Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34(04): 412-418
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1666787
Rapid Communication
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Direct Excision of the Lower Eyelid: A Safe and Effective Method for Treating Dermatochalasis and Pigmentation

Robert Glasgold
1   Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School New Brunswick, New Brunswick, New Jersey
2   Glasgold Group – Facial Plastic Surgery, Princeton, New Jersey
,
Joelle Rogal
3   Cosmetic Surgery Associates of New York - Facial Plastic Surgery, Harrison, New York
,
Lesley A. Rabach
4   LM Medical NYC – Facial Plastic Surgery, New York, New York
,
Mark Glasgold
1   Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School New Brunswick, New Brunswick, New Jersey
2   Glasgold Group – Facial Plastic Surgery, Princeton, New Jersey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 June 2018 (online)

Abstract

The subciliary and skin pinch approaches are the most widely accepted techniques for treating dermatochalasis of the lower eyelid. Direct excision (DE) is an accepted method for treating festoons; however, it is not a popular technique for the treatment of dermatochalasis and pigment of the lower lid. DE of the lower lid offers a safe and excellent aesthetic result for dermatochalasis and pigment of the lower lid, without causing lower lid malposition, which can occur with more traditional methods. In addition to being able to remove significantly more skin without risking lower lid malposition, this procedure allows for removal of the most pigmented and poorly textured skin overlying the nasojugal groove. It is an effective alternative to the conventional subciliary and skin pinch approaches.

 
  • References

  • 1 Glavas IP. The diagnosis and management of blepharoplasty complications. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2005; 38 (05) 1009-1021
  • 2 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. “2016 Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics.” Available at: https://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/ASAPS-Stats2016.pdf . Accessed May 1, 2017
  • 3 Branham GH. Lower eyelid blepharoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2016; 24 (02) 129-138
  • 4 Haddock NT, Saadeh PB, Boutros S, Thorne CH. The tear trough and lid/cheek junction: anatomy and implications for surgical correction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (04) 1332-1340 , discussion 1341–1342
  • 5 Stutman RL, Codner MA. Tear trough deformity: review of anatomy and treatment options. Aesthet Surg J 2012; 32 (04) 426-440
  • 6 Rees TD, Dupuis CC. Baggy eyelids in young adults. Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 43 (04) 381-387
  • 7 Aston SJ. Skin-muscle flap lower lid blepharoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 1988; 15 (02) 305-308
  • 8 Casson P, Siebert J. Lower lid blepharoplasty with skin flap and muscle split. Clin Plast Surg 1988; 15 (02) 299-304
  • 9 Massry GG. Comprehensive lower eyelid rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg 2010; 26 (03) 209-221
  • 10 Baylis HI, Long JA, Groth MJ. Transconjunctival lower eyelid blepharoplasty. Technique and complications. Ophthalmology 1989; 96 (07) 1027-1032
  • 11 McGraw BL, Adamson PA. Postblepharoplasty ectropion. Prevention and management. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117 (08) 852-856
  • 12 McCord Jr CD, Ellis DS. The correction of lower lid malposition following lower lid blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92 (06) 1068-1072
  • 13 Sultan B, Genther DJ, Perkins SW. Measurement of change in lower eyelid position in patients undergoing transcutaneous skin-muscle flap lower eyelid blepharoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (06) 429-435
  • 14 Tessier P. The conjunctival approach to the orbital floor and maxilla in congenital malformation and trauma. J Maxillofac Surg 1973; 1 (01) 3-8
  • 15 Zarem HA, Resnick JI. Expanded applications for transconjunctival lower lid blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 88 (02) 215-220 , discussion 221
  • 16 Kashkouli MB, Pakdel F, Kiavash V, Ghiasian L, Heirati A, Jamshidian-Tehrani M. Transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty: a 2-sided assessment of results and subjects' satisfaction. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 29 (04) 249-255
  • 17 Roberts III TL. Laser blepharoplasty and laser resurfacing of the periorbital area. Clin Plast Surg 1998; 25 (01) 95-108
  • 18 Glasgold M, Lam SM, Glasgold R. Volumetric rejuvenation of the periorbital region. Facial Plast Surg 2010; 26 (03) 252-259
  • 19 Meier JD, Glasgold RA, Glasgold MJ. Autologous fat grafting: long-term evidence of its efficacy in midfacial rejuvenation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009; 11 (01) 24-28
  • 20 Gerth DJ, King B, Rabach L, Glasgold RA, Glasgold MJ. Long-term volumetric retention of autologous fat grafting processed with closed-membrane filtration. Aesthet Surg J 2014; 34 (07) 985-994
  • 21 Bellinvia P, Klinger F, Bellinvia G. Lower blepharoplasty with direct excision of skin excess: a five-year experience. Aesthet Surg J 2010; 30 (05) 665-670
  • 22 Goldberg RA, McCann JD, Fiaschetti D, Ben Simon GJ. What causes eyelid bags? Analysis of 114 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (05) 1395-1402 , discussion 1403–1404
  • 23 Collar RM, Lyford-Pike S, Byrne P. Algorithmic approach to lower lid blepharoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29 (01) 32-39
  • 24 Hashem AM, Couto RA, Waltzman JT, Drake RL, Zins JE. Evidence based medicine: a graded approach to lower lid blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (01) 139e-150e
  • 25 de Castro CC. A critical analysis of the current surgical concepts for lower blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (03) 785-793 , discussion 794–796
  • 26 Bedrossian Jr EH. Reconstructive lower lid blepharoplasty. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2005; 18 (02) 291-300 , vi
  • 27 Pacella SJ, Nahai FR, Nahai F. Transconjunctival blepharoplasty for upper and lower eyelids. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (01) 384-392
  • 28 Honrado CP, Pastorek NJ. Long-term results of lower-lid suspension blepharoplasty: a 30-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004; 6 (03) 150-154