Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34(05): 466-473
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669990
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Surgical and Nonsurgical Techniques in Forehead Rejuvenation

Demetri Arnaoutakis
1   Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Benjamin Bassichis
2   Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Advanced Facial Plastic Surgery Center, Dallas, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 October 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The periorbital and forehead regions are among the most expressive parts of the face. A thorough understanding of the complex facial anatomy and aesthetic norms are essential when evaluating and treating a patient for facial brow rejuvenation. Not only will knowledge of the anatomy enhance facial injection and surgical outcomes, but will also diminish potential complications. Combining nonsurgical and surgical techniques, including laser and skin rejuvenation, can yield the most natural and effective aesthetic brow improvements.

Keywords

brow lift - Botox - neuromodulator - hyaluronic acid - temple rejuvenation - forehead lift - endoscopic surgery
 

  • References

  • 1 Lambros V. Observations on periorbital and midface aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (05) 1367-1376 , discussion 1377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Fitzgerald R. Contemporary concepts in brow and eyelid aging. Clin Plast Surg 2013; 40 (01) 21-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Knize DM. Limited-incision forehead lift for eyebrow elevation to enhance upper blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97 (07) 1334-1342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Knize DM. An anatomically based study of the mechanism of eyebrow ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97 (07) 1321-1333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Knize DM. Muscles that act on glabellar skin: a closer look. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (01) 350-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Knize DM. A study of the supraorbital nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (03) 564-569
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ramirez OM. Endoscopic techniques in facial rejuvenation: an overview. Part I. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1994; 18 (02) 141-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Agarwal CA, Mendenhall III SD, Foreman KB, Owsley JQ. The course of the frontal branch of the facial nerve in relation to fascial planes: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (02) 532-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gunter JP, Antrobus SD. Aesthetic analysis of the eyebrows. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (07) 1808-1816
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Roth JM, Metzinger SE. Quantifying the arch position of the female eyebrow. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (03) 235-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lemke BN, Stasior OG. The anatomy of eyebrow ptosis. Arch Ophthalmol 1982; 100 (06) 981-986
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Situm M, Buljan M, Cavka V, Bulat V, Krolo I, Mihić LL. Skin changes in the elderly people--how strong is the influence of the UV radiation on skin aging?. Coll Antropol 2010; 34 (Suppl. 02) 9-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hassan KM, Benedetto AV. Facial skin rejuvenation: ablative laser resurfacing, chemical peels, or photodynamic therapy? Facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol 2013; 31 (06) 737-740
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Brauer JA, Patel U, Hale EK. Laser skin resurfacing, chemical peels, and other cutaneous treatments of the brow and upper lid. Clin Plast Surg 2013; 40 (01) 91-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bae-Harboe YS, Geronemus RG. Eyelid tightening by CO2 fractional laser, alternative to blepharoplasty. Dermatol Surg 2014; 40 (Suppl. 12) S137-S141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Alam M, Dover JS, Arndt KA. Pain associated with injection of botulinum A exotoxin reconstituted using isotonic sodium chloride with and without preservative: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arch Dermatol 2002; 138 (04) 510-514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hankins CL, Strimling R, Rogers GS. Botulinum A toxin for glabellar wrinkles. Dose and response. Dermatol Surg 1998; 24 (11) 1181-1183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rao V, Chi S, Woodward J. Reversing facial fillers: interactions between hyaluronidase and commercially available hyaluronic-acid based fillers. J Drugs Dermatol 2014; 13 (09) 1053-1056
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Briceño CA, Zhang-Nunes SX, Massry GG. Minimally invasive options for the brow and upper lid. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2015; 23 (02) 153-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 DeLorenzi C. Complications of injectable fillers, part 2: vascular complications. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (04) 561-575
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lambros V. A technique for filling the temples with highly diluted hyaluronic acid: the “dilution solution”. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (01) 89-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Romo III T, Jacono AA, Sclafani AP. Endoscopic forehead lifting and contouring. Facial Plast Surg 2001; 17 (01) 3-10
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Eaves FF. Endoscopic brow lift surgery. In: Bostwick J, Eaves FF, Nahai F. , et al., eds. Endoscopic Plastic Surgery. St Louis, MO: Quality Medical; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Rohrich RJ, Beran SJ. Evolving fixation methods in endoscopically assisted forehead rejuvenation: controversies and rationale. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (06) 1575-1582 , discussion 1583–1584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chiu ES, Baker DC. Endoscopic brow lift: a retrospective review of 628 consecutive cases over 5 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (02) 628-633 , discussion 634–635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar