Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2021; 34(01): 080-086
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692673
Original Article

Functional Outcomes of Revision Osteosynthesis after Failure of Surgical Treatment of Patellar Fractures

Elena Caroline Müller
1   Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
,
Karl-Heinz Frosch
1   Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
2   Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf UKE, Hamburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations Funding The study was funded by Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Patellar fractures account for approximately 1% of all skeletal fractures. These fractures are rare; however, because of the crucial function of the patella in the extensor mechanism of the knee, they may lead to serious impairment. New data are revealing functional impairment remains common even with improved surgical techniques. The aim of this study was to assess the functional outcomes of patients after revision surgery in cases of secondary fracture dislocation or persistent articular incongruity. This study included 16 patients with a mean age of 51.8 years (range: 16–85 years) with a mean follow-up of 35.1 months. According to the AO/OTA classification, 15 patients had a C-type fracture, including 10 patients with C3 fracture. Thirteen patients were initially treated with tension band wiring via K-wires or cannulated screws. Revision surgery was performed because of persistent articular incongruity in five patients and secondary fracture dislocation or refracture in 11 patients. We analyzed pain (visual analog scale [0–10]), satisfaction, range of motion (ROM), Böstman's score, Lysholm's score, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) after revision surgery and could extract follow-up data from 15 patients. Mean pain score at rest was 0.57 (range: 0–3.5) and on exertion 2.79 (range: 0–8). The measurement of the ROM of the affected knee compared with that of the opposite knee revealed complete extension. Mean flexion was 123 degrees, in the corresponding knee it was 136 degrees (p = 0.05). The mean postoperative Böstman's and Lysholm's scores were 25.11 (good, maximum: 30) and 78.67 (moderate, maximum: 100), respectively. KOOS was as follows: symptoms, 66.8 points; pain, 77.55 points; activity of daily living (ADL), 75.67 points; and quality of life, 56.25 points. The results of this study suggested that early revision surgery after failure of primary osteosynthesis with secondary anatomic reconstruction and good radiological results leads to satisfactory functional outcomes with persistent functional deficits.

Keywords

patellar fracture - revision surgery - functional outcome


Publication History

Received: 26 September 2018

Accepted: 19 May 2019

Article published online:
09 July 2019

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Boström A. Fracture of the patella. A study of 422 patellar fractures. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1972; 143: 1-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Transverse fractures of the patella. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981; (158) 180-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pengas IP, Assiotis A, Khan W, Spalding T. Adult native knee extensor mechanism ruptures. Injury 2016; 47 (10) 2065-2070
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Jarraya M, Diaz LE, Arndt WF, Roemer FW, Guermazi A. Imaging of patellar fractures. Insights Imaging 2017; 8 (01) 49-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Benli IT, Akalin S, Mumcu EF, Citak M, Kiliç M, Paşaoğlu E. The computed tomographic evaluation of patellofemoral joint in patellar fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Kobe J Med Sci 1992; 38 (04) 233-243
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. AO-Foundation. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2018. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32 (01) (Suppl. 01) S1-S170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Speck M, Regazzoni P. [Classification of patellar fractures]. Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed 1994; 87 (01) 27-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Buckley RE, Moran CG, Apivatthakakul T. AO Principles of Fracture Management; Vol. 1: Principles, Vol. 2: Specific Fractures. 3 ed. Thieme; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Labitzke R. [Proper and improper tension band fixation exemplified by patellar fracture]. Chirurg 1997; 68 (06) 638-642
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Levack B, Flannagan JP, Hobbs S. Results of surgical treatment of patellar fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985; 67 (03) 416-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Weber MJ, Janecki CJ, McLeod P, Nelson CL, Thompson JA. Efficacy of various forms of fixation of transverse fractures of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980; 62 (02) 215-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Catalano JB, Iannacone WM, Marczyk S. et al. Open fractures of the patella: long-term functional outcome. J Trauma 1995; 39 (03) 439-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Carpenter JE, Kasman RA, Patel N, Lee ML, Goldstein SA. Biomechanical evaluation of current patella fracture fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11 (05) 351-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wild M, Windolf J, Flohé S. [Fractures of the patella]. Unfallchirurg 2010; 113 (05) 401-411 , quiz 412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Müller EC, Frosch KH. [Plate osteosynthesis of patellar fractures]. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2017; 29 (06) 509-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wurm S, Augat P, Bühren V. Biomechanical assessment of locked plating for the fixation of patella fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2015; 29 (09) e305-e308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Wurm S, Bühren V. Patellafrakturen. Trauma Berufskrankheit 2015; 17 (03) 153-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ellwein A, Lill H, Jensen G, Gruner A, Katthagen JC. Die Plattenosteosynthese der Patellafraktur–Technik und erste Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Studie. Der Unfallchirurg 2017; 120 (09) 753-760
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gwinner C, Märdian S, Schwabe P, Schaser KD, Krapohl BD, Jung TM. Current concepts review: fractures of the patella. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW 2016; 5: Doc01
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Böstman O, Kiviluoto O, Nirhamo J. Comminuted displaced fractures of the patella. Injury 1981; 13 (03) 196-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Böstman O, Kiviluoto O, Santavirta S, Nirhamo J, Wilppula E. Fractures of the patella treated by operation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1983; 102 (02) 78-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 LeBrun CT, Langford JR, Sagi HC. Functional outcomes after operatively treated patella fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2012; 26 (07) 422-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lazaro LE, Wellman DS, Sauro G. et al. Outcomes after operative fixation of complete articular patellar fractures: assessment of functional impairment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (14) e96 , 1–8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar