Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33(04): 428-433
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603782
Rapid Communication
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Do Patients Access Appropriate Information Online?

Amar Gupta
1   Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
,
Michael E. Nissan
1   Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
,
Dennis I. Bojrab II
1   Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
,
Adam Folbe
1   Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
,
Michael A. Carron
1   Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 July 2017 (online)

Abstract

Health care providers should be aware of information available on the Internet to ensure proper patient care. The current analysis assesses the reliability, quality, and readability of internet information describing rhytidectomy. Previously validated survey instruments to assess the reliability, quality, and readability of online websites describing rhytidectomy were used. An internet search using Google with the search term “facelift” was conducted. The first 50 search results were reviewed, and 36 were deemed appropriate to be included in this analysis. Websites were divided based on type of authorship into professional organization, academic, physician based, and unidentified. The validated DISCERN instrument was used to determine reliability, quality, and overall rating of each site. The Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) were used to measure readability. A 1 to 3 point scale was used to rate websites, with a higher number indicating a website that possessed either greater reliability or greater quality. Mean scores for reliability ranged from 1.7 (±0.99) in the academic group to 2.0 (±0.12) in the unidentified group. Mean scores for quality ranged from 1.5 (±0.13) in the unidentified group to 1.7 (±0.38) in the physician-based group. The highest overall rating was 1.4 (±0.22 and ± 0.31, respectively) in the unidentified and physician-based groups. The lowest overall rating was 1 (±0.58) in the academic group. FRESs ranged from 21.6 to 74.6. FKGLs ranged from 6.9 to 13.9. Information available online regarding rhytidectomy may be significantly deficient in reliability, quality, and readability. These deficiencies are present in articles with all types of author affiliations. This underscores the clinicians' duty to provide patients with high-quality information at an adequate level of comprehension.

 
  • References

  • 1 Miniwatts Marketing Group. Internet usage statistics. Available at: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm . Accessed December 14, 2016
  • 2 International Telecommunications Union. Percentage of individuals using the Internet 2000 - 2012. Available at: http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/statistics/2013/Individuals_Internet_2000-2012.xls . Accessed December 14, 2016
  • 3 US Census Bureau. Computer and Internet use in the United States. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/p20-569.pdf . Accessed December 14, 2016
  • 4 Saithna A, Ajayi OO, Davis ET. The quality of Internet sites providing information relating to hip resurfacing. Surgeon 2008; 6 (02) 85-87
  • 5 Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Health-online/Part-One/Section-6.aspx . Accessed December 21, 2016
  • 6 Fashner J, Drye ST. Internet availability and interest in patients at a family medicine residency clinic. Fam Med 2011; 43 (02) 117-120
  • 7 Ilic D, Bessell TL, Silagy CA, Green S. Specialized medical search-engines are no better than general search-engines in sourcing consumer information about androgen deficiency. Hum Reprod 2003; 18 (03) 557-561
  • 8 Murero M, D'Ancona G, Karamanoukian H. Use of the Internet by Patients Before and After Cardiac Surgery: An Interdisciplinary Telephone Survey. J Med Internet Res 2001; 3: E27
  • 9 Evans D. Internet visibility. Ceatus Mark. Gr. Available at: www.ceatus.com . Accessed December 21, 2016
  • 10 Butler L, Foster NE. Back pain online: a cross-sectional survey of the quality of web-based information on low back pain. Spine 2003; 28 (04) 395-401
  • 11 Surman R, Bath PA. An assessment of the quality of information on stroke and speech and language difficulty web sites. J Inf Sci 2013; 39: 113-125
  • 12 Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ, Steinberg DR, Bernstein J. Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet. The case of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82-A (11) 1540-1543
  • 13 Ademiluyi G, Rees CE, Sheard CE. Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the Internet. Patient Educ Couns 2003; 50 (02) 151-155
  • 14 Ansani NT, Vogt M, Henderson BAF. , et al. Quality of arthritis information on the Internet. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005; 62 (11) 1184-1189
  • 15 Rodriguez-Bruno K, Papel ID. Rhytidectomy: principles and practice emphasizing safety. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27 (01) 98-111
  • 16 Larrabee Jr WF, Henderson JL. Face lift: the anatomic basis for a safe, long-lasting procedure. Facial Plast Surg 2000; 16 (03) 239-253
  • 17 Neuman HB, Cabral C, Charlson ME, Temple LK. Is Internet information adequate to facilitate surgical decision-making in familial adenomatous polyposis?. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50 (12) 2135-2141
  • 18 Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Website quality indicators for consumers. J Med Internet Res 2005; 7 (05) e55
  • 19 Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53 (02) 105-111
  • 20 Shepperd S, Charnock D, Cook A. A 5-star system for rating the quality of information based on DISCERN. Health Info Libr J 2002; 19 (04) 201-205
  • 21 Charnock D, Shepperd S. Learning to DISCERN online: applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting. Health Educ Res 2004; 19 (04) 440-446
  • 22 Rees CE, Ford JE, Sheard CE. Evaluating the reliability of DISCERN: a tool for assessing the quality of written patient information on treatment choices. Patient Educ Couns 2002; 47 (03) 273-275
  • 23 Yeung TM, D'Souza ND. Quality analysis of patient information on surgical treatment of haemorrhoids on the Internet. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013; 95 (05) 341-344
  • 24 Yeung TM, Mortensen NJ. Assessment of the quality of patient-orientated Internet information on surgery for diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (01) 85-89
  • 25 Daraz L, Macdermid JC, Wilkins S, Gibson J, Shaw L. The quality of websites addressing fibromyalgia: an assessment of quality and readability using standardised tools. BMJ Open 2011; 1 (01) e000152
  • 26 Sanghvi S, Cherla DV, Shukla PA, Eloy JA. Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (09) 1943-1948
  • 27 Kasabwala K, Agarwal N, Hansberry DR, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Readability assessment of patient education materials from the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 147 (03) 466-471
  • 28 Misra P, Agarwal N, Kasabwala K, Hansberry DR, Setzen M, Eloy JA. Readability analysis of healthcare-oriented education resources from the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (01) 90-96
  • 29 Woodmansey K. Readability of educational materials for endodontic patients. J Endod 2010; 36 (10) 1703-1706
  • 30 Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 1948; 32 (03) 221-233
  • 31 Shankar J. Patients' memory for medical information. J R Soc Med 2003; 96 (10) 520
  • 32 Smith P, Bansal-Travers M, O'Connor R. , et al. Correcting over 50 years of tobacco industry misinformation. Am J Prev Med 2011; 40 (06) 690-698
  • 33 Carroll J. Legal examination of physician advertising on the Internet. Facial Plast Surg 2006; 22 (01) 75-79
  • 34 Colaco M, Svider PF, Agarwal N, Eloy JA, Jackson IM. Readability assessment of online urology patient education materials. J Urol 2013; 189 (03) 1048-1052
  • 35 Hansberry DR, Agarwal N, Shah R. , et al. Analysis of the readability of patient education materials from surgical subspecialties. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (02) 405-412
  • 36 Sheridan SL, Halpern DJ, Viera AJ, Berkman ND, Donahue KE, Crotty K. Interventions for individuals with low health literacy: a systematic review. J Health Commun 2011; 16 (Suppl. 03) 30-54
  • 37 Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155 (02) 97-107
  • 38 Murray MD, Tu W, Wu J, Morrow D, Smith F, Brater DC. Factors associated with exacerbation of heart failure include treatment adherence and health literacy skills. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009; 85 (06) 651-658
  • 39 Svider PF, Agarwal N, Choudhry OJ. , et al. Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments. Am J Otolaryngol 2013; 34 (01) 31-35
  • 40 National Institutes of Health. How to Write Easy-to-Read Health Materials. Available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/etr.html . Accessed December 21, 2016
  • 41 Svider PF, Keeley BR, Zumba O, Mauro AC, Setzen M, Eloy JA. From the operating room to the courtroom: a comprehensive characterization of litigation related to facial plastic surgery procedures. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (08) 1849-1853
  • 42 Svider PF, Pashkova AA, Folbe AJ. , et al. Obstructive sleep apnea: strategies for minimizing liability and enhancing patient safety. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 149 (06) 947-953
  • 43 Blake DM, Svider PF, Carniol ET, Mauro AC, Eloy JA, Jyung RW. Malpractice in otology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 149 (04) 554-561
  • 44 Hong SS, Yheulon CG, Sniezek JC. Salivary gland surgery and medical malpractice. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (04) 589-594
  • 45 Svider P, Blake D, Sahni K, Folbe A. Meningitis and legal liability: an otolaryngology perspective. Am J Otolaryngol 2014; 35 (02) 198-203
  • 46 Svider P, Blake D, Husain Q. , et al. In the eyes of the law: malpractice litigation in oculoplastic surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 30 (02) 119-123