Download PDF
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2016; 77(01): 046-051
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558822
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

From Abstract to Publication in a Peer-Reviewed Journal: Evaluation of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the German Society of Neurosurgery

Patrick Czorlich
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
Jan Regelsberger
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
Jürgen Meixensberger
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxonia, Germany
,
Manfred Westphal
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
Sven Oliver Eicker
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

05 March 2015

15 May 2015

Publication Date:
07 October 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The presentation and academic discussion of the latest scientific research is the central purpose of meetings like the annual meeting of the German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC). The aim of this study was to investigate the publication rate of all oral and poster abstracts of the DGNC meeting 2012 held in Leipzig, Germany, in peer-reviewed journals and to identify factors that are associated with a higher publication rate.

Material and Methods We reviewed all accepted oral and poster presentations of the meeting. Then a search in PubMed was performed to determine the publication rate within 3 years after the abstract submission deadline. We used the information to identify factors associated with a higher publication rate.

Results The publication rate in a peer-reviewed journal was 40.4% for all presented abstracts. Overall, 41.5% of all poster presentations and 40.1% of all oral presentations were published within 3 years. Abstracts presenting prospective studies or university research had a statistically higher chance of publication. The average journal impact factor for all published abstracts was 2.99, and 81 different journals were chosen for publication.

Conclusions Overall, 40.4% of all presented abstracts at the 2012 DGNC were published in a peer-reviewed journal indexed in PubMed, which reflects the high scientific standard of this meeting. Prospective studies and studies presented by authors from universities had a higher chance of being published.

Keywords

publication rate - abstracts - German Society of Neurosurgery - congress and meeting
 

  • References

  • 1 Schulte TL, Huck K, Osada N , et al. Fate of abstracts presented at the 2009 American Transplant Congress. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (10) 2105-2112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Durinka JB, Chang PN, Ortiz J. Fate of abstracts presented at the 2009 American Transplant Congress. J Surg Educ 2014; 71 (5) 674-679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Yilmaz S, Kalyoncu U, Cinar M , et al. Features and publication rates of scientific abstracts presented at a rheumatology congress—EULAR 2008. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2013; 71 (2) 124-127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Patel AJ, Cherian J, Fox BD , et al. Publication patterns of oral and poster presentations at the annual meetings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (6) 1258-1261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (2) MR000005
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Meissner A, Delouya G, Marcovitch D, Donath D, Taussky D. Publication rates of abstracts presented at the 2007 and 2010 Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology meetings. Curr Oncol 2014; 21 (2) e250-e254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Harvey SA, Wandersee JR. Publication rate of abstracts and posters presented at Medical Library Association annual meeting. J Med Libr Assoc 2010; 98 (3) 250-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Nasir AA, Ameh EA, Poenaru D. Completion publication of abstracts presented at the scientific meetings of the pan-African pediatric surgical association. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2013; 10 (3) 246-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Clemency BM, Thompson JJ, Lindstrom HA, Gurien S, Jaison BA, Grates-Sciarrino AA. Frequency of manuscript publication following presentation of EMS abstracts at national meetings. Prehosp Disaster Med 2014; 29 (3) 294-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Daluiski A, Kuhns CA, Jackson KR, Lieberman JR. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 1998; 16 (6) 645-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kwong Y, Kwong FN, Patel J. Publication rate of trauma abstracts presented at an International Orthopaedic conference. Injury 2007; 38 (7) 745-749
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 DeMola PM, Hill DL, Rogers K, Abboud JA. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the shoulder and elbow session of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (6) 1629-1633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ogilvie LN, Pauwels J, Chanda NK, Kozak FK. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery annual meetings: a five year study 2006–2010. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; . Available at: http://www.journalotohns.com/content/43/1/51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nourbakhsh E, Nugent R, Wang H, Cevik C, Nugent K. Medical literature searches: a comparison of and Google Scholar. Health Info Libr J 2012; 29 (3) 214-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar