Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1364206
Technological Advances in the Hemostasis Laboratory
Publication History
Publication Date:
17 January 2014 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/sth/201402/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-0033-1364206-1.jpg)
Abstract
Automation is conventionally defined as the use of machines, control systems, and information technologies to optimize productivity. Although automation is now commonplace in several areas of diagnostic testing, especially in clinical chemistry and immunochemistry, the concept of extending this process to hemostasis testing has only recently been advanced. The leading drawbacks are still represented by the almost unique biological matrix because citrated plasma can only be used for clotting assays and few other notable exceptions, and by the highly specific pretreatment of samples, which is particularly distinct to other test systems. Despite these important limitations, a certain degree of automation is also now embracing hemostasis testing. The more relevant developments include the growing integration of routine hemostasis analyzers with track line systems and workcells, the development of specific instrumentation tools to enhance reliability of testing (i.e., signal detection with different technologies to increase test panels, plasma indices for preanalytical check of interfering substances, failure patterns sensors for identifying insufficient volume, clots or bubbles, cap-piercing for enhancing operator safety, automatic reflex testing, automatic redilution of samples, and laser barcode readers), preanalytical features (e.g., positive identification, automatic systems for tube(s) labeling, transillumination devices), and postphlebotomy tools (pneumatic tube systems for reducing turnaround time, sample transport boxes for ensuring stability of specimens, monitoring systems for identifying unsuitable conditions of transport). Regardless of these important innovations, coagulation/hemostasis testing still requires specific technical and clinical expertise, not only in terms of measurement procedures but also for interpreting and then appropriately utilizing the derived information. Thus, additional and special caution has to be used when designing projects of automation that include coagulation/hemostasis testing because peculiar and particular requirements must be taken into account.
-
References
- 1 Messmore Jr HL. Automation in coagulation testing. Clinical applications. Semin Thromb Hemost 1983; 9 (4) 341-345
- 2 Lippi G, Favaloro EJ, Franchini M, Guidi GC. Milestones and perspectives in coagulation and hemostasis. Semin Thromb Hemost 2009; 35 (1) 9-22
- 3 Lippi G, Favaloro EJ. Laboratory hemostasis: milestones in clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013; 51 (1) 91-97
- 4 Olsen K. The first 110 years of laboratory automation: technologies, applications, and the creative scientist. J Lab Autom 2012; 17 (6) 469-480
- 5 Da Rin G, Lippi G. Total laboratory automation of routine hemostasis testing. J Lab Autom 2013; ; doi: 10.1177/2211068213511246
- 6 Salvagno GL, Lippi G, Bassi A, Poli G, Guidi GC. Prevalence and type of pre-analytical problems for inpatients samples in coagulation laboratory. J Eval Clin Pract 2008; 14 (2) 351-353
- 7 Favaloro EJ, Lippi G, Adcock DM. Preanalytical and postanalytical variables: the leading causes of diagnostic error in hemostasis?. Semin Thromb Hemost 2008; 34 (7) 612-634
- 8 Qari MH. High throughput coagulation analyzers review. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2005; 8 (4) 353-360
- 9 Walenga JM, Fareed J. Automation and quality control in the coagulation laboratory. Clin Lab Med 1994; 14 (4) 709-728
- 10 Lippi G, Plebani M, Favaloro EJ. Interference in coagulation testing: focus on spurious hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia. Semin Thromb Hemost 2013; 39 (3) 258-266
- 11 Simundic AM, Nikolac N, Ivankovic V , et al. Comparison of visual vs. automated detection of lipemic, icteric and hemolyzed specimens: can we rely on a human eye?. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009; 47 (11) 1361-1365
- 12 Plebani M, Lippi G. Hemolysis index: quality indicator or criterion for sample rejection?. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009; 47 (8) 899-902
- 13 Fairbanks VF, Ziesmer SC, O'Brien PC. Methods for measuring plasma hemoglobin in micromolar concentration compared. Clin Chem 1992; 38 (1) 132-140
- 14 Malinauskas RA. Plasma hemoglobin measurement techniques for the in vitro evaluation of blood damage caused by medical devices. Artif Organs 1997; 21 (12) 1255-1267
- 15 Sanderink GJ, van Rijn HJ. Quantitative measurement of plasma hemoglobin by second derivative spectrophotometry. Clin Chim Acta 1985; 146 (1) 65-73
- 16 Harboe M. A method for determination of hemoglobin in plasma by near-ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1959; 11: 66-70
- 17 Martin-Toutain I, Jobic L, Mancic T, Ankri A. Evaluation of the automated coagulation analyzer Sysmex(®) CS-2100i (Siemens) [in French]. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2011; 69 (6) 699-704
- 18 Molenaar PJ, Leyte A. Pre-acquisition system assessment of the Sysmex(®) Coagulation System CS-2100i and comparison with end-user verification; a model for the regional introduction of new analysers and methods. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49 (9) 1479-1489
- 19 Lippi G, Ippolito L, Favaloro EJ. Technical evaluation of the novel preanalytical module on instrumentation laboratory ACL TOP: advancing automation in hemostasis testing. J Lab Autom 2013; 18 (5) 382-390
- 20 Lippi G, Pipitone S, Gennari D, Franchini M. Identification of spurious hemolysis in anticoagulated blood with Sysmex XE-2100 and Siemens Advia 2120. Clin Lab 2012; 58 (7–8) 801-804
- 21 Lippi G, Franchini M. Advancements in laboratory diagnostics: an invaluable tool for assessing quality of blood transfusions. Blood Transfus 2012; 1–2: 1-2
- 22 Banfi G, Salvagno GL, Lippi G. The role of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) as in vitro anticoagulant for diagnostic purposes. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007; 45 (5) 565-576
- 23 Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Guidi GC. Influence of two different buffered sodium citrate concentrations on coagulation testing. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2005; 16 (5) 381-383
- 24 Lippi G, Plebani M. Primary blood tubes mixing: time for updated recommendations. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012; 50 (4) 599-600
- 25 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. H3–A6 Procedures for the Collection of Diagnostic Blood Specimens by Venipuncture. 6th ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2007
- 26 Lippi G, Caputo M, Banfi G , et al. Recommendations for collection of venous blood. Biochim Clin 2008; 32: 569-577
- 27 Favaloro EJ, Adcock Funk DM, Lippi G. Pre-analytical variables in coagulation testing associated with diagnostic errors in hemostasis. Lab Med 2012; 43 (2) 1-10
- 28 Bonar R, Favaloro EJ, Adcock DM. Quality in coagulation and haemostasis testing. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2010; 20 (2) 184-199
- 29 Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL , et al. Effects of vigorous mixing of blood vacuum tubes on laboratory test results. Clin Biochem 2013; 46 (3) 250-254
- 30 Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Bassi A, Montagnana M, Poli G, Guidi GC. Dishomogeneous separation of citrated plasma in primary collection tubes for routine coagulation testing. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2008; 19 (4) 330-332
- 31 Caskey CR. Ergonomics in the clinical laboratory. Clin Lab Sci 1999; 12 (3) 140-144
- 32 Lippi G, Guidi GC, Mattiuzzi C, Plebani M. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006; 44 (4) 358-365
- 33 Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S , et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49 (7) 1113-1126
- 34 Simundic AM, Lippi G. Preanalytical phase—a continuous challenge for laboratory professionals. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012; 22 (2) 145-149
- 35 Lippi G, Becan-McBride K, Behúlová D , et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013; 51 (1) 229-241
- 36 Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Poli G, Guidi GC. Influence of the needle bore size on platelet count and routine coagulation testing. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2006; 17 (7) 557-561
- 37 Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Guidi GC. No influence of a butterfly device on routine coagulation assays and D-dimer measurement. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3 (2) 389-391
- 38 Lippi G, Guidi GC. Effect of specimen collection on routine coagulation assays and D-dimer measurement. Clin Chem 2004; 50 (11) 2150-2152
- 39 Lippi G, Franchini M, Montagnana M, Salvagno GL, Poli G, Guidi GC. Quality and reliability of routine coagulation testing: can we trust that sample?. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2006; 17 (7) 513-519
- 40 Preston FE, Lippi G, Favaloro EJ, Jayandharan GR, Edison ES, Srivastava A. Quality issues in laboratory haemostasis. Haemophilia 2010; 16 (Suppl. 05) 93-99
- 41 Lippi G, Blanckaert N, Bonini P , et al. Causes, consequences, detection, and prevention of identification errors in laboratory diagnostics. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009; 47 (2) 143-153
- 42 Lippi G, Plebani M. Identification errors in the blood transfusion laboratory: a still relevant issue for patient safety. Transfus Apheresis Sci 2011; 44 (2) 231-233
- 43 Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Guidi GC. Short-term venous stasis influences routine coagulation testing. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2005; 16 (6) 453-458
- 44 The Joint Commission. National Patient Safety Goals Effective January 1, 2011. Available at: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/NPSG_Chapter_Jan2012_OBS.pdf . Accessed: October 13, 2013
- 45 Da Rin G. Pre-analytical workstations: a tool for reducing laboratory errors. Clin Chim Acta 2009; 404 (1) 68-74
- 46 Lippi G, Sonntag O, Plebani M. Appropriate labelling of blood collection tubes: a step ahead towards patient's safety. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49 (12) 1921-1923
- 47 Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Picheth G, Guidi GC. Impact of the phlebotomy training based on CLSI/NCCLS H03-a6 - procedures for the collection of diagnostic blood specimens by venipuncture. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012; 22 (3) 342-351
- 48 Lima-Oliveira G, Salvagno GL, Lippi G , et al. Elimination of the venous stasis error for routine coagulation testing by transillumination. Clin Chim Acta 2011; 412 (15–16) 1482-1484
- 49 Plebani M, Lippi G. Is laboratory medicine a dying profession? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed. Clin Biochem 2010; 43 (12) 939-941
- 50 Lippi G, Simundic AM. Laboratory networking and sample quality: a still relevant issue for patient safety. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012; 50 (10) 1703-1705
- 51 Pragay DA, Fan P, Brinkley S, Chilcote ME. A computer directed pneumatic tube system: its effects on specimens. Clin Biochem 1980; 13 (6) 259-261
- 52 Kratz A, Salem RO, Van Cott EM. Effects of a pneumatic tube system on routine and novel hematology and coagulation parameters in healthy volunteers. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131 (2) 293-296
- 53 Wallin O, Söderberg J, Grankvist K, Jonsson PA, Hultdin J. Preanalytical effects of pneumatic tube transport on routine haematology, coagulation parameters, platelet function and global coagulation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008; 46 (10) 1443-1449
- 54 Plebani M, Zaninotto M. Pneumatic tube delivery systems for patient samples: evidence of quality and quality of evidence. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49 (8) 1245-1246
- 55 Dyszkiewicz-Korpanty A, Quinton R, Yassine J, Sarode R. The effect of a pneumatic tube transport system on PFA-100 trade mark closure time and whole blood platelet aggregation. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2 (2) 354-356
- 56 Bolliger D, Seeberger MD, Tanaka KA , et al. Pre-analytical effects of pneumatic tube transport on impedance platelet aggregometry. Platelets 2009; 20 (7) 458-465
- 57 Hübner U, Böckel-Frohnhöfer N, Hummel B, Geisel J. The effect of a pneumatic tube transport system on platelet aggregation using optical aggregometry and the PFA-100. Clin Lab 2010; 56 (1–2) 59-64
- 58 Amann G, Zehntner C, Marti F, Colucci G. Effect of acceleration forces during transport through a pneumatic tube system on ROTEM® analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012; 50 (8) 1335-1342
- 59 Lippi G, Lima-Oliveira G, Nazer SC , et al. Suitability of a transport box for blood sample shipment over a long period. Clin Biochem 2011; 44 (12) 1028-1029
- 60 Zaninotto M, Tasinato A, Padoan A , et al. An integrated system for monitoring the quality of sample transportation. Clin Biochem 2012; 45 (9) 688-690
- 61 Zaninotto M, Tasinato A, Padoan A , et al. Effects of sample transportation on commonly requested laboratory tests. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012; 50 (10) 1755-1760