Download PDF
Yearb Med Inform 1996; 05(01): 195-198
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1638058
Synopsis
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Computer-based Patient Records

A.L. Rector
1   Medical Informatics Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Address of the author:

Alan L. Rector
Medical Informatics Group
Department of Computer Science
University of Manchester
Manchester MI3 9PL, United Kingdom.
Email: rector@cs.man.ac.uk   

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 March 2018 (online)

 
 PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

 


#

  • References

  • 1 Moorman PW, van Ginneken AM, Siersema PD, van der Lei J, van Bemmel JH. Evaluation of reporting based on descriptional knowledge. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1995; 2: 365-73.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hammer JS, Strain JJ, Friederg A, Fulop G. Operationalizing a bedside pen entry notebook clinical database system in consultation- liason psychiatry. Gen Hosp Psychiat 1995; 17: 165-72.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kalra L, Fowle A. An integrated system for multidisciplinary assessments in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1994; 25: 2210-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Solomon GL, Dechter M. Are patients pleased with computer use in the examination room?. JFamPractice 1995; 41: 241-4.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rasinoux A-M, Juge C, Michel P. et al. Analysis of medical jargon: The RECIT system. In:. Barahona P, Stefanelli M, Wyatt J. ed. Fifth conference on Artificial lntelligence in Medicine Europe (AIME ’95).. Pavia, Italy: Springer; 1995: 42-4.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Baud R, Lovis C, Alpay L. et al. Modelling for Natural Language Understanding. In:. Safran C. ed. Seventeenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care (SCAMC-93).. Washington DC: McGraw Hill; 1993: 289-93.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Moorman PW, vanGinneken AM. vander Lei J, van Bemmel JH. A model for structured data entry based on explicit descriptionalknowledge. Meth Inform Med 1994; 33: 454-63.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rector A, Glowinski A, Nowlan W, RossiMori A. Medical concept models and medical records: An approach based on GALEN and PEN&PAD. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1995; 2: 19-35.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rector A. Coordinating taxonomies: Key to re-usable concept representations. In:. Barahona P, Stefanelli M, Wyatt J. ed. Fifth conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Europe (AIME ’95).. Pavia, Italy: Springer; 1995: 17-28.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Evans DA, Cimino J, Hersh WR, Huff SM, Bell DS. The Canon Group. Position Statement: Towards a Medical Concept Representation Language. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 207-17.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Campbell KE, Das AK, Musen MA. A logical foundation for representation of clinical data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 218-32.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cimino J. Controlled Medical Vocabulary Construction: Methods from the Canon Group. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 296-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bell DS, Pattison-Gordon E, Greenes RA. Experiments in concept modeling for radiographic image reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 249-62.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tuttle MS. The position of the can on group: A reality check. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 298-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ingram D. GEHR: The Good European Health Record. In:. Laires M, Ladeira M, Christensen J. ed. Health in the New Communications Age.. Amsterdam: lOS Press; 1995: 66-74.
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Rector A, Solomon W, Nowlan W, Rush T. A Terminology Server for Medical Language and Medical Information Systems. Meth lnform Med 1995; 34: 147-57.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Goldschmidt A, Luz C, Giere W, L&decke R, Jonas D. Multi-dimensional visualisation of laboratory findings and functional test results for analysing the clinical course of disease in medicine. Meth Inform Med 1995; 34: 302-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Address of the author:

Alan L. Rector
Medical Informatics Group
Department of Computer Science
University of Manchester
Manchester MI3 9PL, United Kingdom.
Email: rector@cs.man.ac.uk   

  • References

  • 1 Moorman PW, van Ginneken AM, Siersema PD, van der Lei J, van Bemmel JH. Evaluation of reporting based on descriptional knowledge. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1995; 2: 365-73.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hammer JS, Strain JJ, Friederg A, Fulop G. Operationalizing a bedside pen entry notebook clinical database system in consultation- liason psychiatry. Gen Hosp Psychiat 1995; 17: 165-72.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kalra L, Fowle A. An integrated system for multidisciplinary assessments in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1994; 25: 2210-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Solomon GL, Dechter M. Are patients pleased with computer use in the examination room?. JFamPractice 1995; 41: 241-4.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rasinoux A-M, Juge C, Michel P. et al. Analysis of medical jargon: The RECIT system. In:. Barahona P, Stefanelli M, Wyatt J. ed. Fifth conference on Artificial lntelligence in Medicine Europe (AIME ’95).. Pavia, Italy: Springer; 1995: 42-4.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Baud R, Lovis C, Alpay L. et al. Modelling for Natural Language Understanding. In:. Safran C. ed. Seventeenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care (SCAMC-93).. Washington DC: McGraw Hill; 1993: 289-93.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Moorman PW, vanGinneken AM. vander Lei J, van Bemmel JH. A model for structured data entry based on explicit descriptionalknowledge. Meth Inform Med 1994; 33: 454-63.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rector A, Glowinski A, Nowlan W, RossiMori A. Medical concept models and medical records: An approach based on GALEN and PEN&PAD. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1995; 2: 19-35.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rector A. Coordinating taxonomies: Key to re-usable concept representations. In:. Barahona P, Stefanelli M, Wyatt J. ed. Fifth conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Europe (AIME ’95).. Pavia, Italy: Springer; 1995: 17-28.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Evans DA, Cimino J, Hersh WR, Huff SM, Bell DS. The Canon Group. Position Statement: Towards a Medical Concept Representation Language. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 207-17.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Campbell KE, Das AK, Musen MA. A logical foundation for representation of clinical data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 218-32.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cimino J. Controlled Medical Vocabulary Construction: Methods from the Canon Group. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 296-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bell DS, Pattison-Gordon E, Greenes RA. Experiments in concept modeling for radiographic image reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 249-62.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tuttle MS. The position of the can on group: A reality check. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 298-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ingram D. GEHR: The Good European Health Record. In:. Laires M, Ladeira M, Christensen J. ed. Health in the New Communications Age.. Amsterdam: lOS Press; 1995: 66-74.
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Rector A, Solomon W, Nowlan W, Rush T. A Terminology Server for Medical Language and Medical Information Systems. Meth lnform Med 1995; 34: 147-57.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Goldschmidt A, Luz C, Giere W, L&decke R, Jonas D. Multi-dimensional visualisation of laboratory findings and functional test results for analysing the clinical course of disease in medicine. Meth Inform Med 1995; 34: 302-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

   Permissions and Reprints