Development of a novel endoscopic manipulation system: the Endoscopic Operation Robot ver.3

Background and aims: The next generation of flexible endoscopy platforms such as The Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER) is primarily for remote control manipulation of forceps, but manipulation of the flexible endoscope itself still depends on conventional techniques. We have developed the Endoscopic Operation Robot (EOR) ver.3, which incorporates haptic feedback to provide complete remote control flexible-endoscope manipulation. The present study aimed to evaluate the performance of the EOR ver.3.

Method: A colonoscopy training model was used with scope insertion to the cecum. Force during insertion and insertion time (seconds) to the cecum were evaluated. The data were compared by colon zone and experience level (trainee or expert).

Results: The mean insertion time into the cecum was 118.54 ± 89.42 seconds. Stronger force and torque were required for deeper insertion of the scope. Expert and trainee endoscopists differed in the insertion time to the cecum, maximum counterclockwise torque, mean clockwise torque, and mean counterclockwise torque.

Conclusion: The EOR ver.3 has operability with which endoscopists can easily familiarize themselves.

• References

• 1 Phee SJ, Ho KY, Lomanto D et al. Natural orifice transgastric endoscopic wedge hepatic resection in an experimental model using an intuitively controlled master and slave translumenal endoscopic robot (MASTER). Surg Endoscopy 2010; 24: 2293-2298
• 2 Phee SJ, Low SC, Huynh VA et al. Master and slave translumenal endoscopic robot (MASTER) for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009; 4: 1192-1195
• 3 Ho KY, Phee SJ, Shabbir A et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions by using a master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 593-599
• 4 Phee SJ, Reddy N, Chiu PW et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection is effective in treating patients with early-stage gastric neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1117-1121
• 5 Thompson CC, Ryou M, Soper NJ et al. Evaluation of a manually driven, multitasking platform for complex endolumenal and natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery applications (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 121-125
• 6 Spaun GO, Zheng B, Swanstrom LL. A multitasking platform for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a benchtop comparison of a new device for flexible endoscopic surgery and a standard dual-channel endoscope. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 2720-2727
• 7 Ikeda K, Sumiyama K, Tajiri H et al. Evaluation of a new multitasking platform for endoscope full-thickness resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 117-122
• 8 Swanstrom LL. NOTES: platform development for a paradigm shift in flexible endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1150-1154
• 9 Yeung BP, Gourlay T. A technical review of flexible endoscopic multitasking platforms. Int J Surg 2012; 10: 45-54
• 10 Klibansky D, Rothstein RI. Robotics in endoscopy. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2012; 28: 477-482
• 11 Kume K, Kuroki T, Sugihara T et al. Development of a novel endoscopic manipulation system: The endoscopic operation robot. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 3: 145-150
• 12 Kume K, Kuroki T, Shingai M et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection using the endoscopic operation robot. Endoscopy 2012; 44: E399-E400
• 13 Kume K, Kuroki T, Shingai M. Development of a novel endoscopic manipulation system: The endoscopic operation robot ver. 2. Hepatogastroenterology In press 2015.
• 14 Korman LY, Brandt LJ, Metz DC et al. Segmental increases in force application during colonoscope insertion: quantitative analysis using force monitoring technology. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 867-872