Prospective Clinical Study of Biodegradable Poly-L-Lactide Implant as an Augmentation Device with Fascia Lata in Cranial Cruciate Ligament Repair in the Dog: Early Results

O. Laitinen

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1633045

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 07(01): 51-55
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633045

Clinical Report

Schattauer GmbH

Prospective Clinical Study of Biodegradable Poly-L-Lactide Implant as an Augmentation Device with Fascia Lata in Cranial Cruciate Ligament Repair in the Dog: Early Results

O. Laitinen

¹From the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Helsinki, Finland

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

Twenty-seven dogs with cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture were treated with intra-articular reconstruction using a biodegradable poly-Llactide (PLLA) implant as an augmentation device, with a fascia lata graft in 12 dogs or with a fascia lata graft alone in 15 dogs. The clinical assessment was performed two, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. At 12 weeks the stability of the stifle joints was significantly better (p < 0.05) in the fascia lata-PLLA (FL-PLLA) group, compared to the fascia lata (FL) group, because the PLLA augmentation device gave additional support to the fascia lata graft in the early healing phase. At 24 weeks 11 dogs (92%) of the FL-PLLA group and 13 dogs (87%) of the FL group were free of lameness. Radiographically, degenerative changes defined as osteophyte formation were found preoperatively in 10 dogs in the FLPLLA group and 11 dogs in the FL group. The postoperative degenerative changes increased in four dogs in the FL-PLLA group and five dogs in the FL group at 12 weeks. At 24 weeks in two dogs in both groups the degenerative changes had advanced.

A biodegradable poly-L-lactide (PLLA) augmentation device was used to reinforce a fascia lata graft in cranial cruciate ligament repair in 12 dogs and compared clinically and radio-graphically with a fascia lata replacement technique in 15 dogs. Clinically, at 12 weeks the stability of the stifle joints was significantly better (p <0.05) using the PLLA im-plant with the fascia lata. At 24 weeks significant differences were not found in the clinical nor radiographic outcome between the two groups.

Keywords

Cranial cruciate ligament repair - biodegradable poly-L-lactide implant - fascia lata

Full Text

References

References
1 Paatsama S. Ligamentous injuries of the canine stifle joint: A clinical and experimental study. Helsinki, Finland: Thesis; 1952
2 Dickinson CR, Nunamaker DM. Repair of ruptured anterior cruciate ligament in the dog: Experience of 101 cases, using a modified fascia strip technique. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1977; 170: 827-30.
3 Paulos LE, Butler DL, Noyes FR, Grood ES. Intra-articular cruciate reconstruction II: Replacement with vascularized patellar tendon. Clin Orthop 1983; 172: 78-84.
4 Butler DL, Grood ES, Noyes FR. et al. Mechanical properties of primate vascularized vs nonvascularized patellar tendon grafts; changes over time. J Orthop Res 1989; 7: 68-79.
5 Schepsis AA, Greenleaf J. Prosthetic materials for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop Rev 1990; 19: 984-91.
6 Laitinen O, Toivonen T, Vasenius J. et al. Tissue response to braided poly-L-lactide implant in experimental reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1993; 4: 547-54.
7 Miller RA, Brady JM, Cutright DE. Degradation rates of oral resorbable implants (polylactates and polyglycolates): Rate modification with changes in PLA/PGA copolymer ratios. J Biomed Mater Res 1977; 11: 711-9.
8 Hollinger JO, Battistone GC. Biodegradable bone repair materials. Clin Orthop 1986; 207: 290-305.
9 Getter L, Cutright DE, Bhaskar SN, Augsburg JK. A biodegradable intraosseus appliance in the treatment of mandibular fractures. J Oral Surg 1972; 30: 344-8.
10 Bos RRM, Rozema FR, Boering G. et al. Degradation of and tissue reaction to biodegradable poly(L-lactide) for use as internal fixation of fractures: a study in rats. Biomaterials 1991; 12: 32-6.
11 Laitinen O, Tormala P, Taurio R. et al. Mechanical properties of biodegradable ligament augmentation device of poly-L-Iactide in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 1992; 13: 1012-6.
12 Robins GM. The canine stifle joint. In: Canine Orthopedics. 2nd ed. Whittick WG. (ed). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1990: 693-760.
13 Paatsama S. Ein weiterer Beitrag zu den Kniegelenksoperationen beim Hund. XVII. World Veterinary Congress, Hannover. Proceedings 1963; 2: 997-9.
14 Hulse DA, Michaelson F, Johnson C, Abdelbaki YZ. A technique for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in the dog: preliminary report. Vet Surg 1980; 9: 135-40.
15 Park JP, Grana WA, Chitwood JS. A high-strength dacron augmentation for cruciate ligament reconstruction. A two-year canine study. Clin Orthop 1985; 196: 175-85.
16 Vasseur PB, Berry CR. Progression of stifle osteoarthrosis following reconstruction of the cranial cruciate ligament in 21 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1992; 28: 129-36.
17 Marshall JL, Olsson SE. Instability of the knee. A long term experimental study in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg 1971; 53-A: 1561-70.
18 Heffron LE, Campbell JR. Osteophyte formation in the canine stifle joint following treatment for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. J Small Anim Pract 1979; 20: 603-11.
19 Elkins AD, Pechman R, Kearney MT, Herron M. A retrospective study evaluating the degree of degenerative joint disease in the stifle joint of dogs following surgical repair of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1991; 27: 533-40.