Palladium-Catalyzed Alcoholysis of 3-Iodopropynamides: Selective Synthesis of Carbamoylacetates

Abstract

A novel and selective method for the synthesis of carbamoylacetates via the alcoholysis of 3-iodopropynamides has been developed. 3-Iodopropynamides react with alcohols in the presence of palladium(II) acetate and DABCO to afford the corresponding carbamoylacetates in moderate to good yields.

Key words

palladium - 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane - alcoholysis - 3-iodopropynamides - carbamoylacetates

Carbamoylacetates are versatile synthetic building blocks that are used for the synthesis of many natural products and related compounds of biological and medicinal importance.[1] The traditional synthetic approach to carbamoylacetates is direct condensation of anilines with monoethyl malonates or alkyl malonyl chlorides. A few alternative methods, such as palladium-catalyzed carbonylation of diazo compounds with carbon monoxide,[2] palladium/light-catalyzed carbonylation of α-iodoacetates, carbon monoxide, and amines,[3] and other reactions,[4] have been reported. Alkynyl iodides are a class of important compounds that have been used widely in organic synthesis.[5] Recently, we also reported a modified protocol for the synthesis of internal alkynes, such as N,3-diarylpropynamides, by the palladium(II) acetate catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction of alkynyl iodides with arylboronic acids.[5f] Interestingly, however, in a similar reaction using 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) as base, we found that the envisioned internal alkyne was obtained only in low yield, and the carbamoylacetate was formed as the principal product. This led us to investigate the alcoholysis reaction, and here we present an efficient palladium and DABCO system catalyzed alcoholysis of 3-iodopropynamides to carbamoylacetates under an air atmosphere (Scheme [1]).

The reaction between 3-iodo-N-methyl-N-phenylpropynamide (1a) and methanol (2a) was chosen as a model reaction to screen the optimal reaction conditions; the results are summarized in Table [1]. Initially, the effects of varying the palladium catalyst were examined. The results showed that treatment of 1a with 2a using 2.0 mol% palladium catalyst and two equivalents of DABCO in acetonitrile under an air atmosphere for 12 hours afforded the desired product 3 in 52, 71, 62, and 83% yields, respectively (entries 1–4). Palladium(II) acetate was the best catalyst in terms of yield, and the amount of palladium(II) acetate also affected the yield to some extent (entries 4–7). A variety of other bases, such as triethylamine, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, potassium tert-butoxide, and 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) were then investigated, and they were inferior to DABCO (entries 4 and 8–11). It was noted that the reaction does not take place with cesium carbonate (entry 12). Finally, the use of various solvents, including methanol, tetrahydrofuran, N,N-dimethylformamide, 1,2-dichloroethane, and toluene, was also examined, and acetonitrile provided the highest yield (entries 4 and 13–17); methanol gave identical results to acetonitrile (entry 13). In view of the high-boiling or complex alcohols which were not easily purified, acetonitrile was chosen over methanol as a solvent.

Scheme 1 Palladium-catalyzed synthesis of carbamoylacetates

With the optimal reaction conditions in hand, the scope of the 3-iodopropynamide and alcohol was investigated (Table [2]). Initially, we turned our attention to examine suitable alcohols for the reaction. The results demonstrated that a variety of alcohols 2b–e all worked well with 3-iodo-N-methyl-N-phenylpropynamide (1a) in moderate to good yields (entries 1–4). For example, reaction of 2b or 2c with 1a in the presence of 2.0 mol% palladium catalyst and two equivalents of DABCO in acetonitrile under an air atmosphere for 12 hours gave the corresponding carbamoylacetates 4 and 5 in 83 and 75% yields, respectively (entries 1 and 2). The addition of benzyl alcohol afforded the product 6 in good yield (entry 3). Gratifyingly, the sterically hindered tertiary alcohol 2e was also consistent with the reaction conditions, and gave the desired product 7 in moderate yield (entry 4). Subsequently, a number of 3-iodopropynamides 1b–h were examined in the presence of the alcohol, palladium(II) acetate, and DABCO (entries 5–11). We found that reaction of substituted phenyl 3-iodopropynamides 1b and 1c with ethanol (2b) afforded the corresponding products 8 and 9 in 81 and 78% yields, respectively (entries 5 and 6). Comparing N-phenyl- with N-(o-tolyl)- and N-(m-tolyl)propynamides, meta substitution on the phenyl ring was found to have some effect on the reaction, and the yield of 12 slightly decreased to 60% compared to 71–73% for 10 and 11 (entries 7–9). Although the activity was reduced for the reaction, 3-iodo-N,N-diphenylpropynamide (1g) and N-benzyl-3-iodo-N-methylpropynamide (1h) were also suitable substrates leading to the desired products 13 and 14 smoothly in moderate yields (entries 10 and 11). Surprisingly, the reaction of phenyl 3-iodopropynoate (1i) with ethanol (2b) afforded the ester-exchanged product, diethyl malonate (15), in 42% yield (entry 12). However, no product was generated using 3-iodo-N-methyl-N-phenylpropynamide (1a) and diethylamine (2f) under the optimal reaction conditions.

Table 1 Screening Optimal Conditions^a

Entry	Palladium catalyst (mol%)	Base	Solvent	Isolated yield (%)
1	Pd(dba)2 (2.0)	DABCO	MeCN	52
2	PdCl2 (2.0)	DABCO	MeCN	71
3	PdCl2(PPh3)2 (2.0)	DABCO	MeCN	62
4	Pd(OAc)2 (2.0)	DABCO	MeCN	83
5	Pd(OAc)2 (1.0)	DABCO	MeCN	76
6	Pd(OAc)2 (0.5)	DABCO	MeCN	55
7	Pd(OAc)2 (5.0)	DABCO	MeCN	83
8	Pd(OAc)2 (2.0)	Et3N	MeCN	48
9	Pd(OAc)2 (2.0)	DMAP	MeCN	15
10	Pd(OAc)2 (2.0)	KOt-Bu	MeCN	30
11	Pd(OAc)2 (2.0)	DBU	MeCN	22
12	Pd(OAc)2 (2.0)	Cs2CO3	MeCN	0
13	Pd(OAc)2 (2.0)	DABCO	MeOH	83
14	Pd(OAc)2 (2.0)	DABCO	THF	27
15	Pd(OAc)2 (2.0)	DABCO	DMF	25
16	Pd(OAc)2 (2.0)	DABCO	DCE	11
17	Pd(OAc)2 (2.0)	DABCO	toluene	trace

^a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), base (2 equiv), solvent (2 mL), r.t., 12 h, air atmosphere.

The products of alcoholysis of 3-iodopropynamides provide an attractive and useful route to introduce new groups in the synthesis of natural products. For example, methyl 3-[methyl(phenyl)amino]-3-oxopropanoate (3) underwent a methylation–cyclization route to give an oxoindoline­ derivative 16 in good yield (Scheme [2]).[6]

Scheme 2 Application of carbamoylacetates

In summary, we have developed a novel, efficient and facile­ protocol for the synthesis of carbamoylacetates by the palladium(II) acetate/DABCO system catalyzed alcoholysis of 3-iodopropynamides under aerobic conditions. This protocol is simple and highly general for the diverse substrate scope, which provides a valuable complement to traditional methods. Further utilization of this procedure will continue in our laboratory.

Table 2 Alcoholysis of 3-Iodopropynamide 1 ^a

Entry	Propynamide	R1	R2	Alcohol	R3	Product	Yieldb (%)
1	1a	Ph	Me	2b	Et	4	83
2	1a	Ph	Me	2c	CH2CH=CH2	5	75
3	1a	Ph	Me	2d	Bn	6	80
4	1a	Ph	Me	2e	t-Bu	7	66
5	1b	4-MeC6H4	Me	2b	Et	8	81
6	1c	4-ClC6H4	Me	2b	Et	9	78
7	1d	Ph	H	2a	Me	10	71
8	1e	2-MeC6H4	H	2a	Me	11	73
9	1f	3-MeC6H4	H	2a	Me	12	60
10	1g	Ph	Ph	2a	Me	13	55
11	1h	Bn	Me	2a	Me	14	48
12c	1i	–d	–d	2b	Et	15	42
13	1a	Ph	Me	2f	–e	–f	–f

^a Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (2 equiv), DABCO (2 equiv), MeCN (2 mL), r.t., air atmosphere, 12 h.

^b Isolated yield.

^c Diethyl malonate (15) was obtained.

^d Substrate was phenyl 3-iodopropynoate.

^e Diethylamine was used.

^f No reaction.

Chemicals were purchased from commercial supplier (Aldrich, USA, and Changsha Chemical Company, China) and used without purification prior to use. NMR spectroscopy was performed on a Bruker-500 spectrometer operating at 500 MHz (¹H NMR) and 125 MHz (¹³C NMR). TMS was used an internal standard and CDCl₃ was used as the solvent. HRMS data were performed on a micro-TOF mass spectrometer.

3-Iodo-N-methyl-N-phenylpropynamide (1a); Typical Procedure­

To a solution of propynoic acid (154.0 mg, 2.2 mmol) and N-methylaniline (214.0 mg, 2 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (6 mL) was added gradually a solution of DCC (453.2 mg, 2.2 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (6 mL) at 0 °C, then the mixture was stirred at r.t. for 1 h. After purification, the product was then treated with NIS (495 mg, 2.2 mmol) and AgNO_3­ (34.0 mg, 0.2 mmol) in acetone at r.t. under an air atmosphere for 8 h until complete consumption of the starting material (TLC and GC analysis).[7] When the reaction was finished, sat. Na₂S₂O₃ (10 mL) was added to the mixture, and then aqueous phase was extracted with Et₂O. The combined organic extracts were dried (anhyd Na₂SO₄), and evaporated in vacuo, the residue was purified by flash column chromatography (silica gel, hexane–EtOAc) to give the corresponding 3-iodo-N-methyl-N-phenylpropynamide (1a).

Substrates 1 were synthesized according to the typical procedure. Substrates1a,b,d,g,i are known; 1c,e,f,h, with structures similar to the known compounds, were confirmed by GC-MS and used directly for the alcoholysis reaction.

N-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-iodo-N-methylpropiolamide (1c)

MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 319 (64) [M]⁺, 291 (6), 262 (32), 140 (100), 111 (40).

3-Iodo-N-(2-tolyl)propiolamide (1e)

MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 285 (80) [M]⁺, 257 (18), 179 (100), 158 (55), 130 (76).

3-Iodo-N-(3-tolyl)propiolamide (1f)

MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 285 (76) [M]⁺, 257 (16), 179 (100), 158 (60), 130 (72).

N-Benzyl-3-iodo-N-methylpropiolamide (1h)

MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 299 (85) [M]⁺, 271 (18), 242 (28), 120 (100).

Carbamoylacetates 3–15; General Procedure

A mixture of 3-iodopropynamide 1 (0.2 mmol), alcohol 2 (0.4 mmol), Pd(OAc)₂ (0.896 mg, 0.004 mmol), and DABCO (44.8 mg, 0.4 mmol) was stirred in MeCN (2 mL) at r.t. for 12 h until complete consumption of the starting material (TLC and GC analysis). When the reaction was complete, sat. Na₂S₂O₃ (10 ml) was added to the mixture and it was extracted with Et₂O (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (anhyd Na₂SO₄) and evaporated in vacuo and the residue was purified by flash column chromatography (silica gel, EtOAc–hexane) to afford the desired product (Table [2]).

Methyl 3-[Methyl(phenyl)amino]-3-oxopropanoate (3)[1e]

Colorless oil; yield: 34.4 mg (83%).

IR (KBr): 1747, 1651 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.45–7.42 (m, 2 H), 7.38 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.24–7.23 (m, 2 H), 3.68 (s, 3 H), 3.31 (s, 3 H), 3.23 (s, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 168.1, 165.9, 143.4, 129.9, 128.3, 127.2, 52.2, 41.3, 37.4.

HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₁H₁₃NO₃: 207.0895; found: 207.0889.

Ethyl 3-[Methyl(phenyl)amino]-3-oxopropanoate (4)[1e]

Slightly yellow oil; yield: 36.7 mg (83%).

IR (KBr): 1740, 1666 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.43 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.37 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.24 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 4.15–4.11 (m, 2 H), 3.31 (s, 3 H), 3.21 (s, 2 H), 1.25 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3 H).

¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 167.8, 166.1, 143.5, 130.0, 128.3, 127.3, 61.3, 41.6, 37.5, 14.1.

HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₂H₁₅NO₃: 221.1052; found: 221.1048.

Allyl 3-[Methyl(phenyl)amino]-3-oxopropanoate (5)[1e]

Pale yellow oil; yield: 35.0 mg (75%).

IR (KBr): 1744, 1667 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.44 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.37 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.25 (t, J = 10.5 Hz, 2 H), 5.92–5.83 (m, 1 H), 5.32–5.21 (m, 2 H), 4.57 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.31 (s, 3 H), 3.25 (s, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 167.4, 165.9, 143.5, 131.7, 130.0, 128.3, 127.3, 118.6, 65.8, 41.5, 37.5.

HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₃H₁₅NO₃: 233.1052; found: 233.1047.

Benzyl 3-[Methyl(phenyl)amino]-3-oxopropanoate (6)[1f]

Colorless oil; yield: 45.3 mg (80%).

IR (KBr): 1746, 1660 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.38–7.31 (m, 8 H), 7.20–7.17 (m, 2 H), 5.12 (s, 2 H), 3.31 (s, 3 H), 3.27 (s, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 167.6, 165.8, 143.4, 135.5, 130.0, 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 128.3, 127.2, 67.0, 41.6, 37.5.

HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₇H₁₇NO₃: 283.1208; found: 283.1202.

tert-Butyl 3-[Methyl(phenyl)amino]-3-oxopropanoate (7)[1e]

Colorless oil; yield: 32.9 mg (66%).

IR (KBr): 1735, 1664 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.44–7.41 (m, 2 H), 7.37 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.23 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2 H), 3.30 (s, 3 H), 3.18 (s, 2 H), 1.41 (s, 9 H).

¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 167.0, 166.4, 143.7, 129.8, 128.1, 127.3, 81.5, 42.7, 37.4, 28.0.

HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₄H₁₉NO₃: 249.1365; found: 249.1359.

Ethyl 3-[Methyl(p-tolyl)amino]-3-oxopropanoate (8)[1d]

Colorless oil; yield: 38.1 mg (81%).

IR (KBr): 1741, 1667 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.21 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.11 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2 H), 4.15–4.10 (m, 2 H), 3.28 (s, 3 H), 3.21 (s, 2 H), 2.38 (s, 3 H), 1.23 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 3 H).

¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 167.8, 166.2, 141.0, 138.2, 130.5, 127.0, 61.2, 41.5, 37.4, 21.1, 14.1.

HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₃H₁₇NO₃: 235.1208; found: 235.1203.

Ethyl 3-[4-Chlorophenyl(methyl)amino]-3-oxopropanoate (9)[1d]

White solid; yield: 39.8 mg (78%); mp 49–50 °C.

IR (KBr): 1741, 1666 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.40 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.19 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 2 H), 4.16–4.10 (m, 2 H), 3.29 (s, 3 H), 3.20 (s, 2 H), 1.24 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 3 H).

¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 167.8, 166.2, 142.0, 134.1, 130.1, 128.7, 61.3, 41.4, 37.4, 14.0.

HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₂H₁₄ClNO₃: 255.0662; found: 255.0658.

Methyl 3-Oxo-3-(phenylamino)propanoate(10)[4a]

Brown solid; yield: 27.4 mg (71%); mp 42–44 °C.

IR (KBr): 1740, 1670 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 9.25 (s, 1 H), 7.53 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.29 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.10 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.75 (s, 3 H), 3.46 (s, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 169.6, 163.3, 137.4, 128.8, 124.5, 120.0, 52.4, 41.8.

HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₀H₁₁NO₃: 193.0739; found: 193.0734.

Methyl 3-Oxo-3-(o-tolylamino)propanoate (11)[8]

Colorless oil; yield: 30.2 mg (73%).

IR (KBr): 1741, 1668 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 9.23 (s, 1 H), 7.96 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.22–7.19 (m, 2 H), 7.07 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.82 (s, 3 H), 3.53 (s, 2 H), 2.33 (s, 3 H).

¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 170.8, 162.8, 135.6, 130.4, 128.5, 126.7, 125.0, 122.2, 52.6, 41.0, 17.8.

HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₁H₁₃NO₃: 207.0895; found: 207.0889.

Methyl 3-Oxo-3-(m-tolylamino)propanoate (12)[9]

Pale yellow solid; yield: 24.8 mg (60%); mp 38–40 °C.

IR (KBr): 1742, 1666 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 9.10 (s, 1 H), 7.38 (s, 1 H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.20 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 6.94 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.79 (s, 3 H), 3.47 (s, 2 H), 2.33 (s, 3 H).

¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 170.2, 162.8, 138.9, 137.3, 128.8, 125.4, 120.7, 117.2, 52.6, 41.5, 21.4.

HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₁H₁₃NO₃: 207.0895; found: 207.0888.

Methyl 3-(Diphenylamino)-3-oxopropanoate (13)[10]

White solid; yield: 29.6 mg (55%); mp 81–83 °C.

IR (KBr): 1734, 1649 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.33–7.21 (m, 10 H), 3.67 (s, 3 H), 3.41 (s, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 167.9, 165.8, 129.9, 128.9, 128.5, 128.3, 126.3, 126.2, 52.3, 42.4.

HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₆H₁₅NO₃: 269.1052; found: 269.1047.

Methyl 3-[Benzyl(methyl)amino]-3-oxopropanoate (14)[1b]

Brown oil; yield: 21.2 mg (48%).

IR (KBr): 1745, 1699 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.33–7.31 (m, 2 H), 7.29–7.27 (m, 3 H), 4.62 (s, 2 H), 3.77 (s, 3 H), 3.54 (s, 2 H), 2.92 (s, 3 H).

¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 168.0, 166.4, 136.7, 128.7, 127.9, 126.4, 52.5, 50.9, 41.3, 35.3.

HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₂H₁₅NO₃: 221.1052; found: 221.1046.

Diethyl Malonate (15)[11]

Colorless oil; yield: 13.4 mg (42%).

IR (KBr): 1747, 1733 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 4.22–4.18 (m, 4 H), 3.37 (s, 2 H), 1.30–1.27 (m, 6 H).

¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 166.4, 61.2, 41.4, 13.8.

MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 160 (2) [M]⁺, 133 (67), 115 (100).

Methyl 1,3-Dimethyl-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-indole-3-carboxylate (16); Typical Procedure

To a solution of methyl 3-[methyl(phenyl)amino]-3-oxopropanoate (3, 103.5 mg, 0.5 mmol) and NaH (24 mg, 1 mmol) in THF (4 mL) was added gradually MeI (78.1 mg, 0.55 mmol) at 0 °C, then the mixture was stirred for 5 min to afford methyl 2-methyl-3-[methyl(phenyl)amino]-3-oxopropanoate. After purification, the product was used for the cyclization reaction.

A mixture of methyl 2-methyl-3-[methyl(phenyl)amino]-3-oxopropanoate (44.2 mg, 0.2 mmol), Cu(OAc)₂·H₂O (39.9 mg, 0.2 mmol), and KOt-Bu (49.3 mg, 0.44 mmol) in DMF (3 mL) was stirred at 110 °C for 1 h. Then sat. NH₄Cl solution (10 mL) was added to the mixture and the aqueous phase was extracted with Et₂O. The combined organic extracts were dried (anhyd Na₂SO₄) and evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography (hexane–EtOAc) to afford the desired product (16)[6] (37.2 mg, 85%) as a white solid; mp 83–85 °C.

IR (KBr): 1743, 1611 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.34 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.27–7.26 (m, 1 H), 7.08 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 6.87 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.68 (s, 3 H), 3.28 (s, 3 H), 1.70 (s, 3 H).

¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 175.1, 170.3, 143.6, 130.3, 129.1, 123.1, 122.9, 108.5, 54.9, 53.0, 26.6, 20.2.

HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₂H₁₃NO₃: 219.0895; found: 219.0891.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21372068) for financial support.

• References


For reviews, see:
• 1a Pugh DS, Klein JE. M. N, Perry A, Taylor RJ. K. Synlett 2010; 934
• 1b Adediran SA, Cabaret D, Lohier J.-F, Wakselman M, Pratt RF. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010; 18: 282
• 1c Russo A, Galdi G, Croce G, Lattanzia A. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18: 6152
• 1d Wang J, Yuan Y, Xiong R, Zhang-Negrerie D, Du Y, Zhao K. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 2210
• 1e Ghosh S, De S, Kakde BN, Bhunia S, Adhikary A, Bisai A. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 5864
• 1f Bhunia S, Ghosh S, Dey D, Bisai A. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 2426
• 2 Zhang Z, Liu Y, Ling L, Li Y, Dong Y, Gong M, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Wang J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 4330
• 3 Sumino S, Fusano A, Fukuyama T, Ryu I. Synlett 2012; 23: 1331
• 4a Graziano ML, Cimminiello G. Synthesis 1989; 54
• 4b López-Alvarado P, Avendaño C, Menéndez JC. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001; 42: 4479
• 4c Tuba R, Ungváry F. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2003; 203: 59
• 4d Balogh J, Kégl T, Ungváry F, Skoda-Földes R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 4727

For reviews, see:
• 5a Yan J, Li JH, Cheng DP. Synlett 2007; 2442
• 5b Rajender Reddy K, Venkateshwar M, Uma Maheswari C, Santhosh Kumar P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 2170
• 5c Usanov DL, Yamamoto H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 1286
• 5d Chen DX, Cao Y, Yuan ZL, Cai HT, Zheng RW, Kong LC, Zhu GG. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 76: 4071
• 5e Li YB, Liu XH, Jiang HF, Liu BF, Chen ZW, Zhou P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 6341
• 5f Tang JS, Xiang XY, Wang ZJ, Li JH. Synthesis 2011; 2789
• 5g Tang JS, Tian M, Sheng WB, Guo CC. Synthesis 2012; 44: 540
• 5h Zeng W, Wu WQ, Jiang HF, Sun YD, Chen ZW. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013; 54: 4605
• 6 Perry A, Taylor RJ. K. Chem. Commun. 2009; 3249
• 7 Shair MD, Yoon T, Danishefsky SJ. J. Org. Chem. 1994; 59: 3755
• 8 Mahboobi S, Eichhorn E, Winkler M, Sellmer A, Moellmann U. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008; 43: 633
• 9 Chakraborty K, Devakumar C. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006; 54: 6800
• 10 Manikowski A, Kolarska Z. Synth. Commun. 2009; 39: 3621
• 11 Kuang Y, Liu X, Chang L, Wang M, Lin L, Feng X. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 3814