Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1642637
Omental Vascularized Lymph Node Flap: A Radiographic Analysis
Publication History
01 December 2017
18 January 2018
Publication Date:
16 April 2018 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/jrm/201807/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0038-1642637_170344-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background Vascularized lymph node transfer is an increasingly popular option for the treatment of lymphedema. The omental donor site is advantageous for its copious soft tissue, well-defined collateral circulation, and large number of available nodes, without the risk of iatrogenic lymphedema. The purpose of this study is to define the anatomy of the omental flap in the context of vascularized lymph node harvest.
Methods Consecutive abdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA) images performed at a single institution over a 1-year period were reviewed. Right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) length, artery caliber, lymph node size, and lymph node location in relation to the artery were recorded. A two-tailed Z-test was used to compare means. A Gaussian Mixture Model confirmed by normalized entropy criterion was used to calculate three-dimensional lymph node cluster locations along the RGEA.
Results In total, 156 CTA images met inclusion criteria. The RGEA caliber at its origin was significantly larger in males compared with females (p < 0.001). An average of 3.1 (1.7) lymph nodes were present per patient. There was no significant gender difference in the number of lymph nodes identified. Average lymph node size was significantly larger in males (4.9 [1.9] × 3.3 [0.6] mm in males vs. 4.5 [1.5] × 3.1 [0.5] mm in females; p < 0.001). Three distinct anatomical variations of the RGEA course were noted, each with a distinct lymph node clustering pattern. Total lymph node number and size did not differ among anatomical subgroups.
Conclusion The omentum is a reliable lymph node donor site with consistent anatomy. This study serves as an aid in preoperative planning for vascularized lymph node transfer using the omental flap.
-
References
- 1 Petrek JA, Pressman PI, Smith RA. Lymphedema: current issues in research and management. CA Cancer J Clin 2000; 50 (05) 292-307 , quiz 308–311
- 2 Beaulac SM, McNair LA, Scott TE, LaMorte WW, Kavanah MT. Lymphedema and quality of life in survivors of early-stage breast cancer. Arch Surg 2002; 137 (11) 1253-1257
- 3 Coen JJ, Taghian AG, Kachnic LA, Assaad SI, Powell SN. Risk of lymphedema after regional nodal irradiation with breast conservation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 55 (05) 1209-1215
- 4 Golshan M, Martin WJ, Dowlatshahi K. Sentinel lymph node biopsy lowers the rate of lymphedema when compared with standard axillary lymph node dissection. Am Surg 2003; 69 (03) 209-211 , discussion 212
- 5 Herd-Smith A, Russo A, Muraca MG, Del Turco MR, Cardona G. Prognostic factors for lymphedema after primary treatment of breast carcinoma. Cancer 2001; 92 (07) 1783-1787
- 6 Kosir MA, Rymal C, Koppolu P. , et al. Surgical outcomes after breast cancer surgery: measuring acute lymphedema. J Surg Res 2001; 95 (02) 147-151
- 7 Meric F, Buchholz TA, Mirza NQ. , et al. Long-term complications associated with breast-conservation surgery and radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2002; 9 (06) 543-549
- 8 Paskett ED, Naughton MJ, McCoy TP, Case LD, Abbott JM. The epidemiology of arm and hand swelling in premenopausal breast cancer survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16 (04) 775-782
- 9 Schijven MP, Vingerhoets AJ, Rutten HJ. , et al. Comparison of morbidity between axillary lymph node dissection and sentinel node biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003; 29 (04) 341-350
- 10 Schrenk P, Rieger R, Shamiyeh A, Wayand W. Morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection for patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 88 (03) 608-614
- 11 Sener SF, Winchester DJ, Martz CH. , et al. Lymphedema after sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast carcinoma. Cancer 2001; 92 (04) 748-752
- 12 Tengrup I, Tennvall-Nittby L, Christiansson I, Laurin M. Arm morbidity after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer. Acta Oncol 2000; 39 (03) 393-397
- 13 Cheng MH, Chen SC, Henry SL, Tan BK, Lin MC, Huang JJ. Vascularized groin lymph node flap transfer for postmastectomy upper limb lymphedema: flap anatomy, recipient sites, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (06) 1286-1298
- 14 Shih YC, Xu Y, Cormier JN. , et al. Incidence, treatment costs, and complications of lymphedema after breast cancer among women of working age: a 2-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27 (12) 2007-2014
- 15 Cheng MH, Huang JJ, Nguyen DH. , et al. A novel approach to the treatment of lower extremity lymphedema by transferring a vascularized submental lymph node flap to the ankle. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 126 (01) 93-98
- 16 Cheng MH, Huang JJ, Wu CW. , et al. The mechanism of vascularized lymph node transfer for lymphedema: natural lymphaticovenous drainage. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (02) 192e-198e
- 17 Raju A, Chang DW. Vascularized lymph node transfer for treatment of lymphedema: a comprehensive literature review. Ann Surg 2015; 261 (05) 1013-1023
- 18 Althubaiti GA, Crosby MA, Chang DW. Vascularized supraclavicular lymph node transfer for lower extremity lymphedema treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (01) 133e-135e
- 19 Ozturk CN, Ozturk C, Glasgow M. , et al. Free vascularized lymph node transfer for treatment of lymphedema: a systematic evidence based review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (09) 1234-1247
- 20 Nguyen AT, Suami H. Laparoscopic free omental lymphatic flap for the treatment of lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (01) 114-118
- 21 Liebermann-Meffert D. The greater omentum. Anatomy, embryology, and surgical applications. Surg Clin North Am 2000; 80 (01) 275-293 , xii
- 22 Lasso JM, Pinilla C, Castellano M. New refinements in greater omentum free flap transfer for severe secondary lymphedema surgical treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015; 3 (05) e387
- 23 Losken A, Carlson GW, Culbertson JH. , et al. Omental free flap reconstruction in complex head and neck deformities. Head Neck 2002; 24 (04) 326-331
- 24 Boulton BJF. S. The technique of omentum harvest for intrathoracic use. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 15 (01) 53-60
- 25 Benoit L, Boichot C, Cheynel N. , et al. Preventing lymphedema and morbidity with an omentum flap after ilioinguinal lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12 (10) 793-799
- 26 Fraley C, Raftery AE. How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. Comput J 1998; 41 (08) 578-588
- 27 Chu YY, Allen Jr RJ, Wu TJ, Cheng MH. Greater omental lymph node flap for upper limb lymphedema with lymph nodes-depleted patient. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5 (04) e1288
- 28 Goldsmith HS, De los Santos R, Beattie Jr EJ. Relief of chronic lymphedema by omental transposition. Ann Surg 1967; 166 (04) 573-585
- 29 van Wingerden JJ, Coret ME, van Nieuwenhoven CA, Totté ER. The laparoscopically harvested omental flap for deep sternal wound infection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37 (01) 87-92
- 30 El Gamel A, Yonan NA, Hassan R. , et al. Treatment of mediastinitis: early modified Robicsek closure and pectoralis major advancement flaps. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65 (01) 41-46 , discussion 46–47
- 31 Hakelius L. Fatal complication after use of the greater omentum for reconstruction of the chest wall: case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 62 (05) 796-797
- 32 Salameh JR, Chock DA, Gonzalez JJ, Koneru S, Glass JL, Franklin Jr ME. Laparoscopic harvest of omental flaps for reconstruction of complex mediastinal wounds. JSLS 2003; 7 (04) 317-322
- 33 Zaha H, Inamine S, Naito T, Nomura H. Laparoscopically harvested omental flap for immediate breast reconstruction. Am J Surg 2006; 192 (04) 556-558
- 34 Saltz R, Stowers R, Smith M, Gadacz TR. Laparoscopically harvested omental free flap to cover a large soft tissue defect. Ann Surg 1993; 217 (05) 542-546 , discussion 546–547
- 35 Gharb BB, Rampazzo A, Spanio di Spilimbergo S, Xu ES, Chung KP, Chen HC. Vascularized lymph node transfer based on the hilar perforators improves the outcome in upper limb lymphedema. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 67 (06) 589-593
- 36 Cook JA, Tholpady SS, Momeni A, Chu MW. Predictors of internal mammary vessel diameter: a computed tomographic angiography-assisted anatomic analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (10) 1340-1348
- 37 Gusenoff JA, Coon D, De La Cruz C, Rubin JP. Superficial inferior epigastric vessels in the massive weight loss population: implications for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (06) 1621-1626
- 38 Hanssen H, Siegrist M, Neidig M. , et al. Retinal vessel diameter, obesity and metabolic risk factors in school children (JuvenTUM 3). Atherosclerosis 2012; 221 (01) 242-248
- 39 Broer PN, Weichman KE, Tanna N. , et al. Venous coupler size in autologous breast reconstruction--does it matter?. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (07) 514-518
- 40 Moran SL, Serletti JM. Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (07) 1954-1960
- 41 Langheinrich AC, Kampschulte M, Crössmann C. , et al. Role of computed tomography voxel size in detection and discrimination of calcium and iron deposits in atherosclerotic human coronary artery specimens. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009; 33 (04) 517-522
- 42 Fansa H, Schirmer S, Cervelli A, Gehl HB. Computed tomographic angiography imaging and clinical implications of internal mammary artery perforator vessels as recipient vessels in autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (05) 533-537
- 43 Gonzalez RG, Hirsch JA, Koroshetz WJ. Acute Ischemic Stroke: Imaging and Intervention. New York, NY: Springer; 2011
- 44 Tavakol M, Ashraf S, Brener SJ. Risks and complications of coronary angiography: a comprehensive review. Glob J Health Sci 2012; 4 (01) 65-93
- 45 Rozen WM, Stella DL, Bowden J, Taylor GI, Ashton MW. Advances in the pre-operative planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps: magnetic resonance angiography. Microsurgery 2009; 29 (02) 119-123
- 46 Murray AC, Rozen WM, Alonso-Burgos A, Ashton MW, Garcia-Tutor E, Whitaker IS. The anatomy and variations of the internal thoracic (internal mammary) artery and implications in autologous breast reconstruction: clinical anatomical study and literature review. Surg Radiol Anat 2012; 34 (02) 159-165
- 47 Kim H, Lim SY, Pyon JK, Bang SI, Oh KS, Mun GH. Preoperative computed tomographic angiography of both donor and recipient sites for microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (01) 11e-20e
- 48 Smit JM, Klein S, Werker PM. An overview of methods for vascular mapping in the planning of free flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (09) e674-e682
- 49 Rozen WM, Stella DL, Phillips TJ, Ashton MW, Corlett RJ, Taylor GI. Magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative planning of DIEA perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (06) 222e-223e
- 50 Masia J, Clavero JA, Larrañaga JR, Alomar X, Pons G, Serret P. Multidetector-row computed tomography in the planning of abdominal perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59 (06) 594-599