Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2019; 32(03): 176-182
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676995
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Ostomy-Related Complications

Douglas R. Murken
1   Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Joshua I. S. Bleier
2   Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 April 2019 (online)

Abstract

Ileostomy or colostomy formation is an important component of many surgical procedures performed for a wide range of disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. Despite the frequency with which intestinal stomas are created, stoma-related complications remain common and are associated with significant morbidity as well as cost. Some of the most prevalent complications of stoma formation which will be detailed in this article include peristomal skin complications, retraction, stomal necrosis, stomal stenosis, prolapse, bleeding, dehydration from high ostomy output, and parastomal hernia. The authors will review these common complications, detail means to avoid or prevent them, and outline recommendations for management.

 
  • References

  • 1 Shabbir J, Britton DC. Stoma complications: a literature overview. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12 (10) 958-964
  • 2 Nugent KP, Daniels P, Stewart B, Patankar R, Johnson CD. Quality of life in stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42 (12) 1569-1574
  • 3 Kwiatt M, Kawata M. Avoidance and management of stomal complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2013; 26 (02) 112-121
  • 4 Krishnamurty DM, Blatnik J, Mutch M. Stoma complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017; 30 (03) 193-200
  • 5 Carlsson E, Fingren J, Hallén AM, Petersén C, Lindholm E. The prevalence of ostomy-related complications 1 year after ostomy surgery: a prospective, descriptive, clinical study. Ostomy Wound Manage 2016; 62 (10) 34-48
  • 6 Bass EM, Del Pino A, Tan A, Pearl RK, Orsay CP, Abcarian H. Does preoperative stoma marking and education by the enterostomal therapist affect outcome?. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40 (04) 440-442
  • 7 Lyons AS. Ileostomy and colostomy support groups. Mt Sinai J Med 2001; 68 (02) 110-112
  • 8 Salvadalena G, Hendren S, McKenna L. , et al. WOCN society and ASCRS position statement on preoperative stoma site marking for patients undergoing colostomy or ileostomy surgery. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2015; 42 (03) 249-252
  • 9 Koc U, Karaman K, Gomceli I. , et al. A retrospective analysis of factors affecting early stoma complications. Ostomy Wound Manage 2017; 63 (01) 28-32
  • 10 Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, Macdonald L. , et al. A prospective audit of stomas--analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5 (01) 49-52
  • 11 Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D. , et al. Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7 (03) 279-285
  • 12 Zorcolo L, Covotta L, Carlomagno N, Bartolo DC. Toward lowering morbidity, mortality, and stoma formation in emergency colorectal surgery: the role of specialization. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46 (11) 1461-1467 , discussion 1467–1468
  • 13 McLeod RS, Lavery IC, Leatherman JR. , et al. Factors affecting quality of life with a conventional ileostomy. World J Surg 1986; 10 (03) 474-480
  • 14 Whitehead A, Cataldo PA. Technical considerations in stoma creation. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017; 30 (03) 162-171
  • 15 Steinhagen E, Colwell J, Cannon LM. Intestinal stomas—postoperative stoma care and peristomal skin complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017; 30 (03) 184-192
  • 16 Taneja C, Netsch D, Rolstad BS, Inglese G, Lamerato L, Oster G. Clinical and economic burden of peristomal skin complications in patients with recent ostomies. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2017; 44 (04) 350-357
  • 17 Shellito PC. Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41 (12) 1562-1572
  • 18 Cottam J, Richards K, Hasted A, Blackman A. Results of a nationwide prospective audit of stoma complications within 3 weeks of surgery. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9 (09) 834-838
  • 19 Zindel J, Gygax C, Studer P. , et al. A sustaining rod increases necrosis of loop ileostomies: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32 (06) 875-881
  • 20 Harris DA, Egbeare D, Jones S, Benjamin H, Woodward A, Foster ME. Complications and mortality following stoma formation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2005; 87 (06) 427-431
  • 21 Meguid MM, McIvor A, Xenos L. Creation of a neoabdominal wall to facilitate emergency placement of a terminal ileostomy in a morbidly obese patient. Am J Surg 1997; 173 (04) 298-300
  • 22 Maeda K, Maruta M, Utsumi T, Sato H, Masumori K, Aoyama H. Pathophysiology and prevention of loop stomal prolapse in the transverse colon. Tech Coloproctol 2003; 7 (02) 108-111
  • 23 Fligelstone LJ, Wanendeya N, Palmer BV. Osmotic therapy for acute irreducible stoma prolapse. Br J Surg 1997; 84 (03) 390
  • 24 Noubibou M, Douala HC, Druez PM, Kartheuser AlexH, Detry RJ, Geubel AP. Chronic stomal variceal bleeding after colonic surgery in patients with portal hypertension: efficacy of beta-blocking agents?. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18 (07) 807-808
  • 25 Fish DR, Mancuso CA, Garcia-Aguilar JE. , et al. Readmission after ileostomy creation: retrospective review of a common and significant event. Ann Surg 2017; 265 (02) 379-387
  • 26 Li L, Lau KS, Ramanathan V. , et al. Ileostomy creation in colorectal cancer surgery: risk of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. J Surg Res 2017; 210: 204-212
  • 27 Tang CL, Yunos A, Leong APK, Seow-Choen F, Goh HS. Ileostomy output in the early postoperative period. Br J Surg 1995; 82 (05) 607
  • 28 Kennedy HJ, Al-Dujaili EA, Edwards CR, Truelove SC. Water and electrolyte balance in subjects with a permanent ileostomy. Gut 1983; 24 (08) 702-705
  • 29 Nagle D, Pare T, Keenan E, Marcet K, Tizio S, Poylin V. Ileostomy pathway virtually eliminates readmissions for dehydration in new ostomates. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (12) 1266-1272
  • 30 Patel SV, Zhang L, Chadi SA, Wexner SD. Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21 (01) 5-13
  • 31 Correa Marinez A, Erestam S, Haglind E. , et al. Stoma-Const--the technical aspects of stoma construction: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2014; 15: 254
  • 32 Etherington RJ, Williams JG, Hayward MW, Hughes LE. Demonstration of para-ileostomy herniation using computed tomography. Clin Radiol 1990; 41 (05) 333-336
  • 33 Sjödahl R, Anderberg B, Bolin T. Parastomal hernia in relation to site of the abdominal stoma. Br J Surg 1988; 75 (04) 339-341
  • 34 Li W, Benlice C, Stocchi L, Kessler H, Gorgun E, Costedio M. Does stoma site specimen extraction increase postoperative ileostomy complication rates?. Surg Endosc 2017; 31 (09) 3552-3558
  • 35 Hamada M, Ozaki K, Muraoka G, Kawakita N, Nishioka Y. Permanent end-sigmoid colostomy through the extraperitoneal route prevents parastomal hernia after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (09) 963-969
  • 36 Lian L, Wu XR, He XS. , et al. Extraperitoneal vs. intraperitoneal route for permanent colostomy: a meta-analysis of 1,071 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27 (01) 59-64
  • 37 Aquina CT, Iannuzzi JC, Probst CP. , et al. Parastomal hernia: a growing problem with new solutions. Dig Surg 2014; 31 (4-5): 366-376
  • 38 Rubin MS, Schoetz Jr DJ, Matthews JB. Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair?. Arch Surg 1994; 129 (04) 413-418 , discussion 418–419
  • 39 Allen-Mersh TG, Thomson JP. Surgical treatment of colostomy complications. Br J Surg 1988; 75 (05) 416-418
  • 40 Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg 2009; 33 (01) 118-121 , discussion 122–123
  • 41 Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, Aufenacker TJ. , et al. Prophylactic mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia, early results of a prospective multicentre randomized trial. Hernia 2016; 20 (04) 535-541
  • 42 Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 2004; 91 (03) 280-282
  • 43 Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, V-Haaren-de Haan H, Aufenacker TJ, Rosman C, Bleichrodt RP. PREVENTion of a parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh in patients undergoing permanent end-colostomy; the PREVENT-trial: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials 2012; 13: 226
  • 44 Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, Aufenacker TJ. , et al; Dutch Prevent Study group. Prophylactic mesh placement during formation of an end-colostomy reduces the rate of parastomal hernia: short-term results of the Dutch PREVENT-trial. Ann Surg 2017; 265 (04) 663-669
  • 45 Williams NS, Nair R, Bhan C. Stapled mesh stoma reinforcement technique (SMART)--a procedure to prevent parastomal herniation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011; 93 (02) 169
  • 46 Williams NS, Hotouras A, Bhan C, Murphy J, Chan CL. A case-controlled pilot study assessing the safety and efficacy of the Stapled Mesh stomA Reinforcement Technique (SMART) in reducing the incidence of parastomal herniation. Hernia 2015; 19 (06) 949-954
  • 47 Figel NA, Rostas JW, Ellis CN. Outcomes using a bioprosthetic mesh at the time of permanent stoma creation in preventing a parastomal hernia: a value analysis. Am J Surg 2012; 203 (03) 323-326 , discussion 326
  • 48 Pianka F, Probst P, Keller AV. , et al. Prophylactic mesh placement for the PREvention of paraSTOmal hernias: the PRESTO systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017; 12 (02) e0171548
  • 49 Lykke A, Andersen JFB, Jorgensen LN, Mynster T. Prevention of parastomal hernia in the emergency setting. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017; 402 (06) 949-955