Scheme [2]). The intermolecular cyclization reaction was found to tolerate various substituents on the aryl nitrile 2, and gave the desired products 3a–o in good to excellent yields of 68–98%; however, the methoxycarbonyl-substituted product 3p was obtained in only 40% yield. Only small amounts of the corresponding homocoupling products of the tosylhydrazones were formed, and the cross-coupling products of the tosylhydrazone with the nitrile were formed in high ratios. The yields were little affected by the presence of electron-withdrawing or electron-donating groups on the nitriles. Moreover, the presence of steric hindrance at the ortho-position had little effect on the yields in this transformation (3h, 3j, and 3k). However, an aryl nitrile bearing two methyl groups at the two ortho-positions gave the corresponding 1,2,3-triazole 3m in a lower yield and a lower cross-coupling ratio. Heterocyclic aryl nitriles also worked well under optimized conditions, and gave good yields of corresponding 1,2,3-triazoles 3n and 3o with a high cross-coupling ratio. Unfortunately, when a hydroxy or amino group was present in the benzonitrile, the desired product was not obtained and the unreacted nitrile was recovered by column chromatography (3q, 3r). Nonaromatic nitriles 2s and 2t also failed to give the desired products 3s and 3t. When phenylacetonitrile was used, the benzaldehyde azine was isolated.
To further expand the scope of this reaction, a series of tosylhydrazones were explored in reactions with various nitriles under the optimized conditions (Scheme [3]). Generally, the corresponding 1,2,3-triazoles were obtained in good to excellent yields with high purities. The cyclization was highly tolerant of various functional groups on the benzene rings. When electron-rich or electron-deficient phenyl tosylhydrazones reacted with benzonitrile, the 1,2,3-triazoles 4a–d were obtained in excellent yields and high purities. The reaction also permitted the use of other substituted benzaldehyde tosylhydrazones with substituted benzonitriles (4e–z). Additionally, hetaryl aldehyde tosylhydrazones were also well tolerated, affording corresponding 1,2,3-triazoles 4aa–ac in good yields.
To demonstrate the synthetic utility of the reaction, we performed a gram-scale reaction (Scheme [4]). When 1a and 2b were used as substrates, the corresponding product 3b was isolated by column chromatography in 85% yield and a purity of 98.4%.
In summary, an intermolecular reaction of tosylhydrazones with nitriles is described.[20] This reaction proceeded smoothly when promoted by potassium tert-butoxide in xylene; these conditions were beneficial to intermolecular cyclization and inhibited the homocoupling of the tosylhydrazone. The reaction provides an efficient and convenient method for the synthesis of NH-1,2,3-triazoles, and a wide range of 4,5-diaryl-2H-1,2,3-triazoles were obtained in good to excellent yields.
#
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to our colleagues in the Centre for Instrumental Analysis for providing services.
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1707321.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a Weide T, Saldanha SA, Minond D, Spicer TP, Fotsing JR, Spaargaren M, Frère J.-M, Bebrone C, Sharpless KB, Hodder PS, Fokin VV. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2010; 1: 150
- 1b Madadi NR, Penthala NR, Howk K, Ketkar A, Eoff RL, Borrelli MJ, Crooks PA. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015; 103: 123
- 1c Cheng Z.-Y, Li W.-J, He F, Zhou J.-M, Zhu X.-F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007; 15: 1533
- 1d Röhrig UF, Majjigapu SR, Grosdidier A, Bron S, Stroobant V, Pilotte L, Colau D, Vogel P, Van den Eynde BJ, Zoete V, Michielin O. J. Med. Chem. 2012; 55: 5270
- 1e Röhrig UF, Awad L, Grosdidier A, Larrieu P, Stroobant V, Colau D, Cerundolo V, Simpson AJ. G, Vogel P, Van den Eynde BJ, Zoete V, Michielin O. J. Med. Chem. 2010; 53: 1172
- 1f Penthala NR, Madhukuri L, Thakkar S, Madadi NR, Lamture G, Eoff RL, Crooks PA. Med. Chem. Commun. 2015; 6: 1535
- 2a Zhang W, Kuang C, Yang Q. Youji Huaxue 2011; 31: 54
- 2b Tomé AC. In Science of Synthesis, Chap. 13, Vol. 13. Storr RC, Gilchrist TL. Thieme; Stuttgart: 2004: 415
- 2c Krivopalov VP, Shkurko OP. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2005; 74: 339
- 3a Rostovtsev VV, Green LG, Fokin VV, Sharpless KB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002; 41: 2596
- 3b Tornøe CW, Christensen C, Meldal M. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 67: 3057
- 4a Quan X.-J, Ren Z.-H, Wang Y.-Y, Guan Z.-H. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 5728 ; corrigendum: Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 393
- 4b Li J, Wang D, Zhang Y, Li J, Chen B. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 3024
- 4c Roshandel S, Suri SC, Marcischak JC, Rasula G, Prakash GK. S. Green Chem. 2018; 20: 3700
- 4d Gao Y, Lam Y. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 3283
- 4e Augustine JK, Boodappa C, Venkatachaliah S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014; 12: 2280
- 5a Wu G.-L, Wu Q.-P. Synthesis 2018; 50: 2768
- 5b Wu G.-L, Wu Q.-P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018; 360: 1949
- 5c Xu C, Jiang S.-F, Wu Y.-D, Jia F.-C, Wu A.-X. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 14802
- 6a Loren JC, Sharpless KB. Synthesis 2005; 1514
- 6b Barluenga J, Valdés C, Beltrán G, Escribano M, Aznar F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006; 45: 6893
- 6c Zhang H, Tanimoto H, Morimoto T, Nishiyama Y, Kakiuchi K. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 5222
- 6d Ramachary DB, Shashank AB. Chem. Eur. J. 2013; 19: 13175
- 6e Liu Y, Yan W, Chen Y, Petersen JL, Shi X. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 5389
- 6f Chai H, Guo R, Yin W, Cheng L, Liu R, Chu C. ACS Comb. Sci. 2015; 17: 147
- 6g Zhang W, Kuang C, Yang Q. Synthesis 2010; 283
- 7 Kim D.-K, Kima J, Park H.-J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004; 14: 2401
- 8a Tsai C.-W, Yang S.-C, Liu Y.-M, Wu M.-J. Tetrahedron 2009; 65: 8367
- 8b Madadi NR, Penthala NR, Song L, Hendrickson HP, Crooks PA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 4207
- 9a Chang S, Lamm SH. Int. J. Toxicol 2003; 22: 175
- 9b Bräse S, Banert K. Organic Azides: Syntheses and Applications . Wiley; Chichester: 2010
- 10a van Berkel SS, Brauch S, Gabriel L, Henze M, Stark S, Vasilev D, Wessjohann LA, Abbas M, Westermann B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 5343
- 10b Wan J.-P, Hu D, Liu Y, Sheng S. ChemCatChem 2015; 7: 901
- 10c Chen Z, Yan Q, Liu Z, Xu Y, Zhang Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 13324
- 10d Cai Z.-J, Lu X.-M, Zi Y, Yang C, Shen L.-J, Li J, Wang S.-Y, Ji S.-J. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 5108
- 10e Liu H.-N, Cao H.-Q, Cheung C.-W, Ma J.-A. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 1396
- 10f Guru MM, Punniyamurthy T. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 5063
- 10g Gu J, Fang Z, Yang Z, Li X, Zhu N, Wan L, Wei P, Guo K. RSC Adv. 2016; 6: 89073
- 10h Chen Z, Yan Q, Liu Z, Zhang Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2014; 20: 17635
- 10i Wang S, Yang L.-J, Zeng J.-L, Zheng Y, Ma J.-A. Org. Chem. Front. 2015; 2: 1468
- 10j Ahamad S, Kant R, Mohanan K. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 280
- 11 He Y, Sun E, Zhao Y, Hai L, Wu Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 111
- 12 Grundon MF, Khan EA. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1988; 2917
- 13a Li D, Liu L, Tian Y, Ai Y, Tang Z, Sun H.-b, Zhang G. Tetrahedron 2017; 73: 3959
- 13b Hu L, Mück-Lichtenfeld C, Wang T, He G, Gao M, Zhao J. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 911
- 13c Hu Q, Liu Y, Deng X, Li Y, Chen Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016; 358: 1689
- 13d Jin T, Kamijo S, Yamamoto Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 2004: 3789
- 14 Shu W.-M, Zhang X.-F, Zhang X.-X, Li M, Wang A.-J, Wu A.-X. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 84: 14919
- 15a Guru MM, De S, Dutta S, Koley D, Maji B. Chem. Sci. 2019; 10: 7964
- 15b Shen X, Gu N, Liu P, Ma X, Xie J, Liu Y, He L, Dai B. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 63726
- 16a Sakač MN, Gaković AR, Csanádi JJ, Djurendić EA, Klisurić O, Kojić V, Bogdanović G, Gaši KM. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 4107
- 16b Mani NS, Fitzgerald AE. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 8889
- 17 Panda S, Maity P, Manna D. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 1534
- 18a Wu L.-Y, Xie Y.-X, Chen Z.-S, Niu Y.-N, Liang Y.-M. Synlett 2009; 1453
- 18b Wu L, Chen Y, Tang M, Song X, Chen G, Song X, Lin Q. Synlett 2012; 23: 1529
- 18c Wu L, Chen Y, Luo J, Sun Q, Peng M, Lin Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 3847
- 18d Wu L, Guo S, Wang X, Guo Z, Yao G, Lin Q, Wu M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015; 56: 2145
- 18e Wu L, Wang X, Chen Y, Huang Q, Lin Q, Wu M. Synlett 2016; 27: 437
- 18f Wu L, Chen Y, He W, An M, Yan G, Fu Q, Chen M. CN 108794412, 2018
- 19 Sha Q, Wei Y. Tetrahedron 2013; 69: 3829
- 20 4,5-Diaryl-2H-1,2,3-triazoles 3a–t, 4a–ag; General Procedure A mixture of the appropriate tosylhydrazone 1 (1.0 mmol), nitrile 2 (1.2 mmol), and t-BuOK (3.0 mmol) in xylene (6 mL) was stirred at 90 °C for 4 h under Ar. The mixture was then cooled to r.t. and diluted with EtOAc (40 mL). The organic layer was washed with water (3 × 40 mL) and brine (30 mL), then dried (Na2SO4) and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuum, and the crude product was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, PE–EtOAc). 4,5-Bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-2H-1,2,3-triazole (4x) White solid; yield: 261.3 mg (93%); mp 121.9–124.9 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.41 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4 H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 4 H), 3.74 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 159.5, 140.6, 129.3, 122.2, 113.9, 55.0.
Corresponding Author
Publication History
Received: 24 July 2020
Accepted after revision: 14 September 2020
Article published online:
12 October 2020
© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1a Weide T, Saldanha SA, Minond D, Spicer TP, Fotsing JR, Spaargaren M, Frère J.-M, Bebrone C, Sharpless KB, Hodder PS, Fokin VV. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2010; 1: 150
- 1b Madadi NR, Penthala NR, Howk K, Ketkar A, Eoff RL, Borrelli MJ, Crooks PA. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015; 103: 123
- 1c Cheng Z.-Y, Li W.-J, He F, Zhou J.-M, Zhu X.-F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007; 15: 1533
- 1d Röhrig UF, Majjigapu SR, Grosdidier A, Bron S, Stroobant V, Pilotte L, Colau D, Vogel P, Van den Eynde BJ, Zoete V, Michielin O. J. Med. Chem. 2012; 55: 5270
- 1e Röhrig UF, Awad L, Grosdidier A, Larrieu P, Stroobant V, Colau D, Cerundolo V, Simpson AJ. G, Vogel P, Van den Eynde BJ, Zoete V, Michielin O. J. Med. Chem. 2010; 53: 1172
- 1f Penthala NR, Madhukuri L, Thakkar S, Madadi NR, Lamture G, Eoff RL, Crooks PA. Med. Chem. Commun. 2015; 6: 1535
- 2a Zhang W, Kuang C, Yang Q. Youji Huaxue 2011; 31: 54
- 2b Tomé AC. In Science of Synthesis, Chap. 13, Vol. 13. Storr RC, Gilchrist TL. Thieme; Stuttgart: 2004: 415
- 2c Krivopalov VP, Shkurko OP. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2005; 74: 339
- 3a Rostovtsev VV, Green LG, Fokin VV, Sharpless KB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002; 41: 2596
- 3b Tornøe CW, Christensen C, Meldal M. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 67: 3057
- 4a Quan X.-J, Ren Z.-H, Wang Y.-Y, Guan Z.-H. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 5728 ; corrigendum: Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 393
- 4b Li J, Wang D, Zhang Y, Li J, Chen B. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 3024
- 4c Roshandel S, Suri SC, Marcischak JC, Rasula G, Prakash GK. S. Green Chem. 2018; 20: 3700
- 4d Gao Y, Lam Y. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 3283
- 4e Augustine JK, Boodappa C, Venkatachaliah S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014; 12: 2280
- 5a Wu G.-L, Wu Q.-P. Synthesis 2018; 50: 2768
- 5b Wu G.-L, Wu Q.-P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018; 360: 1949
- 5c Xu C, Jiang S.-F, Wu Y.-D, Jia F.-C, Wu A.-X. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 14802
- 6a Loren JC, Sharpless KB. Synthesis 2005; 1514
- 6b Barluenga J, Valdés C, Beltrán G, Escribano M, Aznar F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006; 45: 6893
- 6c Zhang H, Tanimoto H, Morimoto T, Nishiyama Y, Kakiuchi K. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 5222
- 6d Ramachary DB, Shashank AB. Chem. Eur. J. 2013; 19: 13175
- 6e Liu Y, Yan W, Chen Y, Petersen JL, Shi X. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 5389
- 6f Chai H, Guo R, Yin W, Cheng L, Liu R, Chu C. ACS Comb. Sci. 2015; 17: 147
- 6g Zhang W, Kuang C, Yang Q. Synthesis 2010; 283
- 7 Kim D.-K, Kima J, Park H.-J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004; 14: 2401
- 8a Tsai C.-W, Yang S.-C, Liu Y.-M, Wu M.-J. Tetrahedron 2009; 65: 8367
- 8b Madadi NR, Penthala NR, Song L, Hendrickson HP, Crooks PA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 4207
- 9a Chang S, Lamm SH. Int. J. Toxicol 2003; 22: 175
- 9b Bräse S, Banert K. Organic Azides: Syntheses and Applications . Wiley; Chichester: 2010
- 10a van Berkel SS, Brauch S, Gabriel L, Henze M, Stark S, Vasilev D, Wessjohann LA, Abbas M, Westermann B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 5343
- 10b Wan J.-P, Hu D, Liu Y, Sheng S. ChemCatChem 2015; 7: 901
- 10c Chen Z, Yan Q, Liu Z, Xu Y, Zhang Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 13324
- 10d Cai Z.-J, Lu X.-M, Zi Y, Yang C, Shen L.-J, Li J, Wang S.-Y, Ji S.-J. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 5108
- 10e Liu H.-N, Cao H.-Q, Cheung C.-W, Ma J.-A. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 1396
- 10f Guru MM, Punniyamurthy T. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 5063
- 10g Gu J, Fang Z, Yang Z, Li X, Zhu N, Wan L, Wei P, Guo K. RSC Adv. 2016; 6: 89073
- 10h Chen Z, Yan Q, Liu Z, Zhang Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2014; 20: 17635
- 10i Wang S, Yang L.-J, Zeng J.-L, Zheng Y, Ma J.-A. Org. Chem. Front. 2015; 2: 1468
- 10j Ahamad S, Kant R, Mohanan K. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 280
- 11 He Y, Sun E, Zhao Y, Hai L, Wu Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 111
- 12 Grundon MF, Khan EA. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1988; 2917
- 13a Li D, Liu L, Tian Y, Ai Y, Tang Z, Sun H.-b, Zhang G. Tetrahedron 2017; 73: 3959
- 13b Hu L, Mück-Lichtenfeld C, Wang T, He G, Gao M, Zhao J. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 911
- 13c Hu Q, Liu Y, Deng X, Li Y, Chen Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016; 358: 1689
- 13d Jin T, Kamijo S, Yamamoto Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 2004: 3789
- 14 Shu W.-M, Zhang X.-F, Zhang X.-X, Li M, Wang A.-J, Wu A.-X. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 84: 14919
- 15a Guru MM, De S, Dutta S, Koley D, Maji B. Chem. Sci. 2019; 10: 7964
- 15b Shen X, Gu N, Liu P, Ma X, Xie J, Liu Y, He L, Dai B. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 63726
- 16a Sakač MN, Gaković AR, Csanádi JJ, Djurendić EA, Klisurić O, Kojić V, Bogdanović G, Gaši KM. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 4107
- 16b Mani NS, Fitzgerald AE. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 8889
- 17 Panda S, Maity P, Manna D. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 1534
- 18a Wu L.-Y, Xie Y.-X, Chen Z.-S, Niu Y.-N, Liang Y.-M. Synlett 2009; 1453
- 18b Wu L, Chen Y, Tang M, Song X, Chen G, Song X, Lin Q. Synlett 2012; 23: 1529
- 18c Wu L, Chen Y, Luo J, Sun Q, Peng M, Lin Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 3847
- 18d Wu L, Guo S, Wang X, Guo Z, Yao G, Lin Q, Wu M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015; 56: 2145
- 18e Wu L, Wang X, Chen Y, Huang Q, Lin Q, Wu M. Synlett 2016; 27: 437
- 18f Wu L, Chen Y, He W, An M, Yan G, Fu Q, Chen M. CN 108794412, 2018
- 19 Sha Q, Wei Y. Tetrahedron 2013; 69: 3829
- 20 4,5-Diaryl-2H-1,2,3-triazoles 3a–t, 4a–ag; General Procedure A mixture of the appropriate tosylhydrazone 1 (1.0 mmol), nitrile 2 (1.2 mmol), and t-BuOK (3.0 mmol) in xylene (6 mL) was stirred at 90 °C for 4 h under Ar. The mixture was then cooled to r.t. and diluted with EtOAc (40 mL). The organic layer was washed with water (3 × 40 mL) and brine (30 mL), then dried (Na2SO4) and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuum, and the crude product was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, PE–EtOAc). 4,5-Bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-2H-1,2,3-triazole (4x) White solid; yield: 261.3 mg (93%); mp 121.9–124.9 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.41 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4 H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 4 H), 3.74 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 159.5, 140.6, 129.3, 122.2, 113.9, 55.0.